1
|
Adolph MB, Cortez D. Mechanisms and regulation of replication fork reversal. DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 141:103731. [PMID: 39089193 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
DNA replication is remarkably accurate with estimates of only a handful of mutations per human genome per cell division cycle. Replication stress caused by DNA lesions, transcription-replication conflicts, and other obstacles to the replication machinery must be efficiently overcome in ways that minimize errors and maximize completion of DNA synthesis. Replication fork reversal is one mechanism that helps cells tolerate replication stress. This process involves reannealing of parental template DNA strands and generation of a nascent-nascent DNA duplex. While fork reversal may be beneficial by facilitating DNA repair or template switching, it must be confined to the appropriate contexts to preserve genome stability. Many enzymes have been implicated in this process including ATP-dependent DNA translocases like SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, HLTF, and the helicase FBH1. In addition, the RAD51 recombinase is required. Many additional factors and regulatory activities also act to ensure reversal is beneficial instead of yielding undesirable outcomes. Finally, reversed forks must also be stabilized and often need to be restarted to complete DNA synthesis. Disruption or deregulation of fork reversal causes a variety of human diseases. In this review we will describe the latest models for reversal and key mechanisms of regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison B Adolph
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, United States
| | - David Cortez
- Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yates M, Marois I, St-Hilaire E, Ronato DA, Djerir B, Brochu C, Morin T, Hammond-Martel I, Gezzar-Dandashi S, Casimir L, Drobetsky E, Cappadocia L, Masson JY, Wurtele H, Maréchal A. SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation controls its association with RPA-coated ssDNA and promotes replication fork stability. PLoS Biol 2024; 22:e3002552. [PMID: 38502677 PMCID: PMC10950228 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Impediments in replication fork progression cause genomic instability, mutagenesis, and severe pathologies. At stalled forks, RPA-coated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) activates the ATR kinase and directs fork remodeling, 2 key early events of the replication stress response. RFWD3, a recently described Fanconi anemia (FA) ubiquitin ligase, associates with RPA and promotes its ubiquitylation, facilitating late steps of homologous recombination (HR). Intriguingly, RFWD3 also regulates fork progression, restart and stability via poorly understood mechanisms. Here, we used proteomics to identify putative RFWD3 substrates during replication stress in human cells. We show that RFWD3 interacts with and ubiquitylates the SMARCAL1 DNA translocase directly in vitro and following DNA damage in vivo. SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation does not trigger its subsequent proteasomal degradation but instead disengages it from RPA thereby regulating its function at replication forks. Proper regulation of SMARCAL1 by RFWD3 at stalled forks protects them from excessive MUS81-mediated cleavage in response to UV irradiation, thereby limiting DNA replication stress. Collectively, our results identify RFWD3-mediated SMARCAL1 ubiquitylation as a novel mechanism that modulates fork remodeling to avoid genome instability triggered by aberrant fork processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maïlyn Yates
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- CHUS Research Center and Cancer Research Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Isabelle Marois
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- CHUS Research Center and Cancer Research Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Edlie St-Hilaire
- Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montréal, Canada
| | - Daryl A. Ronato
- Genome Stability Laboratory, CHU de Québec Research Center, Oncology Division; Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology; Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec City, Canada
| | - Billel Djerir
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- CHUS Research Center and Cancer Research Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Chloé Brochu
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- CHUS Research Center and Cancer Research Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Théo Morin
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- CHUS Research Center and Cancer Research Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | | | | | - Lisa Casimir
