The crystal structure of Pyrococcus abyssi tRNA (uracil-54, C5)-methyltransferase provides insights into its tRNA specificity

Decoding Substrate Selectivity of an Archaeal RlmCD-like Methyltransferase Through Its Salient Traits

5-Methyluridine (m5U) rRNA modifications frequently occur at U747 and U1939 (Escherichia coli numbering) in domains II and IV of the 23S rRNA in Gram-negative bacteria, with the help of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM)-dependent rRNA methyltransferases (MTases), RlmC and RlmD, respectively. In contrast, Gram-positive bacteria utilize a single SAM-dependent rRNA MTase, RlmCD, to modify both corresponding sites. Notably, certain archaea, specifically within the Thermococcales group, have been found to possess two genes encoding SAM-dependent archaeal (tRNA and rRNA) m5U (Arm5U) MTases. Among these, a tRNA-specific Arm5U MTase (PabTrmU54) has already been characterized. This study focused on the structural and functional characterization of the rRNA-specific Arm5U MTase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus horikoshii (PhRlmCD). An in-depth structural examination revealed a dynamic hinge movement induced by the replacement of the iron-sulfur cluster with disulfide bonds, obstructing the substrate-binding site. It revealed distinctive characteristics of PhRlmCD, including elongated positively charged loops in the central domain and rotational variations in the TRAM domain, which influence substrate selectivity. Additionally, the results suggested that two potential mini-rRNA fragments interact in a similar manner with PhRlmCD at a positively charged cleft at the interface of domains and facilitate dual MTase activities akin to the protein RlmCD. Altogether, these observations showed that Arm5U MTases originated from horizontal gene transfer events, most likely from Gram-positive bacteria.

Prediction of chaperonin GroE substrates using small structural patterns of proteins

Molecular chaperones are indispensable proteins that assist the folding of aggregation-prone proteins into their functional native states, thereby maintaining organized cellular systems. Two of the best-characterized chaperones are the Escherichia coli chaperonins GroEL and GroES (GroE), for which in vivo obligate substrates have been identified by proteome-wide experiments. These substrates comprise various proteins but exhibit remarkable structural features. They include a number of α/β proteins, particularly those adopting the TIM β/α barrel fold. This observation led us to speculate that GroE obligate substrates share a structural motif. Based on this hypothesis, we exhaustively compared substrate structures with the MICAN alignment tool, which detects common structural patterns while ignoring the connectivity or orientation of secondary structural elements. We selected four (or five) substructures with hydrophobic indices that were mostly included in substrates and excluded in others, and developed a GroE obligate substrate discriminator. The substructures are structurally similar and superimposable on the 2-layer 2α4β sandwich, the most popular protein substructure, implying that targeting this structural pattern is a useful strategy for GroE to assist numerous proteins. Seventeen false positives predicted by our methods were experimentally examined using GroE-depleted cells, and 9 proteins were confirmed to be novel GroE obligate substrates. Together, these results demonstrate the utility of our common substructure hypothesis and prediction method.

Post-Transcriptional Modifications of Conserved Nucleotides in the T-Loop of tRNA: A Tale of Functional Convergent Evolution

The high conservation of nucleotides of the T-loop, including their chemical identity, are hallmarks of tRNAs from organisms belonging to the three Domains of Life. These structural characteristics allow the T-loop to adopt a peculiar intraloop conformation able to interact specifically with other conserved residues of the D-loop, which ultimately folds the mature tRNA in a unique functional canonical L-shaped architecture. Paradoxically, despite the high conservation of modified nucleotides in the T-loop, enzymes catalyzing their formation depend mostly on the considered organism, attesting for an independent but convergent evolution of the post-transcriptional modification processes. The driving force behind this is the preservation of a native conformation of the tRNA elbow that underlies the various interactions of tRNA molecules with different cellular components.

