Cytoplasmic ribosomal protein genes of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe display a unique promoter type: a suggestion for nomenclature of cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins in databases

Cellular responses to long-term phosphate starvation of fission yeast: Maf1 determines fate choice between quiescence and death associated with aberrant tRNA biogenesis

Inorganic phosphate is an essential nutrient acquired by cells from their environment. Here, we characterize the adaptative responses of fission yeast to chronic phosphate starvation, during which cells enter a state of quiescence, initially fully reversible upon replenishing phosphate after 2 days but resulting in gradual loss of viability during 4 weeks of starvation. Time-resolved analyses of changes in mRNA levels revealed a coherent transcriptional program in which phosphate dynamics and autophagy were upregulated, while the machineries for rRNA synthesis and ribosome assembly, and for tRNA synthesis and maturation, were downregulated in tandem with global repression of genes encoding ribosomal proteins and translation factors. Consistent with the transcriptome changes, proteome analysis highlighted global depletion of 102 ribosomal proteins. Concomitant with this ribosomal protein deficit, 28S and 18S rRNAs became vulnerable to site-specific cleavages that generated temporally stable rRNA fragments. The finding that Maf1, a repressor of RNA polymerase III transcription, was upregulated during phosphate starvation prompted a hypothesis that its activity might prolong lifespan of the quiescent cells by limiting production of tRNAs. Indeed, we found that deletion of maf1 results in precocious death of phosphate-starved cells via a distinctive starvation-induced pathway associated with tRNA overproduction and dysfunctional tRNA biogenesis.

Plant cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins: an update on classification, nomenclature, evolution and resources

Standardized naming systems are essential to integrate and unify distinct research fields, and to link multi-species data within and across kingdoms. We conducted a comprehensive survey of cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins (CRPs) in the dicot model Arabidopsis thaliana and the monocot model rice, noting that the standardized naming system has not been widely adopted in the plant community. We generated a database linking the old classical names to their updated and compliant names. We also explored the sequences, molecular evolution, and structural and functional characteristics of all plant CRP families, emphasizing evolutionarily conserved and plant-specific features through cross-kingdom comparisons. Unlike fungal CRP paralogs that were mainly created by whole-genome duplication (WGD) or retroposition under a concerted evolution mode, plant CRP genes evolved primarily through both WGD and tandem duplications in a rapid birth-and-death process. We also provide a web-based resource (http://www.plantcrp.cn/) with the aim of sharing the latest knowledge on plant CRPs and facilitating the continued development of a standardized framework across the entire community.

A genetic screen for suppressors of hyper-repression of the fission yeast PHO regulon by Pol2 CTD mutation T4A implicates inositol 1-pyrophosphates as agonists of precocious lncRNA transcription termination

Fission yeast phosphate homeostasis genes are repressed in phosphate-rich medium by transcription of upstream lncRNAs that interferes with activation of the flanking mRNA promoters. lncRNA control of PHO gene expression is influenced by the Thr4 phospho-site in the RNA polymerase II CTD and the 3′ processing/termination factors CPF and Rhn1, mutations of which result in hyper-repression of the PHO regulon. Here, we performed a forward genetic screen for mutations that de-repress Pho1 acid phosphatase expression in CTD-T4A cells. Sequencing of 18 independent STF (Suppressor of Threonine Four) isolates revealed, in every case, a mutation in the C-terminal pyrophosphatase domain of Asp1, a bifunctional inositol pyrophosphate (IPP) kinase/pyrophosphatase that interconverts 5-IP7 and 1,5-IP8. Focused characterization of two STF strains identified 51 coding genes coordinately upregulated vis-à-vis the parental T4A strain, including all three PHO regulon genes (pho1, pho84, tgp1). Whereas these STF alleles—asp1-386(Stop) and asp1-493(Stop)—were lethal in a wild-type CTD background, they were viable in combination with mutations in CPF and Rhn1, in which context Pho1 was also de-repressed. Our findings implicate Asp1 pyrophosphatase in constraining 1,5-IP8 or 1-IP7 synthesis by Asp1 kinase, without which 1-IPPs can accumulate to toxic levels that elicit precocious termination by CPF/Rhn1.

