1
|
Triplett MK, Johnson MJ, Symington LS. Induction of homologous recombination by site-specific replication stress. DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 142:103753. [PMID: 39190984 PMCID: PMC11425181 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Revised: 08/07/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
DNA replication stress is one of the primary causes of genome instability. In response to replication stress, cells can employ replication restart mechanisms that rely on homologous recombination to resume replication fork progression and preserve genome integrity. In this review, we provide an overview of various methods that have been developed to induce site-specific replication fork stalling or collapse in eukaryotic cells. In particular, we highlight recent studies of mechanisms of replication-associated recombination resulting from site-specific protein-DNA barriers and single-strand breaks, and we discuss the contributions of these findings to our understanding of the consequences of these forms of stress on genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina K Triplett
- Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular, and Biomedical Studies, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States
| | - Matthew J Johnson
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States; Program in Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, United States
| | - Lorraine S Symington
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Genetics & Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Souza J, Hickson ID. Replication fork barriers to study site-specific DNA replication perturbation. DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 141:103735. [PMID: 39079395 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/18/2024]
Abstract
DNA replication ensures the complete and accurate duplication of the genome. The traditional approach to analysing perturbation of DNA replication is to use chemical inhibitors, such as hydroxyurea or aphidicolin, that slow or stall replication fork progression throughout the genome. An alternative approach is to perturb replication at a single site in the genome that permits a more forensic investigation of the cellular response to the stalling or disruption of a replication fork. This has been achieved in several organisms using different systems that share the common feature of utilizing the high affinity binding of a protein to a defined DNA sequence that is integrated into a specific locus in the host genome. Protein-mediated replication fork blocking systems of this sort have proven very valuable in defining how cells cope with encountering a barrier to fork progression. In this review, we compare protein-based replication fork barrier systems from different organisms that have been developed to generate site-specific replication fork perturbation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenevieve D'Souza
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N 2200, Denmark
| | - Ian D Hickson
- Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N 2200, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hertz EPT, Vega IAD, Kruse T, Wang Y, Hendriks IA, Bizard AH, Eugui-Anta A, Hay RT, Nielsen ML, Nilsson J, Hickson ID, Mailand N. The SUMO-NIP45 pathway processes toxic DNA catenanes to prevent mitotic failure. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2023; 30:1303-1313. [PMID: 37474739 PMCID: PMC10497417 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-01045-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
SUMOylation regulates numerous cellular processes, but what represents the essential functions of this protein modification remains unclear. To address this, we performed genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9-based screens, revealing that the BLM-TOP3A-RMI1-RMI2 (BTRR)-PICH pathway, which resolves ultrafine anaphase DNA bridges (UFBs) arising from catenated DNA structures, and the poorly characterized protein NIP45/NFATC2IP become indispensable for cell proliferation when SUMOylation is inhibited. We demonstrate that NIP45 and SUMOylation orchestrate an interphase pathway for converting DNA catenanes into double-strand breaks (DSBs) that activate the G2 DNA-damage checkpoint, thereby preventing cytokinesis failure and binucleation when BTRR-PICH-dependent UFB resolution is defective. NIP45 mediates this new TOP2-independent DNA catenane resolution process via its SUMO-like domains, promoting SUMOylation of specific factors including the SLX4 multi-nuclease complex, which contributes to catenane conversion into DSBs. Our findings establish that SUMOylation exerts its essential role in cell proliferation by enabling resolution of toxic DNA catenanes via nonepistatic NIP45- and BTRR-PICH-dependent pathways to prevent mitotic failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emil P T Hertz
- Protein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Ignacio Alonso-de Vega
- Protein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Kruse
- Protein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yiqing Wang
- Center for Chromosome Stability, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ivo A Hendriks
- Proteomics Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna H Bizard
- Center for Chromosome Stability, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ania Eugui-Anta
- Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Ronald T Hay
- Centre for Gene Regulation and Expression, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Michael L Nielsen
- Proteomics Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob Nilsson
- Protein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian D Hickson
- Center for Chromosome Stability, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niels Mailand
- Protein Signaling Program, Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Center for Chromosome Stability, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Toft CJ, Sorenson AE, Schaeffer PM. A soft Tus-Ter interaction is hiding a fail-safe lock in the replication fork trap of Dickeya paradisiaca. Microbiol Res 2022; 263:127147. [PMID: 35914414 DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2022.127147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
