Comparison of the effects of calcitriol and maxacalcitol on secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on chronic haemodialysis: a randomized prospective multicentre trial

Persistent uncertainties in optimal treatment approaches of secondary hyperparathyroidism and hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is a critical analysis of treatment results obtained in clinical trials conducted in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT), hyperphosphatemia, or both.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with CKD have a high mortality rate. The disorder of mineral and bone metabolism (CKD-MBD), which is commonly present in these patients, is associated with adverse outcomes, including cardiovascular events and mortality. Clinical trials aimed at improving these outcomes by modifying CKD-MBD associated factors have most often resulted in disappointing results. The complexity of CKD-MBD, where many players are closely interconnected, might explain these negative findings. We first present an historical perspective of current knowledge in the field of CKD-MBD and then examine potential flaws of past and ongoing clinical trials targeting SHPT and hyperphosphatemia respectively in patients with CKD.

Comparative Effects of Etelcalcetide and Maxacalcitol on Serum Calcification Propensity in Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Vitamin D receptor activators and calcimimetics (calcium-sensing receptor agonists) are two major options for medical treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. A higher serum calcification propensity (a shorter T₅₀ value) is a novel surrogate marker of calcification stress and mortality in patients with CKD. We tested a hypothesis that a calcimimetic agent etelcalcetide is more effective in increasing T₅₀ value than a vitamin D receptor activator maxacalcitol.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded end point trial with active control was conducted in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing hemodialysis in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous etelcalcetide 5 mg thrice weekly (etelcalcetide group) or intravenous maxacalcitol 5 or 10 µg thrice weekly (maxacalcitol group). The primary, secondary, and tertiary outcomes were changes in T₅₀ value, handgrip strength, and score of the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System from baseline to 12 months, respectively.

RESULTS

In total, 425 patients from 23 dialysis centers were screened for eligibility, 326 patients were randomized (etelcalcetide, n=167; control, n=159), and 321 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 66 years; 113 women [35%]). The median (interquartile range) of T₅₀ value was changed from 116 minutes (interquartile range, 90-151) to 131 minutes (interquartile range, 102-176) in the maxacalcitol group, whereas it was changed from 123 minutes (interquartile range, 98-174) to 166 minutes (interquartile range, 127-218) in the etelcalcetide group. The increase in T₅₀ value was significantly greater in the etelcalcetide group (difference in change, 20 minutes; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 34 minutes; P=0.004). No significant between-group difference was found in the change in handgrip strength or in the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-Based Integrated Care System score.

CONCLUSIONS

Etelcalcetide was more effective in increasing T₅₀ value than maxacalcitol among patients on hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism. There was no difference in handgrip strength or cognition between the two drugs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

VICTORY; UMIN000030636 and jRCTs051180156.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of maxacalcitol in healthy Taiwanese and Japanese subjects

Pharmacokinetic studies of maxacalcitol in healthy Taiwanese subjects have been conducted. This study to compare the pharmacokinetic properties of maxacalcitol in healthy Taiwanese and Japanese subjects. Healthy male Taiwanese subjects (n = 24) and healthy male Japanese subjects (n = 24) were enrolled in separate single-center and received a single intravenous dose of 1.25, 2.5 and 5 μg maxacalcitol. Male subjects were exclusively employed in the study due to the first administration of maxacalcitol to Taiwanese. Serum samples were collected for up to 72 h for pharmacokinetic analysis, and safety was assessed. Exposures to maxacalcitol as mean C₅ and AUC_inf appeared to increase with increase of doses in Taiwanese subjects (C₅: 74.0, 159, and 321 pg/mL; AUC_inf: 473, 763, and 1460 h･pg/mL) and Japanese subjects (C₅: 92.9, 174, and 346 pg/mL; AUC_inf: 312, 588, and 1040 h･pg/mL). After single bolus IV administration, linearity in maxacalcitol exposure was shown over the dose range of 1.25-5 μg in both Taiwanese and Japanese male healthy subjects. C₅ of maxacalcitol was slightly lower (85%) in Taiwanese compared with that in Japanese and AUC_inf of maxacalcitol in Taiwanese subjects was contrarily 15.0 (41.6%) higher than that in Japanese subjects, resulted in not much difference in pharmacokinetics of maxacalcitol between Taiwanese and Japanese. Moreover, maxacalcitol was well tolerated in both healthy Taiwanese and Japanese subjects.

