Changes in chromatin structure at the replication fork. II The DNPs containing nascent DNA and a transient chromatin modification detected by DNAase I

Histone H1 deposition and histone-DNA interactions in replicating chromatin

An immunochemical method for analyzing protein interactions with BrdUrd-substituted DNA was used to study binding of histones to nascent DNA in nuclei. The results indicate that in Ehrlich ascites tumor (EAT) cells, histone H1 deposits on newly replicated DNA simultaneously with or immediately after core histone deposition so that in chromatin replicated for 3 min, the stoichiometry of the histones is the same as in bulk chromatin. All histones, and especially histone H1, interact with nascent DNA more weakly than with bulk chromatin, although the efficiency of interaction via the globular domains seems to be the same for both types of chromatin.

Remodeling of sperm chromatin following fertilization: nucleosome repeat length and histone variant transitions in the absence of DNA synthesis

Within the first cell cycle following fertilization the average nucleosomal repeat length of sea urchin male pronuclear chromatin declines by 30-40 base pairs to a value typical of that found in the embryo. This decline occurs after a lag of about 30 min postfertilization, and is accompanied by replication of the male chromatin and accumulation of cleavage-stage (CS) core histone variants. When replication is inhibited by greater than 95% with aphidicolin, the decline in repeat length still occurs, although it is slightly retarded. The decline in repeat length also occurs when protein synthesis is blocked by greater than 98% and DNA synthesis by 60-70% with emetine. The adjustment of nucleosome repeat length therefore can occur in vivo without extensive movement of replication forks across the length of the chromatin, or normal progression of the cell cycle, and appears to require no proteins synthesized postfertilization. Blocking of DNA synthesis or protein synthesis also does not prevent the normal histone variant transitions involved in male pronuclear chromatin remodeling. Although their accumulation is slowed, CS core variants eventually become the predominant male pronuclear histones in their classes when replication is inhibited. Since a shortening of the average nucleosomal repeat length of approximately 10-20% is not sufficient to account for this large acquisition of CS variants, some of the sperm (Sp) core histones are probably displaced from the replication-blocked pronucleus. Therefore, accumulation of CS H2A and CS H2B are temporally correlated with the repeat length transition, whereas replication, normal progression of the cell cycle, and the early histone transitions involving SpH1 and SpH2B are not.

Reduced repeat length of nascent nucleosomal DNA is generated by replicating chromatin in vivo

Micrococcal nuclease digestion of nuclei from sea urchin embryos revealed transient changes in chromatin structure which resulted in a reduction in the repeat length of nascent chromatin DNA as compared with bulk DNA. This was considered to be entirely the consequence of in vivo events at the replication fork (Cell 14, 259, 1978). However, a micrococcal nuclease-generated sliding of nucleosome cores relative to nascent DNA, which might account for the smaller DNA fragments, was not excluded. In vivo [3H]thymidine pulse-labeled nuclei were fixed with a formaldehyde prior to micrococcal nuclease digestion. This linked chromatin proteins to DNA and thus prevented any in vitro sliding of histone cores. All the nascent DNAs exhibiting shorter repeat lengths after micrococcal nuclease digestion, were resolved at identical mobilities in polyacrylamide gels of DNA from fixed and unfixed nuclei. We conclude that these differences in repeat lengths between nascent and bulk DNA was generated in vivo by changes in chromatin structure during replication, rather than by micrococcal nuclease-induced sliding of histone cores in vitro.

DNAase I and cellular factors that affect chromatin structure

The use of DNAase I as a probe of chromatin structure is frequently fraught with problems of irreproducibility. We have recently evaluated this procedure, documented the sources of the problems, and standardized the method for reproducible results (Prentice and Gurley (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 740, 134-144). We have now used this probe to detect differences in chromatin structure between cells blocked (1) in G1 phase by isoleucine deprivation, or (2) in early S phase by sequential use of isoleucine deprivation followed by release into the presence of hydroxyurea. The cells blocked in G1 phase have easily-digestible chromatin, while cells blocked in early S phase have chromatin which is much more resistant to DNAase I. These differences were found to be the result of diffusible factors found in the cytoplasm and nuclei of G1- and S-phase cells, respectively. The G1 cells contained a cytoplasmic factor which modulates the chromatin structure of S-phase nuclei to a more easily digestible state, while cells blocked in S phase contain a nuclear factor which modulates the chromatin structure of G1 nuclei to a state more resistant to digestion. DNAase I is much more sensitive to these cell cycle-specific chromatin changes than is micrococcal nuclease. The results indicate that, under controlled conditions, DNAase I should be a valuable probe for detecting chromatin structural changes associated with cell cycle traverse, differentiation, development, hormone action and chemical toxicity.

Nuclease digestibility of chromatin is affected by nuclei isolation procedures

Experiments using nucleases as probes of chromatin structure take place in two stages: (1) nuclei isolation, and (2) nuclease digestion. The parameters of the nuclease digestion stage are usually strictly controlled because of nuclease sensitivity to them. However, there have been no reports on whether parameters in the nuclei isolation stage affect the subsequent nuclease digestions. We have evaluated a typical nuclei isolation technique with respect to how changes in the isolation parameters affect nuclease digestion kinetics. Our observations point out that various parameters encountered in the nuclei isolation stage have a significant effect on the subsequent nuclease digestion kinetics of DNAase I. These parameters include the concentration of cells, divalent cations and phosphatase inhibitors. The pH, concentration of NaCl and concentration of detergent had little effect. Micrococcal nuclease was relatively unaffected by changes in the nuclei isolation parameters. The importance of this report lies in the demonstration that lack of control of seemingly insignificant parameters, such as cell concentration during the nuclei isolation stage, leads to subsequent irreproducible results in the DNAase I digestion. These findings indicate that great care must be exercised in the nuclei isolation stage if reproducible work is to be performed with DNAase I.

Assembly kinetics of replicating chromatin: isolation and characterization of prenucleosomal and nucleosomal DNA

Replicating chromatin is known to be more sensitive to micrococcal nuclease than bulk chromatin. We have used this property and a fractionation procedure based on the specific release of replicating material under mild micrococcal nuclease digestion, in order to analyse both the kinetics of maturation of newly replicated DNA into nucleosomes and the structure of the replicating material. As other authors, we initially observed that repetitive unit of newly replicated chromatin was shorter than that of bulk chromatin, however this result appears to be due to sliding of nucleosomes along the chromatin fibers close to the replicating fork. Replicative chromatin was fractionated and analysed. A prenucleosomal peak was observed and preliminary characterized.