A variety of replication fork traps have recently been characterised in Enterobacterales, unveiling two different types of architecture. Of these, the degenerate type II fork traps are commonly found in Enterobacteriaceae such as Escherichia coli. The newly characterised type I fork traps are found almost exclusively outside Enterobacteriaceae within Enterobacterales and include several archetypes of possible ancestral architectures. Dickeya paradisiaca harbours a somewhat degenerate type I fork trap with a unique Ter1 adjacent to tus gene on one side of the circular chromosome and three putative Ter2-4 sites on the other side of the fork trap. The two innermost Ter1 and Ter2 sites are only separated by 18 kb, which is the shortest distance between two innermost Ter sites of any chromosomal fork trap identified so far. Of note, the dif site is located between these two sites, coinciding with a sharp GC-skew flip. Here we examined and compared the binding modalities of E. coli and D. paradisiaca Tus proteins for these Ter sites. Surprisingly, while Ter1-3 were functional, no significant Tus binding was observed for Ter4 even in low salt conditions, which is in stark contrast with the significant non-specific protein-DNA interactions that occur with E. coli Tus. Even more surprising was the finding that D. paradisiaca Tus has a relatively moderate binding affinity to double-stranded Ter while retaining an extremely high affinity to Ter-lock sequences. Our data revealed major differences in the salt resistance and stability between the D. paradisiaca and E. coli Tus protein complexes, suggesting that while Tus protein evolution can be quite flexible regarding the initial Ter binding step, it requires a highly stringent purifying selection for its final locked complex formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey J Toft
- Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - Alanna E Sorenson
- Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD 4811, Australia
| | - Patrick M Schaeffer
- Molecular and Cell Biology, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Douglas, QLD 4811, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carr A, Lambert S. Recombination-dependent replication: new perspectives from site-specific fork barriers. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2021; 71:129-135. [PMID: 34364031 DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Replication stress (RS) is intrinsic to normal cell growth, is enhanced by exogenous factors and elevated in many cancer cells due to oncogene expression. Most genetic changes are a result of RS and the mechanisms by which cells tolerate RS has received considerable attention because of the link to cancer evolution and opportunities for cancer cell-specific therapeutic intervention. Site-specific replication fork barriers have provided unique insights into how cells respond to RS and their recent use has allowed a deeper understanding of the mechanistic and spatial mechanism that restart arrested forks and how these correlate with RS-dependent mutagenesis. Here we review recent data from site-specific fork arrest systems used in yeast and highlight their strengths and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Carr
- Genome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Sussex, BN1 9RQ, UK
| | - Sarah Lambert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3348, INSERM U1278, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3348, INSERM U1278, 91400 Orsay, France; Equipe Labélisée Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shared and distinct roles of Esc2 and Mms21 in suppressing genome rearrangements and regulating intracellular sumoylation. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247132. [PMID: 33600463 PMCID: PMC7891725 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Protein sumoylation, especially when catalyzed by the Mms21 SUMO E3 ligase, plays a major role in suppressing duplication-mediated gross chromosomal rearrangements (dGCRs). How Mms21 targets its substrates in the cell is insufficiently understood. Here, we demonstrate that Esc2, a protein with SUMO-like domains (SLDs), recruits the Ubc9 SUMO conjugating enzyme to specifically facilitate Mms21-dependent sumoylation and suppress dGCRs. The D430R mutation in Esc2 impairs its binding to Ubc9 and causes a synergistic growth defect and accumulation of dGCRs with mutations that delete the Siz1 and Siz2 E3 ligases. By contrast, esc2-D430R does not appreciably affect sensitivity to DNA damage or the dGCRs caused by the catalytically inactive mms21-CH. Moreover, proteome-wide analysis of intracellular sumoylation demonstrates that esc2-D430R specifically down-regulates sumoylation levels of Mms21-preferred targets, including the nucleolar proteins, components of the SMC complexes and the MCM complex that acts as the catalytic core of the replicative DNA helicase. These effects closely resemble those caused by mms21-CH, and are relatively unaffected by deleting Siz1 and Siz2. Thus, by recruiting Ubc9, Esc2 facilitates Mms21-dependent sumoylation to suppress the accumulation of dGCRs independent of Siz1 and Siz2.
Collapse
|
7
|
Stivison EA, Young KJ, Symington LS. Interstitial telomere sequences disrupt break-induced replication and drive formation of ectopic telomeres. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 48:12697-12710. [PMID: 33264397 PMCID: PMC7736798 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Break-induced replication (BIR) is a mechanism used to heal one-ended DNA double-strand breaks, such as those formed at collapsed replication forks or eroded telomeres. Instead of utilizing a canonical replication fork, BIR is driven by a migrating D-loop and is associated with a high frequency of mutagenesis. Here we show that when BIR encounters an interstitial telomere sequence (ITS), the machinery frequently terminates, resulting in the formation of an ectopic telomere. The primary mechanism to convert the ITS to a functional telomere is by telomerase-catalyzed addition of telomeric repeats with homology-directed repair serving as a back-up mechanism. Termination of BIR and creation of an ectopic telomere is promoted by Mph1/FANCM helicase, which has the capacity to disassemble D-loops. Other sequences that have the potential to seed new telomeres but lack the unique features of a natural telomere sequence, do not terminate BIR at a significant frequency in wild-type cells. However, these sequences can form ectopic telomeres if BIR is made less processive. Our results support a model in which features of the ITS itself, such as the propensity to form secondary structures and telomeric protein binding, pose a challenge to BIR and increase the vulnerability of the D-loop to dissociation by helicases, thereby promoting ectopic telomere formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Stivison
- Program in Nutritional and Metabolic Biology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Kati J Young
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Lorraine S Symington
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.,Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Henninger E, Teixeira MT. Telomere-driven mutational processes in yeast. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2020; 60:99-106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2020.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|