Reduced graft function (with or without dialysis) vs immediate graft function--a comparison of long-term renal allograft survival

An analysis of the relationship between donor and recipient biomarkers and kidney graft function, dysfunction, and rejection

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to find predictive biomarkers to evaluate donor kidney function to predict graft dysfunction as well as to assess an early signs of acute graft rejection.

METHOD

Twenty-seven deceased donors and 54 recipients who underwent a successful kidney transplantation were enrolled in the study. An assessment was made in serum and urine from donors and recipients to measure the following biomarkers: neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 (TIMP-2) and urinary N-acetyl-b-D-glucosaminidase (uNAG). These biomarkers were used to establish a model for predicting a reduced graft function (RGF) classified as either a delayed or slow graft function.

RESULT

Our analysis suggest that out of four tested biomarkers, the serum TIMP-2 and uNAG levels of the donors had a predictive value for RGF; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of serum TIMP-2 and uNAG were 0.714 and 0.779, respectively. The combined best fitting prediction model of serum TIMP-2, uNAG, and creatinine levels was better in predicting RGF than the serum creatinine level alone. In addition, the recipient serum TIMP-2 level on the third day post-transplantation (D3) was associated with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on the seventh day post-transplantation (D7; OR 1.119, 95% CI 1.016-1.233, p = 0.022). Furthermore, the ROC curve value revealed that the AUROC of TIMP-2 on D3 was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1, p < 0.001), and this was the best predictive value of the renal function on D7.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor serum TIMP-2 and uNAG levels are useful predictive biomarkers because they can provide the donor-based prediction for RGF.

A Machine Learning Prediction Model for Immediate Graft Function After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After kidney transplantation (KTx), the graft can evolve from excellent immediate graft function (IGF) to total absence of function requiring dialysis. Recipients with IGF do not seem to benefit from using machine perfusion, an expensive procedure, in the long term when compared with cold storage. This study proposes to develop a prediction model for IGF in KTx deceased donor patients using machine learning algorithms.

METHODS

Unsensitized recipients who received their first KTx deceased donor between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, were classified according to the conduct of renal function after transplantation. Variables related to the donor, recipient, kidney preservation, and immunology were used. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 70% were assigned to the training and 30% to the test group. Popular machine learning algorithms were used: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Gradient Boosting classifier, Logistic Regression, CatBoost classifier, AdaBoost classifier, and Random Forest classifier. Comparative performance analysis on the test dataset was performed using the results of the AUC values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 score.

RESULTS

Of the 859 patients, 21.7% (n = 186) had IGF. The best predictive performance resulted from the eXtreme Gradient Boosting model (AUC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.84; sensitivity, 0.64; specificity, 0.78). Five variables with the highest predictive value were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated the possibility of creating a model for the prediction of IGF, enhancing the selection of patients who would benefit from an expensive treatment, as in the case of machine perfusion preservation.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography Value for Early Prediction of Delayed Graft Function in Renal Transplantation Patients

OBJECTIVES

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common early complication after kidney transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the early prediction of DGF after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 89 renal transplant recipients were retrospectively enrolled and divided into DGF group or normal graft function (NGF) group according to the allograft function. Conventional Doppler ultrasound and CEUS examination data on the first postoperative day were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The resistive indices of segmental and interlobar artery in the DGF group were significantly higher than those in the NGF group (0.71 ± 0.17 versus 0.63 ± 0.08, P = .006; 0.70 ± 0.16 versus 0.62 ± 0.08, P = .004, respectively). The patients experiencing DGF had significantly lower PI-c (14.7 dB ± 6.1 dB versus 18.5 dB ± 3.3 dB, P = .001) and smaller AUC-c (779.8 ± 375.8 dB·seconds versus 991.0 ± 211.7 dB·seconds, P = .003), as well as significantly lower PI-m (12.6 dB ± 5.9 dB versus 15.9 dB ± 3.9 dB, P = .006), shorter MTT-m (30.7 ± 9.4 seconds versus 36.3 ± 7.1 seconds, P = .01), and smaller AUC-m (P = .007). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PI-c, AUC-c, and MTT-m were independent risk factors for DGF. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of the combined predicted value (PI-c + MTT-m, PI-c + AUC-c + MTT-m) of DGF incidence were bigger than that of PI-c, AUC-c, or MTT-m.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS parameters of the cortex and medulla have a good value for an early prediction of DGF after renal transplantation.

The Role of Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting the Delayed Graft Function in Pediatric Renal Transplant Patients

OBJECTIVES

Delayed graft function is a common adverse outcome after renal transplant. Attempts for early prediction and prevention of delayed graft function are often challenging and misleading. Herein, we investigated for the first time the correlation between delayed graft function and preoperative noninvasive hematologic parameters to predict the possible adverse outcomes for renal transplant in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, preoperative hematologic parameters of 51 pediatric renal transplant recipients followed between 2015 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The selected 16 renal transplant patients with delayed graft function and 35 patients without delayed graft function had no concomitant comorbidities. The cutoff values for platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio of <5 and neutrophilto- lymphocyte ratio of <175 were considered low.

RESULTS

We retrospectively evaluated a total of 51 (male/female, 33/18) pediatric kidney transplant recipients with a median age of 12 (interquartile range, 8-18) years. Median level of circulating lymphocytes was significantly higher in patients with delayed graft function compared with patients without delayed graft function (2 vs 1, P = .040). The preoperative low values for platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were more prevalent in recipients who developed delayed graft function versus those who did not develop delayed graft function (68.8% vs 31.4% [P = .014] and 68.8% vs 34.3% [P = .023], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant low platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte were associated with increased number of delayed graft dysfunction. These novels and noninvasive inflammatory biomarkers may contribute to an early prediction of delayed graft function in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

The role of hypothermic machine perfusion in selecting renal grafts with advanced histological score

BACKGROUND

Few studies explored the role of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion (HMP) in the sub-group of non-standard renal grafts with a biopsy-proven advanced histological impairment. This study aimed to investigate the role of HMP in grafts with a Karpinski Score>3 in terms of the need for dialysis, creatinine reduction ratio at day-7 (CRR7), and 3-year graft survival.

METHODS

Twenty-three perfused grafts with Karpinski Score>3 evaluated between November 2017 and December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with a control group of 32 non-perfused grafts transplanted between January 2014 and October 2017.

RESULTS

After transplantation, perfused grafts had fewer cases requiring dialysis (8.7 vs. 34.4%; P=0.051), a better reduction in serum creatinine (median at 7 days: 2.2 vs. 4.3 mg/dL; P=0.045), and shorter length of hospital stay (median 11 vs. 15 days; P=0.01). Three-year death-censored graft survival was better in the perfused cases (91.3% vs. 77.0%; P=0.16). In perfused grafts, initial renal resistance (RR) had the best predictive value for renal function recovery after the first week, as defined by CRR7≤70% (AUC=0.83; P=0.02). A cut-off value of 0.5 mmHg/mL/min showed a sensitivity of 82.4%, a specificity of 83.3% and diagnostic odds ratio=23.4. After dividing the entire population into a Low-RR (n=8) and a High-RR Group (n=15), more cases with CRR7≤70% were reported in the latter group (86.7 vs. 13.3%; P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

HMP yielded promising results in kidneys with Karpinski Score>3. Initial RR should be of interest in selecting non-standard organs for single kidney transplantation even in impaired histology.

