Selectivity of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase E sigma 38 for overlapping promoters and ability to support CRP activation

Novel organisation and regulation of the pic promoter from enteroaggregative and uropathogenic Escherichia coli

The serine protease autotransporters of the Enterobacteriaceae (SPATEs) are a large family of virulence factors commonly found in enteric bacteria. These secreted virulence factors have diverse functions during bacterial infection, including adhesion, aggregation and cell toxicity. One such SPATE, the Pic mucinase (protein involved in colonisation) cleaves mucin, allowing enteric bacterial cells to utilise mucin as a carbon source and to penetrate the gut mucus lining, thereby increasing mucosal colonisation. The pic gene is widely distributed within the Enterobacteriaceae, being found in human pathogens, such as enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and Shigella flexneri 2a. As the pic promoter regions from EAEC strain 042 and UPEC strain CFT073 differ, we have investigated the regulation of each promoter. Here, using in vivo and in vitro techniques, we show that both promoters are activated by the global transcription factor, CRP (cyclic AMP receptor protein), but the architectures of the EAEC and the UPEC pic promoter differ. Expression from both pic promoters is repressed by the nucleoid-associated factor, Fis, and maximal promoter activity occurs when cells are grown in minimal medium. As CRP activates transcription in conditions of nutrient depletion, whilst Fis levels are maximal in nutrient-rich environments, the regulation of the EAEC and UPEC pic promoters is consistent with Pic’s nutritional role in scavenging mucin as a suitable carbon source during colonisation and infection.

Widespread divergent transcription from bacterial and archaeal promoters is a consequence of DNA-sequence symmetry

Transcription initiates at promoters, DNA regions recognized by a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase. We previously identified horizontally acquired Escherichia coli promoters from which the direction of transcription was unclear. In the present study, we show that more than half of these promoters are bidirectional and drive divergent transcription. Using genome-scale approaches, we demonstrate that 19% of all transcription start sites detected in E. coli are associated with a bidirectional promoter. Bidirectional promoters are similarly common in diverse bacteria and archaea, and have inherent symmetry: specific bases required for transcription initiation are reciprocally co-located on opposite DNA strands. Bidirectional promoters enable co-regulation of divergent genes and are enriched in both intergenic and horizontally acquired regions. Divergent transcription is conserved among bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes, but the underlying mechanisms for bidirectionality are different.

An ideal spacing is required for the control of Class II CRP-dependent promoters by the status of CRP K100

Transcription activation by the Escherichia coli CRP at Class II promoters is dependent on direct interactions between RNA polymerase and CRP, therefore the spatial proximity between both proteins plays a significant role in the ability of CRP to activate transcription. Using both in vivo and in vitro techniques, here we demonstrate that the CRP K100 positive charge, adjacent to AR2, is required for full promoter activity when CRP is optimally positioned. Accordingly, K100 mediated activation is very position-dependent and our data confirm that the largest impact of the K100 status on transcription activation occurs when the spacing between the CRP binding site and the A2 of the -10 element is 22 bp. From the results of this study and the progress in the understanding about open complex DNA scrunching, we propose that CRP-dependent promoters should now be numbered by the distance from the center of the DNA site for CRP and the most highly conserved base at position 2 of the -10 hexamer in bacterial promoters.

Activation by NarL at the Escherichia coli ogt promoter

The Escherichia coli NarX/NarL two-component response-regulator system regulates gene expression in response to nitrate ions and the NarL protein is a global transcription factor, which activates transcript initiation at many target promoters. One such target, the E. coli ogt promoter, which controls the expression of an O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase, is dependent on NarL binding to two DNA targets centred at positions -44.5 and -77.5 upstream from the transcript start. Here, we describe ogt promoter derivatives that can be activated solely by NarL binding either at position -44.5 or position -77.5. We show that NarL can also activate the ogt promoter when located at position -67.5. We present data to argue that NarL-dependent activation of transcript initiation at the ogt promoter results from a direct interaction between NarL and a determinant in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. Footprinting experiments show that, at the -44.5 promoter, NarL and the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit bind to opposite faces of promoter DNA, suggesting an unusual mechanism of transcription activation. Our work suggests new organisations for activator-dependent transcription at promoters and future applications for biotechnology.

A non-canonical promoter element drives spurious transcription of horizontally acquired bacterial genes

RNA polymerases initiate transcription at DNA sequences called promoters. In bacteria, the best conserved promoter feature is the AT-rich -10 element; a sequence essential for DNA unwinding. Further elements, and gene regulatory proteins, are needed to recruit RNA polymerase to the -10 sequence. Hence, -10 elements cannot function in isolation. Many horizontally acquired genes also have a high AT-content. Consequently, sequences that resemble the -10 element occur frequently. As a result, foreign genes are predisposed to spurious transcription. However, it is not clear how RNA polymerase initially recognizes such sequences. Here, we identify a non-canonical promoter element that plays a key role. The sequence, itself a short AT-tract, resides 5 base pairs upstream of otherwise cryptic -10 elements. The AT-tract alters DNA conformation and enhances contacts between the DNA backbone and RNA polymerase.

The quorum sensing transcription factor AphA directly regulates natural competence in Vibrio cholerae

Many bacteria use population density to control gene expression via quorum sensing. In Vibrio cholerae, quorum sensing coordinates virulence, biofilm formation, and DNA uptake by natural competence. The transcription factors AphA and HapR, expressed at low and high cell density respectively, play a key role. In particular, AphA triggers the entire virulence cascade upon host colonisation. In this work we have mapped genome-wide DNA binding by AphA. We show that AphA is versatile, exhibiting distinct modes of DNA binding and promoter regulation. Unexpectedly, whilst HapR is known to induce natural competence, we demonstrate that AphA also intervenes. Most notably, AphA is a direct repressor of tfoX, the master activator of competence. Hence, production of AphA markedly suppressed DNA uptake; an effect largely circumvented by ectopic expression of tfoX. Our observations suggest dual regulation of competence. At low cell density AphA is a master repressor whilst HapR activates the process at high cell density. Thus, we provide deep mechanistic insight into the role of AphA and highlight how V. cholerae utilises this regulator for diverse purposes.

Cholera remains a devastating diarrhoeal disease responsible for millions of cases, thousands of deaths, and a $3 billion financial burden every year. Although notorious for causing human disease, the microorganism responsible for cholera is predominantly a resident of aquatic environments. Here, the organism survives in densely packed communities on the surfaces of crustaceans. Remarkably, in this situation, the microbe can feast on neighbouring cells and acquire their DNA. This provides a useful food source and an opportunity to obtain new genetic information. In this paper, we have investigated how acquisition of DNA from the local environment is regulated. We show that a “switch” within the microbial cell, known to activate disease processes in the human host, also controls DNA uptake. Our results explain why DNA scavenging only occurs in suitable environments and illustrates how interactions between common regulatory switches affords precise control of microbial behaviours.

