A novel method to identify nucleic acid binding sites in proteins by scanning mutagenesis: application to iron regulatory protein

Functional analysis of the conserved histidine residue of Bamboo mosaic virus capping enzyme in the activity for the formation of the covalent enzyme-m7GMP intermediate

The alphavirus-like mRNA capping enzyme of Bamboo mosaic virus (BaMV) exhibits an AdoMet-dependent guanylyltransferase activity by which the methyl group of AdoMet is transferred to GTP, leading to the formation of m(7)GTP, and the m(7)GMP moiety is next transferred to the 5' end of ppRNA via a covalent enzyme-m(7)GMP intermediate. The function of the conserved H68 of the BaMV capping enzyme in the intermediate formation was analyzed by mutagenesis in this study. The nature of the bond linking the enzyme and m(7)GMP was changed in the H68C mutant protein, strongly suggesting that H68 covalently binds to m(7)GMP in the intermediate.

A Northwestern blotting approach for studying iron regulatory element-binding proteins

At least two proteins binding to iron regulatory elements (IRE) in mRNA are known, designated as iron regulatory proteins (IRP) 1 and 2. Their binding activity is widely studied by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA), which resolves one or two bands depending on the species. We used Northwestern blotting to resolve this EMSA complex into four components, and identified two other IRE-binding peptides present in HepG2 cell extracts. We designate these six peptide bands A to F on Northwestern blots, ranging in apparent molecular weight from 111 to 37 kDa. Band C is lost when cells are preloaded with iron or when leupeptin (but not several other protease inhibitors) is included in the extraction buffer. Band E is also lost with leupeptin but increases with iron loading. Binding of all bands is sensitive to iron in vitro. Two-dimensional electrophoresis reveals additional processing, especially indicating charge variants of band C. Northwestern bands A and B both react with an antibody to IRP-1 on parallel Western blots. We conclude that cellular processing can produce multiple IRE-binding species that may be involved in a more complex regulation of iron metabolism than generally appreciated. The Northwestern approach should facilitate studies of processing and binding requirements of proteins and peptides that recognize the IRE sequence.

Genetic regulation of cell function in response to iron overload or chelation

Iron influences many aspects of cell function on different biochemical levels. This review considers effects mediated through iron-dependent changes in gene expression in mammalian cells. Several classes of related genes are responsive to cellular iron levels, but no clear patterns readily account for the toxicity of iron overload or the consequences of removal of iron with chelating agents. Here we group some of the genes influenced by iron status into those related to iron metabolism, oxygen and oxidative stress, energy metabolism, cell cycle regulation, and tissue fibrosis. Iron excess and chelation do not generally result in a continuous or graded transcriptional response, but indicate operation of distinct mechanisms. An emerging concept is that iron signals through generation of reactive oxygen species to activate transcription factors such as NF-kappaB, whereas iron removal mimics hypoxia, perhaps by disrupting iron-based O(2) sensors and influencing gene expression through, e.g., the hypoxia-inducible factor, HIF-1. Heme and other metalloporphyrins have other distinct mechanisms for regulating transcription. Regulation of gene expression through iron-responsive elements in mRNAs coded by several genes is one of the best understood mechanisms of translational control.

Regulation of genes of iron metabolism by the iron-response proteins

Iron is an essential nutrient, yet excess iron can be toxic to cells. The uptake of iron by mammalian cells is post-transcriptionally regulated by the interaction of iron-response proteins (IRP1 and IRP2) with iron-response elements (IREs) found in the mRNAs of genes of iron metabolism, such as ferritin, the transferrin receptor, erythroid aminolevulinic acid synthase, and mitochondrial aconitase. The IRPs are RNA binding proteins that bind to the IRE (found in the mRNAs of the regulated genes) in an iron- dependent manner. Binding of IRPs to the IREs leads to changes in the expression of the regulated genes and subsequent changes in the uptake, utilization, or storage of intracellular iron. Recent work has demonstrated that the binding of the IRPs to the IREs can also be modulated by changes in the redox state or oxidative stress level of the cell. These findings provide an important link between iron metabolism and states of oxidative stress.

