1
|
Böttcher R, Schmidts I, Nitschko V, Duric P, Förstemann K. RNA polymerase II is recruited to DNA double-strand breaks for dilncRNA transcription in Drosophila. RNA Biol 2021; 19:68-77. [PMID: 34965182 PMCID: PMC8786327 DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2021.2014694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks are among the most toxic lesions that can occur in a genome and their faithful repair is thus of great importance. Recent findings have uncovered local transcription that initiates at the break and forms a non-coding transcript, called damage-induced long non-coding RNA (dilncRNA), which helps to coordinate the DNA transactions necessary for repair. We provide nascent RNA sequencing-based evidence that RNA polymerase II transcribes the dilncRNA in Drosophila and that this is more efficient for DNA breaks in an intron-containing gene, consistent with the higher damage-induced siRNA levels downstream of an intron. The spliceosome thus stimulates recruitment of RNA polymerase II to the break, rather than merely promoting the annealing of sense and antisense RNA to form the siRNA precursor. In contrast, RNA polymerase III nascent RNA libraries did not contain reads corresponding to the cleaved loci and selective inhibition of RNA polymerase III did not reduce the yield of damage-induced siRNAs. Finally, the damage-induced siRNA density was unchanged downstream of a T8 sequence, which terminates RNA polymerase III transcription. We thus found no evidence for a participation of RNA polymerase III in dilncRNA transcription in cultured Drosophila cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Böttcher
- Department. Of Biochemistry and Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Ines Schmidts
- Department. Of Biochemistry and Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Volker Nitschko
- Department. Of Biochemistry and Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Petar Duric
- Department. Of Biochemistry and Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Klaus Förstemann
- Department. Of Biochemistry and Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vågbø CB, Slupphaug G. RNA in DNA repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2020; 95:102927. [DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2020.102927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
3
|
Domingo-Prim J, Bonath F, Visa N. RNA at DNA Double-Strand Breaks: The Challenge of Dealing with DNA:RNA Hybrids. Bioessays 2020; 42:e1900225. [PMID: 32105369 DOI: 10.1002/bies.201900225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
RNA polymerase II is recruited to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), transcribes the sequences that flank the break and produces a novel RNA type that has been termed damage-induced long non-coding RNA (dilncRNA). DilncRNAs can be processed into short, miRNA-like molecules or degraded by different ribonucleases. They can also form double-stranded RNAs or DNA:RNA hybrids. The DNA:RNA hybrids formed at DSBs contribute to the recruitment of repair factors during the early steps of homologous recombination (HR) and, in this way, contribute to the accuracy of the DNA repair. However, if not resolved, the DNA:RNA hybrids are highly mutagenic and prevent the recruitment of later HR factors. Here recent discoveries about the synthesis, processing, and degradation of dilncRNAs are revised. The focus is on RNA clearance, a necessary step for the successful repair of DSBs and the aim is to reconcile contradictory findings on the effects of dilncRNAs and DNA:RNA hybrids in HR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judit Domingo-Prim
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.,Moirai Biodesign SL, Parc Científic de Barcelona, E-08028, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Franziska Bonath
- Science for Life Laboratory, National Genomics Infrastructure, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Neus Visa
- Department of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner-Gren Institute, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gutbrod MJ, Martienssen RA. Conserved chromosomal functions of RNA interference. Nat Rev Genet 2020; 21:311-331. [PMID: 32051563 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-019-0203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
RNA interference (RNAi), a cellular process through which small RNAs target and regulate complementary RNA transcripts, has well-characterized roles in post-transcriptional gene regulation and transposon repression. Recent studies have revealed additional conserved roles for RNAi proteins, such as Argonaute and Dicer, in chromosome function. By guiding chromatin modification, RNAi components promote chromosome segregation during both mitosis and meiosis and regulate chromosomal and genomic dosage response. Small RNAs and the RNAi machinery also participate in the resolution of DNA damage. Interestingly, many of these lesser-studied functions seem to be more strongly conserved across eukaryotes than are well-characterized functions such as the processing of microRNAs. These findings have implications for the evolution of RNAi since the last eukaryotic common ancestor, and they provide a more complete view of the functions of RNAi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Gutbrod
- Watson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Martienssen
- Watson School of Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA. .,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
