Transcription activation by GC-boxes: evaluation of kinetic and equilibrium contributions

Effect of arginine mutation of alanine-556 on DNA recognition of zinc finger protein Sp1

Human transcription factor Sp1, which contains three Cys(2)His(2)-class zinc finger motives, specifically binds to the so-called GC box DNA. It has been indicated that finger 1 has a unique DNA-binding mode compared with fingers 2 and 3, or the Zif268 model. Therefore, we investigate the role of Ala at position 6 on the recognition helix, which is not responsible for guanine recognition and highly conserved among Sp1 family. Several Ala-556 mutations of Sp1 bind to DNA with different DNA-binding features. In particular, the Ala-->Arg substitution alters the DNA-binding contribution of the three zinc fingers in Sp1. In this case, the DNA-binding specificity of each finger decreases in the order 2>1>3. This result reveals that one amino acid in position 6 plays an important role not only for the selectivity to the putative finger 1 subsite, but also for the binding mode of the three fingers to each finger subsite. Probably, Ala-556 is indispensable to characterize the binding mode of the Sp1 zinc fingers, namely the diverse binding contribution of finger 1 and the rigid binding one of finger 3. In Sp1, the N-terminal finger 1 serves as a 'hinge finger'.

Kinetic analysis of Sp1-mediated transcriptional activation of the human DNA polymerase beta promoter

In the present studies, we have examined the effect of Sp1 on the activation of the human DNA polymerase beta (beta-pol), a TATA-less promoter. A HeLa cell nuclear extract (NE) based in vitro runoff transcription system of core beta-pol promoter human DNA (pbetaP8) three-step kinetic model of transcription initiation were used to describe the kinetic effect of Sp1. The results showed that distal Sp1-binding sites in the core beta-pol promoter are important for transcriptional activation of the pbetaP8 promoter. A detailed kinetic analysis showed that Sp1 stimulates the activity of the pbetaP8 promoter through distal Sp1-binding sites by increasing the amount of recruitment, instead of stimulating the apparent rate of RPc assembly (k1). There was no significant effect of Sp1 on the apparent rate of open complex (RPo) formation (k2) or on the apparent rate of promoter clearance (k3) of the pbetaP8 promoter. These studies define the kinetic mechanisms by which Sp1 may regulate the rate of transcript formation of the pbetaP8 promoter, and these results may have implications for Sp1 regulation of TATA-less promoters.

Roles for non-TATA core promoter sequences in transcription and factor binding

Sequence blocks within the core region were swapped among RNA polymerase II promoters to explore effects on transcription in vitro. The pair of blocks flanking TATA strongly influenced general transcription, with an additional effect on promoter activation. These flanking elements induced a change in the ratio of activated to basal transcription, whereas swapping TATA and initiator sequences only altered general transcription levels. Swapping the flanking blocks influenced binding by general transcription factors TBP and TFIIB. The results suggest that the architecture of the extended core sequence is important in determining promoter-specific effects on both general transcription levels and the tightness of regulation.

Transcription reinitiation rate: a potential role for TATA box stabilization of the TFIID:TFIIA:DNA complex

Potential pathways that could account for observed rapid rates of transcription reinitiation were explored. A nuclear extract system was established in which reinitiation rates were observed to be kinetically facilitated and in which the rate was sensitive to TATA box mutation. Kinetic facilitation of functional complex formation could be mimicked by pre-assembling activator and certain general transcription factors on the promoter and then adding nuclear extract. The minimal activated complex with this characteristic contained general factors TFIID and TFIIA. The ability of the TFIID:TFIIA complex to complete assembly rapidly was reduced by the same TATA box mutation that reduced reinitiation rate. Band shift experiments also showed that this same mutation lowered the stability of the TBP:TFIIA complex on the DNA. The results suggest that TATA-dependent variations in retention of the TFIID:TFIIA complex after release of the polymerase could be a primary determinant of reinitiation rate, allowing diversity in promoter strength to be related to diversity in TATA element sequences.

Promoter activation via a cyclic AMP response element in vitro

Transcription activation via activating transcription factor cyclic AMP response element binding (ATF/CREB) sites in vitro was explored using transcription and permanganate assay for open complex formation. These sites were used to drive transcription from an adenovirus major late core sequence. Under conditions where activation is strong, 20-50-fold, ATF/CREB is required for preinitiation complexes to reach the open complex stage. Complete opening requires activator, ATP, and initiating nucleotides. In exploration of postinitiation steps, no stimulation of promoter clearance was observed but a modest stimulation of the rate of continuous transcription occurred. High amounts of DNA template, commonly used in in vitro studies, allows some templates to open without activator, but leaves the nucleotide requirements intact. This leads to a drastic lowering of the dependence on ATF/CREB. Taken together, the data indicate that ATF/CREB activates this system primarily by stimulating the formation of functional preinitiation complexes.

Transcription reinitiation rate: a special role for the TATA box

Promoters need to specify both the timing of transcriptional induction and the amount of transcript synthesized. In order to explore each of these effects separately, in vitro assays for the level of active preinitiation complex formation and for the rate of continuous RNA production were done. The effects were found to be influenced differently by different promoter elements. A consensus TATA element had a very strong effect on the rate of continuous RNA production, whereas two types of activators were important primarily in forming active transcription preinitiation complexes. Consensus TATA promoters exhibited high rates of continuous transcription; they assembled active preinitiation transcription complexes slowly but then produced transcripts continuously at an approximately fivefold-higher rate. Initiator-containing TATA-less promoters produced continuous transcripts slowly. Point mutations in the TATA element led to lower levels of transcription by reducing the number of preinitiation complexes and amplifying this reduction by lowering the apparent reinitiation rate. The results allow understanding of the sequence diversity of promoter elements in terms of specifying separate controls over the sensitivity of gene induction and over the strength of the induced promoter.