Indication for corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: validation in the European VALIGA cohort of a treatment score based on the Oxford classification

Immunosuppressive treatment results in patients with primary IgA nephropathy in Turkiye; the data from TSN-GOLD working group

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) treatment consists of maximal supportive care and, for high-risk individuals, immunosuppressive treatment (IST). There are conflicting results regarding IST. Therefore, we aimed to investigate IST results among IgAN patients in Turkiye.

METHOD

The data of 1656 IgAN patients in the Primary Glomerular Diseases Study of the Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases Study Group were analyzed. A total of 408 primary IgAN patients treated with IST (65.4% male, mean age 38.4 ± 12.5 years, follow-up 30 (3-218) months) were included and divided into two groups according to treatment protocols (isolated corticosteroid [CS] 70.6% and combined IST 29.4%). Treatment responses, associated factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Remission (66.7% partial, 33.7% complete) was achieved in 74.7% of patients. Baseline systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and proteinuria levels were lower in responsives. Remission was achieved at significantly higher rates in the CS group (78% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.016). Partial remission was the prominent remission type. The remission rate was significantly higher among patients with segmental sclerosis compared to those without (60.4% vs. 49%, p = 0.047). In the multivariate analysis, MEST-C S1 (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08-1.89, p = 0.013), MEST-C T1 (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91, p = 0.008) and combined IST (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.91, p = 0.009) were found to be significant regarding remission.

CONCLUSION

CS can significantly improve remission in high-risk Turkish IgAN patients, despite the reliance on non-quantitative endpoints for favorable renal outcomes. Key predictors of remission include baseline proteinuria and specific histological markers. It is crucial to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of immunosuppressive therapy for these patients.

Points of view in nephrology: personalized management of IgA nephropathy, beyond KDIGO

IgA nephropathy is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, and an important cause of kidney failure, as 20-40% of patients progress to renal replacement therapy 20-30 years after diagnosis. Its clinical presentation ranges from isolated microscopic hematuria to nephrotic syndrome, and even to a rapidly progressive course. Ethnicity and epigenetics play a key role in its clinical aggressiveness. Selection of patients at risk needing immunosuppressive treatment is a challenge for the nephrologist. Some active and chronic kidney lesions detected on kidney biopsy have been demonstrated to have prognostic value according to the Oxford Classification of IgA nephropathy, later validated by numerous studies. However, KDIGO 2021 guidelines still consider persistent proteinuria > 1 g/24 h to be the most relevant risk factor for the progression of IgA nephropathy and the only one requiring immunosuppressive treatment. KDIGO guidelines have proposed a therapeutic algorithm, but many patients present peculiar characteristics that are not addressed by the current guidelines, pointing to the need for alternative approaches. In these cases, a tailored approach to each patient should be followed in which clinical, histological, laboratory, social and ethical aspects must be considered. In this manuscript we present three cases of IgA nephropathy from different countries, highlighting many of the aspects encountered in clinical practice that illustrate an individualized approach to the treatment of these patients.

IgA nephropathy in children with minimal proteinuria: to biopsy or not to biopsy?

BACKGROUND

Tubulointerstitial lesions and glomerular inflammation severity have been shown to correlate with proteinuria in children with IgA nephropathy (cIgAN). However, there is a lack of data regarding severity of histopathologic findings in cIgAN in patients with minimal to absent proteinuria since kidney biopsy indications are not well defined in these cases.

METHODS

Twenty-eight cIgAN patients with kidney biopsy from 4 different centers in Paris (France) and Montreal (Canada) with a urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCr) ≤ 0.03 g/mmol and a normal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR > 90 ml/min/1.73 m2) on the day of kidney biopsy prior to treatment were included.

RESULTS

Median age was 11.82 (9.32-13.45) years, and median follow-up was 4 years (2.87-6.53). At time of biopsy, median eGFR was 116 (102.3-139.7) ml/min/1.73 m2, and median UPCr was 0.02 (0.011-0.03) g/mmol. Microscopic or macroscopic hematuria was present in 35.7% and 64.3% of cases, respectively. Kidney biopsy microscopy analysis showed mesangial (M1), endocapillary (E1), or extracapillary (C1) hypercellularity in 53.5%, 32.1%, and 7.1% of patients, respectively. Chronic histological lesions were also present: glomerulosclerosis (S1) in 42.8% and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis in 7.1%. Podocytopathic features were detected in 21.4%. An ACE inhibitor or immunosuppressive therapy (IS) was prescribed in 42.8% and 21.4% of these patients respectively. One-third (35.7%) received no treatment. At last follow-up, median eGFR was 111.9 (90.47-136.1) ml/min/1.73 m2, and median UPCr was 0.028 (0.01-0.03) g/mmol.

CONCLUSION

cIgAN with minimal proteinuria at time of biopsy might be linked with acute and chronic glomerular lesions.