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- CHUS Research Center and Cancer Research Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
| | - Elliot Drobetsky
- Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montréal, Canada
- Medicine Department, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Laurent Cappadocia
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Chemistry, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Jean-Yves Masson
- Genome Stability Laboratory, CHU de Québec Research Center, Oncology Division; Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology; Laval University Cancer Research Center, Québec City, Canada
| | - Hugo Wurtele
- Research Center, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montréal, Canada
- Medicine Department, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Alexandre Maréchal
- Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- CHUS Research Center and Cancer Research Institute, Sherbrooke, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jain CK, Mukhopadhyay S, Ganguly A. RecQ Family Helicases in Replication Fork Remodeling and Repair: Opening New Avenues towards the Identification of Potential Targets for Cancer Chemotherapy. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2020; 20:1311-1326. [PMID: 32418530 DOI: 10.2174/1871520620666200518082433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Replication fork reversal and restart has gained immense interest as a central response mechanism to replication stress following DNA damage. Although the exact mechanism of fork reversal has not been elucidated precisely, the involvement of diverse pathways and different factors has been demonstrated, which are central to this phenomenon. RecQ helicases known for their vital role in DNA repair and maintaining genome stability has recently been implicated in the restart of regressed replication forks. Through interaction with vital proteins like Poly (ADP) ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1), these helicases participate in the replication fork reversal and restart phenomenon. Most therapeutic agents used for cancer chemotherapy act by causing DNA damage in replicating cells and subsequent cell death. These DNA damages can be repaired by mechanisms involving fork reversal as the key phenomenon eventually reducing the efficacy of the therapeutic agent. Hence the factors contributing to this repair process can be good selective targets for developing more efficient chemotherapeutic agents. In this review, we have discussed in detail the role of various proteins in replication fork reversal and restart with special emphasis on RecQ helicases. Involvement of other proteins like PARP1, recombinase rad51, SWI/SNF complex has also been discussed. Since RecQ helicases play a central role in the DNA damage response following chemotherapeutic treatment, we propose that targeting these helicases can emerge as an alternative to available intervention strategies. We have also summarized the current research status of available RecQ inhibitors and siRNA based therapeutic approaches that targets RecQ helicases. In summary, our review gives an overview of the DNA damage responses involving replication fork reversal and provides new directions for the development of more efficient and sustainable chemotherapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetan K Jain
- Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, India
| | - Swagata Mukhopadhyay
- Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, India
| | - Agneyo Ganguly
- Department of Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, 721302, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jin J, Wu K, Liu Z, Chen X, Jiang S, Wang Z, Li W. Whole Exome Sequencing Identified a Novel Biallelic SMARCAL1 Mutation in the Extremely Rare Disease SIOD. Front Genet 2019; 10:565. [PMID: 31275356 PMCID: PMC6591458 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia (SIOD) is an extremely rare autosomal recessive pleiotropic disease. Although biallelic mutations in SMARCAL1 gene have been reported to be the genetic etiology of SIOD, its molecular diagnosis has been challenging in a relatively proportion of cases due to the extreme rarity. Here, we made a definitive SIOD diagnosis of a 5-year-old girl with an extremely mild phenotype by applying whole exome sequencing (WES). As a result, a novel maternal mutation (c.2141+5G > A) confirmed to create a novel splice donor site combined with a known paternal mutation (c.1933C > T; p.Arg645Cys) were detected. In addition, previous reported SIOD cases showed excessive enrichment for mutations in the helicase ATP-binding and C-terminal