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Pathogenesis and Latest Treatment

The classic pathogenesis of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) began with the trade-off hypothesis based on parathyroid hormone hypersecretion brought about by renal failure resulting from a physiological response to correct metabolic disorder of calcium, phosphorus, and vitamin D. In dialysis patients with failed renal function, physiological mineral balance control by parathyroid hormone through the kidney fails and hyperparathyroidism progresses. In this process, many significant genetic findings have been established. Abnormalities of Ca-sensing receptor and vitamin D receptor are associated with the pathogenesis of SHPT, and fibroblast growth factor 23 has also been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis. Vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) are widely used for treatment of SHPT. However, VDRAs have calcemic and phosphatemic effects that limit their use to a subset of patients, and calcimimetics have been developed as alternative drugs for SHPT. Hyperphosphatemia also affects progression of SHPT, and control of hyperphosphatemia is, therefore, thought to be fundamental for control of SHPT. Currently, a combination of a VDRA and a calcimimetic is recognized as the optimal strategy for SHPT, and for other outcomes such as reduced cardiovascular disease and improved survival. The latest findings on the pathogenesis and treatment of SHPT are summarized in this review.

Association of Drug Effects on Serum Parathyroid Hormone, Phosphorus, and Calcium Levels With Mortality in CKD: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH), phosphorus, and calcium levels are surrogate outcomes that are central to the evaluation of drug treatments in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This systematic review evaluates the evidence for the correlation between drug effects on biochemical (PTH, phosphorus, and calcium) and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality end points in adults with CKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING & POPULATION

Adults with CKD.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomized trials reporting drug effects on biochemical and mortality end points.

INTERVENTION

Drug interventions with effects on serum PTH, phosphorus, and calcium levels, including vitamin D compounds, phosphate binders, cinacalcet, bisphosphonates, and calcitonin.

OUTCOMES

Correlation between drug effects on biochemical and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

28 studies (6,999 participants) reported both biochemical and mortality outcomes and were eligible for analysis. Associations between drug effects on surrogate biochemical end points and corresponding effects on mortality were weak and imprecise. All correlation coefficients were less than 0.70, and 95% credible intervals were generally wide and overlapped with zero, consistent with the possibility of no association. The exception was an inverse correlation between drug effects on serum PTH levels and all-cause mortality, which was nominally significant (-0.64; 95% credible interval, -0.85 to -0.15), but the strength of this association was very imprecise. Risk of bias within available trials was generally high, further reducing confidence in the summary correlations. Findings were robust to adjustment for age, baseline serum PTH level, allocation concealment, CKD stage, and drug class.

LIMITATIONS

Low power in analyses and combining evidence from many different drug comparisons with incomplete data across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Drug effects on serum PTH, phosphorus, and calcium levels are weakly and imprecisely correlated with all-cause and cardiovascular death in the setting of CKD. Risks of mortality (patient-level outcome) cannot be inferred from treatment-induced changes in biochemical outcomes in people with CKD. Similarly, existing data do not exclude a mortality benefit with treatment. Trials need to address patient-centered outcomes to evaluate drug effectiveness in this setting.

Effects of paricalcitol on calcium and phosphate metabolism and markers of bone health in patients with diabetic nephropathy: results of the VITAL study

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with elevations in serum phosphate, calcium–phosphorus product and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), with attendant risks of cardiovascular and bone disorders. Active vitamin D can suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH), but may raise serum calcium and phosphate concentrations. Paricalcitol, a selective vitamin D activator, suppressed PTH in CKD patients (stages 3 and 4) with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) with minimal changes in calcium and phosphate metabolism.

