Different genome stability proteins underpin primed and naïve adaptation in E. coli CRISPR-Cas immunity

Screening of genes involved in phage-resistance of Escherichia coli and effects of substances interacting with primosomal protein A on the resistant bacteria

AIMS

The study was to identify the genes involved in phage resistance and to develop an effective biocontrol method to improve the lytic activity of phages against foodborne pathogens.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 3,909 single gene-deletion mutants of Escherichia coli BW25113 from the Keio collection were individually screened for genes involved in phage resistance. Phage S127BCL3 isolated from chicken liver, infecting both E. coli BW25113 and O157: H7, was characterized and used for screening. The 10 gene-deletion mutants showed increased susceptibility to phage S127BCL3. Among them, priA gene-deletion mutant strain showed significant susceptibility to the phages S127BCL3 and T7. Furthermore, we investigated the substances that have been reported to inhibit the function of primosomal protein A (PriA) and were used to confirm increased phage susceptibility in E. coli BW25113 (Parent strain) and O157: H7.

CONCLUSION

PriA inhibitors at a low concentration showed combined effects with phage against E. coli O157: H7 and delayed the regrowth rate of phage-resistant cells.

Histones direct site-specific CRISPR spacer acquisition in model archaeon

CRISPR-Cas systems provide heritable immunity against viruses and other mobile genetic elements by incorporating fragments of invader DNA into the host CRISPR array as spacers. Integration of new spacers is localized to the 5' end of the array, and in certain Gram-negative Bacteria this polarized localization is accomplished by the integration host factor. For most other Bacteria and Archaea, the mechanism for 5' end localization is unknown. Here we show that archaeal histones play a key role in directing integration of CRISPR spacers. In Pyrococcus furiosus, deletion of either histone A or B impairs integration. In vitro, purified histones are sufficient to direct integration to the 5' end of the CRISPR array. Archaeal histone tetramers and bacterial integration host factor induce similar U-turn bends in bound DNA. These findings indicate a co-evolution of CRISPR arrays with chromosomal DNA binding proteins and a widespread role for binding and bending of DNA to facilitate accurate spacer integration.

CRISPR-Cas adaptation in Escherichia coli

Prokaryotes use the adaptive immunity mediated via the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR associated (CRISPR-Cas) system for protection against invading elements such as phages and plasmids. The immunity is achieved by capturing small DNA fragments or spacers from foreign nucleic acids (protospacers) and integrating them into the host CRISPR locus. This step of CRISPR-Cas immunity called 'naïve CRISPR adaptation' requires the conserved Cas1-Cas2 complex and is often supported by variable host proteins that assist in spacer processing and integration. Bacteria that have acquired new spacers become immune to the same invading elements when reinfected. CRISPR-Cas immunity can also be updated by integrating new spacers from the same invading elements, a process called 'primed adaptation'. Only properly selected and integrated spacers are functional in the next steps of CRISPR immunity when their processed transcripts are used for RNA-guided target recognition and interference (target degradation). Capturing, trimming, and integrating new spacers in the correct orientation are universal steps of adaptation to all CRISPR-Cas systems, but some details are CRISPR-Cas type-specific and species-specific. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas class 1 type I-E adaptation in Escherichia coli as a general model for adaptation processes (DNA capture and integration) that have been studied in detail. We focus on the role of host non-Cas proteins involved in adaptation, particularly on the role of homologous recombination.

PAM binding ensures orientational integration during Cas4-Cas1-Cas2-mediated CRISPR adaptation

Adaptation in CRISPR-Cas systems immunizes bacteria and archaea against mobile genetic elements. In many DNA-targeting systems, the Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 complex is required for selection and processing of DNA segments containing PAM sequences prior to integration of these "prespacer" substrates as spacers in the CRISPR array. We determined cryo-EM structures of the Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 adaptation complex from the type I-C system that encodes standalone Cas1 and Cas4 proteins. The structures reveal how Cas4 specifically reads out bases within the PAM sequence and how interactions with both Cas1 and Cas2 activate Cas4 endonuclease activity. The Cas4-PAM interaction ensures tight binding between the adaptation complex and the prespacer, significantly enhancing integration of the non-PAM end into the CRISPR array and ensuring correct spacer orientation. Corroborated with our biochemical results, Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 structures with substrates representing various stages of CRISPR adaptation reveal a temporally resolved mechanism for maturation and integration of functional spacers into the CRISPR array.

Programmable RNA targeting by bacterial Argonaute nucleases with unconventional guide binding and cleavage specificity

Argonaute proteins are programmable nucleases that have defense and regulatory functions in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. All known prokaryotic Argonautes (pAgos) characterized so far act on DNA targets. Here, we describe a new class of pAgos that uniquely use DNA guides to process RNA targets. The biochemical and structural analysis of Pseudooceanicola lipolyticus pAgo (PliAgo) reveals an unusual organization of the guide binding pocket that does not rely on divalent cations and the canonical set of contacts for 5'-end interactions. Unconventional interactions of PliAgo with the 5'-phosphate of guide DNA define its new position within pAgo and shift the site of target RNA cleavage in comparison with known Argonautes. The specificity for RNA over DNA is defined by ribonucleotide residues at the cleavage site. The analysed pAgos sense mismatches and modifications in the RNA target. The results broaden our understanding of prokaryotic defense systems and extend the spectrum of programmable nucleases with potential use in RNA technology.

CRISPR-Cas systems: role in cellular processes beyond adaptive immunity

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and associated Cas proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are the only known adaptive immune system in prokaryotes. CRISPR-Cas system provides sequence-specific immunity against invasion by foreign genetic elements. It carries out its functions by incorporating a small part of the invading DNA sequence, termed as spacer into the CRISPR array. Although the CRISPR-Cas systems are mainly responsible for adaptive immune functions, their alternative role in the gene regulation, bacterial pathophysiology, virulence, and evolution has started to unravel. In several species, these systems are revealed to regulate the processes beyond adaptive immunity by employing various components of CRISPR-Cas machinery, independently or in combination. The molecular mechanisms entailing the regulatory processes are not clear in most of the instances. In this review, we have discussed some well-known and some recently established noncanonical functions of CRISPR-Cas system and its fast-extending applications in other biological processes.

Adaptation by Type V-A and V-B CRISPR-Cas Systems Demonstrates Conserved Protospacer Selection Mechanisms Between Diverse CRISPR-Cas Types

Adaptation of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) arrays is a crucial process responsible for the unique, adaptive nature of CRISPR-Cas immune systems. The acquisition of new CRISPR spacers from mobile genetic elements has previously been studied for several types of CRISPR-Cas systems. In this study, we used a high-throughput sequencing approach to characterize CRISPR adaptation of the type V-A system from Francisella novicida and the type V-B system from Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris. In contrast to other class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, we found that for the type V-A and V-B systems, the Cas12 nucleases are dispensable for spacer acquisition, with only Cas1 and Cas2 (type V-A) or Cas4/1 and Cas2 (type V-B) being necessary and sufficient. Whereas the catalytic activity of Cas4 is not essential for adaptation, Cas4 activity is required for correct protospacer adjacent motif selection in both systems and for prespacer trimming in type V-A. In addition, we provide evidence for acquisition of RecBCD-produced DNA fragments by both systems, but with spacers derived from foreign DNA being incorporated preferentially over those derived from the host chromosome. Our work shows that several spacer acquisition mechanisms are conserved between diverse CRISPR-Cas systems, but also highlights unexpected nuances between similar systems that generally contribute to a bias of gaining immunity against invading genetic elements.