Pretransplant endotrophin predicts delayed graft function after kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function after kidney transplantation is common and increases morbidity and health care costs. There is evidence that endotrophin, a specific fragment of pro-collagen type VI, promotes the inflammatory response in kidney diseases. We tested the hypothesis that pretransplant endotrophin in kidney transplant recipients may be associated with the risk of delayed graft function. Pretransplant plasma endotrophin was assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in three independent cohorts with 806 kidney transplant recipients. The primary outcome was delayed graft function, i.e., the necessity of at least one dialysis session within one-week posttransplant. In the discovery cohort median pretransplant plasma endotrophin was higher in 32 recipients (12%) who showed delayed graft function when compared to 225 recipients without delayed graft function (58.4 ng/mL [IQR 33.4-69.0]; N = 32; vs. 39.5 ng/mL [IQR 30.6-54.5]; N = 225; P = 0.009). Multivariable logistic regression, fully adjusted for confounders showed, that pretransplant plasma endotrophin as a continuous variable was independently associated with delayed graft function in both validation cohorts, odds ratio 2.09 [95% CI 1.30-3.36] and 2.06 [95% CI 1.43-2.97]. Pretransplant plasma endotrophin, a potentially modifiable factor, was independently associated with increased risk of delayed graft function and may be a new avenue for therapeutic interventions.

Deep Learning Algorithms for the Prediction of Posttransplant Renal Function in Deceased-Donor Kidney Recipients: A Preliminary Study Based on Pretransplant Biopsy

Background

Posttransplant renal function is critically important for kidney transplant recipients. Accurate prediction of graft function would greatly help in deciding acceptance or discard of allocated kidneys.

Methods

: Whole-slide images (WSIs) of H&E-stained donor kidney biopsies at × 200 magnification between January 2015 and December 2019 were collected. The clinical characteristics of each donor and corresponding recipient were retrieved. Graft function was indexed with a stable estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and reduced graft function (RGF). We used convolutional neural network (CNN)-based models, such as EfficientNet-B5, Inception-V3, and VGG19 for the prediction of these two outcomes.

Results

In total, 219 recipients with H&E-stained slides of the donor kidneys were included for analysis [biopsies from standard criteria donor (SCD)/expanded criteria donor (ECD) was 191/28]. The results showed distinct improvements in the prediction performance of the deep learning algorithm plus the clinical characteristics model. The EfficientNet-B5 plus clinical data model showed the lowest mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE). Compared with the clinical data model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the clinical data plus image model for eGFR classification increased from 0.69 to 0.83. In addition, the predictive performance for RGF increased from 0.66 to 0.80. Gradient-weighted class activation mappings (Grad-CAMs) showed that the models localized the areas of the tubules and interstitium near the glomeruli, which were discriminative features for RGF.

Conclusion

Our results preliminarily show that deep learning for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded H&E-stained WSIs improves graft function prediction accuracy for deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients.

Comparison between Tc-99 m DTPA and Tc-99 m MAG3 Renal Scintigraphy for Prediction of Early Adverse Outcome After Kidney Transplantation

Purpose

Renal scintigraphy (RS) with either technetium-99 m diethylene-triamine-pentaacetate (Tc-99 m DTPA) or technetium-99 m mercaptoacetyltriglycine (Tc-99 m MAG3) has both been used to evaluate early allograft function after kidney transplantation (KT). This study was done to compare the predictive performance of RS using these two radiopharmaceuticals for prediction of outcomes during first 3 months of KT.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients who received KT then underwent both Tc-99 m DTPA and Tc-99 m MAG3 RS, successively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the predictiveness of RS parameters on early clinical adverse outcomes of either (1) graft-related death, (2) need for graft resection, (3) delayed graft function requiring temporary dialysis, or (4) a serum creatinine level of ≥ 2.0 mg/dL at three months post-KT, as well as to predict biopsy-confirmed acute tubular necrosis and acute rejection.

Results

Of 187 patients included, 77 (41.2%) had at least one early adverse clinical outcome. Tc-99 m MAG3 RS was more predictive than Tc-99 m DTPA RS, in terms of AUC_ROC, in three parameters including time to peak (0.754 vs. 0.516, p-value 0.0001), 20-min to peak ratio (0.762 vs. 0.651, p-value 0.006), and 20-min to 3-min ratio (0.823 vs. 0.699, p-value 0.0005). Acute tubular necrosis was better predicted by Tc-99 m MAG3 RS while both were at best only modest in predicting acute rejection.

Conclusion

Three parameters which, when obtained from Tc-99 m MAG3 RS, had superior predictiveness compared with Tc-99 m DTPA RS, including time to peak, 20-min to peak ratio, and 20-min to 3-min ratio.

Plasma Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor Predicts Graft Function Following Kidney Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication after kidney transplantation (KT) with a poor clinical outcome. There are no accurate biomarkers for the early prediction of DGF. Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) release during surgery plays a key role in protecting the kidney, and may be a potential biomarker for predicting post-transplant renal allograft recovery.

Methods: Recipients who underwent KT between July 2020 and December 2020 were enrolled in the study. Plasma MIF levels were tested in recipients at different time points, and the correlation between plasma MIF and DGF in recipients was evaluated. This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000035596).

Results: Intraoperative MIF levels were different between immediate, slowed, and delayed graft function groups (7.26 vs. 6.49 and 5.59, P < 0.001). Plasma MIF was an independent protective factor of DGF (odds ratio = 0.447, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.264–0.754, P = 0.003). Combining plasma MIF level and donor terminal serum creatinine provided the best predictive power for DGF (0.872; 95%CI 0.795–0.949). Furthermore, plasma MIF was significantly associated with allograft function at 1-month post-transplant (R² = 0.42, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Intraoperative MIF, as an independent protective factor for DGF, has excellent diagnostic performance for predicting DGF and is worthy of further exploration.

Donor plasma mitochondrial DNA is associated with antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft recipients

We previously showed that donor plasma mitochondrial DNA (dmtDNA) levels were correlated with renal allograft function. The aim of the current study was to determine whether dmtDNA levels are associated with the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). This is a retrospective open cohort study comprised of 167 donors and 323 recipients enrolled from January 2015 to December 2017. We quantified the mtDNA level present in donor plasma using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The average plasma dmtDNA level in the acute rejection (AR) group was higher than that of the control group (0.156 versus 0.075, p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that dmtDNA levels were also significantly associated with AR (OR=1.588, 95% CI 1.337-4.561, p<0.001). When the dmtDNA level was >0.156, the probability of AR was 62.9%. The plasma dmtDNA level in the ABMR group was significantly higher than that of the T cell-mediated rejection group (0.185 versus 0.099, p=0.032). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of dmtDNA for prediction of ABMR was as high as 0.910 (95% CI 0.843-0.977). We demonstrated that plasma dmtDNA was an independent risk factor for ABMR, which is valuable in organ evaluation. dmtDNA level is a possible first predictive marker for ABMR.

Relative decrease in hemoglobin and outcomes in patients undergoing kidney transplantation surgery: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Recent surgical literature suggests that a relative decrease in hemoglobin (ΔHb) is predictive of adverse outcomes regardless of the absolute level. We aimed to examine the association between perioperative ΔHb and kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of transplant recipients, where ΔHb = [Hb0- Hb1Hb0]x 100 (Hb₀ = hemoglobin pre-KT and Hb₁ = lowest hemoglobin 24-h post-KT). The main outcome of interest was immediate graft function (IGF).

RESULTS

Of the 899 eligible patients, 38% experienced IGF, and ΔHb was associated with 36% lower odds of IGF. Also, ΔHb was associated with higher all-cause graft failure and longer length of stay but not death-censored graft failure or mortality. ΔHb ≥30% was the threshold beyond which the odds of IGF were significantly lower even if Hb₁ was ≥7 g/dL.

