1
|
Yu J, Zhao N, Wang Y, Ding N, Guo Z, He Z, Zhang Q, Zhang J, Yang X, Zhang M, Du X, Zhang K, Chen L. DCP1A, a MEK substrate, regulates the self-renewal and differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Rep 2024; 43:115058. [PMID: 39671288 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.115058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2024] [Revised: 10/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors are widely applied to maintain pluripotency, while prolonged MEK inhibition compromises the developmental potential of mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs). To understand the mechanism of MEK in pluripotency maintenance, we first demonstrated that MEK regulates gene expression at post-transcriptional steps. Consistently, many of the 66 MEK substrates identified by quantitative phosphoproteomics analysis are involved in RNA processing. We further confirmed that MEK1 phosphorylates S563 of DCP1A, an mRNA decapping cofactor and processing body (P body) component. DCP1A, as well as two other P body components, EDC4 and DCP2, are required for the self-renewal and differentiation of ESCs, indicating the role of P bodies in ESCs. Dephosphorylation of DCP1A S563 facilitates both self-renewal and differentiation of ESCs through promoting P body formation and RNA storage. In summary, our study identified 66 MEK substrates supporting the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-independent function of MEK and revealed that DCP1A, phosphorylated by MEK, regulates ESC self-renewal and differentiation through modulating P body formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayu Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Nannan Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Yuying Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Nan Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Zhenchang Guo
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300203, China
| | - Zichan He
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Qingye Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Jingai Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Xiaoqiong Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Xiaoling Du
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300203, China
| | - Lingyi Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Protein Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for Cell Responses, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biology Education and College of Life Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mahara S, Prüssing S, Smialkovska V, Krall S, Holliman S, Blum B, Dachtler V, Borgers H, Sollier E, Plass C, Feldmann A. Transient promoter interactions modulate developmental gene activation. Mol Cell 2024; 84:4486-4502.e7. [PMID: 39476844 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 12/08/2024]
Abstract
Transcriptional induction coincides with the formation of various chromatin topologies. Strong evidence supports that gene activation is accompanied by a general increase in promoter-enhancer interactions. However, it remains unclear how these topological changes are coordinated across time and space during transcriptional activation. Here, we combine chromatin conformation capture with transcription and chromatin profiling during an embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation time course to determine how 3D genome restructuring is related to transcriptional transitions. This approach allows us to identify distinct topological alterations that are associated with the magnitude of transcriptional induction. We detect transiently formed interactions and demonstrate by genetic deletions that associated distal regulatory elements (DREs), as well as appropriate formation and disruption of these interactions, can contribute to the transcriptional induction of linked genes. Together, our study links topological dynamics to the magnitude of transcriptional induction and detects an uncharacterized type of transcriptionally important DREs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Mahara
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Prüssing
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Valeriia Smialkovska
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Samuel Krall
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Belinda Blum
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Victoria Dachtler
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Helena Borgers
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Etienne Sollier
- Division of Cancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Plass
- Division of Cancer Epigenomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angelika Feldmann