Methods

The VITAL study enrolled patients with CKD stages 2–4. We examined the effect and relationship of paricalcitol to calcium and phosphate metabolism and bone markers in a post hoc analysis of VITAL. The study comprised patients with diabetic nephropathy enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of paricalcitol (1 or 2 μg/day). Urinary and serum calcium and phosphate, serum BAP, and intact PTH (iPTH) concentrations were measured throughout the study.

Results

Baseline demographics and calcium, phosphate, PTH (49% with iPTH <70 pg/mL), and BAP concentrations were similar between groups. A transient, modest yet significant increase in phosphate was observed for paricalcitol 2 μg/day (+0.29 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Dose-dependent increases in serum and urinary calcium were observed; however, there were few cases of hypercalcemia: one in the 1-μg/day group (1.1%) and three in the 2-μg/day group (3.2%). Significant reductions in BAP were observed that persisted for 60 days after paricalcitol discontinuation (P < 0.001 for combined paricalcitol groups versus placebo). Paricalcitol dose-dependent reductions in iPTH were observed. Paricalcitol in CKD patients (±SHPT) was associated with modest increases in calcium and phosphate.

Conclusion

Paricalcitol reduces BAP levels, which may be beneficial for reducing vascular calcification.

Trial registration

Trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00421733.

Renale osteodystrophie

The incidence of renal osteodystrophy (ROD) increases with deteriorating kidney function, affecting virtually every patient on chronic dialysis treatment. ROD can persist after kidney transplantation and may be aggravated by immunosuppressants, mainly glucocorticoids. Fracture risk, including hip fractures, is markedly elevated in patients with renal disease compared to the general population. Depending on the type of ROD, high or low bone turnover can be found. Because of poor positive and negative predictive values of serological markers of bone turnover and limited technical capabilities of various bone imaging modalities, the only reliable method to correctly classify ROD is the transiliac bone biopsy. Elevated bone turnover can be successfully treated with active vitamin D, cinacalcet, or parathyreoidectomy, but all of these therapies may lead to oversuppression of bone metabolism. Currently, no specific therapy is available for low turnover bone disease. Bisphosphonates can be a therapeutic option for selected patients after renal transplantation.

Vitamin d receptor activators and clinical outcomes in chronic kidney disease

Vitamin D deficiency appears to be an underestimated risk factor for cardiovascular disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. Evidence from both basic science and clinical studies supports the possible protective role of vitamin D beyond its effect on mineral metabolism. Toxicity of pharmacologic doses of active vitamin D metabolites, in particular calcitriol, is mainly due to the possibility of positive calcium and phosphorus balance. Therefore, vitamin D analogs have been developed, which suppress PTH secretion and synthesis with reduced calcemic and phosphatemic effects. Observational studies suggest that in hemodialysis patients the use of a vitamin D receptor (VDR) activator, such as calcitriol, doxercalciferol, paricalcitol, or alfacalcidol, is associated with a reduced mortality when compared with nonusers of any VDR activator. In this article the existing literature on the topic is reviewed, although a more robust answer to the question of whether or not VDR activators have beneficial effects in hemodialysis patients will hopefully come from a randomized controlled trial.

