Residues 190-210 of human topoisomerase I are required for enzyme activity in vivo but not in vitro

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymers regulate DNA topoisomerase I (Top1) nuclear dynamics and camptothecin sensitivity in living cells

Topoisomerase 1 (Top1) is essential for removing the DNA supercoiling generated during replication and transcription. Anticancer drugs like camptothecin (CPT) and its clinical derivatives exert their cytotoxicity by reversibly trapping Top1 in covalent complexes on the DNA (Top1cc). Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) catalyses the addition of ADP-ribose polymers (PAR) onto itself and Top1. PARP inhibitors enhance the cytotoxicity of CPT in the clinical trials. However, the molecular mechanism by which PARylation regulates Top1 nuclear dynamics is not fully understood. Using live-cell imaging of enhanced green fluorescence tagged-human Top1, we show that PARP inhibitors (Veliparib, ABT-888) delocalize Top1 from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm, which is independent of Top1–PARP1 interaction. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and subsequent fitting of the data employing kinetic modelling we demonstrate that ABT-888 markedly increase CPT-induced bound/immobile fraction of Top1 (Top1cc) across the nuclear genome, suggesting Top1-PARylation counteracts CPT-induced stabilization of Top1cc. We further show Trp205 and Asn722 of Top1 are critical for subnuclear dynamics. Top1 mutant (N722S) was restricted to the nucleolus in the presence of CPT due to its deficiency in the accumulation of CPT-induced Top1-PARylation and Top1cc formation. This work identifies ADP-ribose polymers as key determinant for regulating Top1 subnuclear dynamics.

Sequence selectivity of the cleavage sites induced by topoisomerase I inhibitors: a molecular dynamics study

Topoisomerase IB (Top1) inhibitors, such as camptothecin (CPT), stabilize the Top1-DNA cleavage complex in a DNA sequence-dependent manner. The sequence selectivity of Top1 inhibitors is important for targeting specific genomic sequences of therapeutic value. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying this selectivity remain largely unknown. We performed molecular dynamics simulations to delineate structural, dynamic and energetic features that contribute to the differential sequence selectivity of the Top1 inhibitors. We found the sequence selectivity of CPT to be highly correlated with the drug binding energies, dynamic and structural properties of the linker domain. Chemical insights, gained by per-residue binding energy analysis revealed that the non-polar interaction between CPT and nucleotide at the +1 position of the cleavage site was the major (favorable) contributor to the total binding energy. Mechanistic insights gained by a potential of mean force analysis implicated that the drug dissociation step was associated with the sequence selectivity. Pharmaceutical insights gained by our molecular dynamics analyses explained why LMP-776, an indenoisoquinoline derivative under clinical development at the National Institutes of Health, displays different sequence selectivity when compared with camptothecin and its clinical derivatives.

Adaptation of topoisomerase I paralogs to nuclear and mitochondrial DNA

Topoisomerase I is essential for DNA metabolism in nuclei and mitochondria. In yeast, a single topoisomerase I gene provides for both organelles. In vertebrates, topoisomerase I is divided into nuclear and mitochondrial paralogs (Top1 and Top1mt). To assess the meaning of this gene duplication, we targeted Top1 to mitochondria or Top1mt to nuclei. Overexpression in the fitting organelle served as control. Targeting of Top1 to mitochondria blocked transcription and depleted mitochondrial DNA. This was also seen with catalytically inactive Top1 mutants, but not with Top1mt overexpressed in mitochondria. Targeting of Top1mt to the nucleus revealed that it was much less able to interact with mitotic chromosomes than Top1 overexpressed in the nucleus. Similar experiments with Top1/Top1mt hybrids assigned these functional differences to structural divergences in the DNA-binding core domains. We propose that adaptation of this domain to different chromatin environments in nuclei and mitochondria has driven evolutional development and conservation of organelle-restricted topoisomerase I paralogs in vertebrates.

