Renal events in patients receiving neprilysin inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor in Heart Failure Patients With Renal Dysfunction

Heart failure (HF) and renal dysfunction often coexist and interact in many complex and bidirectional pathways, leading to detrimental effects on patient outcomes. The treatment of HF patients with renal dysfunction presents a significant clinical challenge. Interestingly, sacubitril/valsartan, an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), may have beneficial effects on cardiac and renal outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, particularly by slowing the rate of decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate compared to a single angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Recently, more reports have emphasized the renal protection of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with HF. In HF patients with renal dysfunction, however, there is no strong evidence supporting the use of sacubitril/valsartan to reduce the absolute risk of hyperkalemia and worsening renal function; therefore, the administration of ARNI requires a careful balance between the benefits and risks. Furthermore, the lack of evidence-based management highlights the importance of an individualized approach based on published experience and multidisciplinary collaborations, as well as underlines the need for in-depth studies investigating the underlying mechanisms in cardiorenal interactions with a focus on treatments.

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor for Chronic Kidney Disease: Strategies for Renal Protection

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and hypertension are significant global health challenges that often coexist and aggravate each other. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors are important to the management of these conditions; however, their efficacy for advanced CKD remains uncertain.

SUMMARY

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) have superior efficacy for heart failure (HF) management, as evidenced by landmark trials such as the PARADIGM-HF and PARAGON-HF, thus leading to its endorsement by various guidelines. Although direct evidence supporting the renal-protective effects of ARNI is lacking, post hoc analyses have suggested its potential to mitigate the decline of the estimated glomerular filtration rate and renal events, particularly in patients with HF with a relatively preserved ejection fraction. Mechanistically, ARNI augments the glomerular filtration rate by dilating glomerular arterioles, relaxing mesangial cells, and improving renal medullary blood flow, thereby mitigating interstitial fibrosis progression. ARNI also effectively addresses nondipper hypertension, particularly in salt-sensitive individuals, thereby reducing the cardiovascular risk.

KEY MESSAGES

Uncertainties regarding the efficacy and safety of ARNI for advanced renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min) exist. Excessive hypotension associated with ARNI use may exacerbate the renal function decline, especially in older patients with comorbid HF with a reduced ejection fraction. Hence, vigilant blood pressure monitoring is essential to optimizing the renal benefits of ARNI and minimizing adverse effects. Evidence supporting the renal benefits of ARNI continues to evolve; therefore, ARNI could mitigate renal dysfunction in select patient populations. Further research should be performed to clarify the efficacy of ARNI for advanced renal failure and refine its therapeutic application for patients with concurrent HF and renal dysfunction.

Sacubitril/Valsartan Improves Cardiac Function in Dialysis Patients

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by the activation of adverse neurohormonal systems and a high mortality rate. Noteworthy, HF is a well-known complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), where dialysis patients are seven to eight times more likely to encounter cardiac arrest than the general population. Therefore, it is important to develop efficient treatments to improve cardiac function in dialysis patients and eventually reduce the cardiovascular death toll. Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is a dual inhibitor/blocker of the neprilysin and angiotensin II receptors, which exert cardioprotective effects among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF). Unfortunately, the drug is not approved for subjects with advanced CKD or dialysis patients due to safety concerns. The current study examined the cardiac effects of Sac/Val in HD patients. Administration of Sac/Val (100-400 mg/day) to 12 hemodialysis (HD) patients with HFrEF for six months gradually improved ejection fraction (EF) independently of morphological changes in cardiac geometry, as assessed by echocardiography (ECHO), and hemodynamic alterations. Interestingly, the Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (Kansas City KCCQ-12) revealed that quality of life significantly improved after Sac/Val treatment. No major adverse effects were reported in the present study, supporting the safety of Sac/Val at least in these patients and for the applied follow-up period. Collectively, these findings support the use of Sac/Val as a cardioprotective agent in both HD and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Yet, a more comprehensive study is required to establish these findings and to extend the follow-up period for 12 months in order to solidify these encouraging results.

The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sacubitril/valsartan, a new pharmacological class of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, is beneficial to heart failure through blocking the degradation of natriuretic peptides and inhibiting renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) activation which also relate to the pathophysiologic mechanisms of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its effects on CKD remain unclear. To assess the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan for patients with CKD, we performed this meta-analysis.