Vitamin D compounds for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical guidelines recommend vitamin D compounds to suppress serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) in chronic kidney disease (CKD), however treatment may be associated with increased serum phosphorus and calcium, which are associated with increased mortality in observational studies. Observational data also indicate vitamin D therapy may be independently associated with reduced mortality in CKD.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the effects of vitamin D compounds on clinical, biochemical, and bone outcomes in people with CKD and receiving dialysis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched The Cochrane Renal Group's specialised register, Cochrane's Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in subjects with CKD and requiring dialysis that assessed treatment with vitamin D compounds.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted by two authors. Results are summarised as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes or mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty studies (2773 patients) were included. No formulation, route, or schedule of administration was associated with altered risks of death, bone pain, or parathyroidectomy. Marked heterogeneity in reporting of outcomes resulted in few data available for formal meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, vitamin D compounds lowered serum PTH at the expense of increasing serum phosphorus. Trends toward increased hypercalcaemia and serum calcium did not reach statistical significance but may be clinically relevant. Newer vitamin D compounds (paricalcitol, maxacalcitol, doxercalciferol) lowered PTH compared with placebo, with increased risks of hypercalcaemia, although inadequate data were available for serum phosphorus. Intravenous vitamin D may lower PTH compared with oral treatment, and be associated with lower serum phosphorus and calcium levels, although limitations in the available studies precludes a conclusive statement of treatment efficacy. Few studies were available for intermittent versus daily and intraperitoneal versus oral administration or directly comparative studies of newer versus established vitamin D compounds.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We confirm that vitamin D compounds suppress PTH in people with CKD and requiring dialysis although treatment is associated with clinical elevations in serum phosphorus and calcium. All studies were inadequately powered to assess the effect of vitamin D on clinical outcomes and until such studies are conducted the relative importance of changes in serum PTH, phosphorus and calcium resulting from vitamin D therapy remain unknown. Observational data showing vitamin D compounds may be associated with improved survival in CKD need to be confirmed or refuted in specifically designed RCTs.

Vitamin D analogs: therapeutic applications and mechanisms for selectivity

The vitamin D endocrine system plays a central role in mineral ion homeostasis through the actions of the vitamin D hormone, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1,25(OH)(2)D(3)], on the intestine, bone, parathyroid gland, and kidney. The main function of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) is to promote the dietary absorption of calcium and phosphate, but effects on bone, kidney and the parathyroids fine-tune the mineral levels. In addition to these classical actions, 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) exerts pleiotropic effects in a wide variety of target tissues and cell types, often in an autocrine/paracrine fashion. These biological activities of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) have suggested a multitude of potential therapeutic applications of the vitamin D hormone for the treatment of hyperproliferative disorders (e.g. cancer and psoriasis), immune dysfunction (autoimmune diseases), and endocrine disorders (e.g. hyperparathyroidism). Unfortunately, the effective therapeutic doses required to treat these disorders can produce substantial hypercalcemia. This limitation of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3) therapy has spurred the development of vitamin D analogs that retain the therapeutically important properties of 1,25(OH)(2)D(3), but with reduced calcemic activity. Analogs with improved therapeutic indices are now available for treatment of psoriasis and secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic kidney disease, and research on newer analogs for these indications continues. Other analogs are under development and in clinical trials for treatment of various types of cancer, autoimmune disorders, and many other diseases. Although many new analogs show tremendous promise in cell-based models, this article will limit it focus on the development of analogs currently in use and those that have demonstrated efficacy in animal models or in clinical trials.

Effects of 22-Oxacalcitriol and Calcitriol on PTH Secretion and Bone Mineral Metabolism in a Crossover Trial in Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

The purpose of this crossover comparison study is to elucidate the differences between the effects of a novel calcitriol analog, 22-oxacalcitriol, and calcitriol on parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone mineral metabolism in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). Twenty-three patients with moderate to severe SHPT were included in a random 2 x 2 crossover trial with two vitamin D analogs (12 weeks for each treatment). Two patients withdrew during the run-in period for personal reasons. Serum electrolyte, bone metabolic marker, intact PTH (iPTH) and whole PTH (wPTH) levels were measured periodically. The primary endpoint measure was a decrease in serum iPTH level, and the secondary outcome measures included changes in serum calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), and metabolic bone marker levels. Both treatments decreased iPTH and wPTH levels by similar degrees. Serum Ca, P, and Ca x P product levels at the end of each treatment were comparable and the frequencies of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were also similar during each treatment period. 22-Oxacalcitriol significantly decreased the levels of bone metabolic markers, namely, bone-specific alkaline phosphate, intact osteocalcin, pyridinoline, and cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen, after a 12-week treatment. In contrast, calcitriol did not change any of the levels of bone metabolic markers. The present study showed that 22-oxacalcitriol is equally effective for PTH suppression, and Ca and P metabolism. In addition, 22-oxacalcitriol might have putative actions on bone remodeling independent of its PTH suppression. Further study is necessary to confirm the effects of 22-oxacalcitriol on bone metabolism in SHPT.