The Escherichia coli MarA protein regulates the ycgZ-ymgABC operon to inhibit biofilm formation

The Escherichia coli marRAB operon is a paradigm for chromosomally encoded antibiotic resistance. The operon exerts its effect via an encoded transcription factor called MarA that modulates efflux pump and porin expression. In this work, we show that MarA is also a regulator of biofilm formation. Control is mediated by binding of MarA to the intergenic region upstream of the ycgZ-ymgABC operon. The operon, known to influence the formation of curli fibres and colanic acid, is usually expressed during periods of starvation. Hence, the ycgZ-ymgABC promoter is recognised by σ³⁸ (RpoS)-associated RNA polymerase (RNAP). Surprisingly, MarA does not influence σ³⁸ -dependent transcription. Instead, MarA drives transcription by the housekeeping σ⁷⁰ -associated RNAP. The effects of MarA on ycgZ-ymgABC expression are coupled with biofilm formation by the rcsCDB phosphorelay system, with YcgZ, YmgA and YmgB forming a complex that directly interacts with the histidine kinase domain of RcsC.

The Escherichia coli multiple antibiotic resistance activator protein represses transcription of the lac operon

In Escherichia coli, the marRAB operon is a determinant for antibiotic resistance. Such phenotypes require the encoded transcription factor MarA that activates efflux pump expression. To better understand all genes controlled by MarA, we recently mapped binding of the regulator across the E. coli genome. As expected, many MarA targets were adjacent to genes encoding stress response systems. Surprisingly, one MarA-binding site overlapped the lac operon regulatory region. Here, we show that MarA specifically targets this locus and can block transcription of the lac genes. Repression is mediated by binding of MarA to a site overlapping the lacP1 promoter -35 element. Control of the lac operon by MarA does not impact antibiotic resistance.

The multiple antibiotic resistance operon of enteric bacteria controls DNA repair and outer membrane integrity

The multiple antibiotic resistance (mar) operon of Escherichia coli is a paradigm for chromosomally encoded antibiotic resistance in enteric bacteria. The locus is recognised for its ability to modulate efflux pump and porin expression via two encoded transcription factors, MarR and MarA. Here we map binding of these regulators across the E. coli genome and identify an extensive mar regulon. Most notably, MarA activates expression of genes required for DNA repair and lipid trafficking. Consequently, the mar locus reduces quinolone-induced DNA damage and the ability of tetracyclines to traverse the outer membrane. These previously unrecognised mar pathways reside within a core regulon, shared by most enteric bacteria. Hence, we provide a framework for understanding multidrug resistance, mediated by analogous systems, across the Enterobacteriaceae. Transcription factors MarR and MarA confer multidrug resistance in enteric bacteria by modulating efflux pump and porin expression. Here, Sharma et al. show that MarA also upregulates genes required for lipid trafficking and DNA repair, thus reducing antibiotic entry and quinolone-induced DNA damage.

Molecular Basis of Stationary Phase Survival and Applications

Stationary phase is the stage when growth ceases but cells remain metabolically active. Several physical and molecular changes take place during this stage that makes them interesting to explore. The characteristic proteins synthesized in the stationary phase are indispensable as they confer viability to the bacteria. Detailed knowledge of these proteins and the genes synthesizing them is required to understand the survival in such nutrient deprived conditions. The promoters, which drive the expression of these genes, are called stationary phase promoters. These promoters exhibit increased activity in the stationary phase and less or no activity in the exponential phase. The vectors constructed based on these promoters are ideal for large-scale protein production due to the absence of any external inducers. A number of recombinant protein production systems have been developed using these promoters. This review describes the stationary phase survival of bacteria, the promoters involved, their importance, regulation, and applications.

Regulation of nrf operon expression in pathogenic enteric bacteria: sequence divergence reveals new regulatory complexity

The Escherichia coli K‐12 nrf operon encodes a periplasmic nitrite reductase, the expression of which is driven from a single promoter, pnrf. Expression from pnrf is activated by the FNR transcription factor in response to anaerobiosis and further increased in response to nitrite by the response regulator proteins, NarL and NarP. FNR‐dependent transcription is suppressed by the binding of two nucleoid associated proteins, IHF and Fis. As Fis levels increase in cells grown in rich medium, the positioning of its binding site, overlapping the promoter −10 element, ensures that pnrf is sharply repressed. Here, we investigate the expression of the nrf operon promoter from various pathogenic enteric bacteria. We show that pnrf from enterohaemorrhagic E. coli is more active than its K‐12 counterpart, exhibits substantial FNR‐independent activity and is insensitive to nutrient quality, due to an improved −10 element. We also demonstrate that the Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium core promoter is more active than previously thought, due to differences around the transcription start site, and that its expression is repressed by downstream sequences. We identify the CsrA RNA binding protein as being responsible for this, and show that CsrA differentially regulates the E. coli K‐12 and Salmonella nrf operons.

Horizontally acquired AT-rich genes in Escherichia coli cause toxicity by sequestering RNA polymerase

Horizontal gene transfer permits rapid dissemination of genetic elements between individuals in bacterial populations. Transmitted DNA sequences may encode favourable traits. However, if the acquired DNA has an atypical base composition, it can reduce host fitness. Consequently, bacteria have evolved strategies to minimize the harmful effects of foreign genes. Most notably, xenogeneic silencing proteins bind incoming DNA that has a higher AT content than the host genome. An enduring question has been why such sequences are deleterious. Here, we showed that the toxicity of AT-rich DNA in Escherichia coli frequently results from constitutive transcription initiation within the coding regions of genes. Left unchecked, this causes titration of RNA polymerase and a global downshift in host gene expression. Accordingly, a mutation in RNA polymerase that diminished the impact of AT-rich DNA on host fitness reduced transcription from constitutive, but not activator-dependent, promoters.

Unusually Situated Binding Sites for Bacterial Transcription Factors Can Have Hidden Functionality

A commonly accepted paradigm of molecular biology is that transcription factors control gene expression by binding sites at the 5' end of a gene. However, there is growing evidence that transcription factor targets can occur within genes or between convergent genes. In this work, we have investigated one such target for the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. We show that CRP binds between two convergent genes. When bound, CRP regulates transcription of a small open reading frame, which we term aatS, embedded within one of the adjacent genes. Our work demonstrates that non-canonical sites of transcription factor binding can have hidden functionality.