Transcriptional interference at tandem lncRNA and protein-coding genes: an emerging theme in regulation of cellular nutrient homeostasis

Tandem transcription interference occurs when the act of transcription from an upstream promoter suppresses utilization of a co-oriented downstream promoter. Because eukaryal genomes are liberally interspersed with transcription units specifying long non-coding (lnc) RNAs, there are many opportunities for lncRNA synthesis to negatively affect a neighboring protein-coding gene. Here, I review two eukaryal systems in which lncRNA interference with mRNA expression underlies a regulated biological response to nutrient availability. Budding yeast SER3 is repressed under serine-replete conditions by transcription of an upstream SRG1 lncRNA that traverses the SER3 promoter and elicits occlusive nucleosome rearrangements. SER3 is de-repressed by serine withdrawal, which leads to shut-off of SRG1 synthesis. The fission yeast phosphate homeostasis (PHO) regulon comprises three phosphate acquisition genes – pho1, pho84, and tgp1 – that are repressed under phosphate-replete conditions by 5′ flanking lncRNAs prt, prt2, and nc-tgp1, respectively. lncRNA transcription across the PHO mRNA promoters displaces activating transcription factor Pho7. PHO mRNAs are transcribed during phosphate starvation when lncRNA synthesis abates. The PHO regulon is de-repressed in phosphate-replete cells by genetic manipulations that favor ‘precocious’ lncRNA 3′-processing/termination upstream of the mRNA promoters. PHO lncRNA termination is governed by the Pol2 CTD code and is subject to metabolite control by inositol pyrophosphates.

A long noncoding (lnc)RNA governs expression of the phosphate transporter Pho84 in fission yeast and has cascading effects on the flanking prt lncRNA and pho1 genes

The expression of the phosphate transporter Pho84 in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is repressed in phosphate-rich medium and induced during phosphate starvation. Two other phosphate-responsive genes in S. pombe (pho1 and tgp1) had been shown to be repressed in cis by transcription of a long noncoding (lnc) RNA from the upstream flanking gene, but whether pho84 expression is regulated in this manner is unclear. Here, we show that repression of pho84 is enforced by transcription of the SPBC8E4.02c locus upstream of pho84 to produce a lncRNA that we name prt2 ( pho-repressive transcript 2). We identify two essential elements of the prt2 promoter, a HomolD box and a TATA box, mutations of which inactivate the prt2 promoter and de-repress the downstream pho84 promoter under phosphate-replete conditions. We find that prt2 promoter inactivation also elicits a cascade effect on the adjacent downstream prt (lncRNA) and pho1 (acid phosphatase) genes, whereby increased pho84 transcription down-regulates prt lncRNA transcription and thereby de-represses pho1 Our results establish a unified model for the repressive arm of fission yeast phosphate homeostasis, in which transcription of prt2, prt, and nc-tgp1 lncRNAs interferes with the promoters of the flanking pho84, pho1, and tgp1 genes, respectively.

Poly(A) site choice and Pol2 CTD Serine-5 status govern lncRNA control of phosphate-responsive tgp1 gene expression in fission yeast

Expression of fission yeast glycerophosphate transporter Tgp1 is repressed in phosphate-rich medium and induced during phosphate starvation. Repression is enforced by transcription of the nc-tgp1 locus upstream of tgp1 to produce a long noncoding (lnc) RNA. Here we identify two essential elements of the nc-tgp1 promoter: a TATA box ^-30TATATATA^-23 and a HomolD box ^-64CAGTCACA^-57, mutations of which inactivate the nc-tgp1 promoter and de-repress the downstream tgp1 promoter under phosphate-replete conditions. The nc-tgp1 lncRNA poly(A) site maps to nucleotide +1636 of the transcription unit, which coincides with the binding site for Pho7 (¹⁶³²TCGGACATTCAA¹⁶⁴³), the transcription factor that drives tgp1 expression. Overlap between the lncRNA template and the tgp1 promoter points to transcriptional interference as the simplest basis for lncRNA repression. We identify a shorter RNA derived from the nc-tgp1 locus, polyadenylated at position +508, well upstream of the tgp1 promoter. Mutating the nc-tgp1-short RNA polyadenylation signal abolishes de-repression of the downstream tgp1 promoter elicited by Pol2 CTD Ser5Ala phospho-site mutation. Ser5 mutation favors utilization of the short RNA poly(A) site, thereby diminishing transcription of the lncRNA that interferes with the tgp1 promoter. Mutating the nc-tgp1-short RNA polyadenylation signal attenuates induction of the tgp1 promoter during phosphate starvation. Polyadenylation site choice governed by CTD Ser5 status adds a new level of lncRNA control of gene expression and reveals a new feature of the fission yeast CTD code.