A novel approach for organelle-specific DNA damage targeting reveals different susceptibility of mitochondrial DNA to the anticancer drugs camptothecin and topotecan

DNA is susceptible of being damaged by chemicals, UV light or gamma irradiation. Nuclear DNA damage invokes both a checkpoint and a repair response. By contrast, little is known about the cellular response to mitochondrial DNA damage. We designed an experimental system that allows organelle-specific DNA damage targeting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA damage is mediated by a toxic topoisomerase I allele which leads to the formation of persistent DNA single-strand breaks. We show that organelle-specific targeting of a toxic topoisomerase I to either the nucleus or mitochondria leads to nuclear DNA damage and cell death or to loss of mitochondrial DNA and formation of respiration-deficient ‘petite’ cells, respectively. In wild-type cells, toxic topoisomerase I–DNA intermediates are formed as a consequence of topoisomerase I interaction with camptothecin-based anticancer drugs. We reasoned that targeting of topoisomerase I to the mitochondria of top1Δ cells should lead to petite formation in the presence of camptothecin. Interestingly, camptothecin failed to generate petite; however, its derivative topotecan accumulates in mitochondria and induces petite formation. Our findings demonstrate that drug modifications can lead to organelle-specific DNA damage and thus opens new perspectives on the role of mitochondrial DNA-damage in cancer treatment.

Role of a tryptophan anchor in human topoisomerase I structure, function and inhibition

Human Top1 (topoisomerase I) relaxes supercoiled DNA during cell division and transcription. Top1 is composed of 765 amino acids and contains an unstructured N-terminal domain of 200 amino acids, and a structured functional domain of 565 amino acids that binds and relaxes supercoiled DNA. In the present study we examined the region spanning the junction of the N-terminal domain and functional domain (junction region). Analysis of several published Top1 structures revealed that three tryptophan residues formed a network of aromatic stacking interactions and electrostatic interactions that anchored the N-terminus of the functional domain to sub-domains containing the nose cone and active site. Mutation of the three tryptophan residues (Trp(203)/Trp(205)/Trp(206)) to an alanine residue, either individually or together, in silico revealed that the individual tryptophan residue's contribution to the tryptophan 'anchor' was additive. When the three tryptophan residues were mutated to alanine in vitro, the resulting mutant Top1 differed from wild-type Top1 in that it lacked processivity, exhibited resistance to camptothecin and was inactivated by urea. The results indicated that the tryptophan anchor stabilized the N-terminus of the functional domain and prevented the loss of Top1 structure and function.

Rapid and prolonged stalling of human DNA topoisomerase I in UVA-irradiated genomic areas

DNA topoisomerase I appears to be involved in DNA damage and repair in a complex manner. The enzyme is required for DNA maintenance and repair, but it may also damage DNA through its covalently DNA-bound, catalytic intermediate. The latter mechanism plays a role in tumor cell killing by camptothecins, but seems also involved in oxidative cell killing and certain stages of apoptosis. Stalling and/or suicidal DNA cleavage of topoisomerase I adjacent to nicks and modified DNA bases has been demonstrated in vitro. Here, we investigate the enzyme's interactions with UVA-induced DNA lesions inside living cells. We irradiated cells expressing GFP-tagged topoisomerase I with an UVA laser focused through a confocal microscope at confined areas of the nuclei. At irradiated sites, topoisomerase I accumulated within seconds, and accumulation lasted for more than 90 min. This effect was apparently due to reduced mobility, although the enzyme was not immobilized at the irradiated nuclear sites. Similar observations were made with mutant versions of topoisomerase I lacking the active site tyrosine or the N-terminal domain, but not with the N-terminal domain alone. Thus, accumulation of topoisomerase I at UVA-modified DNA sites is most likely due to non-covalent binding to damaged DNA, and not suicidal cleavage of such lesions. The rapid onset of accumulation suggests that topoisomerase I functions in this context as a component of DNA damage recognition and/or a cofactor of fast DNA-repair processes. However, the prolonged duration of accumulation suggests that it is also involved in more long-termed processes.