Expression of different bacterial cytotoxins is controlled by two global transcription factors, CRP and Fis, that co-operate in a shared-recruitment mechanism

Expression of related autotransporter toxin genes in pathogenic Escherichia coli and Shigella sonnei require the CRP and Fis global regulators. At promoters controlling toxin production, CRP is suboptimally positioned and Fis compensates for this impediment by facilitating RNA polymerase recruitment.

The molecular basis for control of ETEC enterotoxin expression in response to environment and host

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) cause severe diarrhoea in humans and neonatal farm animals. Annually, 380,000 human deaths, and multi-million dollar losses in the farming industry, can be attributed to ETEC infections. Illness results from the action of enterotoxins, which disrupt signalling pathways that manage water and electrolyte homeostasis in the mammalian gut. The resulting fluid loss is treated by oral rehydration. Hence, aqueous solutions of glucose and salt are ingested by the patient. Given the central role of enterotoxins in disease, we have characterised the regulatory trigger that controls toxin production. We show that, at the molecular level, the trigger is comprised of two gene regulatory proteins, CRP and H-NS. Strikingly, this renders toxin expression sensitive to both conditions encountered on host cell attachment and the components of oral rehydration therapy. For example, enterotoxin expression is induced by salt in an H-NS dependent manner. Furthermore, depending on the toxin gene, expression is activated or repressed by glucose. The precise sensitivity of the regulatory trigger to glucose differs because of variations in the regulatory setup for each toxin encoding gene.

Differential role of base pairs on gal promoters strength

Sequence alignments of promoters in prokaryotes postulated that the frequency of occurrence of a base pair at a given position of promoter elements reflects its contribution to intrinsic promoter strength. We directly assessed the contribution of the four base pairs in each position in the intrinsic promoter strength by keeping the context constant in Escherichia coli cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) regulated gal promoters by in vitro transcription assays. First, we show that base pair frequency within known consensus elements correlates well with promoter strength. Second, we observe some substitutions upstream of the ex-10 TG motif that are important for promoter function. Although the galP1 and P2 promoters overlap, only three positions where substitutions inactivated both promoters were found. We propose that RNA polymerase binds to the -12T base pair as part of double-stranded DNA while opening base pairs from -11A to +3 to form the single-stranded transcription bubble DNA during isomerization. The cAMP-CRP complex rescued some deleterious substitutions in the promoter region. The base pair roles and their flexibilities reported here for E. coli gal promoters may help construction of synthetic promoters in gene circuitry experiments in which overlapping promoters with differential controls may be warranted.

Chromosome position effects on gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12

In eukaryotes, the location of a gene on the chromosome is known to affect its expression, but such position effects are poorly understood in bacteria. Here, using Escherichia coli K-12, we demonstrate that expression of a reporter gene cassette, comprised of the model E. coli lac promoter driving expression of gfp, varies by ∼300-fold depending on its precise position on the chromosome. At some positions, expression was more than 3-fold higher than at the natural lac promoter locus, whereas at several other locations, the reporter cassette was completely silenced: effectively overriding local lac promoter control. These effects were not due to differences in gene copy number, caused by partially replicated genomes. Rather, the differences in gene expression occur predominantly at the level of transcription and are mediated by several different features that are involved in chromosome organization. Taken together, our findings identify a tier of gene regulation above local promoter control and highlight the importance of chromosome position effects on gene expression profiles in bacteria.

H-NS can facilitate specific DNA-binding by RNA polymerase in AT-rich gene regulatory regions

Extremely AT-rich DNA sequences present a challenging template for specific recognition by RNA polymerase. In bacteria, this is because the promoter -10 hexamer, the major DNA element recognised by RNA polymerase, is itself AT-rich. We show that Histone-like Nucleoid Structuring (H-NS) protein can facilitate correct recognition of a promoter by RNA polymerase in AT-rich gene regulatory regions. Thus, at the Escherichia coli ehxCABD operon, RNA polymerase is unable to distinguish between the promoter -10 element and similar overlapping sequences. This problem is resolved in native nucleoprotein because the overlapping sequences are masked by H-NS. Our work provides mechanistic insight into nucleoprotein structure and its effect on protein-DNA interactions in prokaryotic cells.

E. coli Fis protein insulates the cbpA gene from uncontrolled transcription

The Escherichia coli curved DNA binding protein A (CbpA) is a poorly characterised nucleoid associated factor and co-chaperone. It is expressed at high levels as cells enter stationary phase. Using genetics, biochemistry, and genomics, we have examined regulation of, and DNA binding by, CbpA. We show that Fis, the dominant growth-phase nucleoid protein, prevents CbpA expression in growing cells. Regulation by Fis involves an unusual “insulation” mechanism. Thus, Fis protects cbpA from the effects of a distal promoter, located in an adjacent gene. In stationary phase, when Fis levels are low, CbpA binds the E. coli chromosome with a preference for the intrinsically curved Ter macrodomain. Disruption of the cbpA gene prompts dramatic changes in DNA topology. Thus, our work identifies a novel role for Fis and incorporates CbpA into the growing network of factors that mediate bacterial chromosome structure.

Compaction of chromosomal DNA is a fundamental process that impacts on all aspects of cellular biology. However, our understanding of chromosome organisation in bacteria is poorly developed. Since bacteria are amongst the most abundant living organisms on the planet, this represents a startling gap in our knowledge. Despite our lack of understanding, it has long been known that Escherichia coli, and other bacteria, radically re-model their chromosomes in response to environmental stress. This is most notable during periods of starvation, when the E. coli chromosome is super compacted. In dissecting the molecular mechanisms that control this phenomenon, we have found that regulatory cross-talk between DNA–organising proteins plays an essential role. Thus, the major DNA folding protein from growing E. coli inhibits production of the major chromosome organisers in starved cells. Our findings illustrate the highly dynamic nature of bacterial chromosomes. Thus, DNA topology, gene transcription, and chromosome folding proteins entwine to create a web of interactions that define the properties of the chromosome.