CONCLUSION

ΔHb is associated with inferior outcomes independent of Hb_1; whether it can be used to guide transfusion practices should be explored.

Injury Pathways That Lead to AKI in a Mouse Kidney Transplant Model

BACKGROUND

Prolonged cold ischemia (CI) is a risk factor for acute kidney injury after kidney transplantation. We endeavored to determine the pathways involved in the development of tubular cell injury and death before and after transplantation. We hypothesized that ex vivo cold storage before transplant would produce a different injury phenotype to that seen after engraftment in kidney transplants with or without CI.

METHODS

Four groups of mouse donor kidneys were studied: (1) nontransplanted control kidneys; (2) donor kidneys subjected to ex vivo cold ischemia (CI); (3) donor kidneys subjected to kidney transplant without CI (Txp); and (4) donor kidneys subjected to CI followed by transplantation (CI+Txp).

RESULTS

Acute kidney injury only occurred in the CI+Txp group, which had significantly increased sCr versus the Txp group and the control mice. Histologically, the CI group demonstrated significantly increased tubular cell apoptosis and caspase-9 expression, whereas the Txp group demonstrated only mild brush border injury without apoptosis or necrosis. In contrast, the CI+Txp group had tubular cell apoptosis associated with expression of caspase-8, TNFR1, and increased serum TNF-α. CI+Txp also led to significantly higher ATN scores in association with increased RIP1, RIP3, pMLKL, and TLR4 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest distinct therapies are needed at different times during organ preservation and transplantation. Prevention of apoptosis during cold storage is best achieved by inhibiting intrinsic pathways. In contrast, prevention of cell death and innate immunity after CI+Txp requires inhibition of both the extrinsic death receptor pathway via TNFR1 and caspase-8 and inhibition of programmed necrosis via TLR4 and TNFR1.

Early Graft Function in Deceased Donor Renal Recipients: Role of N-Acetylcysteine

Reduced graft function (RGF) in donor renal transplant recipients is caused by oxidative damage due to extensive ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury during transplantation. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a promising biomarker to detect tubular injury early after renal transplantation. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a potent antioxidant that can reduce I/R injury by improving oxidative damage. The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy of NAC in improving graft function and reducing renal tubular injury in deceased donor renal transplant recipients. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted on 50 deceased donor renal transplant recipients. The patients were randomized into two groups, receiving either 600 mg NAC twice daily, or placebo (days 0 to 5). Results were assessed based on the rate of RGF, levels of plasma NGAL (p-NGAL) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The rate of RGF was significantly lower in the patients receiving NAC vs. placebo (21.4% vs. 50%). The measurement of p-NGAL levels showed that the patients in the NAC group had significantly greater reduction of p-NGAL by both days 1 and 5 post-transplantation than those in the placebo group. A near steady-state eGFR level was reached by week 1 in the NAC group, however, the improvement of eGFR was significantly slower in the placebo group and a near steady-state was only achieved by week 4. NAC has promising potential in reducing tubular injury and improving graft function, evidenced by significant reduction in the rate of RGF and levels of p-NGAL.

Peri-transplant aminophylline in pediatric kidney transplant recipients of donation after brain death: a double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

During kidney transplantation, the transplanted kidney undergoes ischemia reperfusion injury, with adenosine being a major mediator. This study aimed to assess whether aminophylline, an adenosine receptor antagonist, improves early graft function and reduces incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and slow graft function (SGF).

METHODS

Single center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. Pediatric patients admitted for renal transplantation from donation after brain death donors were randomized into a treatment arm receiving aminophylline and a placebo arm receiving normal saline infusions. Primary outcome was estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 5 days post-transplant. Secondary outcomes were rates of DGF/SGF and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) levels.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were randomized to aminophylline and 27 to placebo. There was no difference in day 5 eGFR, rate of DGF/SGF, or urine NGAL/Creatinine level between aminophylline vs. placebo arm (eGFR 67.39 ± 38.9 ml/min/1.73m² vs. 80.48 ± 52.1 ml/min/1.73m²p = 0.32; DGF/SGF 5/23 (21.7%) vs. 3/27 (11.1%) p = 0.31; urine NGAL/creatinine 300.5 ng/mg IQR 105.5-1464.5 ng/mg vs. 425.4 ng/mg IQR 140.3-1126.2 ng/mg, p = 0.95; respectively). At 12 months, there was 100% patient survival and 98% graft survival. eGFR at 12 months was similar between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no benefit in peri-transplant aminophylline administration. Our results are limited by small sample size, since sample calculations were based on primary outcome of day 5 eGFR and low rate of DGF/SGF, which may have precluded us from demonstrating efficacy. Further clinical studies are necessary to determine any benefit of aminophylline in kidney transplant recipients, particularly from high-risk donors.

Donor Plasma Mitochondrial DNA Is Correlated with Posttransplant Renal Allograft Function

BACKGROUND

The lack of accurate biomarkers makes it difficult to determine whether organs are suitable for transplantation. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) correlates with tissue damage and kidney disease, making it a potential biomarker in organ evaluation.

METHODS

Donors who had experienced cardiac death and successfully donated their kidneys between January 2015 and May 2017 were included this study. We detected the level of mtDNA in the plasma of the donor using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and then statistically analyzed the relationship between the level of mtDNA and the delayed graft function (DGF) of the recipient.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGF or slowed graft function (SGF) increased by 4 times (68% versus 16%, P < 0.001) when the donor mtDNA (dmtDNA) level was >0.114. When dmtDNA levels were >0.243, DGF and primary nonfunction were approximately 100% and 44%, respectively. Moreover, dmtDNA was an independent risk factor for slowed graft function and DGF. A prediction model for DGF based on dmtDNA achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for a prediction score as high as 0.930 (95% confidence interval 0.856-1.000), and the validation cohort results showed that the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 100% and 78%, respectively. dmtDNA levels were correlated with 6-month allograft function (R=0.332, P < 0.001) and 1-year graft survival (79% versus 99%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclusively demonstrated that plasma dmtDNA was an independent risk factor for DGF, which is valuable in organ evaluation. dmtDNA is a possible first predictive marker for primary nonfunction and worth further evaluation.

Relevance of KDPI value and acute rejection on kidney transplant outcomes in recipients with delayed graft function - a retrospective study

Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with poorer graft survival and higher rate of acute rejection (AR). It is unknown whether this negative influence relies on the increased risk of AR or the DGF itself. The different Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) values may also play a role in this interaction. Retrospective study aimed to evaluate the impact of DGF on graft function and graft survival in a subset of KT recipients (2004-2017). We also analyzed the relationship between KDPI and DGF. The study includes 601 KT, 226 of them (37%) developed DGF. Graft survival was lower in patients with DGF compared with non-DGF patients. Multivariable analysis revealed DGF as risk factor for graft loss, independently of the presence or not of acute rejection. Between DGF patients, we observed poorer graft survival in patients with higher KDPI value (>85%). We observed a trend of a greater impact of KDPI in patients with DGF, although this interaction was not statistically significant. Additionally, we observed poorer 12-month graft function in DGF patients. DGF is related to poorer graft survival independently of the developed acute rejection. This negative impact might be influenced by high KDPI values.