C-terminal regions of topoisomerase IIalpha and IIbeta determine isoform-specific functioning of the enzymes in vivo

Topoisomerase II removes supercoils and catenanes generated during DNA metabolic processes such as transcription and replication. Vertebrate cells express two genetically distinct isoforms (alpha and beta) with similar structures and biochemical activities but different biological roles. Topoisomerase IIalpha is essential for cell proliferation, whereas topoisomerase IIbeta is required only for aspects of nerve growth and brain development. To identify the structural features responsible for these differences, we exchanged the divergent C-terminal regions (CTRs) of the two human isoforms (alpha 1173-1531 and beta 1186-1621) and tested the resulting hybrids for complementation of a conditional topoisomerase IIalpha knockout in human cells. Proliferation was fully supported by all enzymes bearing the alpha CTR. The alpha CTR also promoted chromosome binding of both enzyme cores, and was by itself chromosome-bound, suggesting a role in enzyme targeting during mitosis. In contrast, enzymes bearing the beta CTR supported proliferation only rarely and when expressed at unusually high levels. A similar analysis of the divergent N-terminal regions (alpha 1-27 and beta 1-43) revealed no role in isoform-specific functions. Our results show that it is the CTRs of human topoisomerase II that determine their isoform-specific functions in proliferating cells. They also indicate persistence of some functional redundancy between the two isoforms.

Rotation of DNA around intact strand in human topoisomerase I implies distinct mechanisms for positive and negative supercoil relaxation

Topoisomerases are enzymes of quintessence to the upkeep of superhelical DNA, and are vital for replication, transcription and recombination. An atomic-resolution model for human topoisomerase I in covalent complex with DNA is simulated using molecular dynamics with external potentials that mimic torque and bias the DNA duplex downstream of a single-strand cut to rotate around the intact strand, according to the prevailing enzymatic mechanism. The simulations reveal the first dynamical picture of how topoisomerase accommodates large-scale motion of DNA as it changes its supercoiling state, and indicate that relaxation of positive and negative supercoils are fundamentally different. To relax positive supercoils, two separate domains (the 'lips') of the protein open up by about 10-14 A, whereas to relax negative supercoils, a continuous loop connecting the upper and lower parts (and which was a hinge for opening the lips) stretches about 12 A while the lips remain unseparated. Normal mode analysis is additionally used to characterize the functional flexibility of the protein. Remarkably, the same combination of low-frequency eigenvectors exhibit the dominant contribution for both rotation mechanisms through a see-saw motion. The simulated mechanisms suggest mutations to control the relaxation of either type of supercoiling selectively and advance a hypothesis for the debated role of the N-terminal domain in supercoil relaxation.

Human DNA topoisomerase I: relaxation, roles, and damage control

Human DNA topoisomerase I is an essential enzyme involved in resolving the torsional stress associated with DNA replication, transcription, and chromatin condensation. The catalytic cycle of the enzyme consists of DNA cleavage to form a covalent enzyme-DNA intermediate, DNA relaxation, and finally, re-ligation of the phosphate backbone to restore the continuity of the DNA. Structure/function studies have elucidated a flexible enzyme that relaxes DNA through coordinated, controlled movements of distinct enzyme domains. The cellular roles of topoisomerase I are apparent throughout the nucleus, but the concentration of processes acting on ribosomal DNA results in topoisomerase I accumulation in the nucleolus. Although the activity of topoisomerase I is required in these processes, the enzyme can also have a deleterious effect on cells. In the event that the final re-ligation step of the reaction cycle is prevented, the covalent topoisomerase I-DNA intermediate becomes a toxic DNA lesion that must be repaired. The complexities of the relaxation reaction, the cellular roles, and the pathways that must exist to repair topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage highlight the importance of continued study of this essential enzyme.