Investigating the Genomic Background of CRISPR-Cas Genomes for CRISPR-Based Antimicrobials

CRISPR-Cas systems are an adaptive immunity that protects prokaryotes against foreign genetic elements. Genetic templates acquired during past infection events enable DNA-interacting enzymes to recognize foreign DNA for destruction. Due to the programmability and specificity of these genetic templates, CRISPR-Cas systems are potential alternative antibiotics that can be engineered to self-target antimicrobial resistance genes on the chromosome or plasmid. However, several fundamental questions remain to repurpose these tools against drug-resistant bacteria. For endogenous CRISPR-Cas self-targeting, antimicrobial resistance genes and functional CRISPR-Cas systems have to co-occur in the target cell. Furthermore, these tools have to outplay DNA repair pathways that respond to the nuclease activities of Cas proteins, even for exogenous CRISPR-Cas delivery. Here, we conduct a comprehensive survey of CRISPR-Cas genomes. First, we address the co-occurrence of CRISPR-Cas systems and antimicrobial resistance genes in the CRISPR-Cas genomes. We show that the average number of these genes varies greatly by the CRISPR-Cas type, and some CRISPR-Cas types (IE and IIIA) have over 20 genes per genome. Next, we investigate the DNA repair pathways of these CRISPR-Cas genomes, revealing that the diversity and frequency of these pathways differ by the CRISPR-Cas type. The interplay between CRISPR-Cas systems and DNA repair pathways is essential for the acquisition of new spacers in CRISPR arrays. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate that the efficiency of these DNA repair pathways may be inferred from the time-series patterns in the RNA structure of CRISPR repeats. This bioinformatic survey of CRISPR-Cas genomes elucidates the necessity to consider multifaceted interactions between different genes and systems, to design effective CRISPR-based antimicrobials that can specifically target drug-resistant bacteria in natural microbial communities.

Cas1 and Fen1 Display Equivalent Functions During Archaeal DNA Repair

CRISPR-Cas constitutes an adaptive prokaryotic defence system against invasive nucleic acids like viruses and plasmids. Beyond their role in immunity, CRISPR-Cas systems have been shown to closely interact with components of cellular DNA repair pathways, either by regulating their expression or via direct protein-protein contact and enzymatic activity. The integrase Cas1 is usually involved in the adaptation phase of CRISPR-Cas immunity but an additional role in cellular DNA repair pathways has been proposed previously. Here, we analysed the capacity of an archaeal Cas1 from Haloferax volcanii to act upon DNA damage induced by oxidative stress and found that a deletion of the cas1 gene led to reduced survival rates following stress induction. In addition, our results indicate that Cas1 is directly involved in DNA repair as the enzymatically active site of the protein is crucial for growth under oxidative conditions. Based on biochemical assays, we propose a mechanism by which Cas1 plays a similar function to DNA repair protein Fen1 by cleaving branched intermediate structures. The present study broadens our understanding of the functional link between CRISPR-Cas immunity and DNA repair by demonstrating that Cas1 and Fen1 display equivalent roles during archaeal DNA damage repair.

Adaptation by Type III CRISPR-Cas Systems: Breakthrough Findings and Open Questions

CRISPR-Cas systems acquire heritable defense memory against invading nucleic acids through adaptation. Type III CRISPR-Cas systems have unique and intriguing features of defense and are important in method development for Genetics research. We started to understand the common and unique properties of type III CRISPR-Cas adaptation in recent years. This review summarizes our knowledge regarding CRISPR-Cas adaptation with the emphasis on type III systems and discusses open questions for type III adaptation studies.

Unique properties of spacer acquisition by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system

Type III CRISPR-Cas systems have a unique mode of interference, involving crRNA-guided recognition of nascent RNA and leading to DNA and RNA degradation. How type III systems acquire new CRISPR spacers is currently not well understood. Here, we characterize CRISPR spacer uptake by a type III-A system within its native host, Streptococcus thermophilus. Adaptation by the type II-A system in the same host provided a basis for comparison. Cas1 and Cas2 proteins were critical for type III adaptation but deletion of genes responsible for crRNA biogenesis or interference did not detectably change spacer uptake patterns, except those related to host counter-selection. Unlike the type II-A system, type III spacers are acquired in a PAM- and orientation-independent manner. Interestingly, certain regions of plasmids and the host genome were particularly well-sampled during type III-A, but not type II-A, spacer uptake. These regions included the single-stranded origins of rolling-circle replicating plasmids, rRNA and tRNA encoding gene clusters, promoter regions of expressed genes and 5′ UTR regions involved in transcription attenuation. These features share the potential to form DNA secondary structures, suggesting a preferred substrate for type III adaptation. Lastly, the type III-A system adapted to and protected host cells from lytic phage infection.

Digging into the lesser-known aspects of CRISPR biology

A long time has passed since regularly interspaced DNA repeats were discovered in prokaryotes. Today, those enigmatic repetitive elements termed clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) are acknowledged as an emblematic part of multicomponent CRISPR-Cas (CRISPR associated) systems. These systems are involved in a variety of roles in bacteria and archaea, notably, that of conferring protection against transmissible genetic elements through an adaptive immune-like response. This review summarises the present knowledge on the diversity, molecular mechanisms and biology of CRISPR-Cas. We pay special attention to the most recent findings related to the determinants and consequences of CRISPR-Cas activity. Research on the basic features of these systems illustrates how instrumental the study of prokaryotes is for understanding biology in general, ultimately providing valuable tools for diverse fields and fuelling research beyond the mainstream.

Protein or ribonucleoprotein-mediated blocking of recombinase polymerase amplification enables the discrimination of nucleotide and epigenetic differences between cell populations

Isothermal DNA amplification, such as recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), is well suited for point-of-care testing (POCT) as it does not require lengthy thermal cycling. By exploiting DNA amplification at low temperatures that do not denature heat-sensitive molecules such as proteins, we have developed a blocking RPA method to detect gene mutations and examine the epigenetic status of DNA. We found that both nucleic acid blockers and nuclease-dead clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) ribonucleoproteins suppress RPA reactions by blocking elongation by DNA polymerases in a sequence-specific manner. By examining these suppression events, we are able to discriminate single-nucleotide mutations in cancer cells and evaluate genome-editing events. Methyl-CpG binding proteins similarly inhibit elongation by DNA polymerases on CpG-methylated template DNA in our RPA reactions, allowing for the detection of methylated CpG islands. Thus, the use of heat-sensitive molecules such as proteins and ribonucleoprotein complexes as blockers in low-temperature isothermal DNA amplification reactions markedly expands the utility and application of these methods.

Fujita et al. investigate the use of oligoribonucleotides, proteins, and ribonucleoprotein complexes as sequence-specific blockers of DNA extension by DNA polymerases. They demonstrate the value of proteins and ribonucleoprotein complexes as blockers in low-temperature isothermal DNA amplification reactions for discrimination of nucleotide and epigenetic differences.