Early graft function and intrarenal resistant index after kidney transplantation using Biolasol-A new solid organ preservation fluid

Biolasol is a newly developed preserving solution for cold organ storage prior to transplantation. To date, only animal model experiments results are available. The aim of this single-center analysis was to summarize the clinical experience concerning the early post-transplant course of kidney grafts preserved with Biolasol in comparison with other preservation solutions. Before transplantation, 173 kidney grafts were preserved using Biolasol and 240 organs with other solutions (University of Wisconsin-UW, Institute Georges Lopez-IGL-1, or StoreProtect Plus solutions). Early graft function was defined based on serum creatinine concentration at day 3 (<3 mg/dL-immediate graft function, IGF or >3 mg/dL-slow graft function, SGF) or the need of dialysis therapy during first post-operative week (delayed graft function, DGF). The analysis included intrarenal resistive indices measured by Doppler sonography early after transplantation and before discharge from the hospital. IGF was more frequent in patients with organs preserved with IGL-1 (33.5%) and StoreProtect Plus (38.8%) than Biolasol (18.5%), whereas there was no difference in the occurrence of DGF. Both initial and discharge median resistance index values were significantly higher in the Biolasol subgroup (0.77 and 0.75) than in all three other subgroups (P values for all comparisons <.001), also after 1:1 propensity score matching for baseline characteristics. Multiple logistic regression analysis based on the propensity score-matched cohort revealed that the use of Biolasol solution [OR 0.59 (0.35-0.98); P < .05] independently decreased the occurrence of IGF. In our single-center clinical experience, kidney preservation using Biolasol solution was associated with significantly higher intrarenal resistant index in comparison with other preservation fluids, as well as worse early graft function than in the IGL-1 and the StoreProtect Plus subgroups. Long-term follow-up is needed in order to assess the kidney graft and patient survival.

Peritoneal dialysis catheter removal at the time of renal transplantation: Choosing the optimal candidate

INTRODUCTION

Concurrent peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter removal during renal transplantation is controversial, with limited evidence supporting this practice. Our objective was to determine the rate of delayed graft function (DGF) in patients on preoperative PD. Additionally, we sought to identify which patients can safely have their PD catheter removed during transplantation due to a low risk of DGF.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study between June 2011 and December 2015. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of DGF, defined as the need for dialysis within the first week of transplantation. Clinical and transplant factors, including graft type and donor criteria, were assessed for association with the primary outcome. Catheter-related complication rates were also compared between post-transplant PD and hemodialysis (HD).

RESULTS

Of our cohort of 567 patients, 145 patients (25.6%) developed DGF. Obesity (odds ratio [OR] 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.11; p=0.04) and increased perioperative blood loss (OR 1.002; 95% CI 1.000-1.003; p=0.03) were predictors of DGF. Protective factors included living donor (LD) grafts (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.05-0.49; p=0.002) and intraoperative graft urine production (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.23-0.65; p<0.001). In our PD cohort, only LD grafts demonstrated lower DGF rates (0 LD vs. 20.8% deceased donor; p=0.003). In terms of post-transplant renal replacement therapy, patients on PD and HD had similar duration of temporary dialysis (one day PD vs. two days HD; p=0.48) and catheter-related complication rates (4.5% PD vs. 2.6% HD; p=0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients, such as those receiving LD grafts, may benefit from concurrent PD catheter removal.

Systematic Surgical Assessment of Deceased-Donor Kidneys as a Predictor of Short-Term Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Short-term kidney graft dysfunction is correlated with complications and it is associated with a decreased long-term survival; therefore, a scoring system to predict short-term renal transplant outcomes is warranted.

AIM

The aim of this study is to quantify the impression of the organ procurement surgeon in correlation with the following kidney transplant outcomes: immediate graft function (IGF), delayed graft function (DGF), and primary nonfunction (PNF). Results are compared to factors associated with the 1-year outcome.

METHODS

A regional prospective pilot study was performed using deceased-donor organ assessment forms to be filled out by procurement surgeons after procurement. Data were gathered on kidney temperature, perfusion, anatomy, atherosclerosis, and overall quality.

RESULTS

Included were 90 donors who donated 178 kidneys, 166 of which were transplanted. Variables that were significantly more prevalent in the DGF-or-PNF group (n = 65) are: large kidney size (length, p = 0.008; width, p = 0.036), poor perfusion quality (p = 0.037), lower diuresis (p = 0.039), fewer hypotensive episodes (p = 0.003), and donation-after-circulatory-death donors (p = 0.017). Multivariable analysis showed that perfusion quality and kidney width significantly predicted the short-term outcome. However multivariable analysis of long-term outcomes showed that the first measured donor creatinine, kidney donor risk index, IGF vs. DGF+PNG, and kidney length predicted outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show that short-term graft function and 1-year graft function indeed are influenced by different variables. DGF and PNF occur more frequently in kidneys with poor perfusion and in larger kidneys. A plausible explanation for this is that these kidneys might be insufficiently washed out, or even congested, which may predispose to DGF. These kidneys would probably benefit most from reconditioning strategies, such as machine perfusion. A scoring system including these variables might aid in decision-making towards allocation and potential reconditioning strategies.

Predicting urine output after kidney transplantation: development and internal validation of a nomogram for clinical use

Purpose:

To analyze pre-transplantation and early postoperative factors affecting post-transplantation urine output and develop a predictive nomogram.

Patients and Methods:

Retrospective analysis of non-preemptive first transplanted adult patients between 2001-2016. The outcomes were hourly diuresis in mL/Kg in the 1^st (UO₁) and 8^th (UO₈) postoperative days (POD). Predictors for both UO₁ and UO₈ were cold ischemia time (CIT), patient and donor age and sex, HLA I and II compatibility, pre-transplantation duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT), cause of ESRD (ESRD) and immunosuppressive regimen. UO₈ predictors also included UO₁, 1^st/0^th POD plasma creatinine concentration ratio (Cr_1/0), and occurrence of acute cellular rejection (AR). Multivariable linear regression was employed to produce nomograms for UO₁ and UO₈.

Results:

Four hundred and seventy-three patients were included, mostly deceased donor kidneys’ recipients (361, 70.4%). CIT inversely correlated with UO₁ and UO₈ (Spearman's p=-0.43 and −0.37). CR_1/0 inversely correlated with UO₈ (p=-0.47). On multivariable analysis UO₁ was mainly influenced by CIT, with additional influences of donor age and sex, HLA II matching and ESRD. UO₁ was the strongest predictor of UO₈, with significant influences of AR and ESRD.

Conclusions:

The predominant influence of CIT on UO₁ rapidly wanes and is replaced by indicators of functional recovery (mainly UO₁) and allograft's immunologic acceptance (AR absence). Mean absolute errors for nomograms were 0.08 mL/Kg h (UO₁) and 0.05 mL/Kg h (UO₈).

Factors predicting kidney delayed graft function among recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Kidney delayed graft function (kDGF) remains a challenging problem following simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) with a reported incidence up to 40%. Given the scarcity of renal allografts, it is crucial to minimize the development of kDGF among SLKT recipients to improve patient and graft outcomes. We sought to assess the role of preoperative recipient and donor/graft factors on developing kDGF among recipients of SLKT.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 194 patients who received SLKT in the period from January 2004 to March 2017 in a single center was performed to assess the effect of preoperative factors on the development of kDGF.

RESULTS

Kidney delayed graft function was observed in 95 patients (49%). Multivariate analysis revealed that donor history of hypertension, cold static preservation of kidney grafts [versus using hypothermic pulsatile machine perfusion (HPMP)], donor final creatinine, physiologic MELD, and duration of delay of kidney transplantation after liver transplantation were significant independent predictors for kDGF. kDGF is associated with worse graft function and patient and graft survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Kidney delayed graft function has detrimental effects on graft function and graft survival. Understanding the risks and combining careful perioperative patient management, proper recipient selection and donor matching, and graft preservation using HPMP would decrease kDGF among SLKT recipients.

