Transplanting kidneys from CMV-seropositive donors to CMV-seronegative recipients is not associated with poorer renal allograft function or survival

Clinical consequences of primary CMV infection after renal transplantation: a case-control study

The impact of primary cytomegalovirus infection (pCMV) on renal allograft function and histology is controversial. We evaluated the influence on incidence of acute rejection, allograft loss, allograft function and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA). Retrospective case-control study, recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2014. Risk of acute rejection and allograft loss for those who experienced pCMV infection compared with those who did not, within an exposure period of two months after transplantation. Besides, its influence on allograft function and histology at one to three years after transplantation. Of 113 recipients experienced pCMV infection, 306 remained CMV seronegative. pCMV infection in the exposure period could not be proven as increasing the risk for acute rejection [HR = 2.18 (95% CI 0.80-5.97) P = 0.13] or allograft loss [HR = 1.11 (95%CI 0.33-3.72) P = 0.87]. Combination of pCMV infection and acute rejection posed higher hazard for allograft loss than acute rejection alone [HR = 3.69 (95% CI 1.21-11.29) P = 0.02]. eGFR(MDRD) values did not significantly differ at years one [46 vs. 50], two [46 vs. 51] and three [46 vs. 52]. No association between pCMV infection and IF/TA could be demonstrated [OR = 2.15 (95%CI 0.73-6.29) P = 0.16]. pCMV infection was not proven to increase the risk for acute rejection or allograft loss. However, it increased the risk for rejection-associated allograft loss. In remaining functioning allografts, it was not significantly associated with decline in function nor with presence of IF/TA.

Reinfection of cytomegalovirus in renal transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most important pathogen affecting the outcome of renal transplantation. Reinfection of CMV can occur in CMV-seropositive donors and CMV seropositive recipients (D+/R+) settings because the protection against CMV conferred by preexisting immunity is limited due to its strain-dependent immune responses. To analyze the influence of CMV reinfection in renal transplantation, ELISA using fusion proteins encompassing epitope of glycoprotein H(gH) from both AD169 and Towne strains was employed before transplantation. The CMV-gH seropositive rate increased with increases in age and the rate of samples which contained antibodies against both AD169 and Towne were significantly high in the age of 50 years or over. Antibodies from HLA-DR10 and DR11 were associated with a significantly lower response rate against CMV-gH. In renal transplantation, the high degrees of antigenemia and high incidences of CMV disease are more prevalent in the CMV gH antibody-mismatched group in D+/R+ setting. The nucleotide sequence of the region of the gH epitope in the CMV-DNA extracted from the transplant recipients who showed high degree of antigenemia revealed the CMV reinfection from the donors. As a CMV indirect effect, the incidence of acute rejection in the mismatched gH antibody group was higher than that observed in the matched and D+/R- groups. The adverse events were more likely to occur in cases of D+/R+ renal transplantation with mismatched strain-specific antibodies which would indicates the risk of CMV reinfection after transplantation.

Impact of CMV infection on acute rejection and long-term renal allograft function: a systematic analysis in patients with protocol biopsies and indicated biopsies

BACKGROUND

Higher rates of acute rejection (AR) and reduced graft survival have been reported in patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, but an association between these factors remains controversial.

METHODS

In this study, serial protocol biopsies (PBs) and clinically indicated biopsies (IBs) from a large cohort of renal allograft recipients (n ¼ 594) were analyzed to examine the relation between CMV and AR.

RESULTS

Patients with CMV were more likely to receive IB (85 of the 153 patients; 56%) compared to patients without CMV (138 of 441 patients; 32%; P = 0.003). However, this did not translate into a greater number of patients with episodes of acute cellular rejection on histopathology in IBs. Analysis of PBs revealed a significantly higher number of episodes of rejection per patient with CMV infection (P = 0.04), but only in a subgroup of patients with triple immunosuppression. Long-term graft function post-transplantation was analyzed in four different subgroups according to CMV infection and/or AR. Differences in renal function were apparent within the first 6 weeks after transplantation and persisted during follow-up, with the best renal function in patients without AR or CMV, whereas patients with both AR and CMV had the worst (P < 0.012 at 1 year; P < 0.001 at 2 years). On average, the latter group had significantly older donors and more often delayed graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests that the link between CMV and AR is far less significant than previously thought. Outcome in patients with CMV may be more determined by coexisting conditions like high donor age and delayed graft function.