Vitamin D analogs for secondary hyperparathyroidism: what does the future hold?

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (2 degrees HPT) commonly develops in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in response to high phosphate, low calcium and low 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)]. High PTH levels increase the rate of bone turnover, with a net efflux of calcium and phosphate leading to vascular calcification and coronary artery disease. Treatment of 2 degrees HPT with 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) and calcium-based phosphate binders often produces hypercalcemia and over-suppression of PTH, resulting in adynamic bone that cannot buffer excess calcium and phosphate, which increases the risk of vascular calcification. It is essential, then, to reduce PTH levels to a range that supports normal bone turnover and minimizes ectopic calcification. Vitamin D analogs that inhibit PTH gene transcription and parathyroid hyperplasia, and that have less calcemic activity than 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3,) have provided a greater safety margin for the treatment of 2 degrees HPT, as well as enhancing the survival of CKD patients. Although several analogs with less calcemic activity are now used in patients (paricalcitol and doxercalciferol in the USA, and OCT and falecalcitriol in Japan), efforts to develop even more selective analogs continue. Parathyroid glands express both 25-hydroxylase and 1alpha-hydroxylase and may be capable of activating prohormones or prodrugs to suppress PTH and parathyroid growth by an autocrine mechanism. Moreover, the introduction of non-calcium-based phosphate binders (sevelamer and lanthanum carbonate) and cinacalcet (an allosteric activator of the calcium receptor that reduces PTH and the serum calciumxphosphate product) may reduce the risk of hypercalcemia with vitamin D therapy. Combining these agents with higher doses of vitamin D compounds may achieve greater suppression of PTH and possibly enhance survival in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Drug insight: vitamin D analogs in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease

Secondary hyperparathyroidism commonly develops in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in response to high phosphate, low calcium and low 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (calcitriol) levels. High levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) accelerate bone turnover, with efflux of calcium and phosphate that can lead to vascular calcification. Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism with calcitriol and calcium-based phosphate binders can produce hypercalcemia and oversuppression of PTH, which results in adynamic bone that cannot buffer calcium and phosphate levels, and increased risk of vascular calcification. PTH levels must, therefore, be reduced to within a range that supports normal bone turnover and minimizes ectopic calcification. Vitamin D analogs that inhibit PTH gene transcription and parathyroid hyperplasia (and have reduced calcemic activity) are a safer treatment for secondary hyperparathyroidism than calcitriol; these agents enhance the survival of patients with CKD. Several such analogs are now in use, and analogs with even greater selectivity than those currently used are in development. Parathyroid glands express both 25-hydroxylase and 1alpha-hydroxylase, which suggests that these enzymes might suppress parathyroid function by an autocrine mechanism. The risk of hypercalcemia with vitamin D analog therapy is reduced by the introduction of non-calcium-based phosphate binders and cinacalcet; furthermore, recent trials indicate that early intervention with vitamin D analogs in stage 3 and 4 CKD can correct PTH levels, and could prevent renal bone disease and prolong patient survival.

Therapeutic Strategies for Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Dialysis Patients

Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) leads not only to bone disorders, but also to cardiovascular complications in long-term dialysis patients. Conventional treatment with calcium (Ca) supplement, phosphate (P) binders and active vitamin D analogs lead in part to amelioration of SHPT, but are simultaneously associated with unacceptable side-effects, including hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and increased Ca x P products, which are the risk factors for cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Conventional treatment has been unable to facilitate the attainment of optimal management of SHPT proposed in the K/DOQI guidelines. Cinacalcet HCl (cinacalcet), a novel calcimimetic compound, restores the sensitivity of the Ca-sensing receptor in parathyroid cells, and decreases serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) without introducing hypercalcemia or hyperphosphatemia. Cinacalcet treatment enables a significant number of patients to achieve the K/DOQI guideline. Based on experimental data, calcimimetics could ameliorate cardiovascular calcification and remodeling in uremic rats with SHPT. Clinical trials have shown that cinacalcet significantly reduced the risks of parathyroidectomy, fracture and cardiovascular hospitalization among long-term dialysis patients with SHPT. Parathyroid intervention therapy (parathyroidectomy and percutaneous direct injection) is also a useful alternative. In the present article, we review novel therapeutic strategies for SHPT.

