Interactions of regulated and deregulated forms of the sigma54 holoenzyme with heteroduplex promoter DNA

A general mechanism for transcription bubble nucleation in bacteria

Bacterial transcription initiation requires σ factors for nucleation of the transcription bubble. The canonical housekeeping σ factor, σ70, nucleates DNA melting via recognition of conserved bases of the promoter -10 motif, which are unstacked and captured in pockets of σ70. By contrast, the mechanism of transcription bubble nucleation and formation during the unrelated σN-mediated transcription initiation is poorly understood. Herein, we combine structural and biochemical approaches to establish that σN, like σ70, captures a flipped, unstacked base in a pocket formed between its N-terminal region I (RI) and extra-long helix features. Strikingly, RI inserts into the nascent bubble to stabilize the nucleated bubble prior to engagement of the obligate ATPase activator. Our data suggest a general paradigm of transcription initiation that requires σ factors to nucleate an early melted intermediate prior to productive RNA synthesis.

Novel DNA Binding and Regulatory Activities for σ54 (RpoN) in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium 14028s

The variable sigma (σ) subunit of the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme, which is responsible for promoter specificity and open complex formation, plays a strategic role in the response to environmental changes. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium utilizes the housekeeping σ⁷⁰ and five alternative sigma factors, including σ⁵⁴ The σ⁵⁴-RNAP differs from other σ-RNAP holoenzymes in that it forms a stable closed complex with the promoter and requires ATP hydrolysis by an activated cognate bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP) to transition to an open complex and initiate transcription. In S. Typhimurium, σ⁵⁴-dependent promoters normally respond to one of 13 different bEBPs, each of which is activated under a specific growth condition. Here, we utilized a constitutively active, promiscuous bEBP to perform a genome-wide identification of σ⁵⁴-RNAP DNA binding sites and the transcriptome of the σ⁵⁴ regulon of S. Typhimurium. The position and context of many of the identified σ⁵⁴ RNAP DNA binding sites suggest regulatory roles for σ⁵⁴-RNAP that connect the σ⁵⁴ regulon to regulons of other σ factors to provide a dynamic response to rapidly changing environmental conditions.IMPORTANCE The alternative sigma factor σ⁵⁴ (RpoN) is required for expression of genes involved in processes with significance in agriculture, bioenergy production, bioremediation, and host-microbe interactions. The characterization of the σ⁵⁴ regulon of the versatile pathogen S. Typhimurium has expanded our understanding of the scope of the σ⁵⁴ regulon and how it links to other σ regulons within the complex regulatory network for gene expression in bacteria.

Domain movements of the enhancer-dependent sigma factor drive DNA delivery into the RNA polymerase active site: insights from single molecule studies

Recognition of bacterial promoters is regulated by two distinct classes of sequence-specific sigma factors, σ⁷⁰ or σ⁵⁴, that differ both in their primary sequence and in the requirement of the latter for activation via enhancer-bound upstream activators. The σ⁵⁴ version controls gene expression in response to stress, often mediating pathogenicity. Its activator proteins are members of the AAA+ superfamily and use adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis to remodel initially auto-inhibited holoenzyme promoter complexes. We have mapped this remodeling using single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy. Initial remodeling is nucleotide-independent and driven by binding both ssDNA during promoter melting and activator. However, DNA loading into the RNA polymerase active site depends on co-operative ATP hydrolysis by the activator. Although the coupled promoter recognition and melting steps may be conserved between σ⁷⁰ and σ⁵⁴, the domain movements of the latter have evolved to require an activator ATPase.

Use of a promiscuous, constitutively-active bacterial enhancer-binding protein to define the σ⁵⁴ (RpoN) regulon of Salmonella Typhimurium LT2

Background

Sigma54, or RpoN, is an alternative σ factor found widely in eubacteria. A significant complication in analysis of the global σ⁵⁴ regulon in a bacterium is that the σ⁵⁴ RNA polymerase holoenzyme requires interaction with an active bacterial enhancer-binding protein (bEBP) to initiate transcription at a σ⁵⁴-dependent promoter. Many bacteria possess multiple bEBPs, which are activated by diverse environmental stimuli. In this work, we assess the ability of a promiscuous, constitutively-active bEBP—the AAA+ ATPase domain of DctD from Sinorhizobium meliloti—to activate transcription from all σ⁵⁴-dependent promoters for the characterization of the σ⁵⁴ regulon of Salmonella Typhimurium LT2.

