Antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) and transaminase concentration in chronic haemodialysis patients: a study with second-generation assays

Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in dialysis patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We used the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS, 1996-2015) to assess trends in the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for HCV infection as defined by a documented diagnosis or antibody positivity. Among prevalent hemodialysis patients, HCV prevalence was nearly 10% in 2012-2015. Prevalence ranged from 4% in Belgium to as high as 20% in the Middle East, with intermediate prevalence in China, Japan, Italy, Spain, and Russia. HCV prevalence decreased over time in most countries participating in more than one phase of DOPPS, and prevalence was around 5% among patients who had recently (<4 months) initiated dialysis. The incidence of HCV infection decreased from 2.9 to 1.2 per 100 patient-years in countries participating in the initial phase of DOPPS. Although most units reported no seroconversions, 10% of units experienced 3 or more cases over a median of 1.1 years. High HCV prevalence in the hemodialysis unit was a powerful facility-level risk factor for seroconversion, but the use of isolation stations for HCV-positive patients was not associated with significantly lower seroconversion rates. Overall, despite a trend toward lower HCV prevalence among hemodialysis patients, the prevalence of HCV infection remains higher than in the general population. Combined with a high prevalence of HCV infection among patients with Stage 5 CKD, high rates of HCV seroconversion in a subset of hemodialysis units may contribute to this disparity.

The prevention of hepatitis C virus transmission to hemodialysis patients and staff members

In this review article, we cover 4 topics very relevant to those involved in the care of hemodialysis (HD) patients and in the management of a HD unit. We start with an overview of the progress made over the last 25 years to reduce hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission in HD. Next, we discuss the potential strategies to prevent the residual ongoing transmission of HCV to HD patients. Third, we discuss the actions to be taken if a seroconversion for HCV is nevertheless detected in a HD patient. Finally, we briefly discuss how best to protect HD staff members from occupationally acquired HCV infection.

Prevention of Nosocomial Transmission of Hepatitis C Infection in a Hemodialysis Unit. A Prospective Study

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients can be transmitted by transfusions and nosocomially. A high prevalence of HCV infection, over 50%, was demonstrated in our hemodialysis (HD) unit. In order to prevent the nosocomial spread of HCV infection in the HD unit a prospective study was begun separating anti-HCV positive patients from the negative ones. A total of 170 patients (83 anti-HCV positive) started this study in September 1994 and were followed for 4 years. A separate room and dedicated equipment were assigned to anti-HCV positive and anti-HCV negative patients. Of those 170 patients there were 15 hepatitis B virus (HBV) positive patients, 5 of whom were anti-HCV positive, who were treated in a separate room on dialysis equipment for anti-HCV positive or negative patients. Application of general precautions, as recommended by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), was reinforced. During the first 12 weeks after implementing the precautions seven more anti-HCV positive patients were detected, and by December 1995 another two HCV infected patients were found. The follow-up included all changes in HD population treated until the end of 1998. The incidence of seroconversion to HCV was 12.9% in 1995, 7.1% in 1996, 5.0% in 1997, and 6.6% in 1998. The higher incidence of seroconversion in September to November 1994 was probably due to the nosocomial infection being in the incubation period at the time of isolation.

This prospective study in a large HD unit with a high prevalence of HCV infection demonstrates a relatively successful prevention of HCV spread. Procedure-related transmission of HCV in hemodialysis could be prevented by rigorous application of universal precautions as recommended by the CDC. As a second line of prevention, in highly burdened dialysis centers, segregation of HCV positive patients can help control nosocomial transmission.

Hepatitis C and Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Hemodialysis Patients and Staff: A Two Year Follow-Up