Microbial Arsenal of Antiviral Defenses. Part II

Bacteriophages or phages are viruses that infect bacterial cells (for the scope of this review we will also consider viruses that infect Archaea). The constant threat of phage infection is a major force that shapes evolution of microbial genomes. To withstand infection, bacteria had evolved numerous strategies to avoid recognition by phages or to directly interfere with phage propagation inside the cell. Classical molecular biology and genetic engineering had been deeply intertwined with the study of phages and host defenses. Nowadays, owing to the rise of phage therapy, broad application of CRISPR-Cas technologies, and development of bioinformatics approaches that facilitate discovery of new systems, phage biology experiences a revival. This review describes variety of strategies employed by microbes to counter phage infection. In the first part defense associated with cell surface, roles of small molecules, and innate immunity systems relying on DNA modification were discussed. The second part focuses on adaptive immunity systems, abortive infection mechanisms, defenses associated with mobile genetic elements, and novel systems discovered in recent years through metagenomic mining.

CRISPR-Associated Primase-Polymerases are implicated in prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas adaptation

CRISPR-Cas pathways provide prokaryotes with acquired “immunity” against foreign genetic elements, including phages and plasmids. Although many of the proteins associated with CRISPR-Cas mechanisms are characterized, some requisite enzymes remain elusive. Genetic studies have implicated host DNA polymerases in some CRISPR-Cas systems but CRISPR-specific replicases have not yet been discovered. We have identified and characterised a family of CRISPR-Associated Primase-Polymerases (CAPPs) in a range of prokaryotes that are operonically associated with Cas1 and Cas2. CAPPs belong to the Primase-Polymerase (Prim-Pol) superfamily of replicases that operate in various DNA repair and replication pathways that maintain genome stability. Here, we characterise the DNA synthesis activities of bacterial CAPP homologues from Type IIIA and IIIB CRISPR-Cas systems and establish that they possess a range of replicase activities including DNA priming, polymerisation and strand-displacement. We demonstrate that CAPPs operonically-associated partners, Cas1 and Cas2, form a complex that possesses spacer integration activity. We show that CAPPs physically associate with the Cas proteins to form bespoke CRISPR-Cas complexes. Finally, we propose how CAPPs activities, in conjunction with their partners, may function to undertake key roles in CRISPR-Cas adaptation.

CAPPs are putative Primase-Polymerases associated with CRISPR-Cas operons. Here, the authors show CAPPs genetic and physical association with Cas1 and Cas2, their capacity to function as DNA-dependent DNA primases and DNA polymerases, and that Cas1-Cas2 complex adjacent to CAPP has bona fide spacer integration activity.

Prespacers formed during primed adaptation associate with the Cas1-Cas2 adaptation complex and the Cas3 interference nuclease-helicase

Primed adaptation allows rapid acquisition of protective spacers derived from foreign mobile genetic elements into CRISPR arrays of the host. Primed adaptation requires ongoing CRISPR interference that destroys foreign genetic elements, but the nature of this requirement is unknown. Using the Escherichia coli I-E CRISPR-Cas as a model, we show that prespacers, short fragments of foreign DNA on their way to become incorporated into CRISPR arrays as spacers, are associated with both the adaptation integrase Cas1 and the interference nuclease Cas3, implying physical association of the interference and adaptation machineries during priming.

For Type I CRISPR-Cas systems, a mode of CRISPR adaptation named priming has been described. Priming allows specific and highly efficient acquisition of new spacers from DNA recognized (primed) by the Cascade-crRNA (CRISPR RNA) effector complex. Recognition of the priming protospacer by Cascade-crRNA serves as a signal for engaging the Cas3 nuclease–helicase required for both interference and primed adaptation, suggesting the existence of a primed adaptation complex (PAC) containing the Cas1–Cas2 adaptation integrase and Cas3. To detect this complex in vivo, we here performed chromatin immunoprecipitation with Cas3-specific and Cas1-specific antibodies using cells undergoing primed adaptation. We found that prespacers are bound by both Cas1 (presumably, as part of the Cas1–Cas2 integrase) and Cas3, implying direct physical association of the interference and adaptation machineries as part of PAC.

Pruning and Tending Immune Memories: Spacer Dynamics in the CRISPR Array

CRISPR-Cas (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats and CRISPR-associated genes) is a type of prokaryotic immune system that is unique in its ability to provide sequence-specific adaptive protection, which can be updated in response to new threats. CRISPR-Cas does this by storing fragments of DNA from invading genetic elements in an array interspersed with short repeats. The CRISPR array can be continuously updated through integration of new DNA fragments (termed spacers) at one end, but over time existing spacers become obsolete. To optimize immunity, spacer uptake, residency, and loss must be regulated. This mini-review summarizes what is known about how spacers are organized, maintained, and lost from CRISPR arrays.

Integration of diverse DNA substrates by a casposase can be targeted to R-loops in vitro by its fusion to Cas9

CRISPR systems build adaptive immunity against mobile genetic elements by DNA capture and integration catalysed by Cas1–Cas2 protein complexes. Recent studies suggested that CRISPR repeats and adaptation module originated from a novel type of DNA transposons called casposons. Casposons encode a Cas1 homologue called casposase that alone integrates into target molecules single and double-stranded DNA containing terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) from casposons. A recent study showed Methanosarcina mazei casposase is able to integrate random DNA oligonucleotides, followed up in this work using Acidoprofundum boonei casposase, from which we also observe promiscuous substrate integration. Here we first show that the substrate flexibility of Acidoprofundum boonei casposase extends to random integration of DNA without TIRs, including integration of a functional gene. We then used this to investigate targeting of the casposase-catalysed DNA integration reactions to specific DNA sites that would allow insertion of defined DNA payloads. Casposase–Cas9 fusions were engineered that were catalytically proficient in vitro and generated RNA-guided DNA integration products from short synthetic DNA or a gene, with or without TIRs. However, DNA integration could still occur unguided due to the competing background activity of the casposase moiety. Expression of Casposase-dCas9 in Escherichia coli cells effectively targeted chromosomal and plasmid lacZ revealed by reduced β-galactosidase activity but DNA integration was not detected. The promiscuous substrate integration properties of casposases make them potential DNA insertion tools. The Casposase–dCas9 fusion protein may serves as a prototype for development in genetic editing for DNA insertion that is independent of homology-directed DNA repair.

Molecular Mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas Immunity in Bacteria

Prokaryotes have developed numerous defense strategies to combat the constant threat posed by the diverse genetic parasites that endanger them. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas loci guard their hosts with an adaptive immune system against foreign nucleic acids. Protection starts with an immunization phase, in which short pieces of the invader's genome, known as spacers, are captured and integrated into the CRISPR locus after infection. Next, during the targeting phase, spacers are transcribed into CRISPR RNAs (crRNAs) that guide CRISPR-associated (Cas) nucleases to destroy the invader's DNA or RNA. Here we describe the many different molecular mechanisms of CRISPR targeting and how they are interconnected with the immunization phase through a third phase of the CRISPR-Cas immune response: primed spacer acquisition. In this phase, Cas proteins direct the crRNA-guided acquisition of additional spacers to achieve a more rapid and robust immunization of the population.