Postoperative infectious complications of abdominal solid organ transplantation

There is a rapidly growing population of immunocompromised organ transplant recipients. These patients are at risk of a large variety of infections that have significant consequences on mortality, graft dysfunction, and graft loss. The diagnosis and treatment of these infections are facilitated by an understanding of the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative risk factors; the typical pathogens; and their characteristic time of presentation. On the basis of these factors, we put forth an algorithm for diagnosing and treating suspected infections in solid organ transplant recipients.

Effect of cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with acyclovir on renal transplant survival

It is recognized that cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant recipients may lead to graft loss. Prophylaxis with acyclovir has therefore gained widespread acceptance, but the debate on whether this intervention improves long term graft survival continues. All patients who received renal grafts at the National Renal Transplant Centre, Dublin, between January 1992 and December 1999 were retrospectively analyzed. During this time period, patients who were CMV positive and/or had received grafts from CMV-positive donors were administered prophylactic oral acyclovir 800 mg thrice daily, adjusted for calculated creatinine clearance, from the first day post-transplantation. This treatment was continued for three months unless the graft failed or the patient developed CMV disease or died. Graft and patient outcomes were compared in recipients who received acyclovir with those who did not. Over the study period, 935 patients received renal transplants in our center, of whom 487 were administered acyclovir. The incidence of CMV disease was 3.3 cases per 100 patients per annum in those who required prophylaxis. Despite prophylaxis, graft outcomes were found to be significantly worse (p value < 0.001) in the group that qualified for acyclovir. We conclude that acyclovir provides incomplete protection from the negative impact of CMV on graft survival.

The use of consensus guidelines for management of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection imposes a significant economic burden on susceptible patients after renal transplantation. Our study was conducted to determine the prediction, probability, consequences, and treatment costs of CMV infection under Canadian consensus guidelines in 270 sequential transplant patients. Transplant patients from donors positive (D(+)) for CMV into recipients negative (R(-)) for CMV received antiviral prophylaxis for 14 weeks and all but donor negative (D(-))/R(-) patients were monitored weekly for the CMVpp65 marker expression. Marker-positive patients and patients with CMV infection or disease received antiviral treatment. Within the first 6 months, 27% of the 270 patients tested had incidences of asymptomatic CMV infection, while 9% had CMV syndrome or disease. Only 1% of patients had infection after 6 months. The CMVpp65 marker levels were significantly greater in patients with syndrome or disease; but post-test probabilities and predictive value of the marker assay were low. Mean direct costs for care were $2256 and ranged from $927 for D(-)/R(-) patients to $7069 in the D(+)/R(-) patients. Extension of antiviral prophylaxis to D(+) or D(+)/R(+) patients significantly increased the estimated mean costs for an absolute reduction to 4% in CMV syndrome or disease. Our studies show that current guidelines for treatment enable effective control of CMV infection; however, alternative strategies have different economic impact.

Severe graft rejection, increased immunosuppression, and active CMV infection in renal transplantation

Associations between active cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, graft rejection, rejection therapy, and clinical signs and symptoms have been shown repeatedly. However, the causes and the sequence of events remain an area of debate. Two hundred twenty five patients with cadaveric renal transplant were included in the present study. Clinical signs and symptoms, and the development of active CMV infections were recorded during the first 3 months after renal transplantation. CMV monitoring by pp65-antigenemia was performed followed by preemptive antiviral therapy. Delayed graft function and severe graft rejection followed by anti T-cell antibody therapy was associated with the development of active CMV infection. In contrast, the induction therapy with anti-T-cell antibodies was not associated with more active CMV infections. Post-transplant morbidity determined by fever, pneumonia, and duration of hospital stay was increased significantly in patients with active CMV infection. However, in times of preemptive antiviral therapy an increased morbidity occurred in association with severe graft rejection and not with active CMV infection alone. In patients with renal transplantation and preemptive antiviral therapy, the morbidity was no more influenced by the CMV serostatus although the prevalence of active CMV infection was obviously different between CMV exposed (D+/R+,D+/R-, D-/R+) and unexposed (D-/R-) patients. Severe graft rejection and increased immunosuppression could stimulate cooperatively active CMV infections whereas immunosuppression alone may not be as effective. Prevention of severe graft rejection may be important to decrease early post-transplant morbidity and also the development of active CMV infections after renal transplantation.