To estimate the prevalence of antibodies to the hepatitis C virus ((HCV) and hepatitis virus (HBV) and the presence of infection, 101 patients receiving renal replacement therapy and 75 staff members caring for them were tested. Evaluation included detailed history, screening for anti-HCV antibody, HBV markers and liver enzymes 38% of patients were anti-HCV positives and 15 (40%) of these had antibodies to the hepatitis B core antigen indicating previous hepatitis B infection. Positive markers indicating HBV infection only, accounted for another 18% of patients. All staff members were anti-HCV negative, although 34 (45%) were anti-HBc positive. Age, sex and history of blood transfusions did not influence the prevalence of anti-HCV and anti-HBC in patients. There was, however, a significant difference in the prevalence of anti-HCV and anti-HBc positivity between polytransfused and occasionally transfused patients (p<0.05). During a 24-months follow-up a decline was observed in HBs antigen carriers from 20% to 10% and in HBc antibody carriers from 47% to 33%. At the same time, regardless of accurate preventive measures, an increase in incidence of anti-HCV seropositivity from 30% to 38% was detected.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis: Current concepts

A variety of epidemiological data provides evidence for the occurrence of nosocomial transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection to hemodialysis (HD) patients. The most important factor implicated in HCV transmission between patients treated in the same dialysis unit is cross-contamination from supplies and surfaces as a result of failure of staff to follow infection control procedures. Parts of the HCV genome are highly variable and lend themselves to fingerprinting of each isolate using nucleic acid testing (NAT) and sequencing. This approach has permitted investigation of possible transmission routes within HD units. A systematic review of molecular virology papers revealed transmission of HCV via internal fluid pathways of the dialysis machines in a minority of reports only. Dialyzer reuse was not identified as a risk factor for HCV acquisition in multicenter databases. No randomized controlled trials exist on the impact of isolation on the risk of transmission of HCV to hemodialysis patients. A Belgian prospective multicenter study showed a reduction from 1.4% to 0% in the annual incidence of seroconversion for HCV without any isolation measures, by implementation of strict infection control procedures designed to prevent transmission of blood-borne pathogens, including HCV. However, an isolation policy for HCV-infected dialysis patients should be considered in dialysis units where nosocomial transmission of HCV persists despite reinforcement and audit of hygienic precautions for hemodialysis. Routine audit precautions (general and for dialysis machines) are recommended on a regular basis within HD units.

Viral hepatitis in hemodialysis: An update

Hepatitis outbreaks in hemodialysis (HD) patients and staff were reported in the late 1960s, and a number of hepatotropic viruses transmitted by blood and other body fluids have been identified. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the first significant hepatotropic virus to be identified in HD centers. HBV infection has been effectively controlled by active vaccination, screening of blood donors, the use of erythropoietin and segregation of HBV carriers. Hepatitis delta virus is a defective virus that can only infect HBV-positive individuals. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most significant cause of non-A, non-B hepatitis and is mainly transmitted by blood transfusion. The introduction in 1990 of routine screening of blood donors for HCV contributed significantly to the control of HCV transmission. An effective HCV vaccine remains an unsolved challenge; however, pegylation of interferon-alfa has made it possible to treat HCV-positive dialysis patients. Unexplained sporadic outbreaks of hepatitis by the mid-1990s prompted the discovery of hepatitis G virus, hepatitis GB virus C and the TT virus. The vigilant observation of guidelines on universal precaution and regular virologic testing are the cornerstones of the effective control of chronic hepatitis in the setting of HD. Major recent advances in the viral diagnosis technology and the development of new oral, direct-acting antiviral agents allow early diagnosis and better therapeutic response. The current update will review the recent developments, controversies and new treatment of viral hepatitis in HD patients.

Risk factors of HCV seroconversion in hemodialysis patients in tabriz, iran

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a significant health concern in patients with end-stage renal disease under dialysis. Epidemiological studies have reported a prevalence rate of 5.5-55.9% for this condition in Iran.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the risk factors for HCV infection and seroconversion in hemodialysis patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 455 hemodialysis patients from each of the five dialysis units in Tabriz, northwest Iran. Possible risk factors for HCV infection and seroconversion were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients were HCV positive (8.1% of the study population) and seroconversion occurred in 18 of them during the dialysis treatment (3.95% of the study population). History of renal transplantation (44.4%, P < 0.0001), surgical intervention (except for renal transplantation and AV fistula placement) (94.4%, P = 0.03), and mean duration of dialysis (106.06 ± 55.519, P < 0.0001) had strong statistically significant associations with the seroconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study indicates increased risk for HCV infection in patients under dialysis and its relation with the mean duration of hemodialysis, history of renal transplantation and surgical intervention. Considering the immune deficiency in these patients, intense education to both patients and medical staff will be beneficial.