Stationary-Phase Gene Regulation in Escherichia coli §

In their stressful natural environments, bacteria often are in stationary phase and use their limited resources for maintenance and stress survival. Underlying this activity is the general stress response, which in Escherichia coli depends on the σS (RpoS) subunit of RNA polymerase. σS is closely related to the vegetative sigma factor σ70 (RpoD), and these two sigmas recognize similar but not identical promoter sequences. During the postexponential phase and entry into stationary phase, σS is induced by a fine-tuned combination of transcriptional, translational, and proteolytic control. In addition, regulatory "short-cuts" to high cellular σS levels, which mainly rely on the rapid inhibition of σS proteolysis, are triggered by sudden starvation for various nutrients and other stressful shift conditons. σS directly or indirectly activates more than 500 genes. Additional signal input is integrated by σS cooperating with various transcription factors in complex cascades and feedforward loops. Target gene products have stress-protective functions, redirect metabolism, affect cell envelope and cell shape, are involved in biofilm formation or pathogenesis, or can increased stationary phase and stress-induced mutagenesis. This review summarizes these diverse functions and the amazingly complex regulation of σS. At the molecular level, these processes are integrated with the partitioning of global transcription space by sigma factor competition for RNA polymerase core enzyme and signaling by nucleotide second messengers that include cAMP, (p)ppGpp, and c-di-GMP. Physiologically, σS is the key player in choosing between a lifestyle associated with postexponential growth based on nutrient scavenging and motility and a lifestyle focused on maintenance, strong stress resistance, and increased adhesiveness. Finally, research with other proteobacteria is beginning to reveal how evolution has further adapted function and regulation of σS to specific environmental niches.

A cryptic promoter in the LEE1 regulatory region of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli: promoter specificity in AT-rich gene regulatory regions

Transcription of the LEE1 operon in the locus of enterocyte effacement of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli is due to the P1 promoter. Mutational and biochemical analyses reveal the existence of an overlapping promoter, designated P1A, which can drive transcript initiation 10 bp upstream of the P1 promoter transcript start point. Because of the overlap between P1 and P1A, P1A activity is unmasked only when the P1 promoter is inactivated by mutation. In the present paper, we report that mutation of the P1-10 element is less effective in unmasking P1A promoter activity than mutation of the P1-35 element. This suggests that the P1 promoter -35 element, which corresponds to the consensus, can sequester RNA polymerase even when P1 is inactive and thereby prevent RNA polymerase from serving the P1A promoter. We propose that such promoter elements may play a role in enforcing specificity in bacterial regulatory regions that contain alternative possible promoters.

Transcription of the plasmid-encoded toxin gene from enteroaggregative Escherichia coli is regulated by a novel co-activation mechanism involving CRP and Fis

Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC) is a major cause of diarrhoea in developing countries. EAEC 042 is the prototypical strain. EAEC 042 secretes the functionally well-characterized Pet autotransporter toxin that contributes to virulence through its cytotoxic effects on intestinal epithelial cells. Following a global transposon mutagenesis screen of EAEC 042, the transcription factors, CRP and Fis, were identified as essential for transcription of the pet gene. Using both in vivo and in vitro techniques, we show that the pet promoter is co-dependent on CRP and Fis. We present a novel co-activation mechanism whereby CRP is placed at a non-optimal position for transcription initiation, creating dependence on Fis for full activation of pet. This study complements previous findings that establish Fis as a key virulence regulator in EAEC 042.

The E. coli anti-sigma factor Rsd: studies on the specificity and regulation of its expression

Background

Among the seven different sigma factors in E. coli σ⁷⁰ has the highest concentration and affinity for the core RNA polymerase. The E. coli protein Rsd is regarded as an anti-sigma factor, inhibiting σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription at the onset of stationary growth. Although binding of Rsd to σ⁷⁰ has been shown and numerous structural studies on Rsd have been performed the detailed mechanism of action is still unknown.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We have performed studies to unravel the function and regulation of Rsd expression in vitro and in vivo. Cross-linking and affinity binding revealed that Rsd is able to interact with σ⁷⁰, with the core enzyme of RNA polymerase and is able to form dimers in solution. Unexpectedly, we find that Rsd does also interact with σ³⁸, the stationary phase-specific sigma factor. This interaction was further corroborated by gel retardation and footprinting studies with different promoter fragments and σ³⁸- or σ⁷⁰-containing RNA polymerase in presence of Rsd. Under competitive in vitro transcription conditions, in presence of both sigma factors, a selective inhibition of σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription was prevailing, however. Analysis of rsd expression revealed that the nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS and FIS, StpA and LRP bind to the regulatory region of the rsd promoters. Furthermore, the major promoter P2 was shown to be down-regulated in vivo by RpoS, the stationary phase-specific sigma factor and the transcription factor DksA, while induction of the stringent control enhanced rsd promoter activity. Most notably, the dam-dependent methylation of a cluster of GATC sites turned out to be important for efficient rsd transcription.

Conclusions/Significance

The results contribute to a better understanding of the intricate mechanism of Rsd-mediated sigma factor specificity changes during stationary phase.

Escherichia coli σ⁷⁰ senses sequence and conformation of the promoter spacer region

In bacteria, promoter identification by RNA polymerase is mediated by a dissociable σ factor. The housekeeping σ⁷⁰ factor of Escherichia coli recognizes two well characterized DNA sequence elements, known as the ‘−10’ and ‘−35’ hexamers. These elements are separated by ‘spacer’ DNA, the sequence of which is generally considered unimportant. Here, we use a combination of bioinformatics, genetics and biochemistry to show that σ⁷⁰ can sense the sequence and conformation of the promoter spacer region. Our data illustrate how alterations in spacer region sequence can increase promoter activity. This stimulatory effect requires σ⁷⁰ side chain R451, which is located in close proximity to the non-template strand at promoter position −18. Conversely, R451 is not required to mediate transcriptional stimulation by improvement of the −10 element. Mutation of σ⁷⁰ residue R451, which is highly conserved, results in reduced growth rate, consistent with a central role in promoter recognition.

Timing of gene transcription in the galactose utilization system of Escherichia coli

In the natural environment, bacterial cells have to adjust their metabolism to alterations in the availability of food sources. The order and timing of gene expression are crucial in these situations to produce an appropriate response. We used the galactose regulation in Escherichia coli as a model system for understanding how cells integrate information about food availability and cAMP levels to adjust the timing and intensity of gene expression. We simulated the feast-famine cycle of bacterial growth by diluting stationary phase cells in fresh medium containing galactose as the sole carbon source. We followed the activities of six promoters of the galactose system as cells grew on and ran out of galactose. We found that the cell responds to a decreasing external galactose level by increasing the internal galactose level, which is achieved by limiting galactose metabolism and increasing the expression of transporters. We show that the cell alters gene expression based primarily on the current state of the cell and not on monitoring the level of extracellular galactose in real time. Some decisions have longer term effects; therefore, the current state does subtly encode the history of food availability. In summary, our measurements of timing of gene expression in the galactose system suggest that the system has evolved to respond to environments where future galactose levels are unpredictable rather than regular feast and famine cycles.