The repair of DNA double-strand breaks occurs through a series of defined steps that are evolutionarily conserved and well-understood in most experimental organisms. However, it is becoming increasingly clear that repair does not occur in isolation from other DNA transactions. Transcription of DNA produces topological changes, RNA species, and RNA-dependent protein complexes that can dramatically influence the efficiency and outcomes of DNA double-strand break repair. The transcription-associated history of several double-strand break repair factors is reviewed here, with an emphasis on their roles in regulating R-loops and the emerging role of R-loops in coordination of repair events. Evidence for nucleolytic processing of R-loops is also discussed, as well as the molecular tools commonly used to measure RNA-DNA hybrids in cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya T Paull
- The Department of Molecular Biosciences and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Durut N, Mittelsten Scheid O. The Role of Noncoding RNAs in Double-Strand Break Repair. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2019; 10:1155. [PMID: 31611891 PMCID: PMC6776598 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Genome stability is constantly threatened by DNA lesions generated by different environmental factors as well as endogenous processes. If not properly and timely repaired, damaged DNA can lead to mutations or chromosomal rearrangements, well-known reasons for genetic diseases or cancer in mammals, or growth abnormalities and/or sterility in plants. To prevent deleterious consequences of DNA damage, a sophisticated system termed DNA damage response (DDR) detects DNA lesions and initiates DNA repair processes. In addition to many well-studied canonical proteins involved in this process, noncoding RNA (ncRNA) molecules have recently been discovered as important regulators of the DDR pathway, extending the broad functional repertoire of ncRNAs to the maintenance of genome stability. These ncRNAs are mainly connected with double-strand breaks (DSBs), the most dangerous type of DNA lesions. The possibility to intentionally generate site-specific DSBs in the genome with endonucleases constitutes a powerful tool to study, in vivo, how DSBs are processed and how ncRNAs participate in this crucial event. In this review, we will summarize studies reporting the different roles of ncRNAs in DSB repair and discuss how genome editing approaches, especially CRISPR/Cas systems, can assist DNA repair studies. We will summarize knowledge concerning the functional significance of ncRNAs in DNA repair and their contribution to genome stability and integrity, with a focus on plants.
Collapse
|
7
|
Burger K, Ketley RF, Gullerova M. Beyond the Trinity of ATM, ATR, and DNA-PK: Multiple Kinases Shape the DNA Damage Response in Concert With RNA Metabolism. Front Mol Biosci 2019; 6:61. [PMID: 31428617 PMCID: PMC6688092 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Our genome is constantly exposed to endogenous and exogenous sources of DNA damage resulting in various alterations of the genetic code. DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered one of the most cytotoxic lesions. Several types of repair pathways act to repair DNA damage and maintain genome stability. In the canonical DNA damage response (DDR) DSBs are recognized by the sensing kinases Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), Ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), which initiate a cascade of kinase-dependent amplification steps known as DSB signaling. Recent evidence suggests that efficient recognition and repair of DSBs relies on the transcription and processing of non-coding (nc)RNA molecules by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and the RNA interference (RNAi) factors Drosha and Dicer. Multiple kinases influence the phosphorylation status of both the RNAPII carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) and Dicer in order to regulate RNA-dependent DSBs repair. The importance of kinase signaling and RNA processing in the DDR is highlighted by the regulation of p53-binding protein (53BP1), a key regulator of DSB repair pathway choice between homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Additionally, emerging evidence suggests that RNA metabolic enzymes also play a role in the repair of other types of DNA damage, including the DDR to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). RNAi factors are also substrates for mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling and mediate the turnover of ncRNA during nucleotide excision repair (NER) in response to UVR. Here, we review kinase-dependent phosphorylation events on RNAPII, Drosha and Dicer, and 53BP1 that modulate the key steps of the DDR to DSBs and UVR, suggesting an intimate link between the DDR and RNA metabolism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Monika Gullerova
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vítor AC, Sridhara SC, Sabino JC, Afonso AI, Grosso AR, Martin RM, de Almeida SF. Single-molecule imaging of transcription at damaged chromatin. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2019; 5:eaau1249. [PMID: 30662944 PMCID: PMC6326756 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau1249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
How DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) affect ongoing transcription remains elusive due to the lack of single-molecule resolution tools directly measuring transcription dynamics upon DNA damage. Here, we established new reporter systems that allow the visualization of individual nascent RNAs with high temporal and spatial resolution upon the controlled induction of a single DSB at two distinct chromatin locations: a promoter-proximal (PROP) region downstream the transcription start site and a region within an internal exon (EX2). Induction of a DSB resulted in a rapid suppression of preexisting transcription initiation regardless of the genomic location. However, while transcription was irreversibly suppressed upon a PROP DSB, damage at the EX2 region drove the formation of promoter-like nucleosome-depleted regions and transcription recovery. Two-color labeling of transcripts at sequences flanking the EX2 lesion revealed bidirectional break-induced transcription initiation. Transcriptome analysis further showed pervasive bidirectional transcription at endogenous intragenic DSBs. Our data provide a novel framework for interpreting the reciprocal interactions between transcription and DNA damage at distinct chromatin regions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Michelini F, Jalihal AP, Francia S, Meers C, Neeb ZT, Rossiello F, Gioia U, Aguado J, Jones-Weinert C, Luke B, Biamonti G, Nowacki M, Storici F, Carninci P, Walter NG, d'Adda di Fagagna F. From "Cellular" RNA to "Smart" RNA: Multiple Roles of RNA in Genome Stability and Beyond. Chem Rev 2018; 118:4365-4403. [PMID: 29600857 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Coding for proteins has been considered the main function of RNA since the "central dogma" of biology was proposed. The discovery of noncoding transcripts shed light on additional roles of RNA, ranging from the support of polypeptide synthesis, to the assembly of subnuclear structures, to gene expression modulation. Cellular RNA has therefore been recognized as a central player in often unanticipated biological processes, including genomic stability. This ever-expanding list of functions inspired us to think of RNA as a "smart" phone, which has replaced the older obsolete "cellular" phone. In this review, we summarize the last two decades of advances in research on the interface between RNA biology and genome stability. We start with an account of the emergence of noncoding RNA, and then we discuss the involvement of RNA in DNA damage signaling and repair, telomere maintenance, and genomic rearrangements. We continue with the depiction of single-molecule RNA detection techniques, and we conclude by illustrating the possibilities of RNA modulation in hopes of creating or improving new therapies. The widespread biological functions of RNA have made this molecule a reoccurring theme in basic and translational research, warranting it the transcendence from classically studied "cellular" RNA to "smart" RNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Michelini
- IFOM - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology , Milan , 20139 , Italy
| | - Ameya P Jalihal
- Single Molecule Analysis Group and Center for RNA Biomedicine, Department of Chemistry , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109-1055 , United States
| | - Sofia Francia
- IFOM - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology , Milan , 20139 , Italy.,Istituto di Genetica Molecolare , CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pavia , 27100 , Italy
| | - Chance Meers
- School of Biological Sciences , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States
| | - Zachary T Neeb
- Institute of Cell Biology , University of Bern , Baltzerstrasse 4 , 3012 Bern , Switzerland
| | | | - Ubaldo Gioia
- IFOM - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology , Milan , 20139 , Italy
| | - Julio Aguado
- IFOM - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology , Milan , 20139 , Italy
| | | | - Brian Luke
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology , Johannes Gutenberg University , 55099 Mainz , Germany.,Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB) , 55128 Mainz , Germany
| | - Giuseppe Biamonti
- Istituto di Genetica Molecolare , CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pavia , 27100 , Italy
| | - Mariusz Nowacki
- Institute of Cell Biology , University of Bern , Baltzerstrasse 4 , 3012 Bern , Switzerland
| | - Francesca Storici
- School of Biological Sciences , Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta , Georgia 30332 , United States
| | - Piero Carninci
- RIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies , 1-7-22 Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku , Yokohama City , Kanagawa 230-0045 , Japan
| | - Nils G Walter
- Single Molecule Analysis Group and Center for RNA Biomedicine, Department of Chemistry , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , Michigan 48109-1055 , United States
| | - Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
- IFOM - The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology , Milan , 20139 , Italy.,Istituto di Genetica Molecolare , CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche , Pavia , 27100 , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lu WT, Hawley BR, Skalka GL, Baldock RA, Smith EM, Bader AS, Malewicz M, Watts FZ, Wilczynska A, Bushell M. Drosha drives the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids around DNA break sites to facilitate DNA repair. Nat Commun 2018; 9:532. [PMID: 29416038 PMCID: PMC5803274 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02893-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The error-free and efficient repair of DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) is extremely important for cell survival. RNA has been implicated in the resolution of DNA damage but the mechanism remains poorly understood. Here, we show that miRNA biogenesis enzymes, Drosha and Dicer, control the recruitment of repair factors from multiple pathways to sites of damage. Depletion of Drosha significantly reduces DNA repair by both homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Drosha is required within minutes of break induction, suggesting a central and early role for RNA processing in DNA repair. Sequencing of DNA:RNA hybrids reveals RNA invasion around DNA break sites in a Drosha-dependent manner. Removal of the RNA component of these structures results in impaired repair. These results show how RNA can be a direct and critical mediator of DNA damage repair in human cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Ting Lu