Hepatitis C virus infection and the dialysis patient

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains common in patients undergoing regular dialysis and is an important cause of liver disease in this population both during dialysis and after renal transplantation (RT). Anti-HCV screening of blood products has almost eliminated posttransfusion HCV infection but acquisition of HCV continues to occur in dialysis patients because of nosocomial spread. The natural history of HCV in dialysis population is not completely understood though recent data show that HCV infection has a detrimental role on survival of chronic dialysis patients. Several clinical trials have suggested that the response rate to conventional interferon (IFN) is higher in dialysis patients than those with normal kidney function but tolerance is lower. There are only limited data about pegylated IFN alone or in association with ribavirin for hepatitis C in dialysis population. IFN remains contraindicated post-RT because of concern about precipitating graft dysfunction; however, preliminary evidence shows the durability of sustained response to antiviral therapy pre-RT after renal transplant. Successful pretransplant therapy is associated with several benefits after RT including reduced incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus and de novo glomerulonephritis in HCV-infected recipients.

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in Turkish hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49+/-29 [16-80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98+/-66 [12-228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B.

CONCLUSIONS

Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.

Chronic viral hepatitis in hemodialysis patients

Ever since the first outbreaks of hepatitis in hemodialysis units in the late 1960s, a number of hepatotropic viruses transmitted by blood and other body fluids have been identified. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding these blood-borne agents from an epidemiologic and preventive perspective. Data source and study selection were obtained from research and review articles related to the epidemiology of viral hepatitis in hemodialysis and indexed on Medline and Embase from 1965 to 2004. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) was the first significant hepatotropic virus to be identified in hemodialysis centers. HBV infection has been effectively controlled by active vaccination, screening of blood donors, the use of erythropoietin, and segregation of HBV carriers. To date, HBV remains an important cause of morbidity in endemic areas. Hepatitis delta virus is a defective virus that can only infect HBV-positive individuals. Hepatitis C virus is the most significant cause of non-A, non-B hepatitis and is mainly transmitted by blood transfusion. The introduction in 1990 of routine screening of blood donors for HCV contributed significantly to the control of HCV transmission. An effective HCV vaccine remains an unsolved challenge, however. Pegylation of interferon-alpha has made it possible to treat HCV-positive dialysis patients. Unexplained sporadic outbreaks of hepatitis by the mid-1990s prompted the discovery of hepatitis G virus and hepatitis GB virus C in 1995 and the TT virus in 1997. Although epidemiologic analyses revealed high prevalence rates of both viruses in the hemodialysis population, their exact role in liver disease has yet to be determined. The vigilant observation of guidelines on universal precaution and regular virologic testing are the cornerstones of the effective control of chronic hepatitis in the setting of hemodialysis.

Serotyping of hepatitis C virus in hemodialysis patients: comparison with a standardized genotyping assay

The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes and serotypes in anti-HCV-positive hemodialysis patients and determine the concordance between genotyping and serotyping methods. Sixty-two hemodialysis patients were included in this study. HCV RNA was determined using polymerase chain reaction assay and genotypes using a line probe assay. HCV serotyping was performed with competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Genotype 4 (52 patients) was the most predominant genotype, followed by type 1 (10 patients). The most prevalent HCV serotype was type 4 (41 patients), followed by serotype 1 (6 patients). We detected multiple serotypes in 4 patients and untypeable strains in 11. The overall sensitivity of serotyping assay was 82% for the study patients. According to the genotyping results, the sensitivity of serotyping was 60% and 86.5% for HCV types 1 and 4, respectively. There was a 100% concordance between results of serotyping and genotyping in the identification of HCV type 1 and 91% concordance in HCV type 4. Serological typing method may be of great value in microbiology laboratories that require a simple assay for identification of HCV genotypes, although the sensitivity of this assay may be limited by the immunocompetence of infected hemodialysis patients.