Regulation of the Escherichia coli csgD promoter: interplay between five transcription factors

Under stressful conditions in nature, Escherichia coli forms biofilms for long-term survival. Curli fimbriae are an essential architecture for cell–cell contacts within biofilms. Structural components and assembly factors of curli are encoded by two operons, csgBA and csgDEFG. The csgD gene product controls transcription of both operons. Reflecting the response of csgD expression to external stresses, a number of transcription factors participate in the regulation of the csgD promoter. Analysis of the csgD mRNA obtained from E. coli mutants in different transcription factors indicated that CpxR and H-NS act as repressors while OmpR, RstA and IHF act as activators. An acid-stress response regulator, RstA, activates csgD only under acidic conditions. These five factors bind within a narrow region of about 200 bp upstream of the csgD promoter. After pair-wise promoter-binding assays, the increase in csgD transcription in the stationary phase was suggested to be due, at least in part, to the increase in IHF level cancelling the silencing effect of H-NS. In addition, we propose a novel regulation model of this complex csgD promoter through cooperation between the two positive factors (OmpR–IHF and RstA–IHF) and also between the two negative factors (CpxR–H-NS).

Activation of sigma 28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization

The Escherichia coli aer regulatory region contains a single promoter that is recognized by RNA polymerase containing the flagellar sigma factor, sigma(28). Expression from this promoter is dependent on direct activation by the cyclic AMP receptor protein, which binds to a target centred 49.5 base pairs upstream from the transcript start. Activator-dependent transcription from the aer promoter was reconstituted in vitro, and a tethered inorganic nuclease was used to find the position of the C-terminal domains of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits in transcriptionally competent open complexes. We report that the ternary activator--RNA polymerase--aer promoter open complex is organized differently from complexes at previously characterized promoters. Among other E. coli promoters recognized by RNA polymerase containing sigma(28), only the trg promoter is activated directly by the cyclic AMP receptor protein. The organization of the different promoter elements and the activator binding site at the trg promoter is the same as at the aer promoter, suggesting a common activation mechanism.

Transcription analysis of central metabolism genes in Escherichia coli. Possible roles of sigma38 in their expression, as a response to carbon limitation

The phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate transferase system (PTS) transports glucose in Escherichia coli. Previous work demonstrated that strains lacking PTS, such as PB11, grow slow on glucose. PB11 has a reduced expression of glycolytic, and upregulates poxB and acs genes as compared to the parental strain JM101, when growing on glucose. The products of the latter genes are involved in the production of AcetylCoA. Inactivation of rpoS that codes for the RNA polymerase σ³⁸ subunit, reduces further (50%) growth of PB11, indicating that σ³⁸ plays a central role in the expression of central metabolism genes in slowly growing cells. In fact, transcription levels of glycolytic genes is reduced in strain PB11rpoS⁻ as compared to PB11. In this report we studied the role of σ⁷⁰ and σ³⁸ in the expression of the complete glycolytic pathway and poxB and acs genes in certain PTS⁻ strains and their rpoS⁻ derivatives. We determined the transcription start sites (TSSs) and the corresponding promoters, in strains JM101, PB11, its derivative PB12 that recovered its growth capacity, and in their rpoS⁻ derivatives, by 5′RACE and pyrosequencing. In all these genes the presence of sequences resembling σ³⁸ recognition sites allowed the proposition that they could be transcribed by both sigma factors, from overlapping putative promoters that initiate transcription at the same site. Fourteen new TSSs were identified in seventeen genes. Besides, more than 30 putative promoters were proposed and we confirmed ten previously reported. In vitro transcription experiments support the functionality of putative dual promoters. Alternatives that could also explain lower transcription levels of the rpoS⁻ derivatives are discussed. We propose that the presence if real, of both σ⁷⁰ and σ³⁸ dependent promoters in all glycolytic genes and operons could allow a differential transcription of these central metabolism genes by both sigma subunits as an adaptation response to carbon limitation.

Downregulation of the Escherichia coli guaB promoter by upstream-bound cyclic AMP receptor protein

The Escherichia coli guaB promoter (P(guaB)) is responsible for directing transcription of the guaB and guaA genes, which specify the biosynthesis of the nucleotide GMP. P(guaB) is subject to growth rate-dependent control (GRDC) and possesses an UP element that is required for this regulation. In addition, P(guaB) contains a discriminator, three binding sites for the nucleoid-associated protein FIS, and putative binding sites for the regulatory proteins DnaA, PurR, and cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP). Here we show that the CRP-cyclic AMP (cAMP) complex binds to a site located over 100 bp upstream of the guaB transcription start site, where it serves to downregulate P(guaB). The CRP-mediated repression of P(guaB) activity increases in media that support lower growth rates. Inactivation of the crp or cyaA gene or ablation/translocation of the CRP site relieves repression by CRP and results in a loss of GRDC of P(guaB). Thus, GRDC of P(guaB) involves a progressive increase in CRP-mediated repression of the promoter as the growth rate decreases. Our results also suggest that the CRP-cAMP complex does not direct GRDC at P(guaB) and that at least one other regulatory factor is required for conferring GRDC on this promoter. However, PurR and DnaA are not required for this regulatory mechanism.

Competition between NarL-dependent activation and Fis-dependent repression controls expression from the Escherichia coli yeaR and ogt promoters

The Escherichia coli NarL protein is a global gene regulatory factor that activates transcription at many target promoters in response to nitrate and nitrite ions. Although most NarL-dependent promoters are also co-dependent on a second transcription factor, FNR protein, two targets, the yeaR and ogt promoters, are activated by NarL alone with no involvement of FNR. Biochemical and genetic studies presented here show that activation of the yeaR promoter is dependent on the binding of NarL to a single target centred at position −43.5, whereas activation at the ogt promoter requires NarL binding to tandem DNA targets centred at position −45.5 and −78.5. NarL-dependent activation at both the yeaR and ogt promoters is decreased in rich medium and this depends on Fis, a nucleoid-associated protein. DNase I footprinting studies identified Fis-binding sites that overlap the yeaR promoter NarL site at position −43.5, and the ogt promoter NarL site at position −78.5, and suggest that Fis represses both promoters by displacing NarL. The ogt gene encodes an O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase and, hence, this is the first report of expression of a DNA repair function being controlled by nitrate ions.

Assays for transcription factor activity

Transcription factors interact at promoters to modulate the transcription of genes. This chapter describes three in vitro methods that can be used to monitor their activity: transcript assays, abortive initiation assays, and potassium permanganate footprinting. These techniques have been developed using bacterial systems, and can be used to study the kinetics of transcription initiation, and hence to unravel regulatory mechanisms.

