How did cyclophosphamide become the drug of choice for lupus nephritis?

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Remission Induction with Modified Multitarget Therapy with Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis

Introduction

Therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis (PLN) is yet to be optimized. Standard of care for induction consists of intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CYC) and steroids, which shows an improved outcome, but end-stage renal disease (ESRD) progression, increased mortality, and therapy-related adverse effects remain a major concern. The other treatment reported to induce early remission was the multitarget therapy comprising tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and steroid, but infections were high in the multitarget therapy. Considering azathioprine as a potentially safer and effective alternative anti-B-cell therapy, modified multitarget therapy (MMTT) was planned replacing mycophenolate with azathioprine.

Material and Methods

A single-center, 24-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial comprising adults of age 18-65 years with biopsy-proven PLN was carried out. The intervention groups were 1) MMTT: tacrolimus 0.075 mg/kg/day and azathioprine 2 mg/kg/day and 2) IV CYC group with a starting dose of 0.75 (adjusted to 0.5-1.0) g/m2 every 4 weeks for 6 months. Both groups received 3 days of pulse methylprednisolone followed by a tapering course of oral prednisone therapy.

Results

Among 100 randomized patients, 48 were in MMTT arm and 52 were in IV CYC arm. At the end of 24 weeks, overall remission (complete and partial) was comparable in both the arms: MMTT (86.36%) and IV CYC (87.75%). There was comparable proteinuria reduction and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) score improvement with recovery of complement level C3 in both groups. Major adverse events were numerically more in the IV CYC group, including one death from pneumonia.

Conclusion

The MMTT arm is as effective as IV CYC in improving short-term outcome in PLN, with a comparable safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab therapy for patients with lupus nephritis: A meta-analysis and a propensity score-matched case-control study

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we performed a meta-analysis and a propensity score-matched case-control study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with lupus nephritis (LN).

METHODS

We analyzed the data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the effects of belimumab treatment on renal improvement and adverse effects. Our study included a total of six LN patients who received belimumab treatment and an additional six LN patients who received standard therapy. All participants were followed up for a duration exceeding 96 weeks to evaluate the outcomes of the treatments.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis incorporated data from three articles involving a total of 666 patients. The results of the analysis revealed that a higher proportion of patients who received belimumab treatment experienced renal improvement compared to those in the control group. The patients in belimumab group had a higher renal complete response rate and proteinuria improvement rate compared to the control group. However, belimumab treatment did not increase the renal partial response rate compared to the control group. The belimumab group also exhibited a higher proportion of patients who achieved normalization of antidouble-stranded DNA, as well as normalization of low C3 and C4 levels. In our case-control study, significant improvement in proteinuria was demonstrated with belimumab at Week 48 (p = 0.037) and at all subsequent time points (all p < 0.05). Over the course of 96 weeks, belimumab treatment was associated with renal function stabilization and an increase in C3 and C4 levels. Moreover, the use of belimumab resulted in a reduction in glucocorticoid dosage at Week 24 (p = 0.02). Additionally, patients receiving belimumab treatment had a lower risk of severe treatment-emergent adverse events, and no other significant adverse effects were observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with LN, the utilization of belimumab therapy has demonstrated notable improvements in renal response rates. Additionally, it has shown a decreased likelihood of serious treatment-related adverse events and a diminished need for glucocorticoid dosage when compared to the active control group.

P2X7 Receptor Blockade Protects Against Acrolein-Induced Bladder Damage: A Potential New Therapeutic Approach for the Treatment of Bladder Inflammatory Diseases

Inflammatory conditions of the urinary bladder have been shown to be associated with urothelial damage and loss of function. The purinergic P2X7 receptor has been implicated in several inflammatory conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the P2X7 receptor in acrolein-induced inflammatory damage using the porcine urinary bladder. For this purpose, an ex-vivo model of porcine urothelial damage induced by direct instillation of acrolein into the whole bladder lumen was used. To determine the role of the P2X7 receptor, the bladders were pre-incubated with a selective P2X7 receptor antagonist, A804598 (10 μM), for 1 h. The effects of the acrolein-induced urothelial damage on the bladder’s function were assessed by examining the bladder wall contractile response, structure changes, apoptosis, and oxidative stress in the bladder tissues. The acrolein treatment led to significant damage to the urothelium histology, tight junction expression, and contractile responses. Acrolein also induced apoptosis in the mucosa layer. All these acrolein-induced responses were attenuated by pre-treatment with the P2X7 receptor antagonist A804598. Acrolein also significantly induced DNA oxidation in the submucosal layer; however, the P2X7 receptor antagonism did not show any protective effect towards the acrolein-induced oxidative stress. These findings suggested that the P2X7 receptor is involved in the acrolein-induced damage to the urothelium; therefore, the P2X7 receptor antagonists may be a new therapeutic option for the treatment of bladder inflammation.