TDP1 overexpression in human cells counteracts DNA damage mediated by topoisomerases I and II

Tyrosyl DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) is a repair enzyme that removes adducts, e.g. of topoisomerase I from the 3'-phosphate of DNA breaks. When expressed in human cells as biofluorescent chimera, TDP1 appeared more mobile than topoisomerase I, less accumulated in nucleoli, and not chromosome-bound at early mitosis. Upon exposure to camptothecin both proteins were cleared from nucleoli and rendered less mobile in the nucleoplasm. However, with TDP1 this happened much more slowly reflecting most likely the redistribution of nucleolar structures upon inhibition of rDNA transcription. Thus, a steady association of TDP1 with topoisomerase I seems unlikely, whereas its integration into repair complexes assembled subsequently to the stabilization of DNA.topoisomerase I intermediates is supported. Cells expressing GFP-tagged TDP1 > 100-fold in excess of endogenous TDP1 exhibited a significant reduction of DNA damage induced by the topoisomerase I poison camptothecin and could be selected by that drug. Surprisingly, DNA damage induced by the topoisomerase II poison VP-16 was also diminished to a similar extent, whereas DNA damage independent of topoisomerase I or II was not affected. Overexpression of the inactive mutant GFP-TDP1(H263A) at similar levels did not reduce DNA damage by camptothecin or VP-16. These observations confirm a requirement of active TDP1 for the repair of topoisomerase I-mediated DNA damage. Our data also suggest a role of TDP1 in the repair of DNA damage mediated by topoisomerase II, which is less clear. Since overexpression of TDP1 did not compromise cell proliferation, it could be a pleiotropic resistance mechanism in cancer therapy.

Role of the linker domain and the 203-214 N-terminal residues in the human topoisomerase I DNA complex dynamics

The influence of the N-terminal residues 203-214 and the linker domain on motions in the human topoisomerase I-DNA complex has been investigated by comparing the molecular dynamics simulations of the system with (topo70) or without (topo58/6.3) these regions. Topo58/6.3 is found to fluctuate more than topo70, indicating that the presence of the N-terminal residues and the linker domain dampen the core and C-terminal fluctuations. The simulations also show that residues 203-207 and the linker domain participate in a network of correlated movements with key regions of the enzyme, involved in the human topoisomerase I catalytic cycle, providing a structural-dynamical explanation for the better DNA relaxation activity of topo70 when compared to topo58/6.3. The data have been examined in relation to a wealth of biochemical, site-directed mutagenesis and crystallographic data on human topoisomerase I. The simulations finally show the occurrence of a network of direct and water mediated hydrogen bonds in the proximity of the active site, and the presence of a water molecule in the appropriate position to accept a proton from the catalytic Tyr-723 residue, suggesting that water molecules have an important role in the stabilization and function of this enzyme.

Distinct effects of topoisomerase I and RNA polymerase I inhibitors suggest a dual mechanism of nucleolar/nucleoplasmic partitioning of topoisomerase I

Topoisomerase I is mostly nucleolar, because it plays a preeminent role in ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription. It is cleared from nucleoli following exposure to drugs stabilizing covalent DNA intermediates of the enzyme (e.g. camptothecin) or inhibiting RNA polymerases (e.g. actinomycin D), an effect summarily attributed to blockade of rDNA transcription. Here we show that two distinct mechanisms are at work: (i). Both drugs induce inactivation and segregation of the rRNA transcription machinery. With actinomycin D this leads to a co-migration of RNA-polymerase I and topoisomerase I to the nucleolar perimeter. The process has a slow onset (>20 min), is independent of topoisomerase I activity, but requires the N-terminal domain of the enzyme to colocalize with RNA polymerase I. (ii). Camptothecin induces, in addition, immobilization of active topoisomerase I on genomic DNA resulting in rapid nucleolar clearance and spreading of the enzyme to the entire nucleoplasm. This effect is independent of the state of rRNA transcription, involves segregation of topoisomerase I from RNA polymerase I, has a rapid onset (<1 min), and requires catalytic activity but neither the N-terminal domain of topoisomerase I nor its major sumoylation site. Thus, nucleolar/nucleoplasmic partitioning of topoisomerase I is regulated by interactions with RNA polymerase I and DNA but not by sumoylation.