The Escherichia coli MelR transcription activator: production of a stable fragment containing the DNA-binding domain

Functional Characterization of the Mannitol Promoter of Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM 50106 and Its Application for a Mannitol-Inducible Expression System for Pseudomonas putida KT2440

A new pBBR1MCS-2-derived vector containing the Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM10506 mannitol promoter PmtlE and mtlR encoding its AraC/XylS type transcriptional activator was constructed and optimized for low basal expression. Mannitol, arabitol, and glucitol-inducible gene expression was demonstrated with Pseudomonas putida and eGFP as reporter gene. The new vector was applied for functional characterization of PmtlE. Identification of the DNA binding site of MtlR was achieved by in vivo eGFP measurement with PmtlE wild type and mutants thereof. Moreover, purified MtlR was applied for detailed in vitro investigations using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and DNaseI footprinting experiments. The obtained data suggest that MtlR binds to PmtlE as a dimer. The proposed DNA binding site of MtlR is AGTGC-N5-AGTAT-N7-AGTGC-N5-AGGAT. The transcription activation mechanism includes two binding sites with different binding affinities, a strong upstream binding site and a weaker downstream binding site. The presence of the weak downstream binding site was shown to be necessary to sustain mannitol-inducibility of PmtlE. Two possible functions of mannitol are discussed; the effector might stabilize binding of the second monomer to the downstream half site or promote transcription activation by inducing a conformational change of the regulator that influences the contact to the RNA polymerase.

Finely tuned regulation of the aromatic amine degradation pathway in Escherichia coli

FeaR is an AraC family regulator that activates transcription of the tynA and feaB genes in Escherichia coli. TynA is a periplasmic topaquinone- and copper-containing amine oxidase, and FeaB is a cytosolic NAD-linked aldehyde dehydrogenase. Phenylethylamine, tyramine, and dopamine are oxidized by TynA to the corresponding aldehydes, releasing one equivalent of H2O2 and NH3. The aldehydes can be oxidized to carboxylic acids by FeaB, and (in the case of phenylacetate) can be further degraded to enter central metabolism. Thus, phenylethylamine can be used as a carbon and nitrogen source, while tyramine and dopamine can be used only as sources of nitrogen. Using genetic, biochemical and computational approaches, we show that the FeaR binding site is a TGNCA-N8-AAA motif that occurs in 2 copies in the tynA and feaB promoters. We show that the coactivator for FeaR is the product rather than the substrate of the TynA reaction. The feaR gene is upregulated by carbon or nitrogen limitation, which we propose reflects regulation of feaR by the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) and the nitrogen assimilation control protein (NAC), respectively. In carbon-limited cells grown in the presence of a TynA substrate, tynA and feaB are induced, whereas in nitrogen-limited cells, only the tynA promoter is induced. We propose that tynA and feaB expression is finely tuned to provide the FeaB activity that is required for carbon source utilization and the TynA activity required for nitrogen and carbon source utilization.

Functional characterization and application of a tightly regulated MekR/P mekA expression system in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas putida

A methyl ethyl ketone (MEK)-inducible system based on the broad-host-range plasmid pBBR1MCS2 and on the P mekA promoter region of the MEK degradation operon of Pseudomonas veronii MEK700 was characterized in Escherichia coli JM109 and Pseudomonas putida KT2440. For validation, β-galactosidase (lacZ) was used as a reporter. The novel system, which is positively regulated by MekR, a member of the AraC/XylS family of regulators, was shown to be subject to carbon catabolite repression by glucose, which, however, could not be attributed to the single action of the global regulators Crc and PtsN. An advantage is its extremely tight regulation accompanied with three magnitudes of fold increase of gene expression after treatment with MEK. The transcriptional start site of P mekA was identified by primer extension, thereby revealing a potential stem-loop structure at the 5' end of the mRNA. Since MekR was highly insoluble, its putative binding site was identified through sequence analysis. The operator seems to be composed of a 15-bp tandem repeat (CACCN5CTTCAA) separated by a 6-bp spacer region, which resembles known binding patterns of other members of the AraC/XylS family. Subsequent mutational modifications of the putative operator region confirmed its importance for transcriptional activation. As the -35 promoter element seems to be overlapped by the putative operator, a class II activation mechanism is assumed.