Success of kidney transplantations from deceased donors with acute kidney injury

Background

The acceptance of organs from deceased donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) varies considerably, with uncertain outcomes. The current organ shortage has led to increased use of marginal donor organs.

Material/Methods

This retrospective, single-center study included 642 patients who underwent kidney allograft transplantation between 2005 and 2016. The recipients were categorized into 3 groups: AKI-1 (n=214), comprising donors with a peak serum creatinine (SCr) level of 1.1–2.0 mg/dl; AKI-2 (n=89), comprising donors with a peak SCr level >2 mg/dl; and non-AKI (n=339), comprising donors with normal kidney function (SCr <1.1 mg/dl).

Results

The cumulative survival rates for patients and grafts did not significantly differ among the AKI-1, AKI-2, and non-AKI groups at the 1-year (91.6%/79.4%, 92.1%/83.1%, 95.3%/88.5%, respectively) and 5-year assessments (79.4%/67.8%, 86.8%/71.7%, 80.5%/71.1%, respectively). These findings were corroborated by mean SCr values and estimated glomerular filtration rates at the 1-year (2.08±1.7/51.16±23.45, 2.01±1.52/56.46±23.63, 1.81±1.13/ 55.44±23.26 mg/dl, respectively) and 5-year assessments (1.91±1.28/51.06±24.65, 1.74±0.66/57.44±31.21, 1.7±0.88/ 58.56±26.04 mg/dl, respectively). The incidence of delayed graft function in each group was 29.9%, 44.9%, and 28.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Kidney transplantation from donors with AKI, although associated with a higher rate of delayed graft function, results in good long-term transplant survival and reliable kidney functionality after 5 years. The inclusion of donors with AKI may widely extend the pool of available organs; however, careful donor selection is necessary.

A phase I/II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing safety and efficacy of C1 esterase inhibitor for prevention of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplant recipients

Delayed graft function (DGF) is defined as need for dialysis early posttransplant. DGF is related to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) that diminishes allograft function and may be complement dependent. Here, we investigate the ability of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH) to prevent IRI/DGF in kidney transplant recipients. Seventy patients receiving deceased donor kidney transplants at risk for DGF were randomized to receive C1INH 50 U/kg (#35) or placebo (#35) intraoperatively and at 24 hours. The primary end point was need for hemodialysis during the first week posttransplant. Assessments of glomerular filtration rate and dialysis dependence were accomplished. Complications and safety of therapy were recorded. Similar characteristics with no significant differences in cold-ischemia time or risk factors for DGF were seen. C1INH did not result in reduction of dialysis sessions at 1 week posttransplant, but significantly fewer dialysis sessions (P = .0232) were required 2 to 4 weeks posttransplant. Patients at highest risk for DGF (Kidney Donor Profile Index ≥85) benefited most from C1INH therapy. Significantly better renal function was seen at 1 year in C1INH patients (P = .006). No significant adverse events were noted with C1INH. Although the primary end point was not met, significant reductions in need for dialysis and improvements in long-term allograft function were seen with C1INH treatment.

Comparison of Recipient Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation: In-House Versus Imported Deceased Donors

BACKGROUND

Increased cold ischemia time in cadaveric kidney transplants has been associated with a high rate of delayed graft function (DGF), and even with graft survival. Kidney transplantation using in-house donors reduces cold preservation time. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes after transplantation in house and externally.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of donors and recipients of 135 deceased-donor kidney transplantations performed in our center from March 2009 to March 2016.

RESULTS

Among the 135 deceased donors, 88 (65.2%) received the kidneys from in-house donors. Median cold ischemia time of transplantation from in-house donors was shorter than for imported donors (180.00 vs 300.00 min; P < .001). The risks of DGF and slow graft function were increased among the imported versus in-house donors. Imported kidney was independently associated with greater odds of DGF in multivariate regression analysis (odds ratio, 4.165; P = .038). However, the renal function of recipients at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years after transplantation was not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation with in-house donor kidneys was significantly associated with a decreased incidence of DGF, but long-term graft function and survival were similar compared with imported donor kidneys.

Can transplant renal scintigraphy predict the duration of delayed graft function? A dual center retrospective study

Introduction

This study focused on the value of quantitatively analyzed and qualitatively graded renal scintigraphy in relation to the expected duration of delayed graft function after kidney transplantation. A more reliable prediction of delayed graft function duration may result in a more tailored and patient-specific treatment regimen post-transplantation.

Methods

From 2000 to 2014, patients with early transplant dysfunction and a Tc-99m MAG3 renal scintigraphy, within 3 days post-transplantation, were included in a dual center retrospective study. Time-activity curves of renal scintigraphy procedures were qualitatively graded and various quantitative indices (R20/3, TFS, cTER, MUC10) were combined with a new index (Average upslope). The delayed graft function duration was defined as the number of days of dialysis-based/functional delayed graft function.

Results

A total of 377 patients were included, with a mean age (± SD) of 52 ± 14 years, and 58% were male. A total of 274 (73%) patients experienced delayed graft function≥ 7 days. Qualitative grading for the prediction of delayed graft function≥ 7 days had a sensitivity and specificity of respectively 87% and 65%. The quantitative indices with the most optimal results were cTER (76% sensitivity, 72% specificity), and Average upslope (75% sensitivity, 73% specificity).

Conclusions

Qualitative renal scintigraphy grading and the quantitative indices cTER and Average upslope predict delayed graft function ≥ 7 days with a high sensitivity. This finding may help to support both clinicians and patients in managing early post-operative expectations. However, the specificity is limited and thus renal scintigraphy does not reliably help to identify patients in whom the course of delayed graft function is longer than anticipated.

The recovery status from delayed graft function can predict long-term outcome after deceased donor kidney transplantation

The effect of delayed graft function (DGF) recovery on long-term graft outcome is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the association of DGF recovery status with long-term outcome. We analyzed 385 recipients who underwent single kidney transplantation from brain-dead donors between 2004 and 2015. Patients were grouped according to renal function at 1 month post-transplantation: control (without DGF); recovered DGF (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m²); and incompletely recovered DGF group (GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²). DGF occurred in 104 of 385 (27%) recipients. Of the DGF patients, 70 recovered from DGF and 34 incompletely recovered from DGF. Death-censored graft survival rates for control, recovered DGF, and incompletely recovered DGF groups were 95.3%, 94.7%, and 80.7%, respectively, at 5 years post-transplantation (P = 0.003). Incompletely recovered DGF was an independent risk factor for death-censored graft loss (HR = 3.410, 95%CI, 1.114-10.437). DGF was associated with increased risk for patient death regardless of DGF recovery status. Mean GFRs at 5 years were 65.5 ± 20.8, 62.2 ± 27.0, and 45.8 ± 15.4 mL/min/1.73 m² for control, recovered, and incompletely recovered DGF groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Control group and recovered DGF patients had similar renal outcomes. However, DGF was associated with increased risk for patient death regardless of DGF recovery status.

The prognostic value of the furosemide stress test in predicting delayed graft function following deceased donor kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

The Furosemide Stress Test (FST) is a novel dynamic assessment of tubular function that has been shown in preliminary studies to predict patients who will progress to advanced stage acute kidney injury, including those who receive renal replacement therapy (RRT). The aim of this study is to investigate if the urinary response to a single intraoperative dose of intravenous furosemide predicts delayed graft function (DGF) in patients undergoing deceased donor kidney transplant.