domains of SMARCAL1. Similarly, the novel mutation we identified caused a mutant protein truncated in the SMARCAL1 C-terminus. Interestingly, based on the phenotypic profile, compared to reported cases, the patient in our study exhibited milder symptoms with renal dysfunctions limited to asymptomatic proteinuria, but no neurological signs or recurrent infections. Moreover, we identified 73 SMARCAL1-interacting genes, which formed a significant interconnected interaction network with roles in disease-related pathways such as double-strand break repair via homologous recombination, DNA repair, and replication fork processing. Notably, the top 15 SMARCAL1-interacting genes all showed a similar renal temporal expression pattern. Altogether, to our knowledge, the case in this study is the first case diagnosed originally based on a genetic test via WES rather than a characteristic phenotype. The identification of the novel allelic mutation (c.2141+5G > A) extends the phenotypic spectrum of SMARCAL1 mutations and the following bioinformatics analysis presents additional genetic evidence to illustrate the role of SMARCAL1 in SIOD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Jin
- School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Keke Wu
- Wenzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zhenwei Liu
- Institute of Genomic Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Xiaomin Chen
- Institute of Genomic Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.,Center of Scientific Research, The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Shan Jiang
- Institute of Genomic Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Zhen Wang
- School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.,Research Center of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Weixing Li
- School of Laboratory Medicine and Life Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.,Zhejiang Center for Clinical Laboratory, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adenovirus E1B 55-Kilodalton Protein Targets SMARCAL1 for Degradation during Infection and Modulates Cellular DNA Replication. J Virol 2019; 93:JVI.00402-19. [PMID: 30996091 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00402-19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Here, we show that the cellular DNA replication protein and ATR substrate SMARCAL1 is recruited to viral replication centers early during adenovirus infection and is then targeted in an E1B-55K/E4orf6- and cullin RING ligase-dependent manner for proteasomal degradation. In this regard, we have determined that SMARCAL1 is phosphorylated at S123, S129, and S173 early during infection in an ATR- and CDK-dependent manner, and that pharmacological inhibition of ATR and CDK activities attenuates SMARCAL1 degradation. SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral replication centers was shown to be largely dependent upon SMARCAL1 association with the RPA complex, while Ad-induced SMARCAL1 phosphorylation also contributed to SMARCAL1 recruitment to viral replication centers, albeit to a limited extent. SMARCAL1 was found associated with E1B-55K in adenovirus E1-transformed cells. Consistent with its ability to target SMARCAL1, we determined that E1B-55K modulates cellular DNA replication. As such, E1B-55K expression initially enhances cellular DNA replication fork speed but ultimately leads to increased replication fork stalling and the attenuation of cellular DNA replication. Therefore, we propose that adenovirus targets SMARCAL1 for degradation during infection to inhibit cellular DNA replication and promote viral replication.IMPORTANCE Viruses have evolved to inhibit cellular DNA damage response pathways that possess antiviral activities and utilize DNA damage response pathways that possess proviral activities. Adenovirus has evolved, primarily, to inhibit DNA damage response pathways by engaging with the ubiquitin-proteasome system and promoting the degradation of key cellular proteins. Adenovirus differentially regulates ATR DNA damage response signaling pathways during infection. The cellular adenovirus E1B-55K binding protein E1B-AP5 participates in ATR signaling pathways activated during infection, while adenovirus 12 E4orf6 negates Chk1 activation by promoting the proteasome-dependent degradation of the ATR activator TOPBP1. The studies detailed here indicate that adenovirus utilizes ATR kinase and CDKs during infection to promote the degradation of SMARCAL1 to attenuate normal cellular DNA replication. These studies further our understanding of the relationship between adenovirus and DNA damage and cell cycle signaling pathways during infection and establish new roles for E1B-55K in the modulation of cellular DNA replication.
