1
|
Ethier I, Hayat A, Pei J, Hawley CM, Johnson DW, Francis RS, Wong G, Craig JC, Viecelli AK, Cho Y, Htay H, Ng S, Leibowitz S. Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 6:CD013800. [PMID: 38899545 PMCID: PMC11187793 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013800.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) are two possible modalities for people with kidney failure commencing dialysis. Only a few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated PD versus HD. The benefits and harms of the two modalities remain uncertain. This review includes both RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of PD, compared to HD, in people with kidney failure initiating dialysis. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies from 2000 to June 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for NRSIs from 2000 until 28 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs and NRSIs evaluating PD compared to HD in people initiating dialysis were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two investigators independently assessed if the studies were eligible and then extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using standard Cochrane methods, and relevant outcomes were extracted for each report. The primary outcome was residual kidney function (RKF). Secondary outcomes included all-cause, cardiovascular and infection-related death, infection, cardiovascular disease, hospitalisation, technique survival, life participation and fatigue. MAIN RESULTS A total of 153 reports of 84 studies (2 RCTs, 82 NRSIs) were included. Studies varied widely in design (small single-centre studies to international registry analyses) and in the included populations (broad inclusion criteria versus restricted to more specific participants). Additionally, treatment delivery (e.g. automated versus continuous ambulatory PD, HD with catheter versus arteriovenous fistula or graft, in-centre versus home HD) and duration of follow-up varied widely. The two included RCTs were deemed to be at high risk of bias in terms of blinding participants and personnel and blinding outcome assessment for outcomes pertaining to quality of life. However, most other criteria were assessed as low risk of bias for both studies. Although the risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) was generally low for most NRSIs, studies were at risk of selection bias and residual confounding due to the constraints of the observational study design. In children, there may be little or no difference between HD and PD on all-cause death (6 studies, 5752 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; I2 = 28%; low certainty) and cardiovascular death (3 studies, 7073 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.59; I2 = 29%; low certainty), and was unclear for infection-related death (4 studies, 7451 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.46; I2 = 56%; very low certainty). In adults, compared with HD, PD had an uncertain effect on RKF (mL/min/1.73 m2) at six months (2 studies, 146 participants: MD 0.90, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.60; I2 = 82%; very low certainty), 12 months (3 studies, 606 participants: MD 1.21, 95% CI -0.01 to 2.43; I2 = 81%; very low certainty) and 24 months (3 studies, 334 participants: MD 0.71, 95% CI -0.02 to 1.48; I2 = 72%; very low certainty). PD had uncertain effects on residual urine volume at 12 months (3 studies, 253 participants: MD 344.10 mL/day, 95% CI 168.70 to 519.49; I2 = 69%; very low certainty). PD may reduce the risk of RKF loss (3 studies, 2834 participants: RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.68; I2 = 17%; low certainty). Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on all-cause death (42 studies, 700,093 participants: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98; I2 = 99%; very low certainty). In an analysis restricted to RCTs, PD may reduce the risk of all-cause death (2 studies, 1120 participants: RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.86; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). PD had uncertain effects on both cardiovascular (21 studies, 68,492 participants: RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; I2 = 92%) and infection-related death (17 studies, 116,333 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.42; I2 = 98%) (both very low certainty). Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on the number of patients experiencing bacteraemia/bloodstream infection (2 studies, 2582 participants: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.18; I2 = 68%) and the number of patients experiencing infection episodes (3 studies, 277 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.62; I2 = 20%) (both very low certainty). PD may reduce the number of bacteraemia/bloodstream infection episodes (2 studies, 2637 participants: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.71; I2 = 24%; low certainty). Compared with HD; It is uncertain whether PD reduces the risk of acute myocardial infarction (4 studies, 110,850 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.10; I2 = 55%), coronary artery disease (3 studies, 5826 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.97; I2 = 62%); ischaemic heart disease (2 studies, 58,374 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.28; I2 = 95%), congestive heart failure (3 studies, 49,511 participants: RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.21; I2 = 89%) and stroke (4 studies, 102,542 participants: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99; I2 = 0%) because of low to very low certainty evidence. Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on the number of patients experiencing hospitalisation (4 studies, 3282 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.30; I2 = 97%) and all-cause hospitalisation events (4 studies, 42,582 participants: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.29; I2 = 91%) (very low certainty). None of the included studies reported specifically on life participation or fatigue. However, two studies evaluated employment. Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on employment at one year (2 studies, 593 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.43; I2 = 97%; very low certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The comparative effectiveness of PD and HD on the preservation of RKF, all-cause and cause-specific death risk, the incidence of bacteraemia, other vascular complications (e.g. stroke, cardiovascular events) and patient-reported outcomes (e.g. life participation and fatigue) are uncertain, based on data obtained mostly from NRSIs, as only two RCTs were included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Ethier
- Department of Nephrology, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Health innovation and evaluation hub, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Ashik Hayat
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Juan Pei
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Carmel M Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ross S Francis
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Andrea K Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Htay Htay
- Department of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Samantha Ng
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Saskia Leibowitz