Use of corticosteroids in Norwegian patients with immunoglobulin a nephropathy progressing to end-stage kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Despite several clinical trials, the use of corticosteroid therapy for treating immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains controversial. We aimed to describe the use of corticosteroid therapy combined with supportive therapy in Norwegian patients with IgAN who had progressed to end-stage kidney disease.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Norwegian Renal Registry. Overall, 143 patients with primary IgAN who progressed to end-stage kidney disease were divided into two groups: the corticosteroid group, who had been treated with corticosteroids and supportive therapy, and the non-corticosteroid group, which had underwent only supportive therapy. The kidney function, time to end-stage kidney disease, and adverse effects were described. The observation period lasted from the diagnostic kidney biopsy until the initiation of kidney replacement therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 143 included patients, 103 underwent supportive therapy alone, and 40 were treated with corticosteroids. Most patients (94%) were treated with renin-angiotensin-system blockade, and all patients reached end-stage kidney disease after a median of 5 years (interquartile range; 2-9 years). Time from diagnosis until end-stage kidney disease was similar in the two study groups (p = 0.98). During 6 months of corticosteroid therapy, median eGFR declined from 21 (interquartile range; 13-46) mL/min/1.73 m2 to 20 (interquartile range; 12-40) mL/min/1.73 m2, and median proteinuria decreased from 5.5 g/24 h to 3.0 g/24 h. Most patients (87.5%) treated with corticosteroids reported adverse events. In our linear regression analysis investigating the time to ESKD, we found that age (β = -0.079, p = 0.008) and proteinuria at diagnosis (β = -0.50, p = 0.01) exhibited statistically significant associations with a delay in the progression to ESKD.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of Norwegian patients with IgAN, corticosteroid therapy did not affect the time from diagnosis until end-stage kidney disease among a cohort of patients who all reached end-stage kidney disease. The treatment was also associated with adverse effects.

Treatment of IgA Nephropathy: A Rapidly Evolving Field

The pivotal event in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy is the binding of circulating IgA-containing immune complexes to mesangial cells, with secondary glomerular and tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis. The paramount difficulty in the management of IgA nephropathy is the heterogeneity in its clinical presentation and prognosis, requiring an individualized treatment approach. Goal-directed supportive care remains the bedrock of therapy for all patients, regardless of risk of progression. Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors and sparsentan should be integral to contemporary supportive care, particularly in patients with chronic kidney damage. Pending the development of reliable biomarkers, it remains a challenge to identify patients prone to progression due to active disease and most likely to derive a net benefit from immunosuppression. The use of clinical parameters, including the degree of proteinuria, the presence of persistent microscopic hematuria, and the rate of eGFR loss, combined with the mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary hypercellularity, segmental glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, crescents score, is currently the best approach. Systemic glucocorticoids are indicated in high-risk patients, but the beneficial effects wane after withdrawal and come at the price of substantial treatment-associated toxicity. Therapies with direct effect on disease pathogenesis are increasingly becoming available. While targeted-release budesonide has garnered the most attention, anti-B-cell strategies and selective complement inhibition will most likely prove their added value. We propose a comprehensive approach that tackles the different targets in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy according to their relevance in the individual patient.

Evaluating Progression Risk in Patients With Immunoglobulin A Nephropathy

The highly variable rate of decline in kidney function in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) provides a major clinical challenge. Predicting which patients will progress to kidney failure, and how quickly, is difficult. Multiple novel therapies are likely to be approved in the short-term, but clinicians lack the tools to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific treatments at the right time. Noninvasive and validated markers for selecting at-risk patients and longitudinal monitoring are urgently needed. This review summarizes what is known about demographic, clinical, and histopathologic prognostic markers in the clinician's toolkit, including the International IgAN Prediction Tool. We also briefly review what is known on these topics in children and adolescents with IgAN. Although helpful, currently used markers leave clinicians heavily reliant on histologic features from the diagnostic kidney biopsy and standard clinical data to guide treatment choice, and very few noninvasive markers reflect treatment efficacy over time. Novel prognostic and predictive markers are under clinical investigation, with considerable progress being made in markers of complement activation. Other areas of research are the interplay between gut microbiota and galactose-deficient IgA1 expression; microRNAs; imaging; artificial intelligence; and markers of fibrosis. Given the rate of therapeutic advancement, the remaining gaps in biomarker research need to be addressed. We finish by describing our route to clinical utility of predictive and prognostic markers in IgAN. This route will provide us with the chance to improve IgAN prognosis by using robust, clinically practical markers to inform patient care.

IgA nephropathy

IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most prevalent primary glomerulonephritis worldwide, carries a considerable lifetime risk of kidney failure. Clinical manifestations of IgAN vary from asymptomatic with microscopic or intermittent macroscopic haematuria and stable kidney function to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. IgAN has been proposed to develop through a 'four-hit' process, commencing with overproduction and increased systemic presence of poorly O-glycosylated galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), followed by recognition of Gd-IgA1 by antiglycan autoantibodies, aggregation of Gd-IgA1 and formation of polymeric IgA1 immune complexes and, lastly, deposition of these immune complexes in the glomerular mesangium, leading to kidney inflammation and scarring. IgAN can only be diagnosed by kidney biopsy. Extensive, optimized supportive care is the mainstay of therapy for patients with IgAN. For those at high risk of disease progression, the 2021 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline suggests considering a 6-month course of systemic corticosteroid therapy; however, the efficacy of systemic steroid treatment is under debate and serious adverse effects are common. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of IgAN have led to clinical trials of novel targeted therapies with acceptable safety profiles, including SGLT2 inhibitors, endothelin receptor blockers, targeted-release budesonide, B cell proliferation and differentiation inhibitors, as well as blockade of complement components.