Sequential XylS-CTD binding to the Pm promoter induces DNA bending prior to activation

XylS protein, a member of the AraC family of transcriptional regulators, comprises a C-terminal domain (CTD) involved in DNA binding and an N-terminal domain required for effector binding and protein dimerization. In the absence of benzoate effectors, the N-terminal domain behaves as an intramolecular repressor of the DNA binding domain. To date, the poor solubility properties of the full-length protein have restricted XylS analysis to genetic approaches in vivo. To characterize the molecular consequences of XylS binding to its operator, we used a recombinant XylS-CTD variant devoid of the N-terminal domain. The resulting protein was soluble and monomeric in solution and activated transcription from its cognate promoter in an effector-independent manner. XylS binding sites in the Pm promoter present an intrinsic curvature of 35 degrees centered at position -42 within the proximal site. Gel retardation and DNase footprint analysis showed XylS-CTD binding to Pm occurred sequentially: first a XylS-CTD monomer binds to the proximal site overlapping the RNA polymerase binding sequence to form complex I. This first event increased Pm bending to 50 degrees and was followed by the binding of the second monomer, which further increased the observed global curvature to 98 degrees. This generated a concomitant shift in the bending center to a region centered at position -51 when the two sites were occupied (complex II). We propose a model in which DNA structure and binding sequences strongly influence XylS binding events previous to transcription activation.

Autoregulation of the Escherichia coli melR promoter: repression involves four molecules of MelR

The Escherichia coli MelR protein is a transcription activator that autoregulates its own promoter by repressing transcription initiation. Optimal repression requires MelR binding to a site that overlaps the melR transcription start point and to upstream sites. In this work, we have investigated the different determinants needed for optimal repression and their spatial requirements. We show that repression requires a complex involving four DNA-bound MelR molecules, and that the global CRP regulator plays little or no role.

Roles of effectors in XylS-dependent transcription activation: intramolecular domain derepression and DNA binding

XylS, an AraC family protein, activates transcription from the benzoate degradation pathway Pm promoter in the presence of a substrate effector such as 3-methylbenzoate (3MB). We developed a procedure to obtain XylS-enriched preparations which proved suitable to analyze its activation mechanism. XylS showed specific 3MB-independent binding to its target operator, which became strictly 3MB dependent in a dimerization-defective mutant. We demonstrated that the N-terminal domain of the protein can make linker-independent interactions with the C-terminal domain and inhibit its capacity to bind DNA. Interactions are hampered in the presence of 3MB effector. We propose two independent roles for 3MB in XylS activation: in addition to its known influence favoring protein dimerization, the effector is able to modify XylS conformation to trigger N-terminal domain intramolecular derepression. We also show that activation by XylS involves RNA polymerase recruitment to the Pm promoter as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. RNA polymerase switching in Pm transcription was reproduced in in vitro transcription assays. All sigma(32)-, sigma(38)-, and sigma(70)-dependent RNA polymerases were able to carry out Pm transcription in a rigorous XylS-dependent manner, as demonstrated by the formation of open complexes only in the presence of the regulator.

XylS-Pm promoter interactions through two helix-turn-helix motifs: identifying XylS residues important for DNA binding and activation