- Department of Nephrology, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fernández Lucas M, Piris González M, Díaz Domínguez ME, Collado Alsina A, Rodríguez Mendiola NM. Incremental hemodialysis and vascular access complications: a 12-year experience in a hospital hemodialysis unit. J Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s40620-024-01932-9. [PMID: 38837005 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-01932-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incremental hemodialysis (HD) is considered a valid alternative for patients with residual kidney function. Evidence concerning its effect on vascular access is scarce. We present our 12-year experience of an incremental hemodialysis program with the aim of evaluating survival and complications of arteriovenous fistula in these patients compared to the thrice-weekly scheme. METHODS From January 1st, 2006 to December 31st, 2017, 220 incident patients started hemodialysis, 132 (60%) of whom began hemodialysis with two sessions per week and 88 (40%) with three sessions per week. Demographic and clinical variables were assessed at the start of treatment. Data regarding arteriovenous fistula survival and complications were collected. RESULTS Both groups had similar baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. A total of 188 (85%) patients were dialyzed with an arteriovenous fistula during follow-up. Eighty-three patients had one or more fistula complications, with no differences between incremental and conventional groups (p = 0.55). Fistula survival rates showed no significant difference between the two groups, whether analyzed from the date of fistula creation (Log Rank p = 0.810) or from the date of initial fistula cannulation (Log Rank p = 0.695). CONCLUSIONS We found no differences in arteriovenous fistula survival or complication rate between patients who started HD with an incremental versus a conventional treatment scheme. Randomized controlled clinical trials may be warranted to achieve a higher degree of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milagros Fernández Lucas
- Nephrology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain.
- Alcalá de Henares University, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Marcos Piris González
- Nephrology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Martha Elizabeth Díaz Domínguez
- Nephrology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrea Collado Alsina
- Nephrology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria María Rodríguez Mendiola
- Nephrology Department, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Casino DFG, Murea M, Floege MJ, Zoccali C. Incremental dialysis: two complementary views. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfae020. [PMID: 38404364 PMCID: PMC10894032 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Franco Casino and Mariana Murea discuss today's knowledge about the 'incremental dialysis' concept. Franco Casino frames the problem by saying that, in the presence of substantial residual kidney function, kidney replacement therapy can begin with low doses and/or frequencies, to be gradually increased to compensate for any subsequent losses of residual kidney function, keeping the total clearance above the minimum levels of adequacy. He remarks that studies so far have documented that this approach is safe. He recognizes that adequate randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are necessary to confirm the safety and simplify and standardize the practical aspects of this approach. Mariana Murea objects that most of the evidence gathered so far primarily derives from retrospective and observational studies, which can be influenced by socioeconomic constraints. She argues for the need for RCTs to provide compelling empirical evidence on the efficacy of incremental dialysis. Nephrologists are still reluctant to adopt this approach for various reasons, including unfamiliarity with the method, lack of practical guidance and financial disincentives. Several countries have ongoing or planned RCTs comparing incremental dialysis with conventional dialysis. These trials can shift the haemodialysis paradigm if they validate the safety and effectiveness of this approach. The moderators believe that the results of ongoing trials must be carefully interpreted, and further validation may be needed across different patient populations or healthcare settings. The ultimate goal is to gather robust evidence that could lead to widespread adoption of incremental haemodialysis, optimizing treatment, reducing overtreatment, preserving resources and improving patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mariana Murea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Nephrology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Carmine Zoccali
- Renal Research Institute NY, USA
- BIOGEM, Ariano Irpino, Italy
- IPNET, Reggio Cal, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Munshi R, Swartz SJ. Incremental dialysis: review of the literature with pediatric perspective. Pediatr Nephrol 2024; 39:49-55. [PMID: 37306719 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06030-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Drivers towards initiation of kidney replacement therapy in advanced chronic kidney disease include metabolic and fluid derangements, growth, and nutritional status with focus on health optimization. Once initiated, prescription of dialysis is often uniform despite variability in patient characteristics and etiology of kidney failure. Preservation of residual kidney function has been associated with improved outcomes in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease on dialysis. Incremental dialysis is the approach of reducing the dialysis dose by reduction in treatment time, days, or efficiency of clearance. Incremental dialysis has been described in adults at initiation of kidney replacement therapy, to better preserve residual kidney function and meet the individual needs of the patient. Consideration of incremental dialysis in pediatrics may be reasonable in a subset of children with continued emphasis on promotion of growth and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raj Munshi
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Sarah J Swartz
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takkavatakarn K, Jintanapramote K, Phannajit J, Praditpornsilpa K, Eiam-Ong S, Susantitaphong P. Incremental versus conventional haemodialysis in end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfad280. [PMID: 38186889 PMCID: PMC10768771 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Appropriate dialysis prescription in the transitional setting from chronic kidney disease to end-stage kidney disease is still challenging. Conventional thrice-weekly haemodialysis (HD) might be associated with rapid loss of residual kidney function (RKF) and high mortality. The benefits and risks of incremental HD compared with conventional HD were explored in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2023 for studies that compared the impacts of incremental (once- or twice-weekly HD) and conventional thrice-weekly HD on cardiovascular events, RKF, vascular access complications, quality of life, hospitalization and mortality. Results A total of 36 articles (138 939 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The mortality rate and cardiovascular events were similar between incremental and conventional HD {odds ratio [OR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.72-1.04 and OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.43-1.05], respectively}. However, hospitalization and loss of RKF were significantly lower in patients treated with incremental HD [OR 0.44 (95% CI 0.27-0.72) and OR 0.31 (95% CI 0.25-0.39), respectively]. In a sensitivity analysis that included studies restricted to those with RKF or urine output criteria, incremental HD had significantly lower cardiovascular events [OR 0.22 (95% CI 0.08-0.63)] and mortality [OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.79)]. Vascular access complications, hyperkalaemia and volume overload were not statistically different between groups. Conclusions Incremental HD has been shown to be safe and may provide superior benefits in clinical outcomes, particularly in appropriately selected patients. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these potential advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kullaya Takkavatakarn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kavita Jintanapramote