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Ben R Hawley
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | | | - Robert A Baldock
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, PA, USA
| | - Ewan M Smith
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | - Aldo S Bader
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
| | | | - Felicity Z Watts
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RQ, UK
| | | | - Martin Bushell
- MRC Toxicology Unit, Lancaster Road, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tants JN, Fesser S, Kern T, Stehle R, Geerlof A, Wunderlich C, Juen M, Hartlmüller C, Böttcher R, Kunzelmann S, Lange O, Kreutz C, Förstemann K, Sattler M. Molecular basis for asymmetry sensing of siRNAs by the Drosophila Loqs-PD/Dcr-2 complex in RNA interference. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:12536-12550. [PMID: 29040648 PMCID: PMC5716069 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
RNA interference defends against RNA viruses and retro-elements within an organism's genome. It is triggered by duplex siRNAs, of which one strand is selected to confer sequence-specificity to the RNA induced silencing complex (RISC). In Drosophila, Dicer-2 (Dcr-2) and the double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) protein R2D2 form the RISC loading complex (RLC) and select one strand of exogenous siRNAs according to the relative thermodynamic stability of base-pairing at either end. Through genome editing we demonstrate that Loqs-PD, the Drosophila homolog of human TAR RNA binding protein (TRBP) and a paralog of R2D2, forms an alternative RLC with Dcr-2 that is required for strand choice of endogenous siRNAs in S2 cells. Two canonical dsRBDs in Loqs-PD bind to siRNAs with enhanced affinity compared to miRNA/miRNA* duplexes. Structural analysis, NMR and biophysical experiments indicate that the Loqs-PD dsRBDs can slide along the RNA duplex to the ends of the siRNA. A moderate but notable binding preference for the thermodynamically more stable siRNA end by Loqs-PD alone is greatly amplified in complex with Dcr-2 to initiate strand discrimination by asymmetry sensing in the RLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Niklas Tants
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Chair of Biomolecular NMR Spectroscopy, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Stephanie Fesser
- Genzentrum & Department Biochemie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Thomas Kern
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Chair of Biomolecular NMR Spectroscopy, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Ralf Stehle
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Chair of Biomolecular NMR Spectroscopy, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Arie Geerlof
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Wunderlich
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences CMBI, Universität Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Juen
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences CMBI, Universität Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Christoph Hartlmüller
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Chair of Biomolecular NMR Spectroscopy, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Romy Böttcher
- Genzentrum & Department Biochemie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Stefan Kunzelmann
- Genzentrum & Department Biochemie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Oliver Lange
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Chair of Biomolecular NMR Spectroscopy, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Christoph Kreutz
- Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences CMBI, Universität Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Klaus Förstemann
- Genzentrum & Department Biochemie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Michael Sattler
- Institute of Structural Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
- Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich at Chair of Biomolecular NMR Spectroscopy, Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Damage-induced lncRNAs control the DNA damage response through interaction with DDRNAs at individual double-strand breaks. Nat Cell Biol 2017; 19:1400-1411. [PMID: 29180822 PMCID: PMC5714282 DOI: 10.1038/ncb3643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 238] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The DNA damage response (DDR) preserves genomic integrity. Small non-coding RNAs termed DDRNAs are generated at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and are critical for DDR activation. Here we show that active DDRNAs specifically localize to their damaged homologous genomic sites in a transcription-dependent manner. Following DNA damage, RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) binds to the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex, is recruited to DSBs and synthesizes damage-induced long non-coding RNAs (dilncRNAs) from and towards DNA ends. DilncRNAs act both as DDRNA precursors and by recruiting DDRNAs through RNA-RNA pairing. Together, dilncRNAs and DDRNAs fuel DDR focus formation and associate with 53BP1. Accordingly, inhibition of RNAPII prevents DDRNA recruitment, DDR activation and DNA repair. Antisense oligonucleotides matching dilncRNAs and DDRNAs impair site-specific DDR focus formation and DNA repair. We propose that DDR signalling sites, in addition to sharing a common pool of proteins, individually host a unique set of site-specific RNAs necessary for DDR activation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Vitelli V, Galbiati A, Iannelli F, Pessina F, Sharma S, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Recent Advancements in DNA Damage-Transcription Crosstalk and High-Resolution Mapping of DNA Breaks. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2017; 18:87-113. [PMID: 28859573 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091416-035314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Until recently, DNA damage arising from physiological DNA metabolism was considered a detrimental by-product for cells. However, an increasing amount of evidence has shown that DNA damage could have a positive role in transcription activation. In particular, DNA damage has been detected in transcriptional elements following different stimuli. These physiological DNA breaks are thought to be instrumental for the correct expression of genomic loci through different mechanisms. In this regard, although a plethora of methods are available to precisely map transcribed regions and transcription start sites, commonly used techniques for mapping DNA breaks lack sufficient resolution and sensitivity to draw a robust correlation between DNA damage generation and transcription. Recently, however, several methods have been developed to map DNA damage at single-nucleotide resolution, thus providing a new set of tools to correlate DNA damage and transcription. Here, we review how DNA damage can positively regulate transcription initiation, the current techniques for mapping DNA breaks at high resolution, and how these techniques can benefit future studies of DNA damage and transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Vitelli
- FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM), Milan 20139, Italy;
| | | | - Fabio Iannelli
- FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM), Milan 20139, Italy;
| | - Fabio Pessina
- FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM), Milan 20139, Italy;
| | - Sheetal Sharma
- FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM), Milan 20139, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
- FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology (IFOM), Milan 20139, Italy; .,Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Pavia 27100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
D'Alessandro G, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Transcription and DNA Damage: Holding Hands or Crossing Swords? J Mol Biol 2017; 429:3215-3229. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Revised: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
15
|
Merk K, Breinig M, Böttcher R, Krebs S, Blum H, Boutros M, Förstemann K. Splicing stimulates siRNA formation at Drosophila DNA double-strand breaks. PLoS Genet 2017. [PMID: 28628606 PMCID: PMC5495518 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA double-strand breaks trigger the production of locus-derived siRNAs in fruit flies, human cells and plants. At least in flies, their biogenesis depends on active transcription running towards the break. Since siRNAs derive from a double-stranded RNA precursor, a major question is how broken DNA ends can generate matching sense and antisense transcripts. We performed a genome-wide RNAi-screen in cultured Drosophila cells, which revealed that in addition to DNA repair factors, many spliceosome components are required for efficient siRNA generation. We validated this observation through site-specific DNA cleavage with CRISPR-cas9 followed by deep sequencing of small RNAs. DNA breaks in intron-less genes or upstream of a gene's first intron did not efficiently trigger siRNA production. When DNA double-strand breaks were induced downstream of an intron, however, this led to robust siRNA generation. Furthermore, a downstream break slowed down splicing of the upstream intron and a detailed analysis of siRNA coverage at the targeted locus revealed that unspliced pre-mRNA contributes the sense strand to the siRNA precursor. Since splicing factors are stimulating the response but unspliced transcripts are entering the siRNA biogenesis, the spliceosome is apparently stalled in a pre-catalytic state and serves as a signaling hub. We conclude that convergent transcription at DNA breaks is stimulated by a splicing dependent control process. The resulting double-stranded RNA is converted into siRNAs that instruct the degradation of cognate mRNAs. In addition to a potential role in DNA repair, the break-induced transcription may thus be a means to cull improper RNAs from the transcriptome of Drosophila melanogaster. Since the splicing factors identified in our screen also stimulated siRNA production from high copy transgenes, it is possible that this surveillance mechanism serves in genome defense beyond DNA double-strand breaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Merk