The XylS protein is the positive transcription regulator of the TOL plasmid meta-cleavage pathway operon Pm. XylS belongs to the AraC family of transcriptional regulators and exhibits an N-terminal domain involved in effector recognition, and a C-terminal domain, made up of seven alpha-helices conforming two helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domains. alpha-Helix 3 and alpha-helix 6 are the recognition helices. In consonance with XylS structural organization, Pm exhibits a bipartite DNA-binding motif consisting of two boxes, called A and B, whose sequences are TGCA and GGNTA, respectively. This bipartite motif is repeated at the Pm promoter so that one of the XylS monomers binds to each of the repeats. An extensive series of genetic epistasis assays combining mutant Pm promoters and XylS single substitution mutant proteins revealed that alpha-helix 3 contacts A box nucleotides, whereas alpha-helix 6 residues contact B box nucleotides. In alpha-helix 3, Asn246 and Arg242 are involved in specific contacts with the TG dinucleotide at box A, whereas Arg296 and Glu299 contact the second G and T nucleotides at box B. On the basis of our results and of the three-dimensional model of the XylS C-terminal domain, we propose that Ser243, Glu249 and Lys250 in alpha-helix 3, and Asn299 and Arg302 in alpha-helix 6 contact the phosphate backbones. Alanine substitutions at the predicted phosphate backbone-contacting residues yielded mutants with low levels of activity, suggesting that XylS-Pm binding specificity not only involves specific amino acid-base interactions, but also relies on secondary DNA structure, which, although at another level, also comes into play. We propose a model in which a XylS dimer binds to the direct repeats in Pm in a head-to-tail conformation that allows the direct interaction of the XylS proximal subunit with the RNA polymerase sigma factor.

Mutational analysis of the Escherichia coli melR gene suggests a two-state concerted model to explain transcriptional activation and repression in the melibiose operon

Transcription of the Escherichia coli melAB operon is regulated by the MelR protein, an AraC family member whose activity is modulated by the binding of melibiose. In the absence of melibiose, MelR is unable to activate the melAB promoter but autoregulates its own expression by repressing the melR promoter. Melibiose triggers MelR-dependent activation of the melAB promoter and relieves MelR-dependent repression of the melR promoter. Twenty-nine single amino acid substitutions in MelR that result in partial melibiose-independent activation of the melAB promoter have been identified. Combinations of different substitutions result in almost complete melibiose-independent activation of the melAB promoter. MelR carrying each of the single substitutions is less able to repress the melR promoter, while MelR carrying some combinations of substitutions is completely unable to repress the melR promoter. These results argue that different conformational states of MelR are responsible for activation of the melAB promoter and repression of the melR promoter. Supporting evidence for this is provided by the isolation of substitutions in MelR that block melibiose-dependent activation of the melAB promoter while not changing melibiose-independent repression of the melR promoter. Additional experiments with a bacterial two-hybrid system suggest that interactions between MelR subunits differ according to the two conformational states.

Transcription activation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter: interactions of MelR with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit

We have investigated the role of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit during MelR-dependent activation of transcription at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter. To do this, we used a simplified melAB promoter derivative that is dependent on MelR binding at two 18 bp sites, located from position -34 to -51 and from position -54 to -71, upstream of the transcription start site. Results from experiments with hydroxyl radical footprinting, and with RNA polymerase, carrying alpha subunits that were tagged with a chemical nuclease, show that the C-terminal domains of the RNA polymerase alpha subunits are located near position -52 and near position -72 during transcription activation. We demonstrate that the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit is needed for open complex formation, and we describe two experiments showing that the RNA polymerase alpha subunit can interact with MelR. Finally, we used alanine scanning to identify determinants in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit that are important for MelR-dependent activation of the melAB promoter.

Transcription activation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter: interactions of MelR with its DNA target site and with domain 4 of the RNA polymerase sigma subunit