- Mechanisms of Genome Control, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muckenhuber M, Seufert I, Müller-Ott K, Mallm JP, Klett LC, Knotz C, Hechler J, Kepper N, Erdel F, Rippe K. Epigenetic signals that direct cell type-specific interferon beta response in mouse cells. Life Sci Alliance 2023; 6:e202201823. [PMID: 36732019 PMCID: PMC9900254 DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The antiviral response induced by type I interferon (IFN) via the JAK-STAT signaling cascade activates hundreds of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) across human and mouse tissues but varies between cell types. However, the links between the underlying epigenetic features and the ISG profile are not well understood. We mapped ISGs, binding sites of the STAT1 and STAT2 transcription factors, chromatin accessibility, and histone H3 lysine modification by acetylation (ac) and mono-/tri-methylation (me1, me3) in mouse embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts before and after IFNβ treatment. A large fraction of ISGs and STAT-binding sites was cell type specific with promoter binding of a STAT1/2 complex being a key driver of ISGs. Furthermore, STAT1/2 binding to putative enhancers induced ISGs as inferred from a chromatin co-accessibility analysis. STAT1/2 binding was dependent on the chromatin context and positively correlated with preexisting H3K4me1 and H3K27ac marks in an open chromatin state, whereas the presence of H3K27me3 had an inhibitory effect. Thus, chromatin features present before stimulation represent an additional regulatory layer for the cell type-specific antiviral response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Muckenhuber
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Isabelle Seufert
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Müller-Ott
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jan-Philipp Mallm
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
- Single Cell Open Lab, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lara C Klett
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Biosciences, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Caroline Knotz
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jana Hechler
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nick Kepper
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Erdel
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karsten Rippe
- Division of Chromatin Networks, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dimitrova E, Feldmann A, van der Weide RH, Flach KD, Lastuvkova A, de Wit E, Klose RJ. Distinct roles for CKM-Mediator in controlling Polycomb-dependent chromosomal interactions and priming genes for induction. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2022; 29:1000-1010. [PMID: 36220895 PMCID: PMC9568430 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-022-00840-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Precise control of gene expression underpins normal development. This relies on mechanisms that enable communication between gene promoters and other regulatory elements. In embryonic stem cells (ESCs), the cyclin-dependent kinase module Mediator complex (CKM-Mediator) has been reported to physically link gene regulatory elements to enable gene expression and also prime genes for induction during differentiation. Here, we show that CKM-Mediator contributes little to three-dimensional genome organization in ESCs, but it has a specific and essential role in controlling interactions between inactive gene regulatory elements bound by Polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs). These interactions are established by the canonical PRC1 (cPRC1) complex but rely on CKM-Mediator, which facilitates binding of cPRC1 to its target sites. Importantly, through separation-of-function experiments, we reveal that this collaboration between CKM-Mediator and cPRC1 in creating long-range interactions does not function to prime genes for induction during differentiation. Instead, we discover that priming relies on an interaction-independent mechanism whereby the CKM supports core Mediator engagement with gene promoters during differentiation to enable gene activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelika Feldmann
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robin H van der Weide
- Division of Gene Regulation, Oncode Institute and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Hubrecht Institute KNAW, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Koen D Flach
- Division of Gene Regulation, Oncode Institute and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Lastuvkova
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elzo de Wit
- Division of Gene Regulation, Oncode Institute and The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J Klose
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li R, Grimm SA, Wade PA. CUT&Tag-BS for simultaneous profiling of histone modification and DNA methylation with high efficiency and low cost. CELL REPORTS METHODS 2021; 1:100118. [PMID: 35028637 PMCID: PMC8754398 DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
It remains a challenge to decipher the complex relationship between DNA methylation, histone modification, and the underlying DNA sequence with limited input material. Here, we developed an efficient, low-input, and low-cost method for the simultaneous profiling of genomic localization of histone modification and methylation status of the underlying DNA at single-base resolution from the same cells in a single experiment by integrating cleavage under targets and tagmentation (CUT&Tag) with tagmentation-based bisulfite sequencing (CUT&Tag-BS). We demonstrated the validity of our method using representative histone modifications of euchromatin and constitutive and facultative heterochromatin (H3K4me1, H3K9me3, and H3K27me3, respectively). Similar histone modification enrichment patterns were observed in CUT&Tag-BS compared with non-bisulfite-treated control, and H3K4me1-marked regions were found to mostly be CpG poor, lack methylation concordance, and exhibit prevalent DNA methylation heterogeneity among mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). We anticipate that CUT&Tag-BS will be widely applied to directly address the genomic relationship between DNA methylation and histone modification, especially in low-input scenarios with precious biological samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruifang Li