- Gene Center and Dept. of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Marco Breinig
- Division Signaling and Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Romy Böttcher
- Gene Center and Dept. of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Stefan Krebs
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Helmut Blum
- Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis (LAFUGA), Gene Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Michael Boutros
- Division Signaling and Functional Genomics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 580, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Förstemann
- Gene Center and Dept. of Biochemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Small RNA-mediated repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by the DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN 2 and ARGONAUTE 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E2965-E2974. [PMID: 28325872 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618834114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
As photosynthetic organisms, plants need to prevent irreversible UV-induced DNA lesions. Through an unbiased, genome-wide approach, we have uncovered a previously unrecognized interplay between Global Genome Repair and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) in the recognition of DNA photoproducts, prevalently in intergenic regions. Genetic and biochemical approaches indicate that, upon UV irradiation, the DNA DAMAGE-BINDING PROTEIN 2 (DDB2) and ARGONAUTE 1 (AGO1) of Arabidopsis thaliana form a chromatin-bound complex together with 21-nt siRNAs, which likely facilitates recognition of DNA damages in an RNA/DNA complementary strand-specific manner. The biogenesis of photoproduct-associated siRNAs involves the noncanonical, concerted action of RNA POLYMERASE IV, RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE-2, and DICER-LIKE-4. Furthermore, the chromatin association/dissociation of the DDB2-AGO1 complex is under the control of siRNA abundance and DNA damage signaling. These findings reveal unexpected nuclear functions for DCL4 and AGO1, and shed light on the interplay between small RNAs and DNA repair recognition factors at damaged sites.
Collapse
|
17
|
Capozzo I, Iannelli F, Francia S, d'Adda di Fagagna F. Express or repress? The transcriptional dilemma of damaged chromatin. FEBS J 2017; 284:2133-2147. [PMID: 28231404 DOI: 10.1111/febs.14048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The fine modulation of transcriptional activity around DNA lesions is essential to carefully regulate the crosstalk between the activation of the DNA damage response, DNA repair and transcription, particularly when the lesion occurs next to actively transcribed genes. Recently, several studies have been carried out to investigate how DNA lesions impact on local transcription, but the emerging model remains incomplete. Transcription of genes around damaged DNA is actively downregulated by the DNA damage response through different mechanisms, which appear specific to the chromatin context, the type of DNA damage or its complexity. Intriguingly, emerging evidence also indicates that transcription of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) is induced at sites of DNA damage, producing small ncRNAs that are, in turn, required for a full DNA damage response activation. We discuss here these recent findings, highlighting the major unresolved questions in the field, and propose ways to reconcile these apparently contradictory observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Capozzo
- Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pavia, Italy.,Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia, Italy
| | - Fabio Iannelli
- IFOM Foundation - FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Sofia Francia
- Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pavia, Italy.,IFOM Foundation - FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna
- Istituto di Genetica Molecolare, CNR - Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Pavia, Italy.,IFOM Foundation - FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology Foundation, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
The emerging role of RNAs in DNA damage repair. Cell Death Differ 2017; 24:580-587. [PMID: 28234355 PMCID: PMC5384027 DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2017.16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Revised: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 01/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Many surveillance and repair mechanisms exist to maintain the integrity of our genome. All of the pathways described to date are controlled exclusively by proteins, which through their enzymatic activities identify breaks, propagate the damage signal, recruit further protein factors and ultimately resolve the break with little to no loss of genetic information. RNA is known to have an integral role in many cellular pathways, but, until very recently, was not considered to take part in the DNA repair process. Several reports demonstrated a conserved critical role for RNA-processing enzymes and RNA molecules in DNA repair, but the biogenesis of these damage-related RNAs and their mechanisms of action remain unknown. We will explore how these new findings challenge the idea of proteins being the sole participants in the response to DNA damage and reveal a new and exciting aspect of both DNA repair and RNA biology.
Collapse
|