Clinical usefulness of a new hepatitis C virus RNA extraction method using specific capture probe and magnetic particle in hemodialysis patients

Hemodialysis patients are a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Assessment of HCV infection using HCV-RNA assay among dialysis patients is important for the issue of safety and environmental protection. However, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods are unsuitable for analyzing samples from dialysis patients because the conventional centrifugal extraction method fails to eliminate heparin, a potent inhibitor of PCR. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness of a HCV-RNA extraction method using probes and magnetic particles for hemodialysis patients in comparison with the centrifugal method. The study population consisted of 17 HCV antibody-positive patients undergoing hemodialysis. These 17 patients consisted of 12 HCV carrier patients and five patients with past HCV infection. One hundred and two samples from these patients were measured using the centrifugal and magnetic methods. Moreover, we prepared five standards that included theoretically 5 KIU/mL of HCV. One was made from non-HD patient's serum and the other four were from hemodialysis patients' serum. These standards were measured using the two methods. False-negative results were not observed with the magnetic method, but were observed in five out of 102 samples with the centrifugal method. Studies using standard samples revealed that accurate HCV-RNA measurement is achieved using the magnetic method. In conclusion, the present study showed that this magnetic extraction method is a highly reproducible and reliable assay to obtain correct information about the presence of the infective virus itself in the hemodialysis setting. Precise identification of HCV-RNA using this specific method is considered to be useful in preventing HCV infection in hemodialysis units.

Reverse transcriptase/polymerase chain reaction analyses of hemodialysis ultrafiltrates and sera of hepatitis C virus positive patients

The hepatitis C virus is a highly prevalent infection among chronic dialysis patients and represents one of the major problems of hemodialysis units. Hepatitis C virus transmission occurs either by blood transfusion or nosocomially. One of the proposed pathways of nosocomial transmission of the hepatitis C virus is cross-contamination through the dialysis procedure. In an effort to elucidate whether the hepatitis C virus may pass across the hemodialysis membrane, we have performed analyses of ultrafiltrates collected in different stages of hemodialysis treatments, using different types of hemodialysis membranes and different types of dialysis machines. Samples collected from the dialysis compartment during the rinsing of the blood compartment at the end of the hemodialysis treatment were also analyzed. The hepatitis C virus was found in 17 out of 58 ultrafiltrate samples taken at different times of the hemodialysis treatment. Moreover, the hepatitis C virus was present in 15 out of 17 samples collected from the dialysate compartment during the saline solution rinsing step of the blood compartment. The presence of the hepatitis C virus had no strict correlation with the type of dialysis membrane or with the type of dialysis machine. Although the results suggest that the passage of the hepatitis C virus during the hemodialysis treatment is multi-factorial and case- specific, the most critical point is when the blood is flushed out with physiological saline.

Hepatitis B virus infection in Haemodialysis Centres from Santa Catarina State, Southern Brazil. Predictive risk factors for infection and molecular epidemiology

BACKGROUND

Patients under haemodialysis are considered at high risk to acquire hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Since few data are reported from Brazil, our aim was to assess the frequency and risk factors for HBV infection in haemodialysis patients from 22 Dialysis Centres from Santa Catarina State, south of Brazil.

METHODS

This study includes 813 patients, 149 haemodialysis workers and 772 healthy controls matched by sex and age. Serum samples were assayed for HBV markers and viraemia was detected by nested PCR. HBV was genotyped by partial S gene sequencing. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses with stepwise logistic regression analysis were carried out to analyse the relationship between HBV infection and the characteristics of patients and their Dialysis Units.

RESULTS

Frequency of HBV infection was 10.0%, 2.7% and 2.7% among patients, haemodialysis workers and controls, respectively. Amidst patients, the most frequent HBV genotypes were A (30.6%), D (57.1%) and F (12.2%). Univariate analysis showed association between HBV infection and total time in haemodialysis, type of dialysis equipment, hygiene and sterilization of equipment, number of times reusing the dialysis lines and filters, number of patients per care-worker and current HCV infection. The logistic regression model showed that total time in haemodialysis, number of times of reusing the dialysis lines and filters, and number of patients per worker were significantly related to HBV infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Frequency of HBV infection among haemodialysis patients at Santa Catarina state is very high. The most frequent HBV genotypes were A, D and F. The risk for a patient to become HBV positive increase 1.47 times each month of haemodialysis; 1.96 times if the dialysis unit reuses the lines and filters > or = 10 times compared with haemodialysis units which reuse < 10 times; 3.42 times if the number of patients per worker is more than five. Sequence similarity among the HBV S gene from isolates of different patients pointed out to nosocomial transmission.

