Basal level transcription of the histone H1(0) gene is mediated by a 80 bp promoter fragment

Chemical reagents for investigating the major groove of DNA

Chemical modification provides an inexpensive and rapid method for characterizing the structure of DNA and its association with drugs and proteins. Numerous conformation-specific probes are available, but most investigations rely on only the most common and readily available of these. The major groove of DNA is typically characterized by reaction with dimethyl sulfate, diethyl pyrocarbonate, potassium permanganate, osmium tetroxide, and, quite recently, bromide with monoperoxysulfate. This commentary discusses the specificity of these reagents and their applications in protection, interference, and missing contact experiments.

Histone H1 diversity: bridging regulatory signals to linker histone function

Genes encoding linker histone variants have evolved to link their expression to signals controlling the proliferative capacities of cells, i.e. cycling and growth-arrested cells express distinct and specific H1 subtypes. In metazoan, these variants show a tripartite structure, with considerably divergent sequences in their amino and carboxyl terminus domains. The aim of this review is to show how specific regulatory signals control the expression of an individual H1 and to discuss the functional significance of the two variables associated with a linker histone: its primary sequence and the timing of its expression.

Involvement of retinoblastoma protein and HBP1 in histone H1(0) gene expression

The histone H1(0)-encoding gene is expressed in vertebrates in differentiating cells during the arrest of proliferation. In the H1(0) promoter, a specific regulatory element, which we named the H4 box, exhibits features which implicate a role in mediating H1(0) gene expression in response to both differentiation and cell cycle control signals. For instance, within the linker histone gene family, the H4 box is found only in the promoters of differentiation-associated subtypes, suggesting that it is specifically involved in differentiation-dependent expression of these genes. In addition, an element nearly identical to the H4 box is conserved in the promoters of histone H4-encoding genes and is known to be involved in their cell cycle-dependent expression. The transcription factors interacting with the H1(0) H4 box were therefore expected to link differentiation-dependent expression of H1(0) to the cell cycle control machinery. The aim of this work was to identify such transcription factors and to obtain information concerning the regulatory pathway involved. Interestingly, our cloning strategy led to the isolation of a retinoblastoma protein (RB) partner known as HBP1. HBP1, a high-mobility group box transcription factor, interacted specifically with the H1(0) H4 box and moreover was expressed in a differentiation-dependent manner. We also showed that the HBP1-encoding gene is able to produce different forms of HBP1. Finally, we demonstrated that both HBP1 and RB were involved in the activation of H1(0) gene expression. We therefore propose that HBP1 mediates a link between the cell cycle control machinery and cell differentiation signals. Through modulating the expression of specific chromatin-associated proteins such as histone H1(0), HBP1 plays a vital role in chromatin remodeling events during the arrest of cell proliferation in differentiating cells.

Induction of tumor cell differentiation

It is proposed that cell proliferation with reduced individual cell growth (total protein accumulation) is necessary, but not sufficient, for cell differentiation. These conditions may facilitate transcription and accumulation of histones H1 and/or H1o relative to the core histones. This may have a critical role in cell differentiation.

Expression of the rat testis-specific histone H1t gene in transgenic mice. One kilobase of 5'-flanking sequence mediates correct expression of a lacZ fusion gene

H1t is synthesized in mid to late pachytene spermatocytes of the male germ line and is the only tissue-specific member of the mammalian H1 histone family. As a step toward identifying DNA sequences that confer its tissue-specific expression, we have produced transgenic mice containing the intact rat H1t gene as well as a H1t-lacZ fusion gene. Transgenic mice carrying a 6.8-kilobase fragment of rat genomic DNA encompassing the H1t gene expressed rat H1t at high levels in the testis and in no other organ examined. H1t fragments truncated to within 141 base pairs (bp) of the gene in the 5' direction or within 837 bp in the 3' direction retained testis specificity. Expression of rat H1t protein was also evident in the testes of the transgenic mice, and in some lines the level of rat H1t exceeded that of the mouse protein. The stage of spermatogenesis of transgene expression was assessed by following appearance of transgenic mRNA in developing mice and by immunohistochemistry using an antiserum to rat H1t. In lines from three different constructs, expression was restricted to germinal cells, although in two strongly expressing lines the transgenes were expressed somewhat prematurely in preleptotene spermatocytes. An H1t(-948/+71)-lacZ fusion was also expressed specifically in the spermatocytes and round spermatids of a transgenic line, confirming that sequences sufficient for correct tissue and developmental expression lie within this 1,019-bp segment of the gene.