Analysis of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation

Bacterial promoter identification and characterization is not as straightforward as one might presume. Promoters vary widely in their similarity to the consensus recognition element sequences, in their activities, and in their utilization of transcription factors, and multiple approaches often must be used to provide a framework for understanding promoter regulation. Characterization of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation in the absence of additional regulatory factors (basal promoter function) can provide a basis for understanding the steps in transcription initiation that are ultimately targeted by nutritional or environmental factors. Promoters can be localized using genetic approaches in vivo, but the detailed properties of the RNAP-promoter complex are studied most productively in vitro. We first describe approaches for identification of bacterial promoters and transcription start sites in vivo, including promoter-reporter fusions and primer-extension. We then describe a number of methods for characterization of RNAP-promoter complexes in vitro, including in vitro transcription, gel mobility shift assays, footprinting, and filter binding. Utilization of these methods can result in determination of not only basal promoter strength but also the rates of transcription initiation complex formation and decay.

Regulation by nucleoid-associated proteins at the Escherichia coli nir operon promoter

The Escherichia coli K-12 nir operon promoter can be fully activated by binding of the regulator of fumarate and nitrate reduction (FNR) to a site centered at position -41.5 upstream of the transcript start, and this activation is modulated by upstream binding of the integration host factor (IHF) and Fis (factor for inversion stimulation) proteins. Thus, transcription initiation is repressed by the binding of IHF and Fis to sites centered at position -88 (IHF I) and position -142 (Fis I) and activated by IHF binding to a site at position -115 (IHF II). Here, we have exploited mutational analysis and biochemistry to investigate the actions of IHF and Fis at these sites. We show that the effects of IHF and Fis are position dependent and that IHF II functions independently of IHF I and Fis I. Using in vitro assays, we report that IHF and Fis repress transcription initiation by interfering with RNA polymerase binding. Differences in the upstream IHF and Fis binding sites at the nir promoter in related enteric bacteria fix the level of nir operon expression under anaerobic growth conditions.

Selective repression by Fis and H-NS at the Escherichia coli dps promoter

Dps is a nucleoid-associated protein that plays a major role in condensation of the Escherichia coli chromosome in stationary phase. Here we show that two other nucleoid-associated proteins, Fis and H-NS, can bind at the dps gene promoter and downregulate its activity. Both Fis and H-NS selectively repress the dps promoter, preventing transcription initiation by RNA polymerase containing sigma(70), the housekeeping sigma factor, but not by RNA polymerase containing sigma(38), the stationary-phase sigma factor. Fis represses by trapping RNA polymerase containing sigma(70) at the promoter. In contrast, H-NS functions by displacing RNA polymerase containing sigma(70), but not RNA polymerase containing sigma(38). Dps levels are known to be very low in exponentially growing cells and rise sharply as cells enter stationary phase. Conversely, Fis levels are high in growing cells but fall to nearly zero in stationary-phase cells. Our data suggest a simple model to explain how the Dps-dependent super-compaction of the folded chromosome is triggered as cell growth ceases.

Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli melR promoter: repression involves four molecules of MelR

The Escherichia coli MelR protein is a transcription activator that autoregulates its own promoter by repressing transcription initiation. Optimal repression requires MelR binding to a site that overlaps the melR transcription start point and to upstream sites. In this work, we have investigated the different determinants needed for optimal repression and their spatial requirements. We show that repression requires a complex involving four DNA-bound MelR molecules, and that the global CRP regulator plays little or no role.

The multiple roles of CRP at the complex acs promoter depend on activation region 2 and IHF

acs encodes a high-affinity enzyme that permits survival during carbon starvation. As befits a survival gene, its transcription is subject to complex regulation. Previously, we reported that cAMP receptor protein (CRP) activates acs transcription by binding tandem DNA sites located upstream of the major acsP2 promoter and that the nucleoid protein IHF (integration host factor) binds three specific sites located just upstream. In vivo, the sequence that includes these IHF sites exerts a positive effect on CRP-dependent transcription, while a construct containing only the most proximal site exhibits reduced transcription compared with the full-length promoter or with a construct lacking all three IHF sites. Here, we defined the minimal system required for this IHF-dependent inhibition, showing it requires the promoter-distal CRP site and an amino acid residue located within activation region 2 (AR2), a surface determinant of CRP that interacts with RNA polymerase (RNAP). Surprisingly, for a Class III promoter, disruption of AR2 caused significant changes in the activity and structure of both the full-length promoter and the construct with the single proximal IHF site. We propose that AR2, together with IHF, mediates formation of a multi-protein complex, in which RNAP is stabilized in an open complex that remains poised on the promoter ready to respond rapidly to environmental changes.

The C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase alpha subunit plays a role in the CI-dependent activation of the bacteriophage lambda pM promoter

The bacteriophage lambda p(M) promoter is required for maintenance of the lambda prophage in Escherichia coli, as it facilitates transcription of the cI gene, encoding the lambda repressor (CI). CI levels are maintained through a transcriptional feedback mechanism whereby CI can serve as an activator or a repressor of p(M). CI activates p(M) through cooperative binding to the O(R)1 and O(R)2 sites within the O(R) operator, with the O(R)2-bound CI dimer making contact with domain 4 of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit (sigma(4)). Here we demonstrate that the 261 and 287 determinants of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD), as well as the DNA-binding determinant, are important for CI-dependent activation of p(M). We also show that the location of alphaCTD at the p(M) promoter changes in the presence of CI. Thus, in the absence of CI, one alphaCTD is located on the DNA at position -44 relative to the transcription start site, whereas in the presence of CI, alphaCTD is located at position -54, between the CI-binding sites at O(R)1 and O(R)2. These results suggest that contacts between CI and both alphaCTD and sigma are required for efficient CI-dependent activation of p(M).

The molecular basis of selective promoter activation by the ?Ssubunit of RNA polymerase

Different environmental stimuli cause bacteria to exchange the sigma subunit in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) and, thereby, tune their gene expression according to the newly emerging needs. Sigma factors are usually thought to recognize clearly distinguishable promoter DNA determinants, and thereby activate distinct gene sets, known as their regulons. In this review, we illustrate how the principle sigma factor in stationary phase and in stressful conditions in Escherichia coli, sigmaS (RpoS), can specifically target its large regulon in vivo, although it is known to recognize the same core promoter elements in vitro as the housekeeping sigma factor, sigma70 (RpoD). Variable combinations of cis-acting promoter features and trans-acting protein factors determine whether a promoter is recognized by RNAP containing sigmaS or sigma70, or by both holoenzymes. How these promoter features impose sigmaS selectivity is further discussed. Moreover, additional pathways allow sigmaS to compete more efficiently than sigma70 for limiting amounts of core RNAP (E) and thereby enhance EsigmaS formation and effectiveness. Finally, these topics are discussed in the context of sigma factor evolution and the benefits a cell gains from retaining competing and closely related sigma factors with overlapping sets of target genes.

