Modelling and DNA topology of compact 2-start and 1-start chromatin fibres

Composition of Transcription Machinery and Its Crosstalk with Nucleoid-Associated Proteins and Global Transcription Factors

The coordination of bacterial genomic transcription involves an intricate network of interdependent genes encoding nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs), DNA topoisomerases, RNA polymerase subunits and modulators of transcription machinery. The central element of this homeostatic regulatory system, integrating the information on cellular physiological state and producing a corresponding transcriptional response, is the multi-subunit RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme. In this review article, we argue that recent observations revealing DNA topoisomerases and metabolic enzymes associated with RNAP supramolecular complex support the notion of structural coupling between transcription machinery, DNA topology and cellular metabolism as a fundamental device coordinating the spatiotemporal genomic transcription. We analyse the impacts of various combinations of RNAP holoenzymes and global transcriptional regulators such as abundant NAPs, on genomic transcription from this viewpoint, monitoring the spatiotemporal patterns of couplons—overlapping subsets of the regulons of NAPs and RNAP sigma factors. We show that the temporal expression of regulons is by and large, correlated with that of cognate regulatory genes, whereas both the spatial organization and temporal expression of couplons is distinctly impacted by the regulons of NAPs and sigma factors. We propose that the coordination of the growth phase-dependent concentration gradients of global regulators with chromosome configurational dynamics determines the spatiotemporal patterns of genomic expression.

Topological polymorphism of nucleosome fibers and folding of chromatin

We discuss recent observations of polymorphic chromatin packaging at the oligonucleosomal level and compare them with computer simulations. Our computations reveal two topologically different families of two-start 30-nm fiber conformations distinguished by the linker length L; fibers with L ≈ 10n and L ≈ 10n+5 basepairs have DNA linking numbers per nucleosome of ΔLk ≈ -1.5 and -1.0, respectively (where n is a natural number). Although fibers with ΔLk ≈ -1.5 were observed earlier, the topoisomer with ΔLk ≈ -1.0 is novel. These predictions were confirmed experimentally for circular nucleosome arrays with precisely positioned nucleosomes. We suggest that topological polymorphism of chromatin may play a role in transcription, with the {10n+5} fibers producing transcriptionally competent chromatin structures. This hypothesis is consistent with available data for yeast and, partially, for fly. We show that both fiber topoisomers (with ΔLk ≈ -1.5 and -1.0) have to be taken into account to interpret experimental data obtained using new techniques: genome-wide Micro-C, Hi-CO, and RICC-seq, as well as self-association of nucleosome arrays in vitro. The relative stability of these topoisomers is likely to depend on epigenetic histone modifications modulating the strength of internucleosome interactions. Potentially, our findings may reflect a general tendency of functionally distinct parts of the genome to retain topologically different higher-order structures.

The Biochemistry and Evolution of the Dinoflagellate Nucleus

Dinoflagellates are known to possess a highly aberrant nucleus-the so-called dinokaryon-that exhibits a multitude of exceptional biological features. These include: (1) Permanently condensed chromosomes; (2) DNA in a cholesteric liquid crystalline state, (3) extremely large DNA content (up to 200 pg); and, perhaps most strikingly, (4) a deficit of histones-the canonical building blocks of all eukaryotic chromatin. Dinoflagellates belong to the Alveolata clade (dinoflagellates, apicomplexans, and ciliates) and, therefore, the biological oddities observed in dinoflagellate nuclei are derived character states. Understanding the sequence of changes that led to the dinokaryon has been difficult in the past with poor resolution of dinoflagellate phylogeny. Moreover, lack of knowledge of their molecular composition has constrained our understanding of the molecular properties of these derived nuclei. However, recent advances in the resolution of the phylogeny of dinoflagellates, particularly of the early branching taxa; the realization that divergent histone genes are present; and the discovery of dinoflagellate-specific nuclear proteins that were acquired early in dinoflagellate evolution have all thrown new light nature and evolution of the dinokaryon.