- Epigenetics Innovation Lab, Center for Epigenetics Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Sara A. Grimm
- Integrative Bioinformatics Support Group, Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | - Paul A. Wade
- Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation Group, Epigenetics and Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Freire-Pritchett P, Ray-Jones H, Della Rosa M, Eijsbouts CQ, Orchard WR, Wingett SW, Wallace C, Cairns J, Spivakov M, Malysheva V. Detecting chromosomal interactions in Capture Hi-C data with CHiCAGO and companion tools. Nat Protoc 2021; 16:4144-4176. [PMID: 34373652 PMCID: PMC7612634 DOI: 10.1038/s41596-021-00567-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Capture Hi-C is widely used to obtain high-resolution profiles of chromosomal interactions involving, at least on one end, regions of interest such as gene promoters. Signal detection in Capture Hi-C data is challenging and cannot be adequately accomplished with tools developed for other chromosome conformation capture methods, including standard Hi-C. Capture Hi-C Analysis of Genomic Organization (CHiCAGO) is a computational pipeline developed specifically for Capture Hi-C analysis. It implements a statistical model accounting for biological and technical background components, as well as bespoke normalization and multiple testing procedures for this data type. Here we provide a step-by-step guide to the CHiCAGO workflow that is aimed at users with basic experience of the command line and R. We also describe more advanced strategies for tuning the key parameters for custom experiments and provide guidance on data preprocessing and downstream analysis using companion tools. In a typical experiment, CHiCAGO takes ~2-3 h to run, although pre- and postprocessing steps may take much longer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Ray-Jones
- Functional Gene Control Group, Epigenetics Section, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Della Rosa
- Functional Gene Control Group, Epigenetics Section, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Chris Q Eijsbouts
- Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Steven W Wingett
- Bioinformatics, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK
- Cell Biology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Chris Wallace
- Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease (CITIID), Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Mikhail Spivakov
- Functional Gene Control Group, Epigenetics Section, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK.
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Valeriya Malysheva
- Functional Gene Control Group, Epigenetics Section, MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences, London, UK.
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Global hyperactivation of enhancers stabilizes human and mouse naive pluripotency through inhibition of CDK8/19 Mediator kinases. Nat Cell Biol 2020; 22:1223-1238. [PMID: 32989249 DOI: 10.1038/s41556-020-0573-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) transition between cell states in vitro, reflecting developmental changes in the early embryo. PSCs can be stabilized in the naive state by blocking extracellular differentiation stimuli, particularly FGF-MEK signalling. Here, we report that multiple features of the naive state in human and mouse PSCs can be recapitulated without affecting FGF-MEK signalling or global DNA methylation. Mechanistically, chemical inhibition of CDK8 and CDK19 (hereafter CDK8/19) kinases removes their ability to repress the Mediator complex at enhancers. CDK8/19 inhibition therefore increases Mediator-driven recruitment of RNA polymerase II (RNA Pol II) to promoters and enhancers. This efficiently stabilizes the naive transcriptional program and confers resistance to enhancer perturbation by BRD4 inhibition. Moreover, naive pluripotency during embryonic development coincides with a reduction in CDK8/19. We conclude that global hyperactivation of enhancers drives naive pluripotency, and this can be achieved in vitro by inhibiting CDK8/19 kinase activity. These principles may apply to other contexts of cellular plasticity.
Collapse
|
8
|
The Role of CDKs and CDKIs in Murine Development. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21155343. [PMID: 32731332 PMCID: PMC7432401 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21155343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and their inhibitors (CDKIs) play pivotal roles in the regulation of the cell cycle. As a result of these functions, it may be extrapolated that they are essential for appropriate embryonic development. The twenty known mouse CDKs and eight CDKIs have been studied to varying degrees in the developing mouse, but only a handful of CDKs and a single CDKI have been shown to be absolutely required for murine embryonic development. What has become apparent, as more studies have shone light on these family members, is that in addition to their primary functional role in regulating the cell cycle, many of these genes are also controlling specific cell fates by directing differentiation in various tissues. Here we review the extensive mouse models that have been generated to study the functions of CDKs and CDKIs, and discuss their varying roles in murine embryonic development, with a particular focus on the brain, pancreas and fertility.
Collapse
|