Ligand-induced structural alterations in human iron regulatory protein-1 revealed by protein footprinting

Human iron regulatory protein-1 (IRP-1) is a bifunctional protein that regulates iron metabolism by binding to mRNAs encoding proteins involved in iron uptake, storage, and utilization. Intracellular iron accumulation regulates IRP-1 function by promoting the assembly of an iron-sulfur cluster, conferring aconitase activity to IRP-1, and hindering RNA binding. Using protein footprinting, we have studied the structure of the two functional forms of IRP-1 and have mapped the surface of the iron-responsive element (IRE) binding site. Binding of the ferritin IRE or of the minimal regulatory region of transferrin receptor mRNA induced strong protections against proteolysis in the region spanning amino acids 80 to 187, which are located in the putative cleft thought to be involved in RNA binding. In addition, IRE-induced protections were also found in the C-terminal domain at Arg-721 and Arg-728. These data implicate a bipartite IRE binding site located in the putative cleft of IRP-1. The aconitase form of IRP-1 adopts a more compact structure because strong reductions of cleavage were detected in two defined areas encompassing residues 149 to 187 and 721 to 735. Thus both ligands of apo-IRP-1, the IRE and the 4Fe-4S cluster, induce distinct but overlapping alterations in protease accessibility. These data provide evidences for structural changes in IRP-1 upon cluster formation that affect the accessibility of residues constituting the RNA binding site.

An atypical iron-responsive element (IRE) within crayfish ferritin mRNA and an iron regulatory protein 1 (IRP1)-like protein from crayfish hepatopancreas

A putative crayfish iron-responsive element (IRE) is present in the 5'-untranslated region of the crayfish ferritin mRNA. The putative crayfish IRE is in a cap-proximal position and shares most of the structural features of the consensus IRE, but the RNA stem-loop structure contains a bulge of a guanine instead of a cytosine at the expected position, so far thought to be a hallmark of IREs. By using an electromobility shift assay this IRE was shown to specifically bind purified recombinant human iron regulatory protein 1 (IRP1) as well as a factor(s) present in a homogenate of crayfish hepatopancreas, likely to be a crayfish IRP1 homologue. With mutations in the crayfish IRE, the affinity of IRP to IRE was drastically decreased. A cDNA encoding an IRP1-like protein was cloned from the hepatopancreas of crayfish. This protein has sequence similarities to IRP, and contains all the active-site residues of aconitase, two putative RNA-binding regions and a putative contact site between RNA and IRP. These results show that a crayfish IRE, lacking the bulged C, can bind IRP1 in vitro and that an IRP1-like protein present in crayfish hepatopancreas may have both aconitase and RNA-binding activities.

Novel role of phosphorylation in Fe-S cluster stability revealed by phosphomimetic mutations at Ser-138 of iron regulatory protein 1

Animals regulate iron metabolism largely through the action of the iron regulatory proteins (IRPs). IRPs modulate mRNA utilization by binding to iron-responsive elements (IRE) in the 5' or 3' untranslated region of mRNAs encoding proteins involved in iron homeostasis or energy production. IRP1 is also the cytosolic isoform of aconitase. The activities of IRP1 are mutually exclusive and are modulated through the assembly/disassembly of its [4Fe-4S] cluster, reversibly converting it between an IRE-binding protein and cytosolic aconitase. IRP1 is also phosphoregulated by protein kinase C, but the mechanism by which phosphorylation posttranslationally increases IRE binding activity has not been fully defined. To investigate this, Ser-138 (S138), a PKC phosphorylation site, was mutated to phosphomimetic glutamate (S138E), aspartate (S138D), or nonphosphorylatable alanine (S138A). The S138E IRP1 mutant and, to a lesser extent, the S138D IRP1 mutant were impaired in aconitase function in yeast when grown aerobically but not when grown anaerobically. Purified wild-type and mutant IRP1s could be reconstituted to active aconitases anaerobically. However, when exposed to oxygen, the [4Fe-4S] cluster of the S138D and S138E mutants decayed 5-fold and 20-fold faster, respectively, than was observed for wild-type IRP1. Our findings suggest that stability of the Fe-S cluster of IRP1 can be regulated by phosphorylation and reveal a mechanism whereby the balance between the IRE binding and [4Fe-4S] forms of IRP1 can be modulated independently of cellular iron status. Furthermore, our results show that IRP1 can function as an oxygen-modulated posttranscriptional regulator of gene expression.