Results

The AAA+ ATPase domain of DctD was able to drive transcription from nearly all previously characterized or predicted σ⁵⁴-dependent promoters in Salmonella under a single condition. These promoters are controlled by a variety of native activators and, under the condition tested, are not transcribed in the absence of the DctD AAA+ ATPase domain. We also identified a novel σ⁵⁴-dependent promoter upstream of STM2939, a homolog of the cas1 component of a CRISPR system. ChIP-chip analysis revealed at least 70 σ⁵⁴ binding sites in the chromosome, of which 58% are located within coding sequences. Promoter-lacZ fusions with selected intragenic σ⁵⁴ binding sites suggest that many of these sites are capable of functioning as σ⁵⁴-dependent promoters.

Conclusion

Since the DctD AAA+ ATPase domain proved effective in activating transcription from the diverse σ⁵⁴-dependent promoters of the S. Typhimurium LT2 σ⁵⁴ regulon under a single growth condition, this approach is likely to be valuable for examining σ⁵⁴ regulons in other bacterial species. The S. Typhimurium σ⁵⁴ regulon included a high number of intragenic σ⁵⁴ binding sites/promoters, suggesting that σ⁵⁴ may have multiple regulatory roles beyond the initiation of transcription at the start of an operon.

Opening and closing of the bacterial RNA polymerase clamp

Using single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we have defined bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) clamp conformation at each step in transcription initiation and elongation. We find that the clamp predominantly is open in free RNAP and early intermediates in transcription initiation but closes upon formation of a catalytically competent transcription initiation complex and remains closed during initial transcription and transcription elongation. We show that four RNAP inhibitors interfere with clamp opening. We propose that clamp opening allows DNA to be loaded into and unwound in the RNAP active-center cleft, that DNA loading and unwinding trigger clamp closure, and that clamp closure accounts for the high stability of initiation complexes and the high stability and processivity of elongation complexes.

Sensor I threonine of the AAA+ ATPase transcriptional activator PspF is involved in coupling nucleotide triphosphate hydrolysis to the restructuring of sigma 54-RNA polymerase

Transcriptional initiation invariably involves the transition from a closed RNA polymerase (RNAP) promoter complex to a transcriptional competent open complex. Activators of the bacterial sigma(54)-RNAP are AAA+ proteins that couple ATP hydrolysis to restructure the sigma(54)-RNAP promoter complex. Structures of the sigma(54) activator PspF AAA+ domain (PspF(1-275)) bound to sigma(54) show two loop structures proximal to sigma(54) as follows: the sigma(54) contacting the GAFTGA loop 1 structure and loop 2 that classifies sigma(54) activators as pre-sensor 1 beta-hairpin AAA+ proteins. We report activities for PspF(1-275) mutated in the AAA+ conserved sensor I threonine/asparagine motif (PspF(1-275)(T148A), PspF(1-275)(N149A), and PspF(1-275)(N149S)) within the second region of homology. We show that sensor I asparagine plays a direct role in ATP hydrolysis. However, low hydrolysis rates are sufficient for functional output in vitro. In contrast, PspF(1-275)(T148A) has severe defects at the distinct step of sigma(54) promoter restructuring. This defect is not because of the failure of PspF(1-275)(T148A) to stably engage with the closed sigma(54) promoter, indicating (i) an important role in ATP hydrolysis-associated motions during energy coupling for remodeling and (ii) distinguishing PspF(1-275)(T148A) from PspF(1-275) variants involved in signaling to the GAFTGA loop 1, which fail to stably engage with the promoter. Activities of loop 2 PspF(1-275) variants are similar to those of PspF(1-275)(T148A) suggesting a functional signaling link between Thr(148) and loop 2. In PspF(1-275) this link relies on the conserved nucleotide state-dependent interaction between the Walker B residue Glu(108) and Thr(148). We propose that hydrolysis is relayed via Thr(148) to loop 2 creating motions that provide mechanical force to the GAFTGA loop 1 that contacts sigma(54).