Transcription of lncRNA prt, clustered prt RNA sites for Mmi1 binding, and RNA polymerase II CTD phospho-sites govern the repression of pho1 gene expression under phosphate-replete conditions in fission yeast

Expression of fission yeast Pho1 acid phosphatase is repressed during growth in phosphate-rich medium. Repression is mediated by transcription of the prt locus upstream of pho1 to produce a long noncoding (lnc) prt RNA. Repression is also governed by RNA polymerase II CTD phosphorylation status, whereby inability to place a Ser7-PO4 mark (as in S7A) derepresses Pho1 expression, and inability to place a Thr4-PO4 mark (as in T4A) hyper-represses Pho1 in phosphate replete cells. Here we find that basal pho1 expression from the prt-pho1 locus is inversely correlated with the activity of the prt promoter, which resides in a 110-nucleotide DNA segment preceding the prt transcription start site. CTD mutations S7A and T4A had no effect on the activity of the prt promoter or the pho1 promoter, suggesting that S7A and T4A affect post-initiation events in prt lncRNA synthesis that make it less and more repressive of pho1, respectively. prt lncRNA contains clusters of DSR (determinant of selective removal) sequences recognized by the YTH-domain-containing protein Mmi1. Altering the nucleobase sequence of two DSR clusters in the prt lncRNA caused hyper-repression of pho1 in phosphate replete cells, concomitant with increased levels of the prt transcript. The isolated Mmi1 YTH domain binds to RNAs with single or tandem DSR elements, to the latter in a noncooperative fashion. We report the 1.75 Å crystal structure of the Mmi1 YTH domain and provide evidence that Mmi1 recognizes DSR RNA via a binding mode distinct from that of structurally homologous YTH proteins that recognize m(6)A-modified RNA.

Casein kinase 2 inhibits HomolD-directed transcription by Rrn7 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, ribosomal protein gene (RPG) promoters contain a TATA analogue element called the HomolD box. The HomolD-binding protein Rrn7 forms a complex with the RNA polymerase II machinery. Despite the importance of ribosome biogenesis to cell survival, the mechanisms involved in the regulation of transcription of eukaryotic RPGs are unknown. In this study, we identified Rrn7 as a new substrate of the pleiotropic casein kinase 2 (CK2), which is a regulator of basal transcription. Recombinant Rrn7 from S. pombe, which is often used as a model organism for studying eukaryotic transcription, interacted with CK2 in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, CK2-mediated phosphorylation of Rrn7 inhibited its HomolD-directed transcriptional activity and ability to bind to an oligonucleotide containing a HomolD box in vitro. Mutation of Rrn7 at Thr67 abolished these effects, indicating that this residue is a critical CK2 phosphorylation site. Finally, Rrn7 interacted with the regulatory subunit of CK2 in vivo, inhibition of CK2 in vivo potentiated ribosomal protein gene transcription, and chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses identified that the catalytic subunit of CK2 was associated with the rpk5 gene promoter in S. pombe. Taken together, these data suggest that CK2 inhibits ribosomal protein gene transcription in S. pombe via phosphorylation of Rrn7 at Thr67.

Rrn7 protein, an RNA polymerase I transcription factor, is required for RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription directed by core promoters with a HomolD box sequence

The region in promoters that specifies the transcription machinery is called the core promoter, displaying core promoter elements (CPE) necessary for establishment of a preinitiation complex and the initiation of transcription. A classical CPE is the TATA box. In fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, a new CPE, called HomolD box, was discovered. Collectively, 141 ribosomal protein genes encoding the full set of 79 different ribosomal proteins and more than 60 other housekeeping genes display a HomolD box in the core promoter. Here, we show that transcription directed by the HomolD box requires the RNA polymerase II machinery, including the general transcription factors. Most intriguingly, however, we identify, by DNA affinity purification, Rrn7 as the protein binding to the HomolD box. Rrn7 is an evolutionary conserved member of the RNA polymerase I machinery involved in transcription initiation of core ribosomal DNA promoters. ChIP shows that Rrn7 cross-links to a ribosomal protein gene promoter containing the HomolD box but not to a promoter containing a TATA box. Taken together, our results suggest that Rrn7 is an excellent candidate to be involved in the coordination of ribosomal DNA and ribosomal gene transcription during ribosome synthesis and, therefore, offer a new perspective to study conservation and evolvability of regulatory networks in eukaryotes.

Transcription factor substitution during the evolution of fungal ribosome regulation

Coordinated ribosomal protein (RP) gene expression is crucial for cellular viability, but the transcriptional network controlling this regulon has only been well characterized in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We have used whole-genome transcriptional and location profiling to establish that, in Candida albicans, the RP regulon is controlled by the Myb domain protein Tbf1 working in conjunction with Cbf1. These two factors bind both the promoters of RP genes and the rDNA locus; Tbf1 activates transcription at these loci and is essential. Orthologs of Tbf1 bind TTAGGG telomeric repeats in most eukaryotes, and TTAGGG cis-elements are present upstream of RP genes in plants and fungi, suggesting that Tbf1 was involved in both functions in ancestral eukaryotes. In all Hemiascomycetes, Rap1 substituted Tbf1 at telomeres and, in the S. cerevisiae lineage, this substitution also occurred independently at RP genes, illustrating the extreme adaptability and flexibility of transcriptional regulatory networks.

