2
|
Zhao T, Vvedenskaya IO, Lai WKM, Basu S, Pugh BF, Nickels BE, Kaplan CD. Ssl2/TFIIH function in transcription start site scanning by RNA polymerase II in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. eLife 2021; 10:e71013. [PMID: 34652274 PMCID: PMC8589449 DOI: 10.7554/elife.71013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) selects transcription start sites (TSSs) by a unidirectional scanning process. During scanning, a preinitiation complex (PIC) assembled at an upstream core promoter initiates at select positions within a window ~40-120 bp downstream. Several lines of evidence indicate that Ssl2, the yeast homolog of XPB and an essential and conserved subunit of the general transcription factor (GTF) TFIIH, drives scanning through its DNA-dependent ATPase activity, therefore potentially controlling both scanning rate and scanning extent (processivity). To address questions of how Ssl2 functions in promoter scanning and interacts with other initiation activities, we leveraged distinct initiation-sensitive reporters to identify novel ssl2 alleles. These ssl2 alleles, many of which alter residues conserved from yeast to human, confer either upstream or downstream TSS shifts at the model promoter ADH1 and genome-wide. Specifically, tested ssl2 alleles alter TSS selection by increasing or narrowing the distribution of TSSs used at individual promoters. Genetic interactions of ssl2 alleles with other initiation factors are consistent with ssl2 allele classes functioning through increasing or decreasing scanning processivity but not necessarily scanning rate. These alleles underpin a residue interaction network that likely modulates Ssl2 activity and TFIIH function in promoter scanning. We propose that the outcome of promoter scanning is determined by two functional networks, the first being Pol II activity and factors that modulate it to determine initiation efficiency within a scanning window, and the second being Ssl2/TFIIH and factors that modulate scanning processivity to determine the width of the scanning widow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Zhao
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| | - Irina O Vvedenskaya
- Department of Genetics and Waksman Institute, Rutgers UniversityPiscatawayUnited States
| | - William KM Lai
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell UniversityIthacaUnited States
| | - Shrabani Basu
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| | - B Franklin Pugh
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell UniversityIthacaUnited States
| | - Bryce E Nickels
- Department of Genetics and Waksman Institute, Rutgers UniversityPiscatawayUnited States
| | - Craig D Kaplan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qiu C, Jin H, Vvedenskaya I, Llenas JA, Zhao T, Malik I, Visbisky AM, Schwartz SL, Cui P, Čabart P, Han KH, Lai WKM, Metz RP, Johnson CD, Sze SH, Pugh BF, Nickels BE, Kaplan CD. Universal promoter scanning by Pol II during transcription initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol 2020; 21:132. [PMID: 32487207 PMCID: PMC7265651 DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02040-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of eukaryotic promoters utilize multiple transcription start sites (TSSs). How multiple TSSs are specified at individual promoters across eukaryotes is not understood for most species. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a pre-initiation complex (PIC) comprised of Pol II and conserved general transcription factors (GTFs) assembles and opens DNA upstream of TSSs. Evidence from model promoters indicates that the PIC scans from upstream to downstream to identify TSSs. Prior results suggest that TSS distributions at promoters where scanning occurs shift in a polar fashion upon alteration in Pol II catalytic activity or GTF function. RESULTS To determine the extent of promoter scanning across promoter classes in S. cerevisiae, we perturb Pol II catalytic activity and GTF function and analyze their effects on TSS usage genome-wide. We find that alterations to Pol II, TFIIB, or TFIIF function widely alter the initiation landscape consistent with promoter scanning operating at all yeast promoters, regardless of promoter class. Promoter architecture, however, can determine the extent of promoter sensitivity to altered Pol II activity in ways that are predicted by a scanning model. CONCLUSIONS Our observations coupled with previous data validate key predictions of the scanning model for Pol II initiation in yeast, which we term the shooting gallery. In this model, Pol II catalytic activity and the rate and processivity of Pol II scanning together with promoter sequence determine the distribution of TSSs and their usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenxi Qiu
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Present Address: Department of Medicine, Division of Translational Therapeutics, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Huiyan Jin
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
| | - Irina Vvedenskaya
- Waksman Institute of Microbiology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Jordi Abante Llenas
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3128, USA
- Present Address: Whitaker Biomedical Engineering Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Tingting Zhao
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
| | - Indranil Malik
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Present Address: Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Alex M Visbisky
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
| | - Scott L Schwartz
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Ping Cui
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
| | - Pavel Čabart
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Present Address: First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, BIOCEV, 252 42, Vestec, Czech Republic
| | - Kang Hoo Han
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
| | - William K M Lai
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
- Present Address: Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, 458 Biotechnology, Cornell University, New York, 14853, USA
| | - Richard P Metz
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Charles D Johnson
- Genomics and Bioinformatics Service, Texas A&M AgriLife, College Station, TX, 77845, USA
| | - Sing-Hoi Sze
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2128, USA
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-3127, USA
| | - B Franklin Pugh
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA
- Present Address: Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, 458 Biotechnology, Cornell University, New York, 14853, USA
| | - Bryce E Nickels
- Waksman Institute of Microbiology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
- Department of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Craig D Kaplan
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
RNA polymerase II (Pol II) transcribes all protein-coding genes and many noncoding RNAs in eukaryotic genomes. Although Pol II is a complex, 12-subunit enzyme, it lacks the ability to initiate transcription and cannot consistently transcribe through long DNA sequences. To execute these essential functions, an array of proteins and protein complexes interact with Pol II to regulate its activity. In this review, we detail the structure and mechanism of over a dozen factors that govern Pol II initiation (e.g., TFIID, TFIIH, and Mediator), pausing, and elongation (e.g., DSIF, NELF, PAF, and P-TEFb). The structural basis for Pol II transcription regulation has advanced rapidly in the past decade, largely due to technological innovations in cryoelectron microscopy. Here, we summarize a wealth of structural and functional data that have enabled a deeper understanding of Pol II transcription mechanisms; we also highlight mechanistic questions that remain unanswered or controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison C Schier