The hyperthermophilic partners Nanoarchaeum and Ignicoccus stabilize their tRNA T-loops via different but structurally equivalent modifications

The universal L-shaped tertiary structure of tRNAs is maintained with the help of nucleotide modifications within the D- and T-loops, and these modifications are most extensive within hyperthermophilic species. The obligate-commensal Nanoarchaeum equitans and its phylogenetically-distinct host Ignicoccus hospitalis grow physically coupled under identical hyperthermic conditions. We report here two fundamentally different routes by which these archaea modify the key conserved nucleotide U54 within their tRNA T-loops. In N. equitans, this nucleotide is methylated by the S-adenosylmethionine-dependent enzyme NEQ053 to form m⁵U54, and a recombinant version of this enzyme maintains specificity for U54 in Escherichia coli. In N. equitans, m⁵U54 is subsequently thiolated to form m⁵s²U54. In contrast, I. hospitalis isomerizes U54 to pseudouridine prior to methylating its N1-position and thiolating the O4-position of the nucleobase to form the previously uncharacterized nucleotide m¹s⁴Ψ. The methyl and thiol groups in m¹s⁴Ψ and m⁵s²U are presented within the T-loop in a spatially identical manner that stabilizes the 3′-endo-anti conformation of nucleotide-54, facilitating stacking onto adjacent nucleotides and reverse-Hoogsteen pairing with nucleotide m¹A58. Thus, two distinct structurally-equivalent solutions have evolved independently and convergently to maintain the tertiary fold of tRNAs under extreme hyperthermic conditions.

Genome-wide analysis revealed novel molecular features and evolution of Anti-codons in cyanobacterial tRNAs

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) play important roles to decode the genetic information contained in mRNA in the process of translation. The tRNA molecules possess conserved nucleotides at specific position to regulate the unique function. However, several nucleotides at different position of the tRNA undergo modification to maintain proper stability and function. The major modifications include the presence of pseudouridine (Ψ) residue instead of uridine and the presence of m⁵-methylation sites. We found that, Ψ13 is conserved in D-stem, whereas Ψ38 & Ψ39 were conserved in the anti-codon loop (AL) and anti-codon arm (ACA), respectively. Furthermore, Ψ55 found to be conserved in the Ψ loop. Although, fourteen possible methylation sites can be found in the tRNA, cyanobacterial tRNAs were found to possess conserved G9, m³C₃₂, C₃₆, A₃₇, m⁵C₃₈ and U₅₄ methylation sites. The presence of multiple conserved methylation sites might be responsible for providing necessary stability to the tRNA. The evolutionary study revealed, tRNA^Met and tRNA^Ile were evolved earlier than other tRNA isotypes and their evolution is date back to at least 4000 million years ago. The presence of novel pseudouridination and m⁵-methylation sites in the cyanobacterial tRNAs are of particular interest for basic biology. Further experimental study can delineate their functional significance in protein translation.

Regulatory Factors for tRNA Modifications in Extreme- Thermophilic Bacterium Thermus thermophilus

Thermus thermophilus is an extreme-thermophilic bacterium that can grow at a wide range of temperatures (50-83°C). To enable T. thermophilus to grow at high temperatures, several biomolecules including tRNA and tRNA modification enzymes show extreme heat-resistance. Therefore, the modified nucleosides in tRNA from T. thermophilus have been studied mainly from the view point of tRNA stabilization at high temperatures. Such studies have shown that several modifications stabilize the structure of tRNA and are essential for survival of the organism at high temperatures. Together with tRNA modification enzymes, the modified nucleosides form a network that regulates the extent of different tRNA modifications at various temperatures. In this review, I describe this network, as well as the tRNA recognition mechanism of individual tRNA modification enzymes. Furthermore, I summarize the roles of other tRNA stabilization factors such as polyamines and metal ions.

Transfer RNA Modification Enzymes from Thermophiles and Their Modified Nucleosides in tRNA

To date, numerous modified nucleosides in tRNA as well as tRNA modification enzymes have been identified not only in thermophiles but also in mesophiles. Because most modified nucleosides in tRNA from thermophiles are common to those in tRNA from mesophiles, they are considered to work essentially in steps of protein synthesis at high temperatures. At high temperatures, the structure of unmodified tRNA will be disrupted. Therefore, thermophiles must possess strategies to stabilize tRNA structures. To this end, several thermophile-specific modified nucleosides in tRNA have been identified. Other factors such as RNA-binding proteins and polyamines contribute to the stability of tRNA at high temperatures. Thermus thermophilus, which is an extreme-thermophilic eubacterium, can adapt its protein synthesis system in response to temperature changes via the network of modified nucleosides in tRNA and tRNA modification enzymes. Notably, tRNA modification enzymes from thermophiles are very stable. Therefore, they have been utilized for biochemical and structural studies. In the future, thermostable tRNA modification enzymes may be useful as biotechnology tools and may be utilized for medical science.