Mapping ATP-dependent activation at a sigma54 promoter

The sigma(54) promoter specificity factor is distinct from other bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) sigma factors in that it forms a transcriptionally silent closed complex upon promoter binding. Transcriptional activation occurs through a nucleotide-dependent isomerization of sigma(54), mediated via its interactions with an enhancer-binding activator protein that utilizes the energy released in ATP hydrolysis to effect structural changes in sigma(54) and core RNA polymerase. The organization of sigma(54)-promoter and sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complexes was investigated by fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays using sigma(54) single cysteine-mutants labeled with an acceptor fluorophore and donor fluorophore-labeled DNA sequences containing mismatches that mimic nifH early- and late-melted promoters. The results show that sigma(54) undergoes spatial rearrangements of functionally important domains upon closed complex formation. sigma(54) and sigma(54)-RNAP promoter complexes reconstituted with the different mismatched DNA constructs were assayed by the addition of the activator phage shock protein F in the presence or absence of ATP and of non-hydrolysable analogues. Nucleotide-dependent alterations in fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiencies identify different functional states of the activator-sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex that exist throughout the mechano-chemical transduction pathway of transcriptional activation, i.e. from closed to open promoter complexes. The results suggest that open complex formation only occurs efficiently on replacement of a repressive fork junction with down-stream melted DNA.

Holoenzyme Switching and Stochastic Release of Sigma Factors from RNA Polymerase In Vivo

We investigated the binding of E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzymes bearing sigma70, sigma(S), sigma32, or sigma54 to the ribosomal RNA operons (rrn) in vivo. At the rrn promoter, we observed "holoenzyme switching" from Esigma70 to Esigma(S) or Esigma32 in response to environmental cues. We also examined if sigma factors are retained by core polymerase during transcript elongation. At the rrn operons, sigma70 translocates briefly with the elongating polymerase and is released stochastically from the core polymerase with an estimated half-life of approximately 4-7 s. Similarly, at gadA and htpG, operons that are targeted by Esigma(S) and Esigma32, respectively, we find that sigma(S) and sigma32 also dissociate stochastically, albeit more rapidly than sigma70, from the elongating core polymerase. Up to approximately 70% of Esigma70 (the major vegetative holoenzyme) in rapidly growing cells is engaged in transcribing the rrn operons. Thus, our results suggest that at least approximately 70% of cellular holoenzymes release sigma70 during transcript elongation. Release of sigma factors during each round of transcription provides a simple mechanism for rapidly reprogramming polymerase with the relevant sigma factor and is consistent with the occurrence of a "sigma cycle" in vivo.

Communication between Esigma(54) , promoter DNA and the conserved threonine residue in the GAFTGA motif of the PspF sigma-dependent activator during transcription activation

Conversion of Esigma(54) closed promoter complexes to open promoter complexes requires specialized activators which are members of the AAA (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) protein family. The ATP binding and hydrolysis activity of Esigma(54) activators is used in an energy coupling reaction to remodel the Esigma(54) closed promoter complex and to overcome the sigma(54)-imposed block on open complex formation. The remodelling target for the AAA activator within the Esigma(54) closed complex includes a complex interface contributed to by Region I of sigma(54), core RNA polymerase and a promoter DNA fork junction structure, comprising the Esigma(54) regulatory centre. One sigma(54) binding surface on Esigma(54) activators is a conserved sequence known as the GAFTGA motif. Here, we present a detailed characterization of the interaction between Region I of sigma(54) and the Escherichia coli AAA sigma(54) activator Phage shock protein F. Using Esigma(54) promoter complexes that mimic different conformations adopted by the DNA during open complex formation, we investigated the contribution of the conserved threonine residue in the GAFTGA motif to transcription activation. Our results suggest that the organization of the Esigma(54) regulatory centre, and in particular the conformation adopted by the sigma(54) Region I and the DNA fork junction structure during open complex formation, is communicated to the AAA activator via the conserved T residue of the GAFTGA motif.