RESULTS

On an adjusted multiple logistic regression, a single 100 mg dose of intraoperative furosemide after the anastomosis of the renal vessels (FST) predicted the need for RRT at 2 and 6 h post kidney transplantation (KT). Recipient urinary output was measured at 2 and 6 h post furosemide administration. In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the FST predicted DGF with an area-under-the curve of 0.85 at an optimal urinary output cut-off of <600 mls at 6 h with a sensitivity of and a specificity of 83% and 74%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The FST is a predictor of DGF post kidney transplant and has the potential to identify patients requiring RRT early after KT.

Delayed Graft Function Phenotypes and 12-Month Kidney Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) leading to delayed graft function (DGF), defined by the United Network for Organ Sharing as dialysis in the first week (UNOS-DGF), associates with poor kidney transplant outcomes. Controversies remain, however, about dialysis initiation thresholds and the utility for other criteria to denote less severe IRI, or slow graft function (SGF).

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective study of deceased-donor kidney recipients to compare UNOS-DGF to a definition that combines impaired creatinine reduction in the first 48 hours or greater than 1 dialysis session for predicting 12-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We also assessed 10 creatinine and urine output-based SGF definitions relative to 12-month eGFR.

RESULTS

In 560 recipients, 215 (38%) had UNOS-DGF, 330 (59%) met the combined definition, 14 (3%) died, and 23 (4%) had death-censored graft failure by 12 months. Both DGF definitions were associated with lower adjusted 12-month eGFR (95% confidence interval)-by 7.3 (3.6-10.9) and 7.4 (3.8-11.0) mL/min per 1.73 m, respectively. Adjusted relative risks for 12-month eGFR less than 30 mL/min per 1.73 m were 1.9 (1.2-3.1) and 2.1 (1.1-3.7), with unadjusted areas under the curve of 0.618 and 0.627, respectively. For SGF definitions, postoperative day (POD) 7 creatinine had the strongest association with 12-month eGFR, and POD5 creatinine and creatinine reduction between POD1 and POD2 demonstrated modest separations in 12-month eGFR.

CONCLUSIONS

Although UNOS-DGF does not adequately predict 12-month function on its own, our findings do not support changing the definition. Postoperative day 7 creatinine is correlated with 12-month eGFR, but large translational studies are needed to understand the biological link between IRI severity at transplant and longer-term outcomes.

Association Between Slow and Delayed Graft Function With Graft Outcomes in Pediatric and Adolescent Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) is associated with an increased risk of graft loss in adult kidney transplant recipients but the association remains inconsistent in pediatric recipients. The aim of this study is to examine the association between DGF and graft loss in pediatric and adolescent deceased donor kidney transplant recipients aged 21 years or younger using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry.

METHODS

The associations between DGF status, overall and death-censored graft loss (DCGL) were examined using adjusted Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

There were 367 recipients followed up for a median of 9.7 years between 1990 and 2012, with 82 (22%) experiencing DGF requiring dialysis (DGF-D) in the first 72 hours after transplant. Compared with recipients who did not experienced DGF-D, the adjusted hazard ratios for overall graft loss and DCGL in recipients who have experienced DGF-D was 2.08 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.39-3.11; P < 0.001) and 2.09 (95% CI, 1.38-3.17; P < 0.001), respectively, independent of era, age, and initial immunosuppression. Slow graft function, defined as no immediate function but not requiring dialysis, was associated with adjusted hazard ratios of 2.60 (95% CI, 1.50-4.51; P = 0.001) for overall graft loss and 2.49 (95% CI, 1.39-4.47; P = 0.002) for DCGL.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that DGF, encompassing a spectrum of renal dysfunction after kidney transplantation including those who may or may not require dialysis, is an independent risk factor for long-term graft loss.

Use of a Targeted Urine Proteome Assay (TUPA) to identify protein biomarkers of delayed recovery after kidney transplant

PURPOSE

Development of delayed graft function (DGF) following kidney transplant is associated with poor outcomes. An ability to rapidly identify patients with DGF versus those with immediate graft function (IGF) may facilitate the treatment of DGF and the research needed to improve prognosis. The purpose of this study was to use a Targeted Urine Proteome Assay to identify protein biomarkers of delayed recovery from kidney transplant.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Potential biomarkers were identified using the Targeted Urine Proteome (MRM) Assay to interrogate the relative DGF/IGF levels of expression of 167 proteins in urine taken 12-18 h after kidney implantation from 21 DGF, 15 SGF (slow graft function), and 16 IGF patients. An iterative Random Forest analysis approach evaluated the relative importance of each biomarker, which was then used to identify an optimum biomarker panel that provided the maximum sensitivity and specificity with the least number of biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Four proteins were identified that together distinguished DGF with a sensitivity of 77.4%, specificity of 82.6%, and AUC of 0.891. This panel represents an important step toward identifying DGF at an early stage so that more effective treatments can be developed to improve long-term graft outcomes.

Pretransplant Recipient Circulating CD4+CD127lo/- Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor 2+ Regulatory T Cells: A Surrogate of Regulatory T Cell-Suppressive Function and Predictor of Delayed and Slow Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Delayed graft function (DGF) and slow graft function (SGF) are ischemia-reperfusion-associated acute kidney injuries (AKI) that decrease long-term graft survival after kidney transplantation. Regulatory T (Treg) cells are protective in murine AKI, and their suppressive function predictive of AKI in kidney transplantation. The conventional Treg cell function coculture assay is however time-consuming and labor intensive. We sought a simpler alternative to measure Treg cell function and predict AKI.

METHODS

In this prospective observational cohort study, pretransplant recipient circulating CD4+CD25+CD127lo/- and CD4+CD127lo/- tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2)+ Treg cells were measured by flow cytometry in 76 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients (DGF, n = 18; SGF, n = 34; immediate graft function [IGF], n = 24). In a subset of 37 recipients, pretransplant circulating Treg cell-suppressive function was also quantified by measuring the suppression of autologous effector T-cell proliferation by Treg cell in coculture.

RESULTS

The TNFR2+ expression on CD4+CD127lo/- T cells correlated with Treg cell-suppressive function (r = 0.63, P < 0.01). In receiver operating characteristic curves, percentage and absolute number of CD4+CD127lo/-TNFR2+ Treg cell predicted DGF from non-DGF (IGF + SGF) with area under the curves of 0.75 and 0.77, respectively, and also AKI (DGF + SGF) from IGF with area under the curves of 0.76 and 0.72, respectively (P < 0.01). Prediction of AKI (DGF + SGF) from IGF remained significant in multivariate logistic regression accounting for cold ischemic time, donor age, previous transplant, and pretransplant dialysis modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant recipient circulating CD4+CD127lo/-TNFR2+ Treg cell is potentially a simpler alternative to Treg cell function as a pretransplant recipient immune marker for AKI (DGF + SGF), independent from donor and organ procurement characteristics.