Cpc2/RACK1 is a ribosome-associated protein that promotes efficient translation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe

Cpc2/RACK1 is a highly conserved WD domain protein found in all eucaryotes. Cpc2/RACK1 functions on mammalian signal transduction pathways most notably as an adaptor protein for the betaII protein kinase C isozyme. In single cell eucaryotes, Cpc2/RACK1 regulates growth, differentiation, and entry into G0 stationary phase. The exact biochemical function of Cpc2/RACK1 is unknown. Here, we provide evidence that Cpc2 is associated with the ribosome. Using immunoaffinity purification, we isolated ribosomal proteins in association with Cpc2/RACK1. Polysome and ribosomal subunit analysis using velocity gradient centrifugation of cell lysates demonstrated that Cpc2 co-sediments with the 40 S ribosomal subunit and with polysomes. Conditions known to disrupt ribosome structure alter sedimentation of the ribosome and of Cpc2/RACK1 coordinately. Loss of cpc2 does not dramatically alter the rate of cellular protein synthesis but causes a decrease in the steady state level of numerous proteins, some of which regulate methionine metabolism. Whereas real time PCR analysis demonstrated that transcriptional mechanisms are responsible for down-regulation of some of these proteins, one protein, ribosomal protein L25, is probably regulated at the level of translation.

Comparative analysis of ribosomal proteins in complete genomes: an example of reductive evolution at the domain scale

A comprehensive investigation of ribosomal genes in complete genomes from 66 different species allows us to address the distribution of r-proteins between and within the three primary domains. Thirty-four r-protein families are represented in all domains but 33 families are specific to Archaea and Eucarya, providing evidence for specialisation at an early stage of evolution between the bacterial lineage and the lineage leading to Archaea and Eukaryotes. With only one specific r-protein, the archaeal ribosome appears to be a small-scale model of the eukaryotic one in terms of protein composition. However, the mechanism of evolution of the protein component of the ribosome appears dramatically different in Archaea. In Bacteria and Eucarya, a restricted number of ribosomal genes can be lost with a bias toward losses in intracellular pathogens. In Archaea, losses implicate 15% of the ribosomal genes revealing an unexpected plasticity of the translation apparatus and the pattern of gene losses indicates a progressive elimination of ribosomal genes in the course of archaeal evolution. This first documented case of reductive evolution at the domain scale provides a new framework for discussing the shape of the universal tree of life and the selective forces directing the evolution of prokaryotes.

Activator-specific recruitment of TFIID and regulation of ribosomal protein genes in yeast

In yeast, TFIID strongly associates with nearly all ribosomal protein (RP) promoters, but a TAF-independent form of TBP preferentially associates with other active promoters. RP promoters are regulated in response to growth stimuli, in most cases by a Rap1-containing activator. This Rap1-dependent activator is necessary and sufficient for TFIID recruitment, whereas other activators do not efficiently recruit TFIID. TAFs are recruited to RP promoters even when TBP and other general transcription factors are not associated, suggesting that TFIID recruitment involves a direct activator-TAF interaction. Most RP promoters lack canonical TATA elements, and they are preferentially activated by the Rap1-containing activator. These results demonstrate activator-specific recruitment of TFIID in vivo, and they suggest that TFIID recruitment is important for coordinate expression of RP genes.

Identification of rpaP1-5 and rpaP2-6 genes encoding two additional variants of the 60S acidic ribosomal proteins of Schizosaccharomyces pombe

In the fission yeast, four genes (rpaP1-1, rpaP1-3, rpaP2-2, and rpaP2-4) encoding two variants of the RpaP1 and RpaP2 ribosomal proteins (rp) have been characterized. We have identified cDNA for additional variants called RpaP1.5 and RpaP2.6. Sequence comparison suggests that RpaP1.5 diverged before RpaP1.1 and RpaP1.3 and that RpaP2.6 is closer to RpaP2.2 than to RpaP2.4. The corresponding genes, rpaP1-5 and rpaP2-6, are transcribed coordinately with other rp genes.

Regulatory elements and expression profiles

There has been steady progress in the computational analysis of transcription control regions, but current methods of predicting the gene regulatory features of noncoding sequences are still not accurate enough to be useful in automatic genome annotation. Therefore, detailed information on the expression patterns of newly sequenced genes is more likely to come from microarray-based high-throughput mRNA quantitation technologies, which have made revolutionary progress over the past few years and are now ready for genome-wide application. Future solutions to the regulatory element prediction problem may be found by the combined analysis of genome sequence and expression data.