Collapse
|
6
|
Butryn A, Woike S, Shetty SJ, Auble DT, Hopfner KP. Crystal structure of the full Swi2/Snf2 remodeler Mot1 in the resting state. eLife 2018; 7:37774. [PMID: 30289385 PMCID: PMC6188472 DOI: 10.7554/elife.37774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Swi2/Snf2 ATPases remodel protein:DNA complexes in all of the fundamental chromosome-associated processes. The single-subunit remodeler Mot1 dissociates TATA box-binding protein (TBP):DNA complexes and provides a simple model for obtaining structural insights into the action of Swi2/Snf2 ATPases. Previously we reported how the N-terminal domain of Mot1 binds TBP, NC2 and DNA, but the location of the C-terminal ATPase domain remained unclear (Butryn et al., 2015). Here, we report the crystal structure of the near full-length Mot1 from Chaetomium thermophilum. Our data show that Mot1 adopts a ring like structure with a catalytically inactive resting state of the ATPase. Biochemical analysis suggests that TBP binding switches Mot1 into an ATP hydrolysis-competent conformation. Combined with our previous results, these data significantly improve the structural model for the complete Mot1:TBP:DNA complex and suggest a general mechanism for Mot1 action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agata Butryn
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephan Woike
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Savera J Shetty
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, United States
| | - David T Auble
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, United States
| | - Karl-Peter Hopfner
- Department of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.,Center for Integrated Protein Sciences Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liao H, Ji F, Helleday T, Ying S. Mechanisms for stalled replication fork stabilization: new targets for synthetic lethality strategies in cancer treatments. EMBO Rep 2018; 19:embr.201846263. [PMID: 30108055 DOI: 10.15252/embr.201846263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Timely and faithful duplication of the entire genome depends on completion of replication. Replication forks frequently encounter obstacles that may cause genotoxic fork stalling. Nevertheless, failure to complete replication rarely occurs under normal conditions, which is attributed to an intricate network of proteins that serves to stabilize, repair and restart stalled forks. Indeed, many of the components in this network are encoded by tumour suppressor genes, and their loss of function by mutation or deletion generates genomic instability, a hallmark of cancer. Paradoxically, the same fork-protective network also confers resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs that induce high-level replication stress. Here, we review the mechanisms and major pathways rescuing stalled replication forks, with a focus on fork stabilization preventing fork collapse. A coherent understanding of how cells protect their replication forks will not only provide insight into how cells maintain genome stability, but also unravel potential therapeutic targets for cancers refractory to conventional chemotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongwei Liao
- Department of Pharmacology & Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Fang Ji
- Department of Pharmacology & Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Thomas Helleday
- Science for Life Laboratory, Division of Translational Medicine and Chemical Biology, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden .,Sheffield Cancer Centre, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Songmin Ying
- Department of Pharmacology & Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease of Zhejiang Province, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
A large number of SNF2 family, DNA and ATP-dependent motor proteins are needed during transcription, DNA replication, and DNA repair to manipulate protein-DNA interactions and change DNA structure. SMARCAL1, ZRANB3, and HLTF are three related members of this family with specialized functions that maintain genome stability during DNA replication. These proteins are recruited to replication forks through protein-protein interactions and bind DNA using both their motor and substrate recognition domains (SRDs). The SRD provides specificity to DNA structures like forks and junctions and confers DNA remodeling activity to the motor domains. Remodeling reactions include fork reversal and branch migration to promote fork stabilization, template switching, and repair. Regulation ensures these powerful activities remain controlled and restricted to damaged replication forks. Inherited mutations in SMARCAL1 cause a severe developmental disorder and mutations in ZRANB3 and HLTF are linked to cancer illustrating the importance of these enzymes in ensuring complete and accurate DNA replication. In this review, we examine how these proteins function, concentrating on their common and unique attributes and regulatory mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A Poole
- a Department of Biochemistry , Vanderbilt University School of Medicine , Nashville , TN , USA
| | - David Cortez
- a Department of Biochemistry , Vanderbilt University School of Medicine , Nashville , TN , USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lugli N, Sotiriou SK, Halazonetis TD. The role of SMARCAL1 in replication fork stability and telomere maintenance. DNA Repair (Amst) 2017. [PMID: 28623093 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