Decreased serum aminotransferase activity in patients with chronic renal failure: impact on the detection of viral hepatitis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in the dialysis population and patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) not requiring dialysis. HCV is the most important cause of chronic liver disease in dialysis patients; however, its role has been underestimated by the lower aminotransferase activity in the dialysis population. Aminotransferase activity in patients with CRF not requiring dialysis has not been adequately addressed to date. The aim of this study is to investigate whether serum aminotransferase levels in predialysis patients with CRF are less than those obtained in healthy individuals and dialysis patients. We also analyzed the potential association between serum aminotransferase activity and demographic, clinical, and biochemical parameters. Aspartate (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity was greater in antibody to hepatitis C (anti-HCV)-positive than anti-HCV-negative patients with CRF not requiring dialysis (AST, 32.3 +/- 19 versus 18.1 +/- 8 IU/L [P = 0.0001]; ALT, 32.9 +/- 28 versus 17.7 +/- 11 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). Predialysis patients with CRF had lower AST and ALT activity in comparison to healthy individuals (AST, 19.7 +/- 11.2 versus 20.4 +/- 6.8 IU/L [P = 0.00001]; ALT, 19.5 +/- 15.1 versus 21.7 +/- 11.3 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). The difference was much greater after correction for viral markers: AST and ALT levels in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative anti-HCV-negative predialysis patients with CRF were less than those in the healthy population (AST, 17.9 +/- 8 versus 20.4 +/- 6.8 IU/L [P = 0.00001]; ALT, 17.5 +/- 10 versus 21.7 +/- 11.3 IU/L [P = 0.00001], respectively). Comparison of AST and ALT activity between age-matched healthy and predialysis seronegative CRF groups showed lower AST and ALT values in the study population. HBsAg-negative anti-HCV-negative dialysis patients had lower AST and ALT activity than seronegative predialysis patients with CRF (AST, 16.6 +/- 11.6 versus 17.9 +/- 8 IU/L [P = 0.01]; ALT, 16.3 +/- 9.4 versus 17.5 +/- 10 [P = 0.041], respectively). Multivariate analysis in the predialysis CRF population showed an independent association between AST (P = 0.00001) and ALT (P = 0.00001) activity and anti-HCV positivity, and age was negatively linked to AST (P = 0.011) and ALT levels (P = 0.001). AST level was negatively related to serum creatinine level (P = 0.0001). In conclusion, HCV infection causes significant liver injury in predialysis patients with CRF. These patients have decreased aminotransferase activity compared with the general population. Dialysis patients show lower aminotransferase activity than predialysis patients with CRF. Because serum aminotransferase levels are commonly used to screen for liver disease in the dialysis and predialysis CRF population, recognition of liver damage may be hampered by the reduction in aminotransferase values in these patients. Studies aimed to clarify the pathogenesis of this phenomenon are in progress.

Serotyping strip immunoblot assay for assessing hepatitis C virus strains in dialysis patients