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Royal Thai Air Force, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Jeerath Phannajit
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Research Unit for Metabolic Bone Disease in CKD patients, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Somchai Eiam-Ong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Paweena Susantitaphong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Research Unit for Metabolic Bone Disease in CKD patients, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hegerty K, Jaure A, Scholes-Robertson N, Howard K, Ju A, Evangelidis N, Wolley M, Baumgart A, Johnson DW, Hawley CM, Reidlinger D, Hickey L, Welch A, Cho Y, Kerr PG, Roberts MA, Shen JI, Craig J, Krishnasamy R, Viecelli AK. Australian Workshops on Patients' Perspectives on Hemodialysis and Incremental Start. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:478-488. [PMID: 36938090 PMCID: PMC10014336 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Most patients with kidney failure commence and continue hemodialysis (HD) thrice weekly. Incremental initiation (defined as HD less than thrice weekly) is increasingly considered to be safe and less burdensome, but little is known about patients' perspectives. We aimed to describe patients' priorities and concerns regarding incremental HD. Methods Patients currently, previously, or soon to be receiving HD in Australia participated in two 90-minute online workshops to discuss views about HD focusing on incremental start and priorities for trial outcomes. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Outcomes were ranked on the basis of the sum of participants' priority scores (i.e., single allocation of 3 points for most important, 2 for second, and 1 for third most important outcome). Results All 26 participants (1 caregiver and 25 patients) preferred an incremental HD approach. The top prioritized outcomes were quality of life (QOL) (56 points), residual kidney function (RKF) (27 points), and mortality (16 points). The following 4 themes underpinning outcome priorities, experience, and safety concerns were identified: (i) unpreparedness and pressure to adapt, (ii) disruption to daily living, (iii) threats to safety, and (iv) hope and future planning. Conclusion Patients with kidney failure preferred an incremental start to HD to minimize disruption to daily living and reduce the negative impacts on their education, ability to work, and family life. QOL was the most critically important outcome, followed by RKF and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Hegerty
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Correspondence: Katharine Hegerty, Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Queensland, 4102, Australia.
| | - Allison Jaure
- The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Menzies Center for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Angela Ju
- The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicole Evangelidis
- The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Center for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Wolley
- Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - David W. Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Carmel M. Hawley
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Donna Reidlinger
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Laura Hickey
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alyssa Welch
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Peter G. Kerr
- Department of Nephrology, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew A. Roberts
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jenny I. Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rathika Krishnasamy
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrea K. Viecelli
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland, Australia
- The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu HHL, Dhaygude AP, Mitra S, Tennankore KK. Home dialysis in older adults: challenges and solutions. Clin Kidney J 2022; 16:422-431. [PMID: 36865019 PMCID: PMC9972827 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfac220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a rising demand for dialysis in the older population given the increased numbers of older adults living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) progressing to kidney failure. Home dialysis, i.e. peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home hemodialysis (HHD), has been available for decades, but more recently there has been a rapid increase in home dialysis utilization as patients and clinicians consider its practical and clinical advantages. For older adults, incident home dialysis utilization more than doubled and prevalent home dialysis growth nearly doubled over the past decade. Whilst its advantages and recent rise in popularity are evident, there are numerous barriers and challenges that are important to consider prior to initiating older adults on home dialysis. Some nephrology healthcare professionals do not view home dialysis as an option for older adults. Successful delivery of home dialysis for older adults may be made even more difficult by physical or cognitive limitations, concerns around dialysis adequacy, and treatment-related complications, as well as challenges relating to caregiver burnout and patient frailty that are unique to home dialysis and older adults. Ultimately, it would be important for clinicians, patients and their caregivers to define what constitutes a 'successful therapy' to ensure treatment goals are aligned towards each individual's priorities of care, considering the complex challenges that surround an older adult receiving home dialysis. In this review, we evaluate some of the key challenges surrounding the delivery of home dialysis to older adults and propose potential solutions based on updated evidence to overcome these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ajay P Dhaygude
- Department of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Sandip Mitra
- Department of Renal Medicine, Manchester Academy of Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University Hospitals, Manchester, UK
| | - Karthik K Tennankore
- Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health, Dickson Building, 5820 University Avenue, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|