Calcium mass balance in adults during single hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration treatments using lower calcium dialysate concentrations

BACKGROUND

Debate continues as to the optimum hemodialysis (HD) dialysate calcium concentration. Although current guidelines advocate 1.25-1.5 mmol/L, some investigators have suggested these may cause calcium gains. As such we investigated whether using dialysate calcium of 1.25 mmol/L risked calcium gains, and whether there were differences between hemodiafiltration and high flux HD.

METHODS

We continuously collect an aliquot of effluent dialysate during dialysis sessions, and calculated dialysis calcium mass balance by the difference between the amount of calcium delivered as fresh dialysate and that lost in effluent dialysate.

RESULTS

We studied 106 stable outpatients, 64% male, mean age 64.4 ± 16.2 years, median dialysis vintage 32 (22-60) months. Most sessions (69%) used a 1.0 mmol/L calcium dialysate, with a median sessional loss of 13.7 (11.5-17.1) mmol, whereas using 1.25 mmol/L the median loss was 7.4 (4.9-10.1) mmol, but with 6.9% had a positive balance (p = 0.031 vs dialysate calcium 1.0 mmol/L). Most patients (85.8%) were treated by hemodiafiltration, but there was no difference in sessional losses (11.7 (8.4-15.8) vs 13.5 (8.1-16.8)) with high flux HD. Dialysis sessional calcium balance was associated with the use of lower dialysate calcium concentration (β -19.5, 95% confidence limits (95%CL) -27.7 to -11.3, p < 0.001), and sessional duration (β 0.07 (95% CL) 0.03-012, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Ideally, the choice of dialysate calcium should be individualized, but clinicians should be aware, that even when using a dialysate calcium of 1.25 mmol/L, some patients are at risk of a calcium gain during hemodiafiltration and high-flux hemodialysis.

Targeting serum calcium in chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: is normal too high?

Hypocalcemia is common in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and it is standard practice to correct this back to the normal range, presumably to prevent symptomatic hypocalcemia and help control hyperparathyroidism. However, there are few studies to support this approach, and recent data suggest that this promotes vascular calcification and adynamic bone disease. Whether setting a lower target will improve outcomes has not been tested, but existing data suggest that this may have minimal risks and substantial potential benefits and should be explored.

Quantification of Dialytic Removal and Extracellular Calcium Mass Balance during a Weekly Cycle of Hemodialysis

Objectives

The removal of calcium during hemodialysis with low calcium concentration in dialysis fluid is generally slow, and the net absorption of calcium from dialysis fluid is often reported. The details of the calcium transport process during dialysis and calcium mass balance in the extracellular fluid, however, have not been fully studied.

Methods

Weekly cycle of three dialysis sessions with interdialytic breaks of 2-2-3 days was monitored in 25 stable patients on maintenance hemodialysis with calcium concentration in dialysis fluid of 1.35 mmol/L. Total and ionic calcium were frequently measured in blood and dialysate. The volume of fluid compartments was measured by bioimpedance.

Results

Weekly dialytic removal of 12.79 ± 8.71 mmol calcium was found in 17 patients, whereas 9.48 ± 8.07 mmol calcium was absorbed per week from dialysis fluid in 8 patients. Ionic calcium was generally absorbed from dialysis fluid, whereas complexed calcium (the difference of total and ionic calcium in dialysis fluid) was removed from the body. The concentration of total calcium in plasma increased slightly during dialysis. The mass of total and ionic calcium in extracellular fluid decreased during dialysis in patients with the dialytic removal of calcium from the body and did not change in patients with the absorption of calcium from dialysis fluid.

Conclusions

We conclude that about one third of patients on dialysis with calcium 1.35 mmol/L in dialysis fluid may absorb calcium from dialysis fluid and therefore individual prescriptions of calcium concentration in dialysis fluid should be considered for such patients.

A neglected issue in dialysis practice: haemodialysate

The intended function of dialysate fluid is to correct the composition of uraemic blood to physiologic levels, both by reducing the concentration of uraemic toxins and correcting electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities. This is accomplished principally by formulating a dialysate whose constituent concentrations are set to approximate normal values in the body. Sodium balance is the cornerstone of intradialysis cardiovascular stability and good interdialytic blood pressure control; plasma potassium concentration and its intradialytic kinetics certainly play a role in the genesis of cardiac arrhythmias; calcium is related to haemodynamic stability, mineral bone disease and also cardiac arrhythmias; the role of magnesium is still controversial; lastly, acid buffering by means of base supplementation is one of the major roles of dialysis. In conclusion, learning about the art and the science of fashioning haemodialysates is one of the best ways to further the understanding of the pathophysiologic processes underlying myriad acid-base, fluid, electrolyte as well as blood pressure abnormalities of the uraemic patient on maintenance haemodialysis.

Optimizing the dialysate calcium concentration in bicarbonate haemodialysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus regarding the optimal dialysate calcium concentration (DCa) during haemodialysis (HD). Low DCa may predispose to acute arrhythmias, whereas high DCa increases the long-term risk of soft tissue calcifications.

METHODS

Twenty-two HD patients treated in four dialysis centres underwent two HD sessions, respectively, with 1.5 and 1.25 mmol/L total DCa. Calcium mass balance (CMB) was calculated from ionized calcium (iCa) in the dialysate and blood at the start and end of each run, using a kinetic formula to define the mean concentrations in the blood and dialysate and then estimating CMBs over the entire treatments.

RESULTS

Mean blood iCa levels increased using 1.5 DCa, whereas they remained unchanged using 1.25 DCa. Diffusive CMB positively correlated with the dialysate/blood iCa gradient. With 1.5 DCa, diffusive CMBs were strongly positive at the blood side and negative at the dialysate side, indicating transfer from dialysate to blood. With 1.