Recent accumulated evidence shows that dialysis patients are a high-risk group for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Assessment of HCV genotype distribution among dialysis patients may be important because specific viral genotypes are associated with different clinical manifestations, disease progression, and response to antiviral therapy. However, polymerase chain reaction-based methods are cumbersome and unsuitable for analyzing large cohorts of dialysis patients with HCV. Instead, this information can be obtained by using a novel recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) recently developed for determining HCV serotype. The RIBA HCV serotyping strip immunoblot assay (SIA; Chiron Corporation, Emeryville, CA), is based on an immunoblot strip with five lanes of immobilized serotype-specific HCV peptides from the nonstructural (NS4) and core regions of the genomes of HCV types 1, 2, and 3. HCV serotype is deduced by determining the greatest intensity of reactivity to the NS4 serotype-specific HCV peptide band in relation to the internal control band (human immunoglobulin G) intensity on each strip. HCV core peptide reactivity is used only in the absence of NS4 reactivity. We compared RIBA HCV serotyping SIA with genotyping using sera from a large (n = 107) cohort of HCV-infected patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD). We successfully serotyped 79 of 107 patients (74%) undergoing HD. We found a remarkable concordance (65 of 70 results; 93%) between RIBA HCV serotyping SIA and genotyping (line probe assay [LiPA]) techniques (kappa = 0.786) with sera from viremic patients infected with a known genotype. Only 5 of 70 patients (7%) had apparently discordant results. In a subset of patients (28 of 107 patients; 26%) not typed by RIBA HCV serotyping SIA, most (24 of 28 patients; 86%) were successfully genotyped by LiPA technology. It was possible to assess serotype reactivity in some patients (9 of 107 patients; 7%) who could not be genotyped. The distribution of HCV serotypes was associated with the antibody response against HCV proteins and the patterns of reactivity by RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA. In conclusion, (1) we found good agreement between serotyping and genotyping methods in our large cohort of dialysis patients infected with HCV; (2) the impaired immunocompetence conferred by uremia may limit serotyping analysis in some HCV-infected patients undergoing HD; (3) RIBA HCV serotyping SIA may be useful in tracking transmission routes for HD patients who cleared the virus and have only anti-HCV antibody; and (4) the distribution of HCV serotypes was associated with the antibody response against HCV proteins and the patterns of reactivity by RIBA HCV 2.0 SIA. Assessment of HCV strains appears to be very useful in the routine clinical activity of nephrologists within HD units because consistent biological differences among HCV strains exist. RIBA serotyping SIA is a simple, inexpensive, and highly reproducible assay to obtain information about HCV types in the HD setting.

Biological dynamics of viral load in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus

The biological dynamics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia in uremic patients with chronic infection have not been fully characterized. We prospectively studied fluctuations of HCV-RNA in sera from 52 patients with end-stage renal disease who were undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (HD) and had chronic HCV infection. We measured HCV viremia monthly over the course of 13 months with the branched-chain DNA (bDNA) signal amplification assay and prospectively analyzed liver function, expressed by monthly serum aspartate (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) determinations. We observed three different patterns of HCV viremia: (1) patients persistently positive by bDNA assay (persistent viremia; 23 of 52 patients; 44%), (2) individuals with alternatively positive and negative results (intermittent viremia; 17 of 52 patients; 33%), and (3) patients persistently negative by bDNA assay (12 of 52 patients; 23%). The HCV viral load over the follow-up was greater among patients with persistent compared with intermittent viremia (persistent, 31.7 x 10(5) Eq/mL; range, 6.3 x 10(5) to 16.03 x 10(6) Eq/mL versus intermittent, 10.4 x 10(5) Eq/mL; range, 1.1 x 10(5) to 9.4 x 10(6) Eq/mL; P = 0.0001). In addition, patients with persistent viremia had over time greater AST and/or ALT activities than the intermittent group (AST: persistent, 26.5 IU/L; range, 9.6 to 73.7 IU/L versus intermittent, 21.3 IU/L; range, 8 to 56.8 IU/L; P = 0.001 and ALT: persistent, 14.7 IU/L; range, 3.7 to 57.9 IU/L versus intermittent, 10.9 IU/L; range, 2.3 to 52.1 IU/L; P = 0.001). In the group with persistent viremia, the mean difference between maximum and minimum values of HCV-RNA observed in each individual patient was 2.09 +/- 0.7 natural logarithm (Log(n)) and in intermittent viremic patients, 1.55 +/- 1 Log(n) (P = 0.045). The HCV load at study entry (19.4 x 10(5) Eq/mL) was rather low and did not change versus the end of follow-up in all patients (P = not significant [NS]). In the entire group, the fluctuations in HCV-RNA levels over time between and within individuals were not significant (P = NS). No difference in variability of HCV-RNA values over time between patients infected with different HCV genotypes was seen. In conclusion, three different patterns of HCV viremia in HD over time were assessed; one third of viremic patients had intermittent viremia, and those patients had less HCV-RNA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and aminotransferase activity than did patients with persistent HCV load. Larger fluctuations in HCV RNA levels occurred in patients with persistent than with intermittent HCV viremia. However, the viremic HCV load was low and relatively stable over a 13-month follow-up in our population. Studies with longer observation periods are warranted to understand fully the natural history of HCV in these immunosuppressed individuals.