Controlling the motor activity of a transcription-repair coupling factor: autoinhibition and the role of RNA polymerase

Motor proteins that couple ATP hydrolysis to movement along nucleic acids play a variety of essential roles in DNA metabolism. Often these enzymes function as components of macromolecular complexes, and DNA translocation by the motor protein drives movement of other components of the complex. In order to understand how the activity of motor proteins is regulated within multi-protein complexes we have studied the bacterial transcription-repair coupling factor, Mfd, which is a helicase superfamily 2 member that binds to RNA polymerase (RNAP) and removes stalled transcription complexes from DNA. Using an oligonucleotide displacement assay that monitors protein movement on double-stranded DNA we show that Mfd has little motor activity in isolation, but exhibits efficient oligonucleotide displacement activity when bound to a stalled transcription complex. Deletion of the C-terminal domain of Mfd increases the ATPase activity of the protein and allows efficient oligo-displacement in the absence of RNAP. Our results suggest that an autoinhibitory domain ensures the motor activity of Mfd is only functional within the correct macromolecular context: recruitment of Mfd to a stalled transcription complex relieves the autoinhibition and unmasks the motor activity.

The Escherichia coli K-12 NarL and NarP proteins insulate the nrf promoter from the effects of integration host factor

The Escherichia coli K-12 nrf operon promoter can be activated fully by the FNR protein (regulator of fumarate and nitrate reduction) binding to a site centered at position -41.5. FNR-dependent transcription is suppressed by integration host factor (IHF) binding at position -54, and this suppression is counteracted by binding of the NarL or NarP response regulator at position -74.5. The E. coli acs gene is transcribed from a divergent promoter upstream from the nrf operon promoter. Transcription from the major acsP2 promoter is dependent on the cyclic AMP receptor protein and is modulated by IHF and Fis binding at multiple sites. We show that IHF binding to one of these sites, located at position -127 with respect to the nrf promoter, has a positive effect on nrf promoter activity. This activation is dependent on the face of the DNA helix, independent of IHF binding at other locations, and found only when NarL/NarP are not bound at position -74.5. Binding of NarL/NarP appears to insulate the nrf promoter from the effects of IHF. The acs-nrf regulatory region is conserved in other pathogenic E. coli strains and related enteric bacteria but differs in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

Study of highly constitutively active mutants suggests how cAMP activates cAMP receptor protein

The cAMP receptor protein (CRP) of Escherichia coli undergoes a conformational change in response to cAMP binding that allows it to bind specific DNA sequences. Using an in vivo screening method following the simultaneous randomization of the codons at positions 127 and 128 (two C-helix residues of the protein interacting with cAMP), we have isolated a series of novel constitutively active CRP variants. Sequence analysis showed that this group of variants commonly possesses leucine or methionine at position 127 with a beta-branched amino acid at position 128. One specific variant, T127L/S128I CRP, showed extremely high cAMP-independent DNA binding affinity comparable with that of cAMP-bound wild-type CRP. Further biochemical analysis of this variant and others revealed that Leu(127) and Ile(128) have different roles in stabilizing the active conformation of CRP in the absence of cAMP. Leu(127) contributes to an improved leucine zipper at the dimer interface, leading to an altered intersubunit interaction in the C-helix region. In contrast, Ile(128) stabilizes the proper position of the beta4/beta5 loop by functionally communicating with Leu(61). By analogy, the results suggest two direct local effects of cAMP binding in the course of activating wild-type CRP: (i) C-helix repositioning through direct interaction with Thr(127) and Ser(128) and (ii) the concomitant reorientation of the beta4/beta5 loop. Finally, we also report that elevated expression of T127L/S128I CRP markedly perturbed E. coli growth even in the absence of cAMP, which suggests why comparably active variants have not been described previously.

An FNR-type regulator controls the anaerobic expression of hyn hydrogenase in Thiocapsa roseopersicina

The purple sulfur photosynthetic bacterium Thiocapsa roseopersicina BBS contains a heat-stable membrane-associated hydrogenase encoded by the hyn operon. Expression from the hyn operon regulatory region is up-regulated under anaerobic conditions. cis elements were mapped between positions -602 and -514 upstream from the hynS gene. Within this region two sequences that resemble DNA sites for FNR were recognized. The gene of an FNR homologue, FnrT, was identified in the genome of T. roseopersicina, and an fnrT knockout mutant was constructed. Anaerobic induction of hynS expression was abolished in the fnrT mutant, suggesting that FnrT is an activator of the hynS promoter. The T. roseopersicina hynS promoter could be activated in Escherichia coli, and this regulation was dependent on E. coli FNR. In vitro experiments with purified E. coli Ala154 FNR protein and purified E. coli RNA polymerase showed that FNR bound to two sites in the hyn regulatory region, that FNR could activate transcription initiation at the hynS promoter, and that FNR bound at the two target sites activated to different extents.

Transcription activation in vitro by the Bradyrhizobium japonicum regulatory protein FixK2

In Bradyrhizobium japonicum, the N2-fixing root nodule endosymbiont of soybean, a group of genes required for microaerobic, anaerobic, or symbiotic growth is controlled by FixK2, a key regulator that is part of the FixLJ-FixK2 cascade. FixK2 belongs to the family of cyclic AMP receptor protein/fumarate and nitrate reductase (CRP/FNR) transcription factors that recognize a palindromic DNA motif (CRP/FNR box) associated with the regulated promoters. Here, we report on a biochemical analysis of FixK2 and its transcription activation activity in vitro. FixK2 was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified as a soluble N-terminally histidine-tagged protein. Gel filtration experiments revealed that increasing the protein concentration shifts the monomer-dimer equilibrium toward the dimer. Purified FixK2 productively interacted with the B. japonicum sigma80-RNA polymerase holoenzyme, but not with E. coli sigma70-RNA polymerase holoenzyme, to activate transcription from the B. japonicum fixNOQP, fixGHIS, and hemN2 promoters in vitro. Furthermore, FixK2 activated transcription from the E. coli FF(-41.5) model promoter, again only in concert with B. japonicum RNA polymerase. All of these promoters are so-called class II CRP/FNR-type promoters. We showed by specific mutagenesis that the FixK2 box at nucleotide position -40.5 in the hemN2 promoter, but not that at -78.5, is crucial for activation both in vivo and in vitro, which argues against recognition of a potential class III promoter. Given the lack of any evidence for the presence of a cofactor in purified FixK2, we surmise that FixK2 alone is sufficient to activate in vitro transcription to at least a basal level. This contrasts with all well-studied CRP/FNR-type proteins, which do require coregulators.