Nucleotide-dependent interactions between a fork junction-RNA polymerase complex and an AAA+ transcriptional activator protein

Enhancer-dependent transcriptional activators that act upon the sigma54 bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme belong to the extensive AAA+ superfamily of mechanochemical ATPases. Formation and collapse of the transition state for ATP hydrolysis engenders direct interactions between AAA+ activators and the sigma54 factor, required for RNA polymerase isomerization. A DNA fork junction structure present within closed complexes serves as a nucleation point for the DNA melting seen in open promoter complexes and restricts spontaneous activator-independent RNA polymerase isomerization. We now provide physical evidence showing that the ADP.AlF(x) bound form of the AAA+ domain of the transcriptional activator protein PspF changes interactions between sigma54-RNA polymerase and a DNA fork junction structure present in the closed promoter complex. The results suggest that one functional state of the nucleotide-bound activator serves to alter DNA binding by sigma54 and sigma54-RNA polymerase and appears to drive events that precede DNA opening. Clear evidence for a DNA-interacting activity in the AAA+ domain of PspF was obtained, suggesting that PspF may make a direct contact to the DNA component of a basal promoter complex to promote changes in sigma54-RNA polymerase-DNA interactions that favour open complex formation. We also provide evidence for two distinct closed promoter complexes with differing stabilities.

Mapping sigma 54-RNA polymerase interactions at the -24 consensus promoter element

The sigma 54 promoter specificity factor is distinct from sigma 70-type factors. The sigma 54-RNA polymerase binds to promoters with conserved sequence elements at -24 and -12 and utilizes specialized enhancer-binding activators to convert, through an ATP-dependent process, closed promoter complexes to open promoter complexes. The interface between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and promoter DNA is poorly characterized, contrasting with sigma 70. Here, sigma 54 was modified with strategically positioned cleavage reagents to provide physical evidence that the highly conserved RpoN box motif of sigma 54 is close to and may therefore interact with the consensus -24 promoter element. We show that the spatial relationship between the sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the -24 promoter element remains unchanged during closed to open complex conversion and transcription initiation but changes during the early elongation phase. In contrast, the spatial relationship between sigma 54-RNA polymerase and the consensus -12 promoter element changes upon conversion of the closed promoter complex to an open one. We provide evidence that some -12 promoter region-sigma 54 interactions are dependent upon either the core RNA polymerase or a fork junction DNA structure at the -12-position, indicating that DNA fork junctions can substitute for core RNAP. We also show the beta-subunit flap domain contributes to different sets of sigma-promoter DNA interactions at sigma 54- and sigma 70-dependent promoters.

Multiple roles of the RNA polymerase beta subunit flap domain in sigma 54-dependent transcription

Recent determinations of the structures of the bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) and promoter complex thereof establish that RNAP functions as a complex molecular machine that contains distinct structural modules that undergo major conformational changes during transcription. However, the contribution of the RNAP structural modules to transcription remains poorly understood. The bacterial core RNAP (alpha(2)beta beta'omega; E) associates with a sigma (sigma) subunit to form the holoenzyme (E sigma). A mutation removing the beta subunit flap domain renders the Escherichia coli sigma(70) RNAP holoenzyme unable to recognize promoters. sigma(54) is the major variant sigma subunit that utilizes enhancer-dependent promoters. Here, we determined the effects of beta flap removal on sigma(54)-dependent transcription. Our analysis shows that the role of the beta flap in sigma(54)-dependent and sigma(70)-dependent transcription is different. Removal of the beta flap does not prevent the recognition of sigma(54)-dependent promoters, but causes multiple defects in sigma(54)-dependent transcription. Most importantly, the beta flap appears to orchestrate the proper formation of the E sigma(54) regulatory center at the start site proximal promoter element where activator binds and DNA melting originates.

Beta subunit residues 186-433 and 436-445 are commonly used by Esigma54 and Esigma70 RNA polymerase for open promoter complex formation

During transcription initiation by DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) promoter DNA has to be melted locally to allow the synthesis of RNA transcript. Localized melting of promoter DNA is a target for genetic regulation and is poorly understood at the molecular level. The Escherichia coli RNAP holoenzyme is a six-subunit (alpha(2)betabeta'omegasigma; Esigma) protein complex. The sigma subunit is directly responsible for promoter recognition and contributes to localized DNA melting. Mutations in the beta subunit have profound effects on promoter melting by Esigma70. The sigma54 subunit is a representative of an unrelated class of the sigma subunits. Here, we determined whether mutations in the beta subunit that affect late stages of promoter complex formation by Esigma70 also influence promoter complex formation by the enhancer-dependent Esigma54. Analyses of in vitro defects in promoter complex formation and transcription initiation exhibited by mutant Esigma54 suggest that during promoter complex formation by Esigma54 and Esigma70 a common set of beta subunit sequences is used. Late stages of promoter complex formation and localized melting of promoter DNA by Esigma70 and Esigma54 thus proceed through a common pathway.