Nephrology: achieving sustainability

The Lack of a Standardized Definition of Chronic Dialysis Treatment in German Statutory Health Insurance Claims Data

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney failure (CKF) is often treated with dialysis, which is invasive and costly and carries major medical risks. The existing studies of patients with CKF requiring dialysis that are based on claims data from German statutory health insurance (SHI) carriers employ varying definitions of this entity, with unclear consequences for the resulting statistical estimates.

METHODS

We carried out a cohort study on four random samples, each consisting of 62 200 persons aged 70 or above, from among the insurees of the SHI AOK Nordost, with one sample for each of the years 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. The prevalence, incidence, mortality, and direct health care costs of CKF requiring dialysis were estimated and compared on the basis of four different definitions from literature and a new definition developed by the authors in reference to billing data.

RESULTS

The different definitions led to variation in 12-month prevalences (range: 0.33-0.61%) and 6-month incidences (0.058-0.100%). The percentage of patients with prior acute kidney injury (AKI) ranged from 27.6% to 61.8%. Among incident patients, three-month survival ranged from 70.2% to 88.1%, and six-month survival from 60.5% to 81.3%. In CKF patients without prior AKI, the survival curves differed less across definitions (80.2-91.8% at three months, 70.7-84.4% at six months). The monthly health care costs ranged from €6010 to €9606, with marked variability across definitions in the costs of inpatient and outpatient care.

CONCLUSION

The lack of a standardized definition of CKF requiring dialysis in German SHI claims data leads to variability in the estimated case numbers, mortality, and health care costs. These differences are most probably in part due to the variable inclusion of inpatients who received short-term dialysis after AKI.

Nephrology Nurses: Essential Professionals in Sustainable Kidney Care

Purpose

The increasing frequency of extreme climate events underscores the need for urgent action on climate change. The health care system contributes 4.6% of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) in Canada; thus, it is a major contributor to the country's carbon footprint. Kidney care in particular can involve high amounts of waste (eg, plastic and consumable waste associated with dialysis, transportation, emissions, energy, and water consumption). Therefore, sustainability initiatives within the health care system, and especially in the context of kidney care, have great potential to make a positive impact on planetary health. Here, we outline ways in which nephrology nurses can expand our duty of care to the environment and incorporate sustainability into our work.

Sources of information

A small advisory group of nephrology nurses in partnership with the Canadian Association of Nurses for the Environment (CANE) assessed ways that sustainable practices can be incorporated into nephrology nursing. Drawing on the Planetary Health Care model used by the Canadian Society of Nephrology: Sustainable Nephrology Action Planning (SNAP) committee, we assessed how the model could be adapted in the context of kidney care using 3 main actionable themes in their work: reducing the demand for health services, matching the supply of health services with demand, and reducing emissions from the supply of health services. We also reviewed and selected real-world examples of initiatives pursued by colleagues.

Key findings

Through this established framework, we provide recommendations and case examples for nephrology nurses to expand our duty of care to the environment. We describe nursing-led strategies used in Canada to improve environmental sustainability in kidney programs and consider their applicability to other renal programs. In 1 case example, we show how a simple nurse-led initiative at a single dialysis clinic can lower plastic waste and associated costs by $2042.59 per year. More broadly, we provide recommendations and actions for nephrology nurses to improve environmental sustainability in kidney care.

Limitations

Nurses in Canada have many responsibilities within limited timeframes, making it essential to choose sustainable practices that do not exacerbate burnout and high workloads. For sustainable practices to be successful, nurses must integrate them into their existing workflows.

Climate crisis and nephrology: a review of climate change's impact on nephrology and how to combat it

Climate change is worsening with tangible effects on our healthcare system. This review aims to examine the repercussions of the climate change on nephrology and explore potential strategies to mitigate its impact. This review examines dialysis's environmental impact, resource recycling methods, and plant-based diets for kidney health. Recent research highlights the advantages of plant-based diets in managing and preventing chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its complications. Integrating these practices can significantly lessen the environmental impact of nephrology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study is to discuss the bidirectional relationship of climate change and kidney disease and the impact of nephrology on climate change and to discuss potential solutions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Each dialysis session consumes significant amounts of resource; reusing them will aid the environment. Plant-based diets slow renal disease and have a lower carbon footprint, making them ecologically friendly.

SUMMARY

Climate change is a growing threat to population health and healthcare. Rising temperatures raise the risk of kidney problems. Dialysis treatments also impact the environment through its high resource requirements while generating high volumes of waste and greenhouse gases. Opportunities exist to reduce the environmental impact of dialysis treatments. Plant-based diets serve to benefit both kidney disease and the environment.

Balancing the health benefits and climate mortality costs of haemodialysis

Extensive work is underway to quantify the carbon footprint of specific healthcare interventions and identify ways to minimise healthcare-related emissions; however, it remains unclear how to balance the relative benefits from delivering healthcare with the harm from the associated carbon footprint. To estimate emissions-related harms, we used the Mortality Cost of Carbon, a recently developed metric from environmental economics, which presents the impacts of carbon emissions in the form of excess deaths. We convert deaths into years of life lost and compare this with the healthy life years gained, under two temperature scenarios: 'Dynamic Integrated Climate Economy Model with an Endogenous Mortality Response' (DICE-EMR) (2.4°C) and 'DICE-Baseline' (4.1°C). As a case study, we use haemodialysis, a life-prolonging intervention with a large carbon footprint. We estimate that 19-53 and 10-25 healthy life years are gained from haemodialysis per year of life lost from the associated emissions in the DICE-EMR and DICE-Baseline scenarios, respectively, depending on the country and treatment regimen. This brings the distribution of harms, benefits and tradeoffs inherent to the decarbonisation of healthcare into sharper focus. More fully accounting for the harm imposed by carbon emissions could result in better value investments to lower the carbon footprint of interventions and support the implementation of the net-zero healthcare agenda.