CRISPR type II-A subgroups exhibit phylogenetically distinct mechanisms for prespacer insertion

CRISPR-Cas is an adaptive immune system that protects prokaryotes against foreign nucleic acids. Prokaryotes gain immunity by acquiring short pieces of the invading nucleic acid termed prespacers and inserting them into their CRISPR array. In type II-A systems, Cas1 and Cas2 proteins insert prespacers always at the leader-repeat junction of the CRISPR array. Among type II-A CRISPR systems, three distinct groups (G1, G2, and G3) exist according to the extent of DNA sequence conservation at the 3' end of the leader. However, the mechanisms by which these conserved motifs interact with their cognate Cas1 and Cas2 proteins remain unclear. Here, we performed in vitro integration assays, finding that for G1 and G2, the insertion site is recognized through defined mechanisms, at least in members examined to date, whereas G3 exhibits no sequence-specific insertion. G1 first recognized a 12-bp sequence at the leader-repeat junction and performed leader-side insertion before proceeding to spacer-side insertion. G2 recognized the full repeat sequence and could perform independent leader-side or spacer-side insertions, although the leader-side insertion was faster than spacer-side. The prespacer morphology requirements for Cas1-Cas2 varied, with G1 stringently requiring a 5-nucleotide 3' overhang and G2 being able to insert many forms of prespacers with variable efficiencies. These results highlight the intricacy of protein-DNA sequence interactions within the seemingly similar type II-A integration complexes and provide mechanistic insights into prespacer insertion. These interactions can be fine-tuned to expand the Cas1-Cas2 toolset for inserting small DNAs into diverse DNA targets.

DNA targeting and interference by a bacterial Argonaute nuclease

Members of the conserved Argonaute protein family use small RNA guides to locate their mRNA targets and regulate gene expression and suppress mobile genetic elements in eukaryotes^1,2. Argonautes are also present in many bacterial and archaeal species^3-5. Unlike eukaryotic proteins, several prokaryotic Argonaute proteins use small DNA guides to cleave DNA, a process known as DNA interference^6-10. However, the natural functions and targets of DNA interference are poorly understood, and the mechanisms of DNA guide generation and target discrimination remain unknown. Here we analyse the activity of a bacterial Argonaute nuclease from Clostridium butyricum (CbAgo) in vivo. We show that CbAgo targets multicopy genetic elements and suppresses the propagation of plasmids and infection by phages. CbAgo induces DNA interference between homologous sequences and triggers DNA degradation at double-strand breaks in the target DNA. The loading of CbAgo with locus-specific small DNA guides depends on both its intrinsic endonuclease activity and the cellular double-strand break repair machinery. A similar interaction was reported for the acquisition of new spacers during CRISPR adaptation, and prokaryotic genomes that encode Ago nucleases are enriched in CRISPR-Cas systems. These results identify molecular mechanisms that generate guides for DNA interference and suggest that the recognition of foreign nucleic acids by prokaryotic defence systems involves common principles.

Detection of CRISPR adaptation

Prokaryotic adaptive immunity is built when short DNA fragments called spacers are acquired into CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) arrays. CRISPR adaptation is a multistep process which comprises selection, generation, and incorporation of prespacers into arrays. Once adapted, spacers provide immunity through the recognition of complementary nucleic acid sequences, channeling them for destruction. To prevent deleterious autoimmunity, CRISPR adaptation must therefore be a highly regulated and infrequent process, at least in the absence of genetic invaders. Over the years, ingenious methods to study CRISPR adaptation have been developed. In this paper, we discuss and compare methods that detect CRISPR adaptation and its intermediates in vivo and propose suppressing PCR as a simple modification of a popular assay to monitor spacer acquisition with increased sensitivity.

A matter of background: DNA repair pathways as a possible cause for the sparse distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria

The absence of CRISPR-Cas systems in more than half of the sequenced bacterial genomes is intriguing, because their role in adaptive immunity and their frequent transfer between species should have made them almost ubiquitous, as is the case in Archaea. Here, we investigate the possibility that the success of CRISPR-Cas acquisition by horizontal gene transfer is affected by the interactions of these systems with the host genetic background and especially with components of double-strand break repair systems (DSB-RS). We first described the distribution of systems specialized in the repair of double-strand breaks in Bacteria: homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. This allowed us to show that such systems are more often positively or negatively correlated with the frequency of CRISPR-Cas systems than random genes of similar frequency. The detailed analysis of these co-occurrence patterns shows that our method identifies previously known cases of mechanistic interactions between these systems. It also reveals other positive and negative patterns of co-occurrence between DSB-RS and CRISPR-Cas systems. Notably, it shows that the patterns of distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems in Proteobacteria are strongly dependent on the epistatic groups including RecBCD and AddAB. Our results suggest that the genetic background plays an important role in the success of adaptive immunity in different bacterial clades and provide insights to guide further experimental research on the interactions between CRISPR-Cas and DSB-RS. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The ecology and evolution of prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems'.

Origins and evolution of CRISPR-Cas systems

CRISPR-Cas, the bacterial and archaeal adaptive immunity systems, encompass a complex machinery that integrates fragments of foreign nucleic acids, mostly from mobile genetic elements (MGE), into CRISPR arrays embedded in microbial genomes. Transcripts of the inserted segments (spacers) are employed by CRISPR-Cas systems as guide (g)RNAs for recognition and inactivation of the cognate targets. The CRISPR-Cas systems consist of distinct adaptation and effector modules whose evolutionary trajectories appear to be at least partially independent. Comparative genome analysis reveals the origin of the adaptation module from casposons, a distinct type of transposons, which employ a homologue of Cas1 protein, the integrase responsible for the spacer incorporation into CRISPR arrays, as the transposase. The origin of the effector module(s) is far less clear. The CRISPR-Cas systems are partitioned into two classes, class 1 with multisubunit effectors, and class 2 in which the effector consists of a single, large protein. The class 2 effectors originate from nucleases encoded by different MGE, whereas the origin of the class 1 effector complexes remains murky. However, the recent discovery of a signalling pathway built into the type III systems of class 1 might offer a clue, suggesting that type III effector modules could have evolved from a signal transduction system involved in stress-induced programmed cell death. The subsequent evolution of the class 1 effector complexes through serial gene duplication and displacement, primarily of genes for proteins containing RNA recognition motif domains, can be hypothetically reconstructed. In addition to the multiple contributions of MGE to the evolution of CRISPR-Cas, the reverse flow of information is notable, namely, recruitment of minimalist variants of CRISPR-Cas systems by MGE for functions that remain to be elucidated. Here, we attempt a synthesis of the diverse threads that shed light on CRISPR-Cas origins and evolution. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue 'The ecology and evolution of prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems'.

Cas3 Protein-A Review of a Multi-Tasking Machine

Cas3 has essential functions in CRISPR immunity but its other activities and roles, in vitro and in cells, are less widely known. We offer a concise review of the latest understanding and questions arising from studies of Cas3 mechanism during CRISPR immunity, and highlight recent attempts at using Cas3 for genetic editing. We then spotlight involvement of Cas3 in other aspects of cell biology, for which understanding is lacking—these focus on CRISPR systems as regulators of cellular processes in addition to defense against mobile genetic elements.

Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas spacer acquisition

Many bacteria and archaea have the unique ability to heritably alter their genomes by incorporating small fragments of foreign DNA, called spacers, into CRISPR loci. Once transcribed and processed into individual CRISPR RNAs, spacer sequences guide Cas effector nucleases to destroy complementary, invading nucleic acids. Collectively, these two processes are known as the CRISPR-Cas immune response. In this Progress article, we review recent studies that have advanced our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying spacer acquisition and that have revealed a fundamental link between the two phases of CRISPR immunity that ensures optimal immunity from newly acquired spacers. Finally, we highlight important open questions and discuss the potential basic and applied impact of spacer acquisition research.