Thyroid hormone receptors bind to the promoter of the mouse histone H10 gene and modulate its transcription

It has been shown that the mouse histone H10 promoter contains a DNA element, composed of a direct repeat of the sequence GGTGACC separated by 7 nt, which is able to bind retinoic acid receptors and to modulate transcription of reporter genes following treatment with retinoic acid. We have now investigated whether this DNA motif is also responsive to thyroid hormone. We co-transfected CV-1 monkey kidney cells with chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) expression plasmids containing either 740 bp of the H10 wild-type promoter or five copies of the repeat element cloned in front of the thymidine kinase promoter and expression vectors for human thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) alpha or beta and retinoid X receptor alpha (RXR alpha). Treatment of transfected cells with triiodothyronine led to a dose-dependent increase in CAT activity. Transfection experiments with increasing amounts of expression vectors for either TR alpha or RXR alpha resulted in up to 6-fold enhancement of CAT transcription. Furthermore, point mutations within the half-sites of the response element of the H10 promoter, as well as deletions within the interspace region, lowered CAT activity to 60-80% of that of the wild-type control. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that the repeat element was able to form retarded complexes with TR alpha homodimers, as well as with TR alpha-RXR alpha heterodimers. Our results suggest that thyroid hormone receptors are involved in the regulation of mouse histone H10 expression.

A H1 histone gene-specific AC-box-related element influences transcription from a major chicken H1 promoter

In comparing several histone H1 promoters, we have identified a highly conserved sequence element, 5'-TGTGTTA, located approx. 450-480 bp upstream from the cap site. This TG-box is a near perfect inverted repeat of the previously characterized AC-box (5'-AAACACA). The distance between these elements is also highly conserved. We performed transient transfection assays with cat gene reporter constructs which indicated that both the presence and correct position of the TG-box were essential for maximal expression of the chicken 02 H1 promoter. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first demonstration of an effect by the TG-box on transcription of a major histone-encoding H1 gene.

Mice develop normally without the H1(0) linker histone

H1 histones bind to the linker DNA between nucleosome core particles and facilitate the folding of chromatin into a 30-nm fiber. Mice contain at least seven nonallelic subtypes of H1, including the somatic variants H1a through H1e, the testis-specific variant H1t, and the replacement linker histone H1(0). H1(0) accumulates in terminally differentiating cells from many lineages, at about the time when the cells cease dividing. To investigate the role of H1(0) in development, we have disrupted the single-copy H1(0) gene by homologous recombination in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mice homozygous for the mutation and completely lacking H1(0) mRNA and protein grew and reproduced normally and exhibited no anatomic or histologic abnormalities. Examination of tissues in which H1(0) is normally present at high levels also failed to reveal any abnormality in cell division patterns. Chromatin from H1(0)-deficient animals showed no significant change in the relative proportions of the other H1 subtypes or in the stoichiometry between linker histones and nucleosomes, suggesting that the other H1 histones can compensate for the deficiency in H1(0) by occupying sites that normally contain H1(0). Our results indicate that despite the unique properties and expression pattern of H1(0), its function is dispensable for normal mouse development.

An upstream control region required for inducible transcription of the mouse H1(zero) histone gene during terminal differentiation

The replacement linker histone H1 (zero) is associated with terminal differentiation in many mammalian cell types, and its accumulation in chromatin may contribute to transcriptional repression occurring during terminal differentiation. H1 (zero) also accumulates in a variety of cell culture lines undergoing terminal differentiation. During in vitro mouse erythroleukemia cell differentiation, H1 (zero) gene expression is induced very rapidly, prior to the time when the cells actually commit to terminal differentiation. We have used a combination of transfection assays and in vitro DNA-protein interaction studies to identify nuclear protein binding sites in the H1 (zero) promoter that control expression and induction of the H1(zero) gene in mouse erythroleukemia cells. The results indicate that transcription of the H1 (zero) gene is controlled by three elements present in the upstream region of the promoter between positions -305 and -470. Site-directed mutagenesis of each of these elements showed that one of them controls inducibility of the gene in differentiating cells. The other two elements in the upstream control region affect primarily the level of transcription of the gene in undifferentiated and differentiating cells. These two elements share a DNA sequence motif consisting of a (dG)6 tract contained in an eight-base consensus, (A/C)GGGGGG(A/C). Additional copies of this motif are present elsewhere in the H1 (zero) promoter.