Activation of transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter is dependent on MelR, a transcription factor belonging to the AraC family. MelR binds to 18 bp target sites using two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs that are both located in its C-terminal domain. The melAB promoter contains four target sites for MelR. Previously, we showed that occupation of two of these sites, centred at positions -42.5 and -62.5 upstream of the melAB transcription start point, is sufficient for activation. We showed that MelR binds as a direct repeat to these sites, and we proposed a model to describe how the two HTH motifs are positioned. Here, we have used suppression genetics to confirm this model and to show that MelR residue 273, which is in HTH 2, interacts with basepair 13 of each target site. As our model for DNA-bound MelR suggests that HTH 2 must be adjacent to the melAB promoter -35 element, we searched this part of MelR for amino acid side-chains that might be able to interact with sigma. We describe genetic evidence to show that MelR residue 261 is close to residues 596 and 599 of the RNA polymerase sigma(70) subunit, and that they can interact. Similarly, MelR residue 265 is shown to be able to interact with residue 596 of sigma(70). In the final part of the work, we describe experiments in which the MelR binding site at position -42.5 was improved. We show that this is detrimental to MelR-dependent transcription activation because bound MelR is mispositioned so that it is unable to make 'correct' interactions with sigma.

Binding of the Escherichia coli MelR protein to the melAB promoter: orientation of MelR subunits and investigation of MelR-DNA contacts

The Escherichia coli MelR protein is a melibiose-triggered transcription factor, belonging to the AraC family, that activates transcription initiation at the melAB promoter. Activation is dependent on the binding of MelR to four 18 bp sites, centred at position -42.5 (site 2'), position -62.5 (site 2), position -100.5 (site 1) and position -120.5 (site 1') relative to the melAB transcription start point. Activation also depends on the binding of CRP to a single site located between MelR binding site 1 and site 2. All members of the AraC family contain two helix-turn-helix (HTH) motifs that contact two segments of the DNA major groove at target sites on the same DNA face. In this work, we have studied the binding of MelR to different sites at the melAB promoter, focusing on the orientation of binding of the two MelR HTH motifs, and the juxtaposition of the different bound MelR subunits with respect to each other. To do this, MelR was engineered to contain a single cysteine residue adjacent to either one or the other HTH motif. The MelR derivatives were purified, and the cysteine residues were tagged with p-bromoacetamidobenzyl-EDTA-Fe, an inorganic DNA cleavage reagent. Patterns of DNA cleavage after MelR binding were then used to determine the positions of the two HTH motifs at target sites. In order to simplify our analysis, we exploited an engineered derivative of the melAB promoter in which MelR binding to site 2 and site 2', in the absence of CRP, is sufficient for transcription activation. To assist in the interpretation of our results, we also used a shortened derivative of MelR, MelR173, that is able to bind to site 2 but not to site 2'. Our results show that MelR binds as a direct repeat to site 2 and site 2' with the C-terminal HTH located towards the promoter-proximal end of each site. The orientation in which MelR binds to site 2' appears to be determined by MelR-MelR interactions rather than by MelR-DNA interactions. In complementary experiments, we used genetic analysis to investigate the importance of different residues in the two HTH motifs of MelR. Epistasis experiments provided evidence that supports the proposed orientation of binding of MelR at its target site.

DNA binding of the transcription activator protein MelR from Escherichia coli and its C-terminal domain

MelR is an Escherichia coli transcription factor belonging to the AraC family. It activates expression of the melAB operon in response to melibiose. Full-length MelR (MelR303) binds to two pairs of sites upstream of the melAB transcription start site, denoted sites 1' and 1 and sites 2 and 2', and to a fifth site, R, which overlaps the divergent melR promoter. The C-terminal domain of MelR (MelR173) does not activate transcription. Here we show that, like MelR303, when MelR173 binds to sites 1 and 2 it recruits CRP to bind between these sites. Hence, the C-terminal domain is involved in heterologous interactions. MelR173 binds to the R site, which has 11 of 18 bp identical to sites 1 and 2 but, surprisingly, does not bind to site 1', which has 12 of 18 bp identical, nor to site 2'. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we show that the binding of MelR303 to sites 1' and 2' is due to cooperative binding with the adjacent site. This homologous cooperativity requires the N-terminal domain of the protein. Activation of the melAB promoter requires MelR to occupy site 2', which overlaps the -35 hexamer. Hence, both domains of MelR are required for transcription activation.