Processing and integration of functionally oriented prespacers in the Escherichia coli CRISPR system depends on bacterial host exonucleases

CRISPR-Cas systems provide bacteria with adaptive immunity against viruses. During spacer adaptation, the Cas1-Cas2 complex selects fragments of foreign DNA, called prespacers, and integrates them into CRISPR arrays in an orientation that provides functional immunity. Cas4 is involved in both the trimming of prespacers and the cleavage of protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) in several type I CRISPR-Cas systems, but how the prespacers are processed in systems lacking Cas4, such as the type I-E and I-F systems, is not understood. In Escherichia coli, which has a type I-E system, Cas1-Cas2 preferentially selects prespacers with 3' overhangs via specific recognition of a PAM, but how these prespacers are integrated in a functional orientation in the absence of Cas4 is not known. Using a biochemical approach with purified proteins, as well as integration, prespacer protection, sequencing, and quantitative PCR assays, we show here that the bacterial 3'-5' exonucleases DnaQ and ExoT can trim long 3' overhangs of prespacers and promote integration in the correct orientation. We found that trimming by these exonucleases results in an asymmetric intermediate, because Cas1-Cas2 protects the PAM sequence, which helps to define spacer orientation. Our findings implicate the E. coli host 3'-5' exonucleases DnaQ and ExoT in spacer adaptation and reveal a mechanism by which spacer orientation is defined in E. coli.

Fidelity of prespacer capture and processing is governed by the PAM-mediated interactions of Cas1-2 adaptation complex in CRISPR-Cas type I-E system

Prokaryotes deploy CRISPR-Cas-based RNA-guided adaptive immunity to fend off mobile genetic elements such as phages and plasmids. During CRISPR adaptation, which is the first stage of CRISPR immunity, the Cas1-2 integrase complex captures invader-derived prespacer DNA and specifically integrates it at the leader-repeat junction as spacers. For this integration, several variants of CRISPR-Cas systems use Cas4 as an indispensable nuclease for selectively processing the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) containing prespacers to a defined length. Surprisingly, however, a few CRISPR-Cas systems, such as type I-E, are bereft of Cas4. Despite the absence of Cas4, how the prespacers show impeccable conservation for length and PAM selection in type I-E remains intriguing. Here, using in vivo and in vitro integration assays, deep sequencing, and exonuclease footprinting, we show that Cas1-2/I-E-via the type I-E-specific extended C-terminal tail of Cas1-displays intrinsic affinity for PAM containing prespacers of variable length in Escherichia coli Although Cas1-2/I-E does not prune the prespacers, its binding protects the prespacer boundaries from exonuclease action. This ensures the pruning of exposed ends by exonucleases to aptly sized substrates for integration into the CRISPR locus. In summary, our work reveals that in a few CRISPR-Cas variants, such as type I-E, the specificity of PAM selection resides with Cas1-2, whereas the prespacer processing is co-opted by cellular non-Cas exonucleases, thereby offsetting the need for Cas4.

CRISPR DNA elements controlling site-specific spacer integration and proper repeat length by a Type II CRISPR-Cas system

CRISPR–Cas systems provide heritable immunity against viruses by capturing short invader DNA sequences, termed spacers, and incorporating them into the CRISPR loci of the prokaryotic host genome. Here, we investigate DNA elements that control accurate spacer uptake in the type II-A CRISPR locus of Streptococcus thermophilus. We determined that purified Cas1 and Cas2 proteins catalyze spacer integration with high specificity for CRISPR repeat junctions. We show that 10 bp of the CRISPR leader sequence is critical for stimulating polarized integration preferentially at the repeat proximal to the leader. Spacer integration proceeds through a two-step transesterification reaction where the 3′ hydroxyl groups of the spacer target both repeat borders on opposite strands. The leader-proximal end of the repeat is preferentially targeted for the first site of integration through recognition of sequences spanning the leader-repeat junction. Subsequently, second-site integration at the leader-distal end of the repeat is specified by multiple determinants including a length-defining mechanism relying on a repeat element proximal to the second site of integration. Our results highlight the intrinsic ability of type II Cas1/Cas2 proteins to coordinate directional and site-specific spacer integration into the CRISPR locus to ensure precise duplication of the repeat required for CRISPR immunity.

Cas4-Cas1 fusions drive efficient PAM selection and control CRISPR adaptation

Microbes have the unique ability to acquire immunological memories from mobile genetic invaders to protect themselves from predation. To confer CRISPR resistance, new spacers need to be compatible with a targeting requirement in the invader's DNA called the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). Many CRISPR systems encode Cas4 proteins to ensure new spacers are integrated that meet this targeting prerequisite. Here we report that a gene fusion between cas4 and cas1 from the Geobacter sulfurreducens I-U CRISPR-Cas system is capable of introducing functional spacers carrying interference proficient TTN PAM sequences at much higher frequencies than unfused Cas4 adaptation modules. Mutations of Cas4-domain catalytic residues resulted in dramatically decreased naïve and primed spacer acquisition, and a loss of PAM selectivity showing that the Cas4 domain controls Cas1 activity. We propose the fusion gene evolved to drive the acquisition of only PAM-compatible spacers to optimize CRISPR interference.

Cas4 Facilitates PAM-Compatible Spacer Selection during CRISPR Adaptation

CRISPR-Cas systems adapt their immunological memory against their invaders by integrating short DNA fragments into clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) loci. While Cas1 and Cas2 make up the core machinery of the CRISPR integration process, various class I and II CRISPR-Cas systems encode Cas4 proteins for which the role is unknown. Here, we introduced the CRISPR adaptation genes cas1, cas2, and cas4 from the type I-D CRISPR-Cas system of Synechocystis sp. 6803 into Escherichia coli and observed that cas4 is strictly required for the selection of targets with protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) conferring I-D CRISPR interference in the native host Synechocystis. We propose a model in which Cas4 assists the CRISPR adaptation complex Cas1-2 by providing DNA substrates tailored for the correct PAM. Introducing functional spacers that target DNA sequences with the correct PAM is key to successful CRISPR interference, providing a better chance of surviving infection by mobile genetic elements.

•

Cas4 facilitates the integration of PAM-compatible spacers

•

Spacer length variation is dictated by Cas1-2

•

Cas4 shortens spacer length

•

Cas4-selected PAMs license type I-D CRISPR interference

Genome Maintenance Proteins Modulate Autoimmunity Mediated Primed Adaptation by the Escherichia coli Type I-E CRISPR-Cas System

Bacteria and archaea use CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity systems to interfere with viruses, plasmids, and other mobile genetic elements. During the process of adaptation, CRISPR-Cas systems acquire immunity by incorporating short fragments of invaders’ genomes into CRISPR arrays. The acquisition of fragments of host genomes leads to autoimmunity and may drive chromosomal rearrangements, negative cell selection, and influence bacterial evolution. In this study, we investigated the role of proteins involved in genome stability maintenance in spacer acquisition by the Escherichia coli type I-E CRISPR-Cas system targeting its own genome. We show here, that the deletion of recJ decreases adaptation efficiency and affects accuracy of spacers incorporation into CRISPR array. Primed adaptation efficiency is also dramatically inhibited in double mutants lacking recB and sbcD but not in single mutants suggesting independent involvement and redundancy of RecBCD and SbcCD pathways in spacer acquisition. While the presence of at least one of two complexes is crucial for efficient primed adaptation, RecBCD and SbcCD affect the pattern of acquired spacers. Overall, our data suggest distinct roles of the RecBCD and SbcCD complexes and of RecJ in spacer precursor selection and insertion into CRISPR array and highlight the functional interplay between CRISPR-Cas systems and host genome maintenance mechanisms.