Blood-borne virus infections in dialysis units--a review

Hepatitis outbreaks in haemodialysis unit patients and staff were reported in the late 1960s. In 1972, the Rosenheim report in the UK established guidelines which included routine tests for hepatitis B surface antigen and isolation facilities for dialysing patients with hepatitis B virus which resulted in a dramatic fall in cases of hepatitis. However, since these guidelines were introduced, other blood-borne viruses, notably HCV and HIV have been discovered, and failures of infection control practices still lead to outbreaks of HBV in haemodialysis units. The prevalence of HCV in dialysis patients varies considerably throughout the world, with reported prevalence ranging from 3.9% to 71%. The number of blood transfusions and the length of time on dialysis have consistently been associated with HCV prevalence. Several reports provide evidence of patient-to-patient HCV transmission with environmental blood contamination the most significant factor in intra-unit transmission. There is no evidence that HCV has been transmitted by re-use of dialysis machines but being dialysed next to an HCV positive patient is associated with a significant risk of HCV acquisition. Several studies have shown that dialysing HCV positive patients in a separate unit or in a defined sector of a dialysis unit significantly reduces nosocomial HCV infection. HGV is prevalent in dialysis units where there is evidence of transmission to patients but no evidence of associated symptoms. HIV is infrequently transmitted in dialysis units and several units treating many HIV-positive patients have shown no evidence of transmission. Careful attention needs to be paid to infection control procedures and regular virological testing.

Phylogenetic analysis of hepatitis C virus isolates from hemodialysis patients

A high prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been reported in hemodialysis patients. Main risk factors for transmission are previous blood transfusions and possibly nosocomial infections within the dialytic environment. In the present study 224 hemodialysis patients from the same department were tested for the presence of anti-HCV antibodies and HCV-RNA. The presence of anti-HCV in hemodialysis patients was correlated with a history of more than 10 blood transfusions (P = 0.001) and with a duration of hemodialysis treatment for more than 10 years (P = 0.001). The issue of possible patient-to-patient infection was addressed by sequence analysis of all HCV-RNA positive hemodialysis patients (N = 14) together with a control panel of HCV isolates from 56 unrelated non-hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C from the same geographical area. Subsequent phylogenetic analysis of nucleotide sequences obtained from the 5'-noncoding region and the nonstructural NS-5 region of the HCV genome revealed that only two hemodialysis patients were infected by a highly related HCV isolate. The remaining HCV-RNA positive hemodialysis patients including those without previous blood transfusions were all infected by phylogenetically-distant HCV isolates, providing evidence against a nosocomial transmission route. The data of the present study show that molecular epidemiological techniques are important to investigate the issue of nosocomial infection. In our hemodialysis unit patient-to-patient infection appears uncommon and draws attention towards other possible (such as, blood products such as human serum albumin, immunoglobulins) or even yet unrecognized transmission routes.

High prevalence of a rare hepatitis C virus in patients treated in the same hemodialysis unit: evidence for nosocomial transmission of HCV

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of hepatitis among patients treated with maintenance hemodialysis. Blood transfusion appears to be the primary risk factor, but nosocomial transmission of HCV in the dialytic environment has been hypothesized. We addressed this issue by analyzing the individual variation of genomic sequences of HCV in 28 patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD) from the same department and 25 environmentally unrelated patients with HCV-related liver disease. Genome variations of HCV were studied by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis of polymerase chain reaction products obtained from the 5'-untranslated region of the viral genome and by sequence analysis. Six different SSCP patterns were identified in HD patients versus 16 in control patients. Among HD patients the three more frequent SSCP patterns accounted for 85% of observations, while in the control group each pattern was found in 4 to 12% of patients. The ability of SSCP to discriminate sequence variation was proven by sequence analysis which confirmed identity/diversity of sequences selected by SSCP. Moreover, sequence analysis permitted a recognition of the most frequent genome observed in HD patients as a type 4 HCV, which is considered to be rare in the Italian population. The relative homogeneity of HCV variants in HD patients treated in the same HD and the high prevalence in this unit of a rare viral variant support the possibility of a nosocomial transmission of HCV in the dialytic environment.