A simple mechanism for co-dependence on two activators at an Escherichia coli promoter

The Escherichia coli melAB promoter is co-dependent upon two transcription activators, MelR and the cyclic AMP receptor protein, CRP. In this study we demonstrate positive co-operativity between the binding of MelR and CRP at the melAB promoter, which provides a simple mechanism for its co-dependence. MelR binds to four sites, centred at positions -42.5, -62.5, -100.5 and -120.5 relative to the melAB transcription start point. When MelR is pre-bound, CRP is able to bind to a target located between MelR at positions -62.5 and -100.5. This increases the occupation of the two downstream sites for MelR, which is essential for transcription activation. We have identified residues within activating region 1 (AR1) of CRP that are important in transcription activation of the melAB promoter. At simple CRP-dependent promoters, the surface of CRP containing these residues is involved in contacting the RNA polymerase alpha subunit. Our results show that, at the melAB promoter, the surface of CRP containing AR1 contacts MelR rather than RNA polymerase. Thus, MelR and CRP activate transcription by a novel mechanism in which they bind co-operatively to adjacent sites and form a bacterial enhanceosome.

Genetic evidence that transcription activation by RhaS involves specific amino acid contacts with sigma 70

RhaS activates transcription of the Escherichia coli rhaBAD and rhaT operons in response to L-rhamnose and is a member of the AraC/XylS family of transcription activators. We wished to determine whether sigma(70) might be an activation target for RhaS. We found that sigma(70) K593 and R599 appear to be important for RhaS activation at both rhaBAD and rhaT, but only at truncated promoters lacking the binding site for the second activator, CRP. To determine whether these positively charged sigma(70) residues might contact RhaS, we constructed alanine substitutions at negatively charged residues in the C-terminal domain of RhaS. Substitutions at four RhaS residues, E181A, D182A, D186A, and D241A, were defective at both truncated promoters. Finally, we assayed combinations of the RhaS and sigma(70) substitutions and found that RhaS D241 and sigma(70) R599 met the criteria for interacting residues at both promoters. Molecular modeling suggests that sigma(70) R599 is located in very close proximity to RhaS D241; hence, this work provides the first evidence for a specific residue within an AraC/XylS family protein that may contact sigma(70). More than 50% of AraC/XylS family members have Asp or Glu at the position of RhaS D241, suggesting that this interaction with sigma(70) may be conserved.

Transcription activation at the Escherichia coli melAB promoter: the role of MelR and the cyclic AMP receptor protein

MelR is a melibiose-triggered transcription activator that belongs to the AraC family of transcription factors. Using purified Escherichia coli RNA polymerase and a cloned DNA fragment carrying the entire melibiose operon intergenic region, we have demonstrated in vitro open complex formation and activation of transcription initiation at the melAB promoter. This activation is dependent on MelR and melibiose. These studies also show that the cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP) interacts with the melAB promoter and increases MelR-dependent transcription activation. DNAase I footprinting has been exploited to investigate the location of MelR-and CRP-binding sites at the melAB promoter. We showed previously that MelR binds to two identical 18 bp target sequences centred at position -100.5 (Site 1) and position -62.5 (Site 2). In this work, we show that MelR additionally binds to two other related 18 bp sequences: Site 1', centred at position -120.5, located immediately upstream of Site 1, and Site R, at position -238.5, which overlaps the transcription start site of the divergent melR promoter. MelR can bind to Site 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site R, in both the absence and the presence of melibiose. However, in the presence of melibiose, MelR also binds to a fifth site (Site 2', centred at position -42.5) located immediately downstream of Site 2, and overlapping the -35 region of the melAB promoter. Additionally, although CRP is unable to bind to the melAB promoter in the absence of MelR, in the presence of MelR, it binds to a site located between MelR binding Site 1 and Site 2. Thus, tandem-bound MelR recruits CRP to the MelR. We propose that expression from the melAB promoter has an absolute requirement for MelR binding to Site 2'. Optimal expression of the melAB promoter requires Sites 1', Site 1, Site 2 and Site 2'; CRP acts as a 'bridge' between MelR bound at Sites 1' and 1 and at Sites 2 and 2', increasing expression from the melAB promoter. In support of this model, we show that improvement of the base sequence of Site 2' removes the requirement for Site 1' and Site 1, and short circuits the effects of CRP.