Developmentally regulated expression of linker-histone variants in vertebrates

The identification of histone H1 variants in vertebrates suggests that these proteins may have specialized functions. During embryonic development, a correspondence between the expression of each of the linker-histone variants and the proliferative and transcriptional activity of embryonic cells can be observed. Analysis of the developmentally regulated expression of these variants leads to the subdivision of these variants into distinct classes. This subdivision may also provide insight into the significance of the differential expression of variants and the roles individual linker histones have in chromatin structure and function.

Relationship between core histone acetylation and histone H1(0) gene activity

In this study we show a striking correlation between histone H1(0) gene expression and histone acetylation. Trichostatin A, a highly specific inhibitor of histone deacetylase, efficiently induces H1(0) gene expression. Moreover, using a cell line sensitive to trichostatin A (FM3A) and a derived cell line selected for its resistance to this inhibitor (TR303), it is shown that the level of H1(0) gene expression is related to the extent of chromatin acetylation. After showing the S-phase-dependent activation of H1(0) gene expression, we demonstrate that hyperacetylation has a dominant effect on H1(0) gene expression, since it enhances the expression of the gene independent of the position of cells in the cell cycle. This response to deacetylase inhibitors is specific to H1(0), since it is not shared by other cell-cycle-dependent histone genes (H1 and H4). Finally, by transfection of trichostatin-A-resistant and trichostatin-A-sensitive cells with a plasmid containing a H1(0) promoter, we show that the exogenous H1(0) promoter is also highly sensitive to trichostatin A treatment and that activation of transcription follows exactly the same pattern as activation of the endogenous gene. These data show that histone acetylation may be used to modulate H1(0) gene activity and offers insight into a possible mechanism in which the developmentally regulated chromatin acetylation acts to potentiate H1(0) gene expression.

Molecular basis of the activation of basal histone H1(0) gene expression

Histone H1(0) is encoded by a gene that is expressed only in cells committed to differentiation. We have previously cloned the Xenopus laevis H1(0) gene and studied elements involved in the regulation of its expression in transfected Xenopus laevis A6 cells, and in microinjected embryos. In this work, in order to understand the basis of the action of these elements, we used an A6 cell nuclear extract and showed that the H1(0) promoter is able to direct efficient in vitro transcription, which is highly dependent on a functional TATA box. However, in contrast to what we observed in vivo, in transfected A6 cells, the in vitro transcription was independent of major regulatory elements, defined in vivo. We then used this in vitro system to reconstitute H1(0) gene regulation. The creation of a repressive environment by the addition of purified histone H1 to the in vitro transcription system allowed us to obtain transcription dependent on the integrity of the regulatory elements. Investigating the basis of this regulation we found that protein-DNA interaction on the proximal promoter region was dependent on the integrity of proximal elements, and moreover the distal regulatory element, the UCE, was able to modulate this interaction. We conclude that the role of these regulatory elements is to maintain the basal TATA-dependent transcription of H1(0) under repressive condition: i.e., H1-mediated repression of transcription, or chromatin assembly in general.

Cell cycle controlled histone H1, H3, and H4 genes share unusual arrangements of recognition motifs for HiNF-D supporting a coordinate promoter binding mechanism

Cell cycle and growth control of the DNA binding and transactivation functions of regulatory factors provides a direct mechanism by which cells may coordinate transcription of a multitude of genes in proliferating cells. The promoters of human DNA replication dependent histone H4, H3, and H1 genes interact with at least seven distinct proteins. One of these proteins is a proliferation-specific nuclear factor, HiNF-D, that interacts with a key cis-regulatory element (H4-Site II; 41 bp) present in H4 genes. Here we describe binding sites for HiNF-D in the promoters of H3 and H1 genes using cross-competition, deletion analysis, and methylation interference assays, and we show that HiNF-D recognizes intricate arrangements of at least two sequence elements (CA- and AG-motifs). These recognition motifs are irregularly dispersed and distantly positioned in the proximal promoters (200 bp) of both the H3 and H1 genes. In all cases, these motifs either overlap or are in close proximity to other established transcriptional elements, including ATF and CCAAT sequences. Although HiNF-D can interact with low affinity to a core recognition domain, auxiliary elements in both the distal and proximal portions of each promoter cooperatively enhance HiNF-D binding. Thus, HiNF-D appears to bridge remote regulatory regions, which may juxtapose additional trans-activating proteins interacting within histone gene promoters. Consistent with observations in many cell culture systems, the interactions of HiNF-D with the H4, H3, and H1 promoters are modulated in parallel during the cessation of proliferation in both osteosarcoma cells and normal diploid osteoblasts, and these events occur in conjunction with concerted changes in histone gene expression. Thus, HiNF-D represents a candidate participant in coordinating transcriptional control of several histone gene classes.