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA
| | - Dylan J Taatjes
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Il'icheva IA, Khodikov MV, Poptsova MS, Nechipurenko DY, Nechipurenko YD, Grokhovsky SL. Structural features of DNA that determine RNA polymerase II core promoter. BMC Genomics 2016; 17:973. [PMID: 27884105 PMCID: PMC5123417 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3292-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The general structure and action of all eukaryotic and archaeal RNA polymerases machinery have an astonishing similarity despite the diversity of core promoter sequences in different species. The goal of our work is to find common characteristics of DNA region that define it as a promoter for the RNA polymerase II (Pol II). Results The profiles of a large number of physical and structural characteristics, averaged over representative sets of the Pol II minimal core promoters of the evolutionary divergent species from animals, plants and unicellular fungi were analysed. In addition to the characteristics defined at the base-pair steps, we, for the first time, use profiles of the ultrasonic cleavage and DNase I cleavage indexes, informative for internal properties of each complementary strand. Conclusions DNA of the core promoters of metazoans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe has similar structural organization. Its mechanical and 3D structural characteristics have singular properties at the positions of TATA-box. The minor groove is broadened and conformational motion is decreased in that region. Special characteristics of conformational behavior are revealed in metazoans at the region, which connects the end of TATA-box and the transcription start site (TSS). The intensities of conformational motions in the complementary strands are periodically changed in opposite phases. They are noticeable, best of all, in mammals. Such conformational features are lacking in the core promoters of S. pombe. The profiles of Saccharomyces cerevisiae core promoters significantly differ: their singular region is shifted down thus pointing to the uniqueness of their structural organization. Obtained results may be useful in genetic engineering for artificial modulation of the promoter strength. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3292-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina A Il'icheva
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
| | - Mingian V Khodikov
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | | | | | - Yury D Nechipurenko
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| | - Sergei L Grokhovsky
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sainsbury S, Niesser J, Cramer P. Structure and function of the initially transcribing RNA polymerase II-TFIIB complex. Nature 2012; 493:437-40. [PMID: 23151482 DOI: 10.1038/nature11715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2012] [Accepted: 10/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The general transcription factor (TF) IIB is required for RNA polymerase (Pol) II initiation and extends with its B-reader element into the Pol II active centre cleft. Low-resolution structures of the Pol II-TFIIB complex indicated how TFIIB functions in DNA recruitment, but they lacked nucleic acids and half of the B-reader, leaving other TFIIB functions enigmatic. Here we report crystal structures of the Pol II-TFIIB complex from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 3.4 Å resolution and of an initially transcribing complex that additionally contains the DNA template and a 6-nucleotide RNA product. The structures reveal the entire B-reader and protein-nucleic acid interactions, and together with functional data lead to a more complete understanding of transcription initiation. TFIIB partially closes the polymerase cleft to position DNA and assist in its opening. The B-reader does not reach the active site but binds the DNA template strand upstream to assist in the recognition of the initiator sequence and in positioning the transcription start site. TFIIB rearranges active-site residues, induces binding of the catalytic metal ion B, and stimulates initial RNA synthesis allosterically. TFIIB then prevents the emerging DNA-RNA hybrid duplex from tilting, which would impair RNA synthesis. When the RNA grows beyond 6 nucleotides, it is separated from DNA and is directed to its exit tunnel by the B-reader loop. Once the RNA grows to 12-13 nucleotides, it clashes with TFIIB, triggering TFIIB displacement and elongation complex formation. Similar mechanisms may underlie all cellular transcription because all eukaryotic and archaeal RNA polymerases use TFIIB-like factors, and the bacterial initiation factor sigma has TFIIB-like topology and contains the loop region 3.2 that resembles the B-reader loop in location, charge and function. TFIIB and its counterparts may thus account for the two fundamental properties that distinguish RNA from DNA polymerases: primer-independent chain initiation and product separation from the template.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Sainsbury
- Gene Center and Department of Biochemistry, Center for Integrated Protein Science CIPSM, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Feodor-Lynen-Str. 25, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kaplan CD. Basic mechanisms of RNA polymerase II activity and alteration of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENE REGULATORY MECHANISMS 2012; 1829:39-54. [PMID: 23022618 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2012] [Revised: 09/18/2012] [Accepted: 09/20/2012] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Transcription by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and all RNA polymerases for that matter, may be understood as comprising two cycles. The first cycle relates to the basic mechanism of the transcription process wherein Pol II must select the appropriate nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) substrate complementary to the DNA template, catalyze phosphodiester bond formation, and translocate to the next position on the DNA template. Performing this cycle in an iterative fashion allows the synthesis of RNA chains that can be over one million nucleotides in length in some larger eukaryotes. Overlaid upon this enzymatic cycle, transcription may be divided into another cycle of three phases: initiation, elongation, and termination. Each of these phases has a large number of associated transcription factors that function to promote or regulate the gene expression process. Complicating matters, each phase of the latter transcription cycle are coincident with cotranscriptional RNA processing events. Additionally, transcription takes place within a highly dynamic and regulated chromatin environment. This chromatin environment is radically impacted by active transcription and associated chromatin modifications and remodeling, while also functioning as a major platform for Pol II regulation. This review will focus on our basic knowledge of the Pol II transcription mechanism, and how altered Pol II activity impacts gene expression in vivo in the model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: RNA Polymerase II Transcript Elongation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig D Kaplan
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2128, USA.
| |
Collapse
|