Which vitamin D derivative to prescribe for renal patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It is possible to control the secondary hyperparathyroidism and osteitis fibrosa of patients with chronic kidney disease by calcitriol when given early and in appropriate doses. However, this control is often achieved at the price of unacceptably high plasma calcium and phosphorus levels, the induction of adynamic bone disease, and soft tissue calcification. To avoid these side effects, so-called 'nonhypercalcemic' vitamin D analogs have been developed. Their possible advantages and their precise place in the treatment and prevention of secondary hyperparathyroidism remain a matter of debate.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large US multicenter study showed that the administration of the vitamin D analog paricalcitol to hemodialysis patients, as compared with calcitriol, was associated with better survival. In a subsequent large US multicenter study paricalcitol-treated hemodialysis patients experienced fewer hospitalizations and hospital days compared with calcitriol-treated patients. In a third, smaller study from Japan, regular alfacalcidol users among hemodialysis patients had better cardiovascular survival than nonusers. Finally, in a recent historical control study the mortality of a large hemodialysis patient cohort was analyzed as a function of previous vitamin D treatment. Patients on active vitamin D compounds at any time had a 2-year survival advantage over vitamin D-naive patients. It must be pointed out, however, that all four studies were retrospective in nature.

SUMMARY

The development of vitamin D analogs with less side effects than with calcitriol is of major theoretical interest. Practically speaking, however, we still need to be convinced that this goal can be achieved in chronic kidney disease patients.

Viewpoint: How Do Calcimimetics Fit Into the Management of Parathyroid Hormone, Calcium, and Phosphate Disturbances in Dialysis Patients?

As suggested by its American brand name (Sensipar), the calcimimetic cinacalcet sensitizes the parathyroid cells to the extracellular calcium signal, suppressing parathyroid hormone (PTH) release and synthesis and preventing parathyroid cell proliferation. This primary PTH suppression decreases the release of calcium and phosphate from bone without increasing intestinal absorption of calcium and phosphate. Therefore cinacalcet decreases the risk of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in contrast to 1alpha-OH vitamin D derivatives. Compared with calcium-containing oral phosphate binder (OPB), it increases the risk of hypocalcemia and may decrease the PTH-mediated phosphaturia in predialysis patients. This justifies its combined use with calcium-containing OPB in order to prevent hypocalcemia and enhance the hypophosphatemic effect of the latter, while improving PTH suppression. The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) has recommended restriction of supplemental elemental calcium to 1.5 g/day, a recommendation that we believe should be revised. No pathophysiologic or randomized trial data have yet evidenced the absolute necessity for systematically using 1alpha-OH vitamin D derivatives and noncalcium-containing OPB rather than higher doses of calcium-containing OPB alone in uremic patients without vitamin D insufficiency. In patients with hyperparathyroidism as severe as in the "Treat to Goal Study," the Durham study showed that a calcium carbonate dose more than three times the K/DOQI limit could decrease PTH into the recommended range, with the advantage of a lower calcium-phosphate product compared with the combination of calcitriol and noncalcium OPB. Besides the efficient PTH suppression associated with lower calcium-phosphate product and a good gastrointestinal tolerance, long-term data suggest that cinacalcet may decrease the risk of parathyroidectomy and fracture, while high bone turnover lesions are improved. However, no long-term data on bone mineral density and cardiovascular calcification and complications are yet available. Such studies, along with those comparing cinacalcet and 1alpha-OH vitamin D-based approaches to hyperparathyroidism, are needed.