A biochemically active MCM-like helicase in Bacillus cereus

Novel Families of Archaeo-Eukaryotic Primases Associated with Mobile Genetic Elements of Bacteria and Archaea

Cellular organisms in different domains of life employ structurally unrelated, non-homologous DNA primases for synthesis of a primer for DNA replication. Archaea and eukaryotes encode enzymes of the archaeo-eukaryotic primase (AEP) superfamily, whereas bacteria uniformly use primases of the DnaG family. However, AEP genes are widespread in bacterial genomes raising questions regarding their provenance and function. Here, using an archaeal primase–polymerase PolpTN2 encoded by pTN2 plasmid as a seed for sequence similarity searches, we recovered over 800 AEP homologs from bacteria belonging to 12 highly diverse phyla. These sequences formed a supergroup, PrimPol-PV1, and could be classified into five novel AEP families which are characterized by a conserved motif containing an arginine residue likely to be involved in nucleotide binding. Functional assays confirm the essentiality of this motif for catalytic activity of the PolpTN2 primase–polymerase. Further analyses showed that bacterial AEPs display a range of domain organizations and uncovered several candidates for novel families of helicases. Furthermore, sequence and structure comparisons suggest that PriCT-1 and PriCT-2 domains frequently fused to the AEP domains are related to each other as well as to the non-catalytic, large subunit of archaeal and eukaryotic primases, and to the recently discovered PriX subunit of archaeal primases. Finally, genomic neighborhood analysis indicates that the identified AEPs encoded in bacterial genomes are nearly exclusively associated with highly diverse integrated mobile genetic elements, including integrative conjugative plasmids and prophages.

•

Primases of the archaeo-eukaryotic primase (AEP) superfamily are widespread in bacteria.

•

We describe five new AEP families in bacteria belonging to 12 diverse phyla.

•

The new AEP families display a conserved signature motif likely involved in nucleotide binding.

•

The primase domains are fused to diverse functional domains, revealing new families of putative helicases.

•

The novel primases are encoded within highly diverse integrated mobile genetic elements.

Staphylococcal SCCmec elements encode an active MCM-like helicase and thus may be replicative

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a public-health threat worldwide. Although the mobile genomic island responsible for this phenotype, staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC), has been thought to be nonreplicative, we predicted DNA-replication-related functions for some of the conserved proteins encoded by SCC. We show that one of these, Cch, is homologous to the self-loading initiator helicases of an unrelated family of genomic islands, that it is an active 3'-to-5' helicase and that the adjacent ORF encodes a single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Our 2.9-Å crystal structure of intact Cch shows that it forms a hexameric ring. Cch, like the archaeal and eukaryotic MCM-family replicative helicases, belongs to the pre-sensor II insert clade of AAA+ ATPases. Additionally, we found that SCC elements are part of a broader family of mobile elements, all of which encode a replication initiator upstream of their recombinases. Replication after excision would enhance the efficiency of horizontal gene transfer.

Primase-polymerases are a functionally diverse superfamily of replication and repair enzymes

Until relatively recently, DNA primases were viewed simply as a class of proteins that synthesize short RNA primers requisite for the initiation of DNA replication. However, recent studies have shown that this perception of the limited activities associated with these diverse enzymes can no longer be justified. Numerous examples can now be cited demonstrating how the term ‘DNA primase’ only describes a very narrow subset of these nucleotidyltransferases, with the vast majority fulfilling multifunctional roles from DNA replication to damage tolerance and repair. This article focuses on the archaeo-eukaryotic primase (AEP) superfamily, drawing on recently characterized examples from all domains of life to highlight the functionally diverse pathways in which these enzymes are employed. The broad origins, functionalities and enzymatic capabilities of AEPs emphasizes their previous functional misannotation and supports the necessity for a reclassification of these enzymes under a category called primase-polymerases within the wider functional grouping of polymerases. Importantly, the repositioning of AEPs in this way better recognizes their broader roles in DNA metabolism and encourages the discovery of additional functions for these enzymes, aside from those highlighted here.

