Optimized high-throughput screening of non-coding variants identified from genome-wide association studies

Protection of the genome and the central exome by peripheral non-coding DNA against DNA damage in health, ageing and age-related diseases

DNA in eukaryotic genomes is under constant assault from both exogenous and endogenous sources, leading to DNA damage, which is considered a major molecular driver of ageing. Fortunately, the genome and the central exome are safeguarded against these attacks by abundant peripheral non-coding DNA. Non-coding DNA codes for small non-coding RNAs that inactivate foreign nucleic acids in the cytoplasm and physically blocks these attacks in the nucleus. Damage to non-coding DNA produced during such blockage is removed in the form of extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) through nucleic pore complexes. Consequently, non-coding DNA serves as a line of defence for the exome against DNA damage. The total amount of non-coding DNA/heterochromatin declines with age, resulting in a decrease in both physical blockage and eccDNA exclusion, and thus an increase in the accumulation of DNA damage in the nucleus during ageing and in age-related diseases. Here, we summarize recent evidence supporting a protective role of non-coding DNA in healthy and pathological states and argue that DNA damage is the proximate cause of ageing and age-related genetic diseases. Strategies aimed at strengthening the protective role of non-coding DNA/heterochromatin could potentially offer better systematic protection for the dynamic genome and the exome against diverse assaults, reduce the burden of DNA damage to the exome, and thus slow ageing, counteract age-related genetic diseases and promote a healthier life for individuals.

Hidden secrets of the cancer genome: unlocking the impact of non-coding mutations in gene regulatory elements

Discoveries in the field of genomics have revealed that non-coding genomic regions are not merely "junk DNA", but rather comprise critical elements involved in gene expression. These gene regulatory elements (GREs) include enhancers, insulators, silencers, and gene promoters. Notably, new evidence shows how mutations within these regions substantially influence gene expression programs, especially in the context of cancer. Advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies have accelerated the identification of somatic and germline single nucleotide mutations in non-coding genomic regions. This review provides an overview of somatic and germline non-coding single nucleotide alterations affecting transcription factor binding sites in GREs, specifically involved in cancer biology. It also summarizes the technologies available for exploring GREs and the challenges associated with studying and characterizing non-coding single nucleotide mutations. Understanding the role of GRE alterations in cancer is essential for improving diagnostic and prognostic capabilities in the precision medicine era, leading to enhanced patient-centered clinical outcomes.

Exploring noncoding variants in genetic diseases: from detection to functional insights

Previous studies on genetic diseases predominantly focused on protein-coding variations, overlooking the vast noncoding regions in the human genome. The development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and functional genomics tools has enabled the systematic identification of functional noncoding variants. These variants can impact gene expression, regulation, and chromatin conformation, thereby contributing to disease pathogenesis. Understanding the mechanisms that underlie the impact of noncoding variants on genetic diseases is indispensable for the development of precisely targeted therapies and the implementation of personalized medicine strategies. The intricacies of noncoding regions introduce a multitude of challenges and research opportunities. In this review, we introduce a spectrum of noncoding variants involved in genetic diseases, along with research strategies and advanced technologies for their precise identification and in-depth understanding of the complexity of the noncoding genome. We will delve into the research challenges and propose potential solutions for unraveling the genetic basis of rare and complex diseases.

Impact of Genetic Variations on Thromboembolic Risk in Saudis with Sickle Cell Disease

BACKGROUND

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a Mendelian disease characterized by multigenic phenotypes. Previous reports indicated a higher rate of thromboembolic events (TEEs) in SCD patients. A number of candidate polymorphisms in certain genes (e.g., FVL, PRT, and MTHFR) were previously reported as risk factors for TEEs in different clinical conditions. This study aimed to genotype these genes and other loci predicted to underlie TEEs in SCD patients.

METHODOLOGY

A multi-center genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving Saudi SCD adult patients with a history of TEEs (n = 65) and control patients without TEE history (n = 285) was performed. Genotyping used the 10× Affymetrix Axiom array, which includes 683,030 markers. Fisher's exact test was used to generate p-values of TEE associations with each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). The haplotype analysis software tool version 1.05, designed by the University of Göttingen, Germany, was used to identify the common inherited haplotypes.

RESULTS

No association was identified between the targeted single-nucleotide polymorphism rs1801133 in MTHFR and TEEs in SCD (p = 0.79). The allele frequency of rs6025 in FVL and rs1799963 in PRT in our cohort was extremely low (<0.01); thus, both variants were excluded from the analysis as no meaningful comparison was possible. In contrast, the GWAS analysis showed novel genome-wide associations (p < 5 × 10-8) with seven signals; five of them were located on Chr 11 (rs35390334, rs331532, rs317777, rs147062602, and rs372091), one SNP on Chr 20 (rs139341092), and another on Chr 9 (rs76076035). The other 34 SNPs located on known genes were also detected at a signal threshold of p < 5 × 10-6. Seven of the identified variants are located in olfactory receptor family 51 genes (OR51B5, OR51V1, OR51A1P, and OR51E2), and five variants were related to family 52 genes (OR52A5, OR52K1, OR52K2, and OR52T1P). The previously reported association between rs5006884-A in OR51B5 and fetal hemoglobin (HbF) levels was confirmed in our study, which showed significantly lower levels of HbF (p = 0.002) and less allele frequency (p = 0.003) in the TEE cases than in the controls. The assessment of the haplotype inheritance pattern involved the top ten significant markers with no LD (rs353988334, rs317777, rs14788626882, rs49188823, rs139349992, rs76076035, rs73395847, rs1368823, rs8888834548, and rs1455957). A haplotype analysis revealed significant associations between two haplotypes (a risk, TT-AA-del-AA-ins-CT-TT-CC-CC-AA, and a reverse protective, CC-GG-ins-GG-del-TT-CC-TT-GG-GG) and TEEs in SCD (p = 0.024, OR = 6.16, CI = 1.34-28.24, and p = 0.019, OR = 0.33, CI = 0.13-0.85, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Seven markers showed novel genome-wide associations; two of them were exonic variants (rs317777 in OLFM5P and rs147062602 in OR51B5), and less significant associations (p < 5 × 10-6) were identified for 34 other variants in known genes with TEEs in SCD. Moreover, two 10-SNP common haplotypes were determined with contradictory effects. Further replication of these findings is needed.