A Simple Criterion for Inferring CRISPR Array Direction

Inferring transcriptional direction (orientation) of the CRISPR array is essential for many applications, including systematically investigating non-canonical CRISPR/Cas functions. The standard method, CRISPRDirection (embedded within CRISPRCasFinder), fails to predict the orientation (ND predictions) for ∼37% of the classified CRISPR arrays (>2200 loci); this goes up to >70% for the II-B subtype where non-canonical functions were first experimentally discovered. Alternatively, Potential Orientation (also embedded within CRISPRCasFinder), has a much smaller frequency of ND predictions but might have significantly lower accuracy. We propose a novel simple criterion, where the CRISPR array direction is assigned according to the direction of its associated cas genes (Cas Orientation). We systematically assess the performance of the three methods (Cas Orientation, CRISPRDirection, and Potential Orientation) across all CRISPR/Cas subtypes, by a mutual crosscheck of their predictions, and by comparing them to the experimental dataset. Interestingly, CRISPRDirection agrees much better with Cas Orientation than with Potential Orientation, despite CRISPRDirection and Potential Orientation being mutually related – Potential Orientation corresponding to one of six (heterogeneous) predictors employed by CRISPRDirection – and being unrelated to Cas Orientation. We find that Cas Orientation has much higher accuracy compared to Potential Orientation and comparable accuracy to CRISPRDirection – while accurately assigning an orientation to ∼95% of the CRISPR arrays that are non-determined by CRISPRDirection. Cas Orientation is, at the same time, simple to employ, requiring only (routine for prokaryotes) the prediction of the associated protein coding gene direction.

Mechanisms of Type I-E and I-F CRISPR-Cas Systems in Enterobacteriaceae

CRISPR-Cas systems provide bacteria and archaea with adaptive immunity against invasion by bacteriophages and other mobile genetic elements. Short fragments of invader DNA are stored as immunological memories within CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat) arrays in the host chromosome. These arrays provide a template for RNA molecules that can guide CRISPR-associated (Cas) proteins to specifically neutralize viruses upon subsequent infection. Over the past 10 years, our understanding of CRISPR-Cas systems has benefited greatly from a number of model organisms. In particular, the study of several members of the Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae family, especially Escherichia coli and Pectobacterium atrosepticum, have provided significant insights into the mechanisms of CRISPR-Cas immunity. In this review, we provide an overview of CRISPR-Cas systems present in members of the Enterobacteriaceae. We also detail the current mechanistic understanding of the type I-E and type I-F CRISPR-Cas systems that are commonly found in enterobacteria. Finally, we discuss how phages can escape or inactivate CRISPR-Cas systems and the measures bacteria can enact to counter these types of events.

CRISPR-Cas adaptation in Escherichia coli requires RecBCD helicase but not nuclease activity, is independent of homologous recombination, and is antagonized by 5' ssDNA exonucleases

Prokaryotic adaptive immunity is established against mobile genetic elements (MGEs) by ‘naïve adaptation’ when DNA fragments from a newly encountered MGE are integrated into CRISPR–Cas systems. In Escherichia coli, DNA integration catalyzed by Cas1–Cas2 integrase is well understood in mechanistic and structural detail but much less is known about events prior to integration that generate DNA for capture by Cas1–Cas2. Naïve adaptation in E. coli is thought to depend on the DNA helicase-nuclease RecBCD for generating DNA fragments for capture by Cas1–Cas2. The genetics presented here show that naïve adaptation does not require RecBCD nuclease activity but that helicase activity may be important. RecA loading by RecBCD inhibits adaptation explaining previously observed adaptation phenotypes that implicated RecBCD nuclease activity. Genetic analysis of other E. coli nucleases and naïve adaptation revealed that 5′ ssDNA tailed DNA molecules promote new spacer acquisition. We show that purified E. coli Cas1–Cas2 complex binds to and nicks 5′ ssDNA tailed duplexes and propose that E. coli Cas1–Cas2 nuclease activity on such DNA structures supports naïve adaptation.

Adaptation processes that build CRISPR immunity: creative destruction, updated

Prokaryotes can defend themselves against invading mobile genetic elements (MGEs) by acquiring immune memory against them. The memory is a DNA database located at specific chromosomal sites called CRISPRs (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) that store fragments of MGE DNA. These are utilised to target and destroy returning MGEs, preventing re-infection. The effectiveness of CRISPR-based immune defence depends on 'adaptation' reactions that capture and integrate MGE DNA fragments into CRISPRs. This provides the means for immunity to be delivered against MGEs in 'interference' reactions. Adaptation and interference are catalysed by Cas (CRISPR-associated) proteins, aided by enzymes well known for other roles in cells. We survey the molecular biology of CRISPR adaptation, highlighting entirely new developments that may help us to understand how MGE DNA is captured. We focus on processes in Escherichia coli, punctuated with reference to other prokaryotes that illustrate how common requirements for adaptation, DNA capture and integration, can be achieved in different ways. We also comment on how CRISPR adaptation enzymes, and their antecedents, can be utilised for biotechnology.

Divergent methylation of CRISPR repeats and cas genes in a subtype I-D CRISPR-Cas-system

Background

The presence and activity of CRISPR-Cas defense systems is a hallmark of many prokaryotic microorganisms. Here, the distribution of sequences related to the highly iterated palindrome 1 (HIP1) element and the DNA methylation of CGATCG motifs embedded within HIP1 as a vital part of the CRISPR1 repeat sequence was analyzed in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Previously suggested functions of HIP1 include organization of chromosomal structure, DNA recombination or gene regulation, all of which could be relevant in CRISPR-Cas functionality.

Results

The CRISPR1 repeat-spacer array contains more than 50 CGATCG elements that are double-methylated (^5mCG^6mATCG) by the enzymes M.Ssp6803I and M.Ssp6803III. Hence, more than 200 possible methylation events cluster over a stretch of 3600 bp of double-stranded DNA. Bisulfite sequencing showed that these motifs were highly methylated at the ^m5CGATCG positions whereas specific motifs within the CRISPR1 cas genes were hypomethylated suggesting a lowered accessibility for the DNA methylase to these regions. Assays for conjugation and CRISPR1-mediated DNA interference revealed a 50% drop in conjugation efficiency in the mutant lacking the ^5mC methylation of CGATCG motifs, while the highly efficient DNA interference activity was not affected by the lack of ^m5CGATCG DNA-methylation, nor was the capability to differentiate between self and non-self targets based on the protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs) GTA and GTC versus the non-PAM AGC. A third DNA methylation mediated by M.Ssp6803II modifies the first cytosine in the motif GGCC yielding GG^m4CC. We found a remarkable absence of GGCC motifs and hence the corresponding methylation over an 11 kb stretch encompassing all the cas genes involved in interference and crRNA maturation but not adaptation of the CRISPR1 system.

Conclusions

The lack of GGCC tetranucleotides along the CRISPR1 interference and maturation genes supports the reported hybrid character of subtype I-D CRISPR-Cas systems. We report tight and very high ^5mC methylation of the CRISPR1 repeat sequences. Nevertheless, cells lacking the ^5mC methylation activity were unaffected in their CRISPR1-mediated interference response but the efficiency of conjugation was reduced by 50%. These results point to an unknown role of ^m5CGATCG DNA-methylation marks in conjugation and DNA transformation.

The Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 complex mediates precise prespacer processing during CRISPR adaptation

CRISPR adaptation immunizes bacteria and archaea against viruses. During adaptation, the Cas1-Cas2 complex integrates fragments of invader DNA as spacers in the CRISPR array. Recently, an additional protein Cas4 has been implicated in selection and processing of prespacer substrates for Cas1-Cas2, although this mechanism remains unclear. We show that Cas4 interacts directly with Cas1-Cas2 forming a Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 complex that captures and processes prespacers prior to integration. Structural analysis of the Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 complex reveals two copies of Cas4 that closely interact with the two integrase active sites of Cas1, suggesting a mechanism for substrate handoff following processing. We also find that the Cas4-Cas1-Cas2 complex processes single-stranded DNA provided in cis or in trans with a double-stranded DNA duplex. Cas4 cleaves precisely upstream of PAM sequences, ensuring the acquisition of functional spacers. Our results explain how Cas4 cleavage coordinates with Cas1-Cas2 integration and defines the exact cleavage sites and specificity of Cas4.

Many people have now heard of CRISPR, or CRISPR-Cas9, as a gene editing technology. Yet CRISPR evolved in bacteria to protect them against viral infections. While parts of the CRISPR system are now being widely used, the research community still does not know everything about how the system operates in its natural setting.

In bacteria, CRISPR protects against infection by making lasting records of viruses a cell has encountered. It cuts short sections from the viral DNA and keeps them as a way to fight the virus if it ever returns. The key proteins in collecting and storing the virus DNA are called Cas1, Cas2 and Cas4. Previous work suggests that Cas4 is important for cutting suitable lengths of DNA for storage. Yet, how Cas4, Cas1 and Cas2 work together to select, cut and store DNA is not well studied.

Lee et al. have now used electron microscopy to examine how Cas1, Cas2 and Cas4 cooperate in the CRISPR system. The proteins studied came from bacteria called Bacillus halodurans. The structure revealed direct links between the Cas1 and Cas4 proteins that likely help to ensure these proteins are coordinated correctly to cut and store the DNA sections. Specifically, it showed that two Cas4 proteins interact with the two key active sites of Cas1. The findings also highlight that Cas4 cuts DNA at specific locations to make sure the resulting DNA sections are suitable for CRISPR protection.

The close association between Cas1 and Cas4 could be a critical aspect of the reliability of the CRISPR system in protecting bacteria from viruses. There are more bacteria on Earth than any other living thing. Understanding their biology has wide ranging environmental, health and bioengineering applications. In addition, learning more about the CRISPR system could further expand its potential to drive revolutionary biotechnology tools derived from these bacterial immune systems.

Advances in CRISPR-Cas systems for RNA targeting, tracking and editing

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) systems, especially type II (Cas9) systems, have been widely used in gene/genome targeting. Modifications of Cas9 enable these systems to become platforms for precise DNA manipulations. However, the utilization of CRISPR-Cas systems in RNA targeting remains preliminary. The discovery of type VI CRISPR-Cas systems (Cas13) shed light on RNA-guided RNA targeting. Cas13d, the smallest Cas13 protein, with a length of only ~930 amino acids, is a promising platform for RNA targeting compatible with viral delivery systems. Much effort has also been made to develop Cas9, Cas13a and Cas13b applications for RNA-guided RNA targeting. The discovery of new RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems as well as the development of RNA-targeting platforms with Cas9 and Cas13 will promote RNA-targeting technology substantially. Here, we review new advances in RNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems as well as advances in applications of these systems in RNA targeting, tracking and editing. We also compare these Cas protein-based technologies with traditional technologies for RNA targeting, tracking and editing. Finally, we discuss remaining questions and prospects for the future.

Endogenous Gene Regulation as a Predicted Main Function of Type I-E CRISPR/Cas System in E. coli

CRISPR/Cas is an adaptive bacterial immune system, whose CRISPR array can actively change in response to viral infections. However, Type I-E CRISPR/Cas in E. coli (an established model system), appears not to exhibit such active adaptation, which suggests that it might have functions other than immune response. Through computational analysis, we address the involvement of the system in non-canonical functions. To assess targets of CRISPR spacers, we align them against both E. coli genome and an exhaustive (~230) set of E. coli viruses. We systematically investigate the obtained alignments, such as hit distribution with respect to genome annotation, propensity to target mRNA, the target functional enrichment, conservation of CRISPR spacers and putative targets in related bacterial genomes. We find that CRISPR spacers have a statistically highly significant tendency to target i) host compared to phage genomes, ii) one of the two DNA strands, iii) genomic dsDNA rather than mRNA, iv) transcriptionally active regions, and v) sequences (cis-regulatory elements) with slower turn-over rate compared to CRISPR spacers (trans-factors). The results suggest that the Type I-E CRISPR/Cas system has a major role in transcription regulation of endogenous genes, with a potential to rapidly rewire these regulatory interactions, with targets being selected through naïve adaptation.

Avoidance of Trinucleotide Corresponding to Consensus Protospacer Adjacent Motif Controls the Efficiency of Prespacer Selection during Primed Adaptation

Adaptive immunity of prokaryotes depends on acquisition of foreign DNA fragments into CRISPR arrays as spacers followed by destruction of foreign DNA by CRISPR interference machinery. Different fragments are acquired into CRISPR arrays with widely different efficiencies, but the factors responsible are not known. We analyzed the frequency of spacers acquired during primed adaptation in an E. coli CRISPR array and found that AAG motif was depleted from highly acquired spacers. AAG is also a consensus protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) that must be present upstream from the target of the CRISPR spacer for its efficient destruction by the interference machinery. These results are important because they provide new information on the mechanism of primed spacer acquisition. They add to other previous evidence in the field that pointed out to a “directionality” in the capture of new spacers. Our data strongly suggest that the recognition of an AAG PAM by the interference machinery components prior to spacer capture occludes downstream AAG sequences, thus preventing their recognition by the adaptation machinery.

CRISPR DNA arrays of unique spacers separated by identical repeats ensure prokaryotic immunity through specific targeting of foreign nucleic acids complementary to spacers. New spacers are acquired into a CRISPR array in a process of CRISPR adaptation. Selection of foreign DNA fragments to be integrated into CRISPR arrays relies on PAM (protospacer adjacent motif) recognition, as only those spacers will be functional against invaders. However, acquisition of different PAM-associated spacers proceeds with markedly different efficiency from the same DNA. Here, we used a combination of bioinformatics and experimental approaches to understand factors affecting the efficiency of acquisition of spacers by the Escherichia coli type I-E CRISPR-Cas system, for which two modes of CRISPR adaptation have been described: naive and primed. We found that during primed adaptation, efficiency of spacer acquisition is strongly negatively affected by the presence of an AAG trinucleotide—a consensus PAM—within the sequence being selected. No such trend is observed during naive adaptation. The results are consistent with a unidirectional spacer selection process during primed adaptation and provide a specific signature for identification of spacers acquired through primed adaptation in natural populations.

Archaeal DNA polymerases: new frontiers in DNA replication and repair

Archaeal DNA polymerases have long been studied due to their superior properties for DNA amplification in the polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing technologies. However, a full comprehension of their functions, recruitment and regulation as part of the replisome during genome replication and DNA repair lags behind well-established bacterial and eukaryotic model systems. The archaea are evolutionarily very broad, but many studies in the major model systems of both Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota are starting to yield significant increases in understanding of the functions of DNA polymerases in the respective phyla. Recent advances in biochemical approaches and in archaeal genetic models allowing knockout and epitope tagging have led to significant increases in our understanding, including DNA polymerase roles in Okazaki fragment maturation on the lagging strand, towards reconstitution of the replisome itself. Furthermore, poorly characterised DNA polymerase paralogues are finding roles in DNA repair and CRISPR immunity. This review attempts to provide a current update on the roles of archaeal DNA polymerases in both DNA replication and repair, addressing significant questions that remain for this field.