A highly divergent archaeo-eukaryotic primase from the Thermococcus nautilus plasmid, pTN2

We report the characterization of a DNA primase/polymerase protein (PolpTN2) encoded by the pTN2 plasmid from Thermococcus nautilus. Sequence analysis revealed that this protein corresponds to a fusion between an N-terminal domain homologous to the small catalytic subunit PriS of heterodimeric archaeal and eukaryotic primases (AEP) and a C-terminal domain related to their large regulatory subunit PriL. This unique domain configuration is not found in other virus- and plasmid-encoded primases in which PriS-like domains are typically fused to different types of helicases. PolpTN2 exhibited primase, polymerase and nucleotidyl transferase activities and specifically incorporates dNTPs, to the exclusion of rNTPs. PolpTN2 could efficiently prime DNA synthesis by the T. nautilus PolB DNA polymerase, suggesting that it is used in vivo as a primase for pTN2 plasmid replication. The N-terminal PriS-like domain of PolpTN2 exhibited all activities of the full-length enzyme but was much less efficient in priming cellular DNA polymerases. Surprisingly, the N-terminal domain possesses reverse transcriptase activity. We speculate that this activity could reflect an ancestral function of AEP proteins in the transition from the RNA to the DNA world.

Novel interaction of the bacterial-Like DnaG primase with the MCM helicase in archaea

DNA priming and unwinding activities are coupled within bacterial primosome complexes to initiate synthesis on the lagging strand during DNA replication. Archaeal organisms contain conserved primase genes homologous to both the bacterial DnaG and archaeo-eukaryotic primase families. The inclusion of multiple DNA primases within a whole domain of organisms complicates the assignment of the metabolic roles of each. In support of a functional bacterial-like DnaG primase participating in archaeal DNA replication, we have detected an interaction of Sulfolobus solfataricus DnaG (SsoDnaG) with the replicative S. solfataricus minichromosome maintenance (SsoMCM) helicase on DNA. The interaction site has been mapped to the N-terminal tier of SsoMCM analogous to bacterial primosome complexes. Mutagenesis within the metal binding site of SsoDnaG verifies a functional homology with bacterial DnaG that perturbs priming activity and DNA binding. The complex of SsoDnaG with SsoMCM stimulates the ATPase activity of SsoMCM but leaves the priming activity of SsoDnaG unchanged. Competition for binding DNA between SsoDnaG and SsoMCM can reduce the unwinding ability. Fluorescent gel shift experiments were used to quantify the binding of the ternary SsoMCM-DNA-SsoDnaG complex. This direct interaction of a bacterial-like primase with a eukaryotic-like helicase suggests that formation of a unique but homologous archaeal primosome complex is possible but may require other components to stimulate activities. Identification of this archaeal primosome complex broadly impacts evolutionary relationships of DNA replication.

DNA helicase 3.6.4.12

EC number

 3.6.4.12

Systematic name

 ATP phosphohydrolase (DNA helix unwinding)

Recommended name

 DNA helicase

Synonyms

 3’ to 5’ DNA helicase <28> [35]

 3’-5’ DNA helicase <11> [55]

 3’-5’ PfDH <11> [55]

 5’ to 3’ DNA helicase <26,27> [19,42]

 AvDH1 <47> [37]

 BACH1 helicase <19> [34]

 BLM <3> [28]

 BLM protein <3> [28]

 BRCA1-associated C-terminal helicase <19> [34]

 BcMCM <8> [52]

 CeWRN-1 <43> [9]

 DDX25 <3,48> [36]

 DNA helicase 120 <7> [15]

 DNA helicase A <4> [8]

 DNA helicase E <5> [44]

 DNA helicase II <9> [7]

 DNA helicase III <4> [27]

 DNA helicase RECQL5β <44> [17]

 DNA helicase VI <3> [45]

 Dbp9p <46> (<46> a member of the DEAD box protein family [24]) [24]

 DmRECQ5 <1> [50]

 DnaB helicase <29> [23]

 E1 helicase <17> [58]

 GRTH/DDX25 <3,48> [36]

 HCoV SF1 helicase <23> [3]

 HCoV helicase <23> [3]

 HDH IV <3> [45]

 Hel E <5> [44]

 Hmi1p <40> [60]

 MCM helicase <6,5,38> [43,54]

 MCM protein <6,35> [43]

 MER3 helicase <22> [30]

 MER3 protein <22> [30]

 MPH1 <28> [35]

 NS3 <12,50> (<12,50> ambiguous [38,65,66]) [38,65,66]