Transcription activation by remodelling of a nucleoprotein assembly: the role of NarL at the FNR-dependent Escherichia coli nir promoter

Expression from the Escherichia coli nir promoter is co-dependent on both the FNR protein (an anaerobically triggered transcription activator) and NarL or NarP proteins (transcription activators triggered by nitrite and nitrate). We found previously that FNR binds to a site centred at position - 41.5 at the nir promoter, but that FNR-dependent activation is repressed by IHF binding to a site centred at position -88 (IHF I) and Fis binding to sites centred at positions -142 (Fis I) and +23 (Fis II). Here, we have studied the binding of purified IHF, Fis and FNR to the nir promoter in vitro. Our results show that the nir promoter contains a second IHF site at position -115 (IHF II) and a third Fis site at position -97 (Fis III), and that IHF, Fis and FNR can bind together to form multiprotein complexes. Surprisingly, IHF binding at the IHF II site increases FNR-dependent activation by decreasing the repression mediated by IHF and Fis binding at the other sites. In previous work, we found that NarL or NarP activates the nir promoter by binding to a site centred at position -69.5 and counteracting the repressive effects of IHF and Fis. We now show that NarL can displace IHF bound at the IHF I site, but IHF is unable to displace bound NarL. We suggest that NarL interferes with IHF binding at the nir promoter by distorting the minor groove at its target site, and we argue that the resulting activation by NarL results from remodelling of the local nucleoprotein structure to facilitate FNR-dependent transcription.

Classification and strength measurement of stationary-phase promoters by use of a newly developed promoter cloning vector

When an Escherichia coli culture changes from exponential growth to the stationary phase, expression of growth-related genes levels off, while a number of stationary-phase-specific genes are turned on. To gain insight into the growth phase-dependent global regulation of genome transcription, we analyzed the strength and specificity of promoters associated with the stationary-phase genes. For the in vivo assay of promoter activity, 300- to 500-bp DNA fragments upstream from the translation initiation codon were isolated and inserted into a newly constructed doubly fluorescent protein (DFP) vector. The activity of test promoters was determined by measuring the green fluorescent protein (GFP). To avoid the possible influence of plasmid copy number, the level of transcription of reference promoter lacUV5 on the same plasmid was determined by measuring the red fluorescent protein (RFP). Thus, the activities of test promoters could be easily and accurately determined by determining the GFP/RFP ratio. Analysis of the culture time-dependent variation of 100 test promoters indicated that (i) a major group of the stationary-phase promoters are up-regulated only in the presence of RpoS sigma; (ii) the phase-coupled increase in the activity of some promoters takes place even in the absence of RpoS; and (iii) the activity of some promoters increases in the absence of RpoS. This classification was confirmed by testing in vitro transcription by using reconstituted RpoD and RpoS holoenzymes.

Identification of activating region (AR) of Escherichia coli LysR-type transcription factor CysB and CysB contact site on RNA polymerase alpha subunit at the cysP promoter

CysB is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) controlling the expression of numerous genes involved in bacterial sulphur assimilation via cysteine biosynthesis. Our previous mutational analysis of CysB identified several residues within the N-terminal domain crucial for DNA-binding function. Here, we focus on the functional significance of CysB residues localized in the turn between the alpha2 and alpha3 helices forming an N-terminal helix-turn-helix motif. On the basis of the characteristics of alanine-substituted mutants, we propose that CysB residues Y27, T28 and S29, lying in this turn region, comprise an 'activating region' (AR) that is crucial for positive control of the cysP promoter, but not for DNA binding and inducer response activities of CysB. Using a library of alanine substitutions in the C-terminal domain of the RNAP alpha subunit (alpha-CTD), we identify several residues in alpha-CTD that are important for CysB-dependent transcription from the cysP promoter. After probing potential protein-protein contacts in vivo with a LexA-based two-hybrid system, we propose that the '273 determinant' on alpha-CTD, including residues K271 and E273, represents a target for interaction with CysB at the cysP promoter.

Contribution of the RpoA C-terminal domain to stimulation of the Salmonella enterica hilA promoter by HilC and HilD

Expression of invasion genes in Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) is mainly driven by the transcriptional activator HilA. Transcription of hilA is subject to complex control and is stimulated by the SPI-1-encoded HilC and HilD proteins. The C-terminal domain of RpoA contributes to hilA activation by HilC/D under certain inducing conditions.

Modulation of CRP-dependent transcription at the Escherichia coli acsP2 promoter by nucleoprotein complexes: anti-activation by the nucleoid proteins FIS and IHF

acs encodes acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase, a high-affinity enzyme that allows cells to scavenge for acetate during carbon starvation. CRP activates acs transcription by binding tandem DNA sites located upstream of the major promoter, acsP2. Here, we used electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNase I footprint analyses to demonstrate that the nucleoid proteins FIS and IHF each bind multiple sites within the acs regulatory region, that FIS competes successfully with CRP for binding to their overlapping and neighbouring sites and that IHF binds independently of either FIS or CRP. Using in vitro transcription assays, we demonstrated that FIS and IHF independently reduce CRP-dependent acs transcription. Using in vivo reporter assays, we showed that disruption of DNA sites for FIS or deletion of DNA sites for IHF increases acs transcription. We propose that FIS and IHF each function directly as anti-activators of CRP, each working independently at different times during growth to set the levels of CRP-dependent acs transcription.

Role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits in CII-dependent activation of the bacteriophage lambda pE promoter: identification of important residues and positioning of the alpha C-terminal domains

The bacteriophage lambda CII protein stimulates the activity of three phage promoters, p(E), p(I) and p(aQ), upon binding to a site overlapping the -35 element at each promoter. Here we used preparations of RNA polymerase carrying a DNA cleavage reagent attached to specific residues in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD) to demonstrate that one alphaCTD binds near position -41 at p(E), whilst the other alphaCTD binds further upstream. The alphaCTD bound near position -41 is oriented such that its 261 determinant is in close proximity to sigma(70). The location of alphaCTD in CII-dependent complexes at the p(E) promoter is very similar to that found at many activator-independent promoters, and represents an alternative configuration for alphaCTD at promoters where activators bind sites overlapping the -35 region. We also used an in vivo alanine scan analysis to show that the DNA-binding determinant of alphaCTD is involved in stimulation of the p(E) promoter by CII, and this was confirmed by in vitro transcription assays. We also show that whereas the K271E substitution in alphaCTD results in a drastic decrease in CII-dependent activation of p(E), the p(I) and p(aQ) promoters are less sensitive to this substitution, suggesting that the role of alphaCTD at the three lysogenic promoters may be different.