Response to Intravenous Cyclophosphamide Treatment for Lupus Nephritis Associated with Polymorphisms in the FCGR2B-FCRLA Locus

Objective.

Cyclophosphamide (CYC) is an immunosuppressant drug widely used to treat various diseases including lupus nephritis, but its efficacy highly varies from individual to individual. This pharmacogenomics association study searched for genetic variations associated with CYC efficacy.

Methods.

Genome-wide association scan was performed for 109 Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with lupus nephritis (classes III–V) who received intravenous CYC induction therapy. Genetic differences between responders and nonresponders were examined using Cochran–Armitage trend tests, and genotype imputation was used for defining the association locus.

Results.

Genetic polymorphisms in the Fcγ receptor gene (FCGR) cluster at human chromosome 1q23, previously associated with lupus nephritis susceptibility, were associated with the response to CYC treatment for lupus nephritis. Significant response association was found for 3 perfectly correlated (r2 = 1) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP): rs6697139, rs10917686, and rs10917688, located between the FCGR2B and FCRLA genes (p = 3.4 × 10−8). Carriage of the minor alleles in these SNP was found only in nonresponders (31%) and none in responders (0%).

Conclusion.

This first genome-wide association approach for CYC response yielded a robust profile of genetic associations including large-effect SNP in the FCGR2B-FCRLA locus, which may provide better insights to CYC metabolism and efficacy.

Tacrolimus use in lupus nephritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There is growing interest in the role of tacrolimus as a potential therapeutic agent in SLE. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the evidence for tacrolimus use in the management of lupus nephritis. Thirteen controlled studies were identified (9 suitable for inclusion), using Cochrane database, SCOPUS, Web of Science and OVID (MEDLINE and EMBASE). Data on complete and partial remission rates, proteinuria reduction and adverse events was extracted and analysed using RevMan software. The meta-analysis showed that overall tacrolimus is more effective at inducing complete renal remission than IVCYC (p=0.004), but there is no significant difference compared to MMF (p=0.87). Multi-target TAC+MMF therapy is more effective than IVCYC only when partial remission is included (p=0.0006). Frequency of key adverse effects seems comparable to other agents used in the management of lupus nephritis with fewer gastrointestinal side effects, leukopenia, menstrual disorders, infections and episodes of liver dysfunction reported, but more new onset hypertension and hyperglycaemia. Mortality was lower in the tacrolimus groups, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.15). Tacrolimus may be more effective at reducing proteinuria, but again this was not statistically significant. There are no controlled trials looking at use in pregnancy or juvenile patients, however case reports suggest potential efficacy and safety. In conclusion, in moderately severe lupus nephritis, there is some evidence supporting efficacy of tacrolimus or multi-target TAC+MMF over IVCYC, but no evidence supporting tacrolimus over MMF. Tacrolimus may be more effective at reducing proteinuria, having potential implications for long-term outcome. Key limitations of this study are the lack of long-term outcome data and the lack of high quality, large, blinded controlled trials in multi-ethnic groups.

Increased DNA double-strand breaks and enhanced apoptosis in patients with lupus nephritis

OBJECTIVE

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) lead to mutations, genomic instability and apoptotic death, whereas accumulation of apoptotic cells results in excessive autoantigen presentation and autoantibody formation. We aimed to measure DSB levels in lupus nephritis, a severe complication of the prototypic systemic autoimmune disease.

METHODS

The intrinsic DNA damage and the apoptosis induction/DSB levels were evaluated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of six patients and 10 healthy controls following exposure to genotoxic agents (melphalan, cisplatin) ex vivo. DSBs were assessed using immunofluorescence quantification of γH2AX foci and comet assay.

RESULTS

Intrinsic DNA damage was increased in lupus versus control cells in both assays (Olive Tail Moment units of 15.8 ± 2.3 versus 3.0 ± 1.4 in comet, p < 0.01; % γH2AX-positive cells: 13.6 ± 1.8 versus 4.6 ± 0.9, p < 0.01, respectively). Melphalan or cisplatin doses as low as 9.9 ± 4.8 or 29.8 ± 8.3 µg/ml, respectively, were sufficient to induce apoptosis in lupus cells; control cells required doses of 32.3 ± 7.7 and 67.7 ± 5.5 µg/ml, respectively. Drug-induced DSB levels were increased in lupus versus control cells, with the area under the curve (AUC) for melphalan-induced DSBs being 3050 ± 610 (% γH2AX-positive staining cells) × (drug dose) in patients and 1580 ± 350 in controls (p < 0.05); the corresponding values for cisplatin-induced AUC were 13900 ± 1800 for lupus and 4500 ± 750 for controls (p < 0.01). Interestingly, within either lupus patients or controls examined, the accumulation of DSBs correlated with apoptosis degrees (all p < 0.01). Results in lupus cells were not associated with individual disease activity level or treatment modalities at the time of the study.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a novel mechanism by which increased accumulation of DSBs may render cells more sensitive to apoptosis, thus contributing to the induction of systemic autoimmunity.