Consumption of N5, N10-methylenetetrahydrofolate in Thermus thermophilus under nutrient-poor condition

TrmFO catalyzes the formation of 5-methyluridine at position 54 in tRNA and uses N5, N10-methylenetetrahydrofolate (CH2THF) as the methyl group donor. We found that the trmFO gene-disruptant strain of Thermus thermophilus, an extremely thermophilic eubacterium, can grow faster than the wild-type strain in the synthetic medium at 70°C (optimal growth temperature). Nucleoside analysis revealed that the majority of modifications were appropriately introduced into tRNA, showing that the limited nutrients are preferentially consumed in the tRNA modification systems. CH2THF is consumed not only for tRNA methylation by TrmFO but also for dTMP synthesis by ThyX and methionine synthesis by multiple steps including MetF reaction. In vivo experiment revealed that methylene group derived from serine was rapidly incorporated into DNA in the absence of TrmFO. Furthermore, the addition of thymidine to the medium accelerated growth speed of the wild-type strain. Moreover, in vitro experiments showed that TrmFO interfered with ThyX through consumption of CH2THF. Addition of methionine to the medium accelerated growth speed of wild-type strain and the activity of TrmFO was disturbed by MetF. Thus, the consumption of CH2THF by TrmFO has a negative effect on dTMP and methionine syntheses and results in the slow growth under a nutrient-poor condition.

The Evolution of Substrate Specificity by tRNA Modification Enzymes

All types of nucleic acids in cells undergo naturally occurring chemical modifications, including DNA, rRNA, mRNA, snRNA, and most prominently tRNA. Over 100 different modifications have been described and every position in the purine and pyrimidine bases can be modified; often the sugar is also modified [1]. In tRNA, the function of modifications varies; some modulate global and/or local RNA structure, and others directly impact decoding and may be essential for viability. Whichever the case, the overall importance of modifications is highlighted by both their evolutionary conservation and the fact that organisms use a substantial portion of their genomes to encode modification enzymes, far exceeding what is needed for the de novo synthesis of the canonical nucleotides themselves [2]. Although some modifications occur at exactly the same nucleotide position in tRNAs from the three domains of life, many can be found at various positions in a particular tRNA and their location may vary between and within different tRNAs. With this wild array of chemical diversity and substrate specificities, one of the big challenges in the tRNA modification field has been to better understand at a molecular level the modes of substrate recognition by the different modification enzymes; in this realm RNA binding rests at the heart of the problem. This chapter will focus on several examples of modification enzymes where their mode of RNA binding is well understood; from these, we will try to draw general conclusions and highlight growing themes that may be applicable to the RNA modification field at large.

Diversity in mechanism and function of tRNA methyltransferases

tRNA molecules undergo extensive post-transcriptional processing to generate the mature functional tRNA species that are essential for translation in all organisms. These processing steps include the introduction of numerous specific chemical modifications to nucleotide bases and sugars; among these modifications, methylation reactions are by far the most abundant. The tRNA methyltransferases comprise a diverse enzyme superfamily, including members of multiple structural classes that appear to have arisen independently during evolution. Even among closely related family members, examples of unusual substrate specificity and chemistry have been observed. Here we review recent advances in tRNA methyltransferase mechanism and function with a particular emphasis on discoveries of alternative substrate specificities and chemistry associated with some methyltransferases. Although the molecular function for a specific tRNA methylation may not always be clear, mutations in tRNA methyltransferases have been increasingly associated with human disease. The impact of tRNA methylation on human biology is also discussed.

Major reorientation of tRNA substrates defines specificity of dihydrouridine synthases

The reduction of specific uridines to dihydrouridine is one of the most common modifications in tRNA. Increased levels of the dihydrouridine modification are associated with cancer. Dihydrouridine synthases (Dus) from different subfamilies selectively reduce distinct uridines, located at spatially unique positions of folded tRNA, into dihydrouridine. Because the catalytic center of all Dus enzymes is conserved, it is unclear how the same protein fold can be reprogrammed to ensure that nucleotides exposed at spatially distinct faces of tRNA can be accommodated in the same active site. We show that the Escherichia coli DusC is specific toward U16 of tRNA. Unexpectedly, crystal structures of DusC complexes with tRNA(Phe) and tRNA(Trp) show that Dus subfamilies that selectively modify U16 or U20 in tRNA adopt identical folds but bind their respective tRNA substrates in an almost reverse orientation that differs by a 160° rotation. The tRNA docking orientation appears to be guided by subfamily-specific clusters of amino acids ("binding signatures") together with differences in the shape of the positively charged tRNA-binding surfaces. tRNA orientations are further constrained by positional differences between the C-terminal "recognition" domains. The exquisite substrate specificity of Dus enzymes is therefore controlled by a relatively simple mechanism involving major reorientation of the whole tRNA molecule. Such reprogramming of the enzymatic specificity appears to be a unique evolutionary solution for altering tRNA recognition by the same protein fold.