METHODS

The Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared sacubitril/valsartan with ACEI/ARBs in patients with CKD whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. We adopted the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias. The effect size was estimated using the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Six trials with a total of 6217 patients with CKD were included. In terms of cardiovascular events, sacubitril/valsartan attenuated the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.76, P < 0.00001, I2 = 43%). With respect to renal function, sacubitril/valsartan prevented the incidence of serum creatinine (Scr) elevation among patients with CKD (OR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.95, P = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Subgroup analysis about eGFR demonstrated that with long follow-up, sacubitril/valsartan significantly decreased the number of patients with more than 50% reduction in eGFR compared with ACEI/ARBs (OR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.32-0.84, P = 0.008, I2 = 9%). In patients with CKD, the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was reduced with sacubitril/valsartan treatment, despite no statistically significant difference between the two groups (OR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.29-1.20, P = 0.14, I2 = 0%). As for the safety, we found that sacubitril/valsartan was associated with the occurrence of hypotension (OR: 1.71, 95% CI 1.15-2.56, P = 0.008, I2 = 51%). However, there was no trend towards increasing the risk of hyperkalemia in patients who received sacubitril/valsartan (OR: 1.09, 95% CI 0.75-1.60, P = 0.64, I2 = 64%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicated that sacubitril/valsartan improved renal function and conferred effective cardiovascular benefits in patients with CKD, without serious safety issues being observed. Thus, sacubitril/valsartan may be a promising option for patients with CKD. Certainly, further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these conclusions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[ https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-4-0045/ ], identifier [INPLASY202240045].

Comparison of the effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and thiazide diuretic/renin-angiotensin system inhibitor combination therapy in hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) have been approved as antihypertensive agents in Japan, and thiazide diuretics (TZDs) are widely used concomitantly with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) for hypertension. This retrospective study included patients with hypertension who switched from RASI to ARNI therapy (ARNI group) and those who were prescribed TZDs with RASIs (TZD/RASI group). Drug-related changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure (BP), body weight (BW), serum electrolytes, uric acid (UA), and triglyceride levels were compared between the two groups. Overall, 70 participants (31 and 39 in the ARNI and TZD/RASI groups, respectively) were enrolled and observed for a median of 2 months. According to linear mixed models, compared with the TZD/RASI group, the ARNI group exhibited a significant change in mean eGFR of 3.71 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-6.84; P = 0.02] from the time of switching drug to the next outpatient visit. Further, compared with the TZD/RASI group, the ARNI group exhibited significant changes in mean serum UA (-1.27; 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.88), sodium (1.22; 95% CI, 0.12 to -2.32), chloride (2.14; 95% CI, 0.75-3.52), and triglyceride (-52.1; 95% CI, -100.9 to -3.29) levels. Conversely, serum potassium levels, BW, and systolic and diastolic BP did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.69, 0.44, 0.49, and 0.66, respectively). Compared with the combination therapy of TZD and RASI, ARNI therapy causes less renal dysfunction, hyperuricemia, and hypertriglyceridemia with fewer electrolyte abnormalities and no significant difference in antihypertensive effects.

Sacubitril/valsartan ameliorates renal tubulointerstitial injury through increasing renal plasma flow in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes with aldosterone excess

BACKGROUND

Aldosterone has been assumed to be one of aggravating factors in diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Natriuretic peptides/guanylyl cyclase-A/cGMP signalling has been shown to ameliorate aldosterone-induced renal injury in mice. Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) is used clinically for chronic heart failure and hypertension, in part by augmenting natriuretic peptide bioavailability. The effects of SAC/VAL on renal pathophysiology including in DKD, however, have remained unclarified.

METHODS

Eight-week-old male db/db mice fed on a high-salt diet (HSD) were treated with vehicle or aldosterone (0.2 μg/kg/min), and divided into four groups: HSD control, ALDO (aldosterone), ALDO + VAL (valsartan), and ALDO + SAC/VAL group. After 4 weeks, they were analysed for plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) levels, renal histology, and haemodynamic parameters including glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by FITC-inulin and renal plasma flow (RPF) by para-amino hippuric acid.

RESULTS

The ALDO + SAC/VAL group showed significantly increased plasma ANP concentration and creatinine clearance, and decreased tubulointerstitial fibrosis and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin expression compared to ALDO and ALDO + VAL groups. SAC/VAL treatment increased GFR and RPF, and suppressed expression of Tgfb1, Il1b, Ccl2, and Lcn2 genes compared to the ALDO group. The percentage of tubulointerstitial fibrotic areas negatively correlated with the RPF and GFR.

CONCLUSION

In a mouse model of type 2 diabetes with aldosterone excess, SAC/VAL increased RPF and GFR, and ameliorated tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Furthermore, RPF negatively correlated well with tubulointerstitial injury, suggesting that the beneficial effects of SAC/VAL could be through increased renal plasma flow with enhanced natriuretic peptide bioavailability.