Lupus nephritis: review of the literature

Physicians in practice should be knowledgeable regarding several aspects of autoimmune disorders, especially systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. These disorders can present to the clinician's clinic and private office regardless of their specialty. This review will discuss various aspects of SLE, its mechanisms of disease, role of accelerated atherosclerosis, proinflammatory cytokines, and therapeutic approaches. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in which and plasma levels have been associated with disease activity, classification of severity, and diagnosis of lupus nephritis is addressed. Current treatment options, prognosis, and future therapeutic approaches and common side effects are also discussed.

Using cyclophosphamide in inflammatory rheumatic diseases

Cyclophosphamide (CYC), primarily introduced into clinical practice as an anti-cancer substance, is a potent immunosuppressive drug. Today, it is used in a number of organ- or life -threatening autoimmune diseases such as systemic vasculitides or connective tissue diseases. While being effective, CYC has a small therapeutic index and is associated with significant toxicity. CYC has been used in oncology in a variety of diseases and a lot of data has been derived from this area. This knowledge is often extrapolated to the rheumatologic settings. However, besides some similarities substantial differences between these two specialties considering the underlying diseases as well as the kind of application of the drug exist. The aim of the present review is to describe the general characteristics of the use of CYC from the rheumatologist's point of view, including pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties, drug interactions, toxicity and possible preventive and/or therapeutic measures; all of which are important to consider when using this particular drug in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases.

Minimising steroids in lupus nephritis – will B cell depletion pave the way?

The aim of this review is to briefly explore how steroids came to be a presumed adjunct to all treatment regimens for lupus nephritis, despite being the main cause of long term damage among patients with lupus and despite increasingly effective alternative agents. I then go on to compare and contrast how differently immunosuppression regimens have developed in the world of solid organ transplantation. Almost from the start of transplantation a clear goal was to develop steroid sparing regimens – and now units such as our own routinely use induction with a biological, a single week of steroids and then monotherapy with tacrolimus. There has been a clear trend of using biologicals as induction agents and less immunosuppression in the long run but with improved outcomes. The drive has not been the same in lupus nephritis despite there being almost no evidence to support the use of steroids and certainly nothing to suggest correct dosage and timing. Rituximab, a B cell depleting antibody, offers great promise as a treatment agent despite the negative randomised control LUNAR trial. I briefly review our own data, demonstrating that early use of rituximab in lupus nephritis allows omission of oral steroids with excellent rates of remission (complete and partial). I review why the LUNAR trial should not discourage the use of rituximab. Finally, I introduce the RITUXILUP trial, a multicentre randomised controlled trial we are developing to formally evaluate our oral steroid avoiding regimen against a standard treatment regimen of mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. We have to follow the lead of our transplant colleagues and challenge the assumption that the future for lupus nephritis cannot be steroid free.

The outcome of proliferative lupus nephritis with pulse cyclophosphamide therapy

Proliferative lupus nephritis deserves aggressive therapy and cyclophosphamide plays a pivotal role. Thirty nine patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (Class III-7 patients and Class IV- 32 patients) with a median follow up of 38 months were considered for this observational study. All the patients received induction therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone. Cyclophosphamide was given intravenously initially in monthly pulses for six months and later quarterly pulses until remission was achieved or until the target dose (200 mg/kg) was reached. The treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone was repeated in the event of a nephritic flare. Later the corticosteroid was reduced to a minimum effective dose and cyclophosphamide was changed to either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. At the time of the last follow up, 82.05% of the patients were in remission (complete remission 51.28% and partial remission 30.77%). The median interval to achieve remission in responders was 15 months. Early diagnosis (P=0.04), a higher creatinine clearance at presentation (P=0.02), and concurrent use of an ACEI or an ARB (P=007) significantly favored attaining remission. Five patients experienced a doubling of serum creatinine and one of them became dialysis dependent. Risk of doubling of serum creatinine correlated with a low Ccr (P=0.03) at presentation, occurrence of renal flares (P=0.034) and failure to achieve remission (P=0.0001). The parameters like serum creatinine, serum C3, serum C4, activity and chronicity indices on renal biopsy, hypertension were not statistically significant. Therapy with cyclophosphamide, if initiated early, helps in inducing remission and hence can retard the progression to CKD.

Treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis: a slowly changing landscape

Proliferative lupus nephritis is the most severe form of lupus nephritis. Outcomes of this disease are affected by ethnicity, clinical characteristics, irreversible damage on renal biopsy, initial response to treatment and future disease course (for example, the occurrence of renal flares). Initial intensive (induction) treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis is aimed at achieving remission, but optimal duration and intensity are not well defined. A combination of intravenous cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids have been shown to decrease the risk of end-stage renal disease, but are associated with substantial acute toxic effects (such as infections) and chronic toxic effects (such as ovarian failure). In white populations, low-dose cyclophosphamide is a reasonable alternative to high-dose cyclophosphamide as it is similarly effective and associated with less toxicity. Mycophenolate mofetil is as effective as high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide in terms of inducing remission and similar in terms of safety. Although most patients respond to induction treatment, remission is often only achieved after patients are switched to maintenance treatment. As maintenance treatment, mycophenolate mofetil is superior to azathioprine and azathioprine is similarly effective to ciclosporin in terms of prevention or reducing the risk of relapse. Rituximab should be reserved for patients with refractory disease. Treatment of lupus nephritis should be individually tailored to patients, with more aggressive therapy reserved for patients at high risk of renal dysfunction and progression of renal disease.

Oral cyclophosphamide is on the verge of extinction as therapy for severe autoimmune diseases (especially lupus): should nephrologists care?

Some day we will have powerful targeted therapies for autoimmune diseases. Remission will be induced efficiently. Side effects will be mere ripples. Unfortunately, that day is not imminent. Current therapies are powerful but with unintended targets and side effects that can be equivalent to a sea change. For SLE, the current competition to select the 'gold standard' immunosuppressant has come down to two regimens: intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY, standard NIH protocol or its variations) versus oral mycophenolate (MMF). Until recently, IVCY reigned as the gold standard, a title it achieved through a curious journey that did not involve rigorous head-to-head competition. Oral cyclophosphamide (POCY) has not been invited to the current competition to select the gold standard immunosuppressant despite the substantial evidence that POCY can perform at least as well as IVCY or mycophenolate, and compared to IVCY, is far less expensive, easier for the patient, and maybe more effective in African-Americans. Here, we state the case for POCY as therapy for severe autoimmune diseases. We suggest that if POCY is allowed to compete, it will not disappoint.

Abetimus sodium: a medication for the prevention of lupus nephritis flares

BACKGROUND

Lupus nephritis, one of the most severe and therapeutically challenging manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), has been the target of drug development by La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company. Abetimus sodium, an example of the La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company's Tolerance Technology is an intravenously administered tetrameric oligonucleotide conjugate that safely reduces antidouble-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies. Given the importance of anti-dsDNA antibodies in the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, the Phase II and III trials were designed to evaluate whether treatment with abetimus sodium could prolong the time to renal flare in cohorts of patients at high risk of nephritic flares.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

The available data regarding abetimus were reviewed and the current status of the drug's development program is reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Animal studies have demonstrated the ability of abetimus to reduce the titers of anti-dsDNA antibodies as well as of antidsDNA antibody-secreting cells. Administration of abetimus to patients with SLE has uniformly been associated with reductions in circulating anti-dsDNA antibodies. However, two pivotal trials with large numbers of lupus nephritis patients failed to demonstrate statistically signi ficant prolongations in time to renal flare. An event-driven randomized placebo-controlled trial was abruptly terminated in February 2009 after an interim data safety monitoring board determined that achievement of a successful study outcome was futile.

Oral cyclophosphamide for lupus glomerulonephritis: an underused therapeutic option

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In our center, systemic lupus erythematosus nephritis is routinely treated with an oral cyclophosphamide (POCY) regimen. POCY is easy to administer and less expensive than intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) as it is currently used in the United States; however, the use of POCY has declined in favor of IVCY. Our experience with POCY suggests that it is well tolerated and consistently associated with good long-term outcomes. Here we report this experience to build a case for maintaining POCY as a therapeutic option in lupus nephritis.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of the outcome of 46 patients who had systemic lupus erythematosus with nephritis and were treated with POCY between 1995 and 2006. POCY was given for 2 to 4 mo at a dosage of 1.0 to 1.5 mg/kg ideal body weight. After completing POCY, the patients received either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 23.5 mo, and median duration of POCY was 4 mo (range 1 to 16 mo). Durable complete or partial remission of proteinuria was achieved in 32 (70%) patients, whereas 5 (11%) progressed to ESRD. Outcomes were comparable in black and white individuals. Adverse effects occurred in fewer than 10% of the cohort, and only four patients discontinued POCY.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that sequential therapy of POCY followed by azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil is comparable to IVCY regimens but that efficacy may not be affected by race.