Pre-transplant Evaluation of Donor Urinary Biomarkers can Predict Reduced Graft Function After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Several recipient biomarkers are reported to predict graft dysfunction, but these are not useful in decision making for the acceptance or allocation of deceased donor kidneys; thus, it is necessary to develop donor biomarkers predictive of graft dysfunction. To address this issue, we prospectively enrolled 94 deceased donors and their 109 recipients who underwent transplantation between 2010 and 2013 at 4 Korean transplantation centers. We investigated the predictive values of donor urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and L-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) for reduced graft function (RGF). We also developed a prediction model of RGF using these donor biomarkers. RGF was defined as delayed or slow graft function. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to generate a prediction model, which was internally validated using a bootstrapping method. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the association of biomarkers with 1-year graft function. Notably, donor urinary NGAL levels were associated with donor AKI (P = 0.014), and donor urinary NGAL and L-FABP were predictive for RGF, with area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of 0.758 and 0.704 for NGAL and L-FABP, respectively. The best-fit model including donor urinary NGAL, L-FABP, and serum creatinine conveyed a better predictive value for RGF than donor serum creatinine alone (P = 0.02). In addition, we generated a scoring method to predict RGF based on donor urinary NGAL, L-FABP, and serum creatinine levels. Diagnostic performance of the RGF prediction score (AUROC 0.808) was significantly better than that of the DGF calculator (AUROC 0.627) and the kidney donor profile index (AUROC 0.606). Donor urinary L-FABP levels were also predictive of 1-year graft function (P = 0.005). Collectively, these findings suggest donor urinary NGAL and L-FABP to be useful biomarkers for RGF, and support the use of a new scoring system based on donor biomarkers to facilitate decision-making in acceptance and allocation of deceased donor kidneys and contribute to maximal organ utilization.

Prolonged Delayed Graft Function Is Associated with Inferior Patient and Kidney Allograft Survivals

It is unclear if there is an association between the duration of delayed graft function (DGF) and kidney transplant (KT) outcomes. This study investigated the impact of prolonged DGF on patient and graft survivals, and renal function one year after KT. This single center retrospective analysis included all deceased donor KT performed between Jan/1998 and Dec/2008 (n = 1412). Patients were grouped in quartiles according to duration of DGF (1-5, 6-10, 11-15, and >15 days, designated as prolonged DGF). The overall incidence of DGF was 54.2%. Prolonged DGF was associated with retransplantation (OR 2.110, CI95% 1.064-4.184,p = 0.033) and more than 3 HLA mismatches (OR 1.819, CI95% 1.117-2.962,p = 0.016). The incidence of acute rejection was higher in patients with DGF compared with those without DGF (36.2% vs. 12.2%, p<0.001). Compared to patients without DGF, DGF(1-5), DGF(6-10), and DGF(11-15), patients with prolonged DGF showed inferior one year patient survival (95.2% vs. 95.4% vs. 95.5% vs. 93.4% vs. 88.86%, p = 0.003), graft survival (91% vs. 91.4% vs. 92% vs. 88.7% vs. 70.5%, p<0.001), death-censored graft survival (95.7% vs. 95.4% vs. 96.4% vs. 94% vs. 79.3%, p<0.001), and creatinine clearance (58.0±24.6 vs. 55.8±22.2 vs. 53.8±24.1 vs. 53.0±27.2 vs. 36.8±27.0 mL/min, p<0.001), respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that prolonged DGF was an independent risk factor for graft loss (OR 3.876, CI95% 2.270-6.618, p<0.001), death censored graft loss (OR 4.103, CI95% 2.055-8.193, p<0.001), and death (OR 3.065, CI95% 1.536-6.117, p = 0.001). Prolonged DGF, determined by retransplantation and higher HLA mismatches, was associated with inferior renal function, and patient and graft survivals at one year.

Center-level variation in the development of delayed graft function after deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Patient-level risk factors for delayed graft function (DGF) have been well described. However, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network definition of DGF is based on dialysis in the first week, which is subject to center-level practice patterns. It remains unclear if there are center-level differences in DGF and if measurable center characteristics can explain these differences.

METHODS

Using the 2003 to 2012 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we developed a hierarchical (multilevel) model to determine the association between center characteristics and DGF incidence after adjusting for known patient risk factors and to quantify residual variability across centers after adjustment for these factors.

RESULTS

Of 82,143 deceased donor kidney transplant recipients, 27.0% developed DGF, with a range across centers of 3.2% to 63.3%. A center's proportion of preemptive transplants (odds ratio [OR], 0.83; per 5% increment; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.74-;0.93; P = 0.001) and kidneys with longer than 30 hr of cold ischemia time (CIT) (OR, 0.95; per 5% increment; 95% CI, 0.92-;0.98; P = 0.001) were associated with less DGF. A center's proportion of donation after cardiac death donors (OR, 1.12; per 5% increment; 95% CI, 1.03-;1.17; P < 0.001) and imported kidneys (OR, 1.06; per 5% increment; 95% CI, 1.03-;1.10; P < 0.001) were associated with more DGF. After patient-level and center-level adjustments, only 41.8% of centers had DGF incidences consistent with the national median and 28.2% had incidences above the national median.

CONCLUSION

Significant heterogeneity in DGF incidences across centers, even after adjusting for patient-level and center-level characteristics, calls into question the generalizability and validity of the current DGF definition. Enhanced understanding of center-level variability and improving the definition of DGF accordingly may improve DGF's utility in clinical care and as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.

Clusterin in kidney transplantation: novel biomarkers versus serum creatinine for early prediction of delayed graft function

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Current methods for rapid detection of delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation are unreliable. Urinary clusterin is a biomarker of kidney injury but its utility for prediction of graft dysfunction is unknown.

METHODS

In a single-center, prospective cohort study of renal transplant recipients (N=81), urinary clusterin was measured serially between 4 hr and 7 days after transplantation. The utility of clusterin for prediction of DGF (hemodialysis within 7 days of transplantation) was compared with urinary interleukin (IL)-18, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1, serum creatinine, and clinical variables.

RESULTS

At 4 hr after reperfusion, anuria was highly specific, but of low sensitivity for detection of DGF. At 4 hr, receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested that urinary clusterin, IL-18, kidney injury molecule-1, and NGAL concentration were predictive of DGF. After adjusting for preoperative clinical variables and anuria, clusterin and IL-18 independently enhanced the clinical model for prediction of DGF. Kidney injury molecule-1 only modestly improved the prediction of DGF, whereas NGAL, serum creatinine, and the creatinine reduction ratio did not improve on the clinical model. At 12 hr, the creatinine reduction ratio independently predicted DGF.

CONCLUSION

Both urinary clusterin and IL-18 are useful biomarkers and may allow triaging of patients with DGF within 4 hr of transplantation. Relative performance of biomarkers for prediction of graft function is time-dependant. Early and frequent measurements of serum creatinine and calculation of the creatinine reduction ratio also predict DGF within 12 hr of reperfusion.

rhErythropoietin-b as a tissue protective agent in kidney transplantation: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Extended criteria donor (ECD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD) kidneys are at increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF). Experimental evidence suggests that erythropoietin (EPO) attenuates renal damage in acute kidney injury. This study piloted the administration of high dose recombinant human EPO-beta at implantation of ECD and DCD kidneys, and evaluated biomarkers of kidney injury post-transplant.

METHODS

Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive either rhEPO-b (100,000 iu) (n = 19 in the intervention group, as 1 patient was un-transplantable post randomisation), or placebo (n = 20) in this, double blind, placebo-controlled trial at Manchester Royal Infirmary from August 2007 to June 2009. Participants received either an ECD (n = 17) or DCD (n = 22) kidney. Adverse events, renal function, haematopoietic markers, and rejections were recorded out to 90 days post-transplant. Biomarkers of kidney injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, Kidney Injury Molecule-1 and IL-18) were measured in blood and urine during the first post-operative week.