The CRISPR-Cas system in Enterobacteriaceae

In nature, microorganisms are constantly exposed to multiple viral infections and thus have developed many strategies to survive phage attack and invasion by foreign DNA. One of such strategies is the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) bacterial immunological system. This defense mechanism is widespread in prokaryotes including several families such as Enterobacteriaceae. Much knowledge about the CRISPR-Cas system has been generated, including its biological functions, transcriptional regulation, distribution, utility as a molecular marker and as a tool for specific genome editing. This review focuses on these aspects and describes the state of the art of the CRISPR-Cas system in the Enterobacteriaceae bacterial family.

CRISPR-Cas immunity, DNA repair and genome stability

Co-opting of CRISPR-Cas 'Interference' reactions for editing the genomes of eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells has highlighted crucial support roles for DNA repair systems that strive to maintain genome stability. As front-runners in genome editing that targets DNA, the class 2 CRISPR-Cas enzymes Cas9 and Cas12a rely on repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DDSBs) by host DNA repair enzymes, using mechanisms that vary in how well they are understood. Data are emerging about the identities of DNA repair enzymes that support genome editing in human cells. At the same time, it is becoming apparent that CRISPR-Cas systems functioning in their native environment, bacteria or archaea, also need DNA repair enzymes. In this short review, we survey how DNA repair and CRISPR-Cas systems are intertwined. We consider how understanding DNA repair and CRISPR-Cas interference reactions in nature might help improve the efficacy of genome editing procedures that utilise homologous or analogous systems in human and other cells.

Bioinformatic evidence of widespread priming in type I and II CRISPR-Cas systems

CRISPR-Cas systems provide bacteria and archaea with adaptive immunity against invading genetic elements, such as plasmids, bacteriophages and archaeal viruses. They consist of cas genes and CRISPR loci, which store genetic memories of previously encountered invaders as short sequences termed spacers. Spacers determine the specificity of CRISPR-Cas defence and immunity can be gained or updated by the addition of new spacers into CRISPR loci. There are two main routes to spacer acquisition, which are known as naïve and primed CRISPR adaptation. Naïve CRISPR adaptation involves the de novo formation of immunity, independent of pre-existing spacers. In contrast, primed CRISPR adaptation (priming) uses existing spacers to enhance the acquisition of new spacers. Priming typically results in spacer acquisition from locations near the site of target recognition by the existing (priming) spacer. Primed CRISPR adaptation has been observed in several type I CRISPR-Cas systems and it is potentially widespread. However, experimental evidence is unavailable for some subtypes, and for most systems, priming has only been shown in a small number of hosts. There is also no current evidence of priming by other CRISPR-Cas types. Here, we used a bioinformatic approach to search for evidence of priming in diverse CRISPR-Cas systems. By analysing the clustering of spacers acquired from phages, prophages and archaeal viruses, including strand and directional biases between subsequently acquired spacers, we demonstrate that two patterns of primed CRISPR adaptation dominate in type I systems. In addition, we find evidence of a priming-like pathway in type II CRISPR-Cas systems.

CRISPR-Cas: Complex Functional Networks and Multiple Roles beyond Adaptive Immunity

CRISPR-Cas is a prokaryotic adaptive immune system that functions by incorporating fragments of foreign DNA into CRISPR arrays. The arrays containing spacers derived from foreign DNA are transcribed, and the transcripts are processed to generate spacer-containing mature CRISPR-RNAs that are employed as guides to specifically recognize and cleave the DNA or RNA of the cognate parasitic genetic elements. The CRISPR-Cas systems show remarkable complexity and diversity of molecular organization and appear to be involved in various cellular functions that are distinct from, even if connected to, adaptive immunity. In this review, we discuss some of such functional links of CRISPR-Cas systems including their effect on horizontal gene transfer that can be either inhibitory or stimulatory, connections between CRISPR-Cas and DNA repair systems as well as programmed cell death and signal transduction mechanisms, and potential role of CRISPR-Cas in transposon integration and plasmid maintenance. The interplay between the primary function of CRISPR-Cas as an adaptive immunity mechanism and these other roles defines the richness of the biological effects of these systems and affects their spread among bacteria and archaea.

DNA replication roadblocks caused by Cascade interference complexes are alleviated by RecG DNA repair helicase

Cascade complexes underpin E. coli CRISPR-Cas immunity systems by stimulating 'adaptation' reactions that update immunity and by initiating 'interference' reactions that destroy invader DNA. Recognition of invader DNA in Cascade catalysed R-loops provokes DNA capture and its subsequent integration into CRISPR loci by Cas1 and Cas2. DNA capture processes are unclear but may involve RecG helicase, which stimulates adaptation during its role responding to genome instability. We show that Cascade is a potential source of genome instability because it blocks DNA replication and that RecG helicase alleviates this by dissociating Cascade. This highlights how integrating in vitro CRISPR-Cas interference and adaptation reactions with DNA replication and repair reactions will help to determine precise mechanisms underpinning prokaryotic adaptive immunity.

Characterizing the activity of abundant, diverse and active CRISPR-Cas systems in lactobacilli

CRISPR-Cas systems provide immunity against phages and plasmids in bacteria and archaea. Despite the popularity of CRISPR-Cas9 based genome editing, few endogenous systems have been characterized to date. Here, we sampled 1,262 publically available lactobacilli genomes found them to be enriched with CRISPR-Cas adaptive immunity. While CRISPR-Cas is ubiquitous in some Lactobacillus species, CRISPR-Cas content varies at the strain level in most Lactobacillus species. We identified that Type II is the most abundant type across the genus, with II-A being the most dominant sub-type. We found that many Type II-A systems are actively transcribed, and encode spacers that efficiently provide resistance against plasmid uptake. Analysis of various CRISPR transcripts revealed that guide sequences are highly diverse in terms of crRNA and tracrRNA length and structure. Interference assays revealed highly diverse target PAM sequences. Lastly, we show that these systems can be readily repurposed for self-targeting by expressing an engineered single guide RNA. Our results reveal that Type II-A systems in lactobacilli are naturally active in their native host in terms of expression and efficiently targeting invasive and genomic DNA. Together, these systems increase the possible Cas9 targeting space and provide multiplexing potential in native hosts and heterologous genome editing purpose.

The physicist's guide to one of biotechnology's hottest new topics: CRISPR-Cas

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated proteins (Cas) constitute a multi-functional, constantly evolving immune system in bacteria and archaea cells. A heritable, molecular memory is generated of phage, plasmids, or other mobile genetic elements that attempt to attack the cell. This memory is used to recognize and interfere with subsequent invasions from the same genetic elements. This versatile prokaryotic tool has also been used to advance applications in biotechnology. Here we review a large body of CRISPR-Cas research to explore themes of evolution and selection, population dynamics, horizontal gene transfer, specific and cross-reactive interactions, cost and regulation, non-immunological CRISPR functions that boost host cell robustness, as well as applicable mechanisms for efficient and specific genetic engineering. We offer future directions that can be addressed by the physics community. Physical understanding of the CRISPR-Cas system will advance uses in biotechnology, such as developing cell lines and animal models, cell labeling and information storage, combatting antibiotic resistance, and human therapeutics.