Functional domains of the TOL plasmid transcription factor XylS

The alkylbenzoate degradation genes of Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid are positively regulated by XylS, an AraC family protein, in a benzoate-dependent manner. In this study, we used deletion mutants and hybrid proteins to identify which parts of XylS are responsible for the DNA binding, transcriptional activation, and benzoate inducibility. We found that a 112-residue C-terminal fragment of XylS binds specifically to the Pm operator in vitro, protects this sequence from DNase I digestion identically to the wild-type (wt) protein, and activates the Pm promoter in vivo. When overexpressed, that C-terminal fragment could activate transcription as efficiently as wt XylS. All the truncations, which incorporated these 112 C-terminal residues, were able to activate transcription at least to some extent when overproduced. Intactness of the 210-residue N-terminal portion was found to be necessary for benzoate responsiveness of XylS. Deletions in the N-terminal and central regions seriously reduced the activity of XylS and caused the loss of effector control, whereas insertions into the putative interdomain region did not change the basic features of the XylS protein. Our results confirm that XylS consists of two parts which probably interact with each other. The C-terminal domain carries DNA-binding and transcriptional activation abilities, while the N-terminal region carries effector-binding and regulatory functions.

Arac/XylS family of transcriptional regulators

The ArC/XylS family of prokaryotic positive transcriptional regulators includes more than 100 proteins and polypeptides derived from open reading frames translated from DNA sequences. Members of this family are widely distributed and have been found in the gamma subgroup of the proteobacteria, low- and high-G + C-content gram-positive bacteria, and cyanobacteria. These proteins are defined by a profile that can be accessed from PROSITE PS01124. Members of the family are about 300 amino acids long and have three main regulatory functions in common: carbon metabolism, stress response, and pathogenesis. Multiple alignments of the proteins of the family define a conserved stretch of 99 amino acids usually located at the C-terminal region of the regulator and connected to a nonconserved region via a linker. The conserved stretch contains all the elements required to bind DNA target sequences and to activate transcription from cognate promoters. Secondary analysis of the conserved region suggests that it contains two potential alpha-helix-turn-alpha-helix DNA binding motifs. The first, and better-fitting motif is supported by biochemical data, whereas existing biochemical data neither support nor refute the proposal that the second region possesses this structure. The phylogenetic relationship suggests that members of the family have recruited the nonconserved domain(s) into a series of existing domains involved in DNA recognition and transcription stimulation and that this recruited domain governs the role that the regulator carries out. For some regulators, it has been demonstrated that the nonconserved region contains the dimerization domain. For the regulators involved in carbon metabolism, the effector binding determinants are also in this region. Most regulators belonging to the AraC/XylS family recognize multiple binding sites in the regulated promoters. One of the motifs usually overlaps or is adjacent to the -35 region of the cognate promoters. Footprinting assays have suggested that these regulators protect a stretch of up to 20 bp in the target promoters, and multiple alignments of binding sites for a number of regulators have shown that the proteins recognize short motifs within the protected region.

DNA binding and DNA bending by the MelR transcription activator protein from Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli melR gene encodes MelR protein which is a member of the AraC/XylS family of bacterial transcription activators. The function of MelR was investigated by making a targeted deletion in the melR gene of the Escherichia coli chromosome. MelR is a transcription activator essential for melibiose- dependent expression of the melAB operon which is needed for bacterial growth with melibiose as a carbon source. To investigate the interactions of MelR at the melAB promoter, both full length MelR and a shortened derivative, MelR173, containing the C-terminal DNA-binding domain, were purified as fusions to glutathione- S -transferase. Circular permutation studies show that both full-length MelR and MelR173 induce an apparent bend upon binding to target sites at the melAB promoter. Bound full-length MelR, but not MelR173, can oligomerise to form larger complexes that are likely to be involved in transcription activation.