 NS3 NTPase/helicase <14> (<14> ambiguous [67]) [67]

 NS3 protein <12> (<12> ambiguous [63]) [63]

 NTPase/helicase <12,16> (<12> ambiguous [61]) [61,64]

 PDH120 <7> [15]

 PIF1 <33> [51]

 PIF1 helicase <33> [51,53]

 PcrA <37> [20]

 PcrA helicase <37,41,49> [20,21,39]

 PcrASpn <41> [21]

 PfDH A <11> [55]

 Pfh1p <27> [42]

 RECQ5 <1> [49,50]

 RECQ5 helicase <1> (<1> small isoform [49]) [49]

 RECQL5b <44> [17]

 REcQ <31> [13]

 RSF1010 RepA <30> [5]

 RecG <45> [6]

 RecQ helicase <32> [56]

 RecQsim <32> [56]

 Rep52 <24> [40]

 Rrm3p <26> [19]

 Sgs1 <36> [29]

 Sgs1 DNA helicase <36> [29]

 TWINKLE <21> [33]

 Tth UvrD <20> [16]

 UvrD <20,42> [16,22]

 UvrD helicase <39> [18]

 WRN <18> [31]

 WRN RecQ helicase <18> [12]

 WRN helicase <18> [12]

 WRN protein <18> [12]

 WRN-1 RecQ helicase <43> [9]

 Werner Syndrome helicase <18> [31]

 Werner syndrome RecQ helicase <18> [12]

 dheI I <1> [46]

 dnaB <29> [23]

 hPif1 <33> [53]

 helicase DnaB <2> [10]

 helicase II <25> [25]

 helicase PcrA <49> [39]

 helicase UvrD <20> [16]

 helicase domain of bacteriophage T7 gene 4 protein <10> [47]

 non structural protein 3 <12> (<12> ambiguous [61,62]) [61,62]

 nonstructural protein 3 <12,14,50,51> (<12,14,50> ambiguous [38,63,65,66,67]; <51> ambigous [4]) [4,38,63,65,66,67]

 protein NS3 <12> (<12> ambiguous [62]) [62]

 scHelI <4> [26]

 urvD <25> [25]

Molecular architecture of a multifunctional MCM complex

DNA replication is strictly regulated through a sequence of steps that involve many macromolecular protein complexes. One of them is the replicative helicase, which is required for initiation and elongation phases. A MCM helicase found as a prophage in the genome of Bacillus cereus is fused with a primase domain constituting an integrative arrangement of two essential activities for replication. We have isolated this helicase–primase complex (BcMCM) showing that it can bind DNA and displays not only helicase and primase but also DNA polymerase activity. Using single-particle electron microscopy and 3D reconstruction, we obtained structures of BcMCM using ATPγS or ADP in the absence and presence of DNA. The complex depicts the typical hexameric ring shape. The dissection of the unwinding mechanism using site-directed mutagenesis in the Walker A, Walker B, arginine finger and the helicase channels, suggests that the BcMCM complex unwinds DNA following the extrusion model similarly to the E1 helicase from papillomavirus.

The origin of a derived superkingdom: how a gram-positive bacterium crossed the desert to become an archaeon

BACKGROUND

The tree of life is usually rooted between archaea and bacteria. We have previously presented three arguments that support placing the root of the tree of life in bacteria. The data have been dismissed because those who support the canonical rooting between the prokaryotic superkingdoms cannot imagine how the vast divide between the prokaryotic superkingdoms could be crossed.

RESULTS

We review the evidence that archaea are derived, as well as their biggest differences with bacteria. We argue that using novel data the gap between the superkingdoms is not insurmountable. We consider whether archaea are holophyletic or paraphyletic; essential to understanding their origin. Finally, we review several hypotheses on the origins of archaea and, where possible, evaluate each hypothesis using bioinformatics tools. As a result we argue for a firmicute ancestry for archaea over proposals for an actinobacterial ancestry.

CONCLUSION

We believe a synthesis of the hypotheses of Lake, Gupta, and Cavalier-Smith is possible where a combination of antibiotic warfare and viral endosymbiosis in the bacilli led to dramatic changes in a bacterium that resulted in the birth of archaea and eukaryotes.

REVIEWERS

This article was reviewed by Patrick Forterre, Eugene Koonin, and Gáspár Jékely.