The archaeal COG1901/DUF358 SPOUT-methyltransferase members, together with pseudouridine synthase Pus10, catalyze the formation of 1-methylpseudouridine at position 54 of tRNA

The methylation of pseudouridine (Ψ) at position 54 of tRNA, producing m(1)Ψ, is a hallmark of many archaeal species, but the specific methylase involved in the formation of this modification had yet to be characterized. A comparative genomics analysis had previously identified COG1901 (DUF358), part of the SPOUT superfamily, as a candidate for this missing methylase family. To test this prediction, the COG1901 encoding gene, HVO_1989, was deleted from the Haloferax volcanii genome. Analyses of modified base contents indicated that while m(1)Ψ was present in tRNA extracted from the wild-type strain, it was absent from tRNA extracted from the mutant strain. Expression of the gene encoding COG1901 from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, VNG1980C, complemented the m(1)Ψ minus phenotype of the ΔHVO_1989 strain. This in vivo validation was extended with in vitro tests. Using the COG1901 recombinant enzyme from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (Mj1640), purified enzyme Pus10 from M. jannaschii and full-size tRNA transcripts or TΨ-arm (17-mer) fragments as substrates, the sequential pathway of m(1)Ψ54 formation in Archaea was reconstituted. The methylation reaction is AdoMet dependent. The efficiency of the methylase reaction depended on the identity of the residue at position 55 of the TΨ-loop. The presence of Ψ55 allowed the efficient conversion of Ψ54 to m(1)Ψ54, whereas in the presence of C55, the reaction was rather inefficient and no methylation reaction occurred if a purine was present at this position. These results led to renaming the Archaeal COG1901 members as TrmY proteins.

New archaeal methyltransferases forming 1-methyladenosine or 1-methyladenosine and 1-methylguanosine at position 9 of tRNA

Two archaeal tRNA methyltransferases belonging to the SPOUT superfamily and displaying unexpected activities are identified. These enzymes are orthologous to the yeast Trm10p methyltransferase, which catalyses the formation of 1-methylguanosine at position 9 of tRNA. In contrast, the Trm10p orthologue from the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius forms 1-methyladenosine at the same position. Even more surprisingly, the Trm10p orthologue from the euryarchaeon Thermococcus kodakaraensis methylates the N¹-atom of either adenosine or guanosine at position 9 in different tRNAs. This is to our knowledge the first example of a tRNA methyltransferase with a broadened nucleoside recognition capability. The evolution of tRNA methyltransferases methylating the N¹ atom of a purine residue is discussed.

Expression and purification of untagged and histidine-tagged folate-dependent tRNA:m5U54 methyltransferase from Bacillus subtilis

Folate-dependent tRNA m(5)U methyltransferase TrmFO is a flavoprotein that catalyzes the C(5)-methylation of uridine at position 54 in the TPsiC loop of tRNA in several bacteria. Here we report the cloning and optimization of expression in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) of untagged, N-terminus, C-terminus (His)(6)-tagged TrmFO from Bacillus subtilis. Tagged and untagged TrmFO were purified to homogeneity by metal affinity or ion exchange and heparin affinity, respectively, followed by size-exclusion chromatography. The tag did not significantly alter the expression level, flavin content, activity and secondary structure of the protein.

Stereochemical mechanisms of tRNA methyltransferases

Methylation of tRNA on the four canonical bases adds structural complexity to the molecule, and improves decoding specificity and efficiency. While many tRNA methylases are known, detailed insight into the catalytic mechanism is only available in a few cases. Of interest among all tRNA methylases is the structural basis for nucleotide selection, by which the specificity is limited to a single site, or broadened to multiple sites. General themes in catalysis include the basis for rate acceleration at highly diverse nucleophilic centers for methyl transfer, using S-adenosylmethionine as a cofactor. Studies of tRNA methylases have also yielded insights into molecular evolution, particularly in the case of enzymes that recognize distinct structures to perform identical reactions at the same target nucleotide.