RESULTS

The incidence of DGF (53% vs 55%) (RR = 1.0; CI = 0.5-1.6; p = 0.93) and slow graft function (SGF) (32% vs 25%) (RR = 1.1; CI = 0.5-1.9; p = 0.73) respectively, serum creatinine, eGFR, haemoglobin and haematocrit, blood pressure, and acute rejection were similar in the 2 study arms. High dose rhEPO-b had little effect on the temporal profiles of the biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose rhEPO-b appears to be safe and well tolerated in the early post- transplant period in this study, but has little effect on delayed or slow graft function in recipients of kidneys from DCD and ECD donors. Comparing the profiles of biomarkers of kidney injury (NGAL, IL-18 and KIM-1) showed little difference between the rhEPO-b treated and placebo groups. A meta-analysis of five trials yielded an overall estimate of the RR for DGF of 0.89 (CI = 0.73; 1.07), a modest effect favouring EPO but not a significant difference. A definitive trial based on this estimate would require 1000-2500 patients per arm for populations with base DGF rates of 50-30% and 90% power. Such a trial is clearly unfeasible.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT Number 2006-005373-22 ISRCTN ISRCTN85447324 registered 19/08/09.

Mannitol infusion within 15 min of cross-clamp improves living donor kidney preservation

Background

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed that cells lining proximal convoluted tubules of living donor kidneys (LDKs) procured by laparoscopic procedures were very swollen in response to the brief period of ischemia experienced between the time of arterial vessel clamping and flushing the excised kidney with cold preservation solution. Damage to the tubules as a result of this cell swelling resulted in varying degrees of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) that slowed the recovery of the donor kidneys during the first 2 weeks after their transplantation.

Methods

To prevent this cell damage during LDK procurement, we changed the protocol for intravenous administration of mannitol (i.e., 12.5 or 25 g) to the donor. Specifically, we reduced the time of mannitol administration from 30 to 15 min or less before clamping the renal artery.

Result

OCT revealed that this change in the timing of mannitol administration protected the human donor proximal tubules from normothermic-induced cell swelling. An evaluation of posttransplant recovery of renal function showed that patients treated with this modified protocol returned to normal renal function significantly faster than those treated with mannitol 30 min or more before clamping the renal artery.

Conclusion

Because slow graft recovery in the first weeks after transplantation represents a risk factor for long-term graft function and survival, we believe that this change in pretreatment protocol will improve renal transplants in patients receiving LDK.

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and recovery of kidney graft function after transplantation

Background

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a marker for acute kidney injury. We studied whether serum NGAL predicts delayed graft function (DGF) and recovery of kidney function after transplantation.

Methods

Serum NGAL was analyzed using commercial ELISA and point-of-care (POC) (Triage®, Biosite) methods. Serum samples were collected from 176 consecutive, deceased-donor kidney recipients just before transplant surgery and on day 1 and 14 after transplantation. The first 132 samples were analyzed with both methods and the remaining samples with the POC method.

Results

The correlation between the ELISA and POC methods was 0.89, p < 0.0001 and hence the POC method was used for the remaining analyses. DGF was seen in 66/176 patients. Day 1 sNGAL was significantly higher in DGF (588 ng/ml, SD 189.6) compared to early graft function (355 ng/ml, SD 166.2, p < 0.0001) and this difference persisted on day 14. Day 1 sNGAL predicted DGF with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.853 (CI 0.792-0.914, p < 0.0001). At the optimal cutoff level of 423 ng/ml the sensitivity was 87% and the specificity 77%. In a multivariate analysis, day 1 sNGAL emerged as an independent predictor of DGF. The sNGAL also predicted DGF lasting longer than 14 days with an AUC of 0.825 (CI 0.751-0.899, p < 0.0001). At the optimal cutoff level of 486 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 80% and specificity 75%.

Conclusion

Serum NGAL predicts clinically significant DGF and is useful in the care of kidney transplant recipients.

Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in patients with delayed graft function

Delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplantation affects adverse outcomes. It remains unclear whether the post-transplant dialysis modality alters perioperative or long-term graft outcomes. We performed a retrospective observational quality initiative at two Canadian renal transplant centers, in which DGF occurred in the recipient, necessitating one of peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD). There was no difference in baseline factors between patients with post-transplant PD (n = 14) or HD (n = 63). The use of PD was associated with an increased risk of wound infection/leakage (PD 5/14 vs. HD 6/63, p = 0.024), shorter length of hospitalization (13.7 vs. 18.7 d, p = 0.009) and time requiring dialysis post-operatively (6.5 vs 11.0 d, p = 0.043). There were no differences in readmission to hospital within 6 months (4/14 vs. 23/63, p = 0.759), graft loss (0/14 vs. 2/63, p = 1.000) or acute rejection episodes (1/14 vs. 4/63, p = 1.000) at one yr, and GFR did not differ between the PD or HD groups at 30 d (35.7 vs. 33.8 mL/min/m(2), p = 0.731), six months (46.9 vs. 45.5 mL/min/m(2), p = 0.835) or one yr (46.6 vs. 44.5 mL/min/m(2), p = 0.746). Further research is needed to determine which transplant patients are most appropriate to undergo PD catheter removal at the time of transplantation.

Cell injury after ischemia and reperfusion in the porcine kidney evaluated by radiolabelled microspheres, sestamibi, and lactadherin

Background

The purpose of the present study was to quantify renal cell injury after ischemia and reperfusion in a pig model using ^99mTc-lactadherin as a marker of apoptosis and ^99mTc-sestamibi as a marker of mitochondrial dysfunction.

Methods

Thirty-four pigs were randomized into unilateral renal warm ischemia of 120 (WI₁₂₀) or 240 min (WI₂₄₀). The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated by renal clearance of ⁵¹Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and apoptosis was quantified by immunohistochemical detection of caspase-3. After 240 min of reperfusion, intravenous ^99mTc-lactadherin or ^99mTc-sestamibi was injected simultaneously with ¹⁵³Gd microspheres into the aorta. Ex-vivo static planar images of the kidneys were acquired for determination of the differential renal function of tracer distribution using a gamma camera.

Results

In WI₁₂₀, there was no significant difference in the uptake of microspheres in the ischemic and contralateral normal kidney indicating adequate perfusion (uptake in ischemic kidney relative to the sum of uptake in both kidneys; 46% ± 12% and 51% ± 5%). In WI₂₄₀, the uptake of microspheres was severely reduced in both groups (17% ± 11% and 27% ± 17%). GFR was severely reduced in the post ischemic kidney in both groups.

In both groups, the uptake of lactadherin was reduced (41% ± 8%, 17% ± 13%) but not different from the uptake of ¹⁵³Gd microspheres. Caspase-3-positive cell profiles were increased in the post-ischemic kidneys (p < 0.001) and increased as the length of ischemia increased (p = 0.003). In both WI₁₂₀ and WI₂₄₀, the amount of ^99mTc-sestamibi in the ischemic kidney was significantly lower than the amount of ¹⁵³Gd microspheres (40 ± 5 versus 51 ± 5 and 20 ± 11 versus 27 ± 17; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

In an established pig model with unilateral renal warm ischemia, we found significantly reduced ^99mTc-sestamibi uptake relative to perfusion in the kidneys exposed to ischemia indicating a potential ability to detect renal ischemic and reperfusion injuries. However, apoptosis was not detected using ^99mTc-lactadherin in the post-ischemic kidneys despite increased number of caspase-3-positive cell profiles.

Trial registration

This study is approved by the Danish Inspectorate of Animal Experiments (2010/561-1837).