Two mRNA species encoding the differentiation-associated histone H1(0) are produced by alternative polyadenylation in mouse

Histone H1(0) is a differentiation-specific member of the histone H1 family. The accumulation of the protein is associated with the terminal stage of cell differentiation and is regulated at various levels. In mouse, the analysis of the expression of the single copy gene encoding H1(0) has shown that another H1(0)-related mRNA species (0.9 kb) is present in addition to the usual 2.1-kb mRNA. In this study, we have cloned and sequenced the smaller H1(0)-related mRNA. This mRNA seems to be produced by the use of an additional polyadenylation signal present in the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the initial transcript. This smaller H1(0)-encoding mRNA is expressed only in mouse and is transferred into polysomes as efficiently as the larger version upon the induction of cell differentiation. The use of the described polyadenylation site removes over 1 kb of the 3' UTR of H1(0) mRNA and seems to be involved in the regulation of H1(0) mRNA stability.

Organization and expression of H1 histone and H1 replacement histone genes

The H1 family is the most divergent subgroup of the highly conserved class of histone proteins [Cole: Int J Pept Protein Res 30:433-449, 1987]. In several vertebrate species, the H1 complement comprises five or more subtypes, and tissue specific patterns of H1 histones have been described. The diversity of the H1 histone family raises questions about the functions of different H1 subtypes and about the differential control of expression of their genes. The expression of main type H1 genes is coordinated with DNA replication, whereas the regulation of synthesis of replacement H1 subtypes, such as H1 zero and H5, and the testis specific H1t appears to be more complex. The differential control of H1 gene expression is reflected in the chromosomal organization of the genes and in different promoter structures. This review concentrates on a comparison of the chromosomal organization of main type and replacement H1 histone genes and on the differential regulation of their expression. General structural and functional data, which apply to both H1 and core histone genes and which are covered by recent reviews, will not be discussed in detail.

Specific expression in adult mice and post-implantation embryos of a transgene carrying the histone H1(0) regulatory region

Histone H1(0), a variant of the H1 group, has been found associated with the repressed state of chromatin and its content is increased in terminally differentiated cells. We have cloned a mouse H1(0) histone gene and introduced the promoter region, ligated to the beta-galactosidase reporter gene, into transgenic mice. By histochemistry we demonstrated a strong expression of the transgene in adult kidney, testis and brain. Intestine, uterus and ovarium were also positive. This expression followed the same pattern as that of the endogenous H1(0) gene, as demonstrated by in situ hybridization with a non-coding fragment of the mRNA, by Northern analysis, and by immunofluorescence with specific antibodies. In post-implantation embryos, the expression was very low up to day ten p.c. At this time, most of the X-Gal staining was found in the brain, retina and some of the large blood vessels. Hence, expression of the transgene as well as of the endogenous H1(0) gene is not exclusively linked to a differentiated phenotype or to a reduced cell proliferation capacity.

Differential regulation of the human H1 zero-histone-gene transcription in human tumor-cell lines

Cloning and sequence analysis of about 2 kb of the 5' flanking region of the human H1 zero histone gene reveals several potential regulatory elements upstream of the transcribed portion of this gene. Transfection studies using the chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) gene as a reporter gene with a series of promoter deletions revealed that the expression of the H1 zero gene may depend on a complex interplay of several transcription factors, including members of the retinoic acid and/or thyroid-hormone-receptor superfamily, at the 5' flanking region of the H1 zero gene. CAT assays demonstrate varied patterns of expression and regulation in different human tumor-cell lines. The leukemia cell line HL60 does not express H1 zero mRNA and shows no CAT activity. HeLa cells strongly express the CAT gene under the control of the H1 zero promoter. Under the same conditions, HepG2 cells also transcribe the CAT gene, although at a lower rate than HeLa cells. Using different promoter-deletion clones, the CAT activity differs in HepG2 and HeLa cells in the very distal promoter region. In both cell lines, the CAT activity decreases several fold when the region between nucleotides -450 and -600 upstream of the mRNA start site is deleted. It also decreases when just the proximal portion but not the distal promoter region is deleted. In summary, the regulatory patterns of these three cell lines differ, indicating a cell-type-specific regulation of the human H1 zero-histone-gene expression.