Approaches to DNA mutagenesis: an overview

In the last several years, the use of double-stranded DNA templates together with thermostable-polymerase PCR has essentially replaced the use single-stranded DNA templates using the thermolabile polymerase for in vitro mutagenesis. Numerous PCR methods are now available, such as overlap-extension PCR, megaprimer PCR, and inverse PCR. All these PCR methods are reliable, effective, and convenient, although they are more prone to high rates of spontaneous error in mutant DNAs than are methods using thermolabile polymerases. Some improvements, such as the introduction of methylated templates, have been employed to minimize PCR errors. On the other hand, because of the introduction of many selection measures (e.g., restoration of antibiotic resistance, restoration of replication origin and unique site elimination), both double-stranded and single-stranded DNAs can now be used as templates for mutagenesis using thermolabile polymerase methods. For PCR methods, selection measures such as nested PCR has developed. All these selection measures have greatly improved the efficiency of mutagenesis by removing wild-type templates prior to transformation. Many efficient methods are available for both SDM and REM. Mutations can be introduce in vitro or in vivo, either by mutagenic primers or by erroneous DNA synthesis. Thus, choices largely depend on the experimental needs and resources of the investigator.

Interaction between iron-regulatory proteins and their RNA target sequences, iron-responsive elements

In this chapter, we have focused on the biochemistry of IRP-1 and the features which distinguish it from the related RNA-binding protein, IRP-2. IRP-1 is the cytoplasmic isoform of the enzyme aconitase, and, depending on iron status, may switch between enzymatic and RNA-binding activities. IRP-1 and IRP-2 are trans-acting regulators of mRNAs involved in iron uptake, storage and utilisation. The finding of an IRE in the citric acid cycle enzymes, mitochondrial aconitase and succinate dehydrogenase, suggests that the IRPs may also influence cellular energy production. These two proteins appear to bind RNAs with different but overlapping specificity, suggesting that they may regulate the stability or translation of as yet undefined mRNA targets, possibly extending their regulatory function beyond that of iron homeostasis. The interaction between the IRPs and the IRE represents one of the best characterised model systems for posttranscriptional gene control, and given that each IRP can also recognise its own unique set of RNAs, the search for new in vivo mRNA targets is expected to provide yet more surprises and insights into the fate of cytoplasmic mRNAs.

Regulation of iron metabolism in eukaryotes

Iron metabolism is regulated in cells to ensure that iron supplies are adequate and nontoxic. The expression of iron metabolism is regulated primarily by posttranscriptional mechanisms. Ferritin, eALAS, SDHb of Drosophila, and mammalian mitochondrial aconitase are translationally regulated. The TfR is regulated at the level of mRNA stability. Iron regulatory proteins are regulated either by assembly or by disassembly of an iron-sulfur cluster (IRP1) or by rapid degradation in the presence of iron (IRP2). The list of targets for IRP-mediated regulation is growing longer, and a range of possibilities for versatile regulation exists, as each IRP can bind to unique targets that differ from the consensus IRE. The reactivity of iron with oxygen and the creation of toxic by-products may be the evolutionary stimulus that produced this system of tight posttranscriptional gene regulation.

Molecular control of vertebrate iron metabolism: mRNA-based regulatory circuits operated by iron, nitric oxide, and oxidative stress

As an essential nutrient and a potential toxin, iron poses an exquisite regulatory problem in biology and medicine. At the cellular level, the basic molecular framework for the regulation of iron uptake, storage, and utilization has been defined. Two cytoplasmic RNA-binding proteins, iron-regulatory protein-1 (IRP-1) and IRP-2, respond to changes in cellular iron availability and coordinate the expression of mRNAs that harbor IRP-binding sites, iron-responsive elements (IREs). Nitric oxide (NO) and oxidative stress in the form of H2O2 also signal to IRPs and thereby influence cellular iron metabolism. The recent discovery of two IRE-regulated mRNAs encoding enzymes of the mitochondrial citric acid cycle may represent the beginnings of elucidating regulatory coupling between iron and energy metabolism. In addition to providing insights into the regulation of iron metabolism and its connections with other cellular pathways, the IRE/IRP system has emerged as a prime example for the understanding of translational regulation and mRNA stability control. Finally, IRP-1 has highlighted an unexpected role for iron sulfur clusters as post-translational regulatory switches.