SMARCAL1 (SWI/SNF Related, Matrix Associated, Actin Dependent Regulator Of Chromatin, Subfamily A-Like 1), also known as HARP, is an ATP-dependent annealing helicase that stabilizes replication forks during DNA damage. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Schimke immune-osseous dysplasia (SIOD), an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by T-cell immunodeficiency and growth dysfunctions. In this review, we summarize the main roles of SMARCAL1 in DNA repair, telomere maintenance and replication fork stability in response to DNA replication stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Lugli
- Department of Molecular Biology, University of Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neelsen KJ, Lopes M. Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: from dead end to dynamic response. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2015; 16:207-20. [PMID: 25714681 DOI: 10.1038/nrm3935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 356] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The remodelling of replication forks into four-way junctions following replication perturbation, known as fork reversal, was hypothesized to promote DNA damage tolerance and repair during replication. Albeit conceptually attractive, for a long time fork reversal in vivo was found only in prokaryotes and specific yeast mutants, calling its evolutionary conservation and physiological relevance into question. Based on the recent visualization of replication forks in metazoans, fork reversal has emerged as a global, reversible and regulated process, with intriguing implications for replication completion, chromosome integrity and the DNA damage response. The study of the putative in vivo roles of recently identified eukaryotic factors in fork remodelling promises to shed new light on mechanisms of genome maintenance and to provide novel attractive targets for cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai J Neelsen
- 1] Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland. [2] The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Massimo Lopes
- Institute of Molecular Cancer Research, University of Zürich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Feldkamp MD, Mason AC, Eichman BF, Chazin WJ. Structural analysis of replication protein A recruitment of the DNA damage response protein SMARCAL1. Biochemistry 2014; 53:3052-61. [PMID: 24730652 PMCID: PMC4020579 DOI: 10.1021/bi500252w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
![]()
SWI/SNF-related,
matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of
chromatin, subfamily A-like1 (SMARCAL1) is a recently identified DNA
damage response protein involved in remodeling stalled replication
forks. The eukaryotic single-strand DNA binding protein replication
protein A (RPA) recruits SMARCAL1 to stalled forks in vivo and facilitates regression of forks containing leading strand gaps.
Both activities are mediated by a direct interaction between an RPA
binding motif (RBM) at the N-terminus of SMARCAL1 and the C-terminal
winged-helix domain of the RPA 32 kDa subunit (RPA32C). Here we report
a biophysical and structural characterization of the SMARCAL1–RPA
interaction. Isothermal titration calorimetry and circular dichroism
spectroscopy revealed that RPA32C binds SMARCAL1-RBM with a Kd of 2.5 μM and induces a disorder-to-helix
transition. The crystal structure of RPA32C was refined to 1.4 Å
resolution, and the SMARCAL1-RBM binding site was mapped on the structure
on the basis of nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift perturbations.
Conservation of the interaction surface to other RBM-containing proteins
allowed construction of a model for the RPA32C/SMARCAL1-RBM complex.
The implications of our results are discussed with respect to the
recruitment of SMARCAL1 and other DNA damage response and repair proteins
to stalled replication forks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Feldkamp
- Department of Biochemistry, ‡Department of Biological Sciences, §Department of Chemistry, and ∥Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Quan J, Yusufzai T. HARP preferentially co-purifies with RPA bound to DNA-PK and blocks RPA phosphorylation. Epigenetics 2014; 9:693-7. [PMID: 24565939 PMCID: PMC4063828 DOI: 10.4161/epi.28310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The HepA-related protein (HARP/SMARCAL1) is an ATP-dependent annealing helicase that is capable of rewinding DNA structures that are stably unwound due to binding of the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein Replication Protein A (RPA). HARP has been implicated in maintaining genome integrity through its role in DNA replication and repair, two processes that generate RPA-coated ssDNA. In addition, mutations in HARP cause a rare disease known as Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. In this study, we purified HARP containing complexes with the goal of identifying the predominant factors that stably associate with HARP. We found that HARP preferentially interacts with RPA molecules that are bound to the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK). We also found that RPA is phosphorylated by DNA-PK in vitro, while the RPA-HARP complexes are not. Our results suggest that, in addition to its annealing helicase activity, which eliminates the natural binding substrate for RPA, HARP blocks the phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-PK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinhua Quan
- Radiation Oncology; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology; Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA USA
| | - Timur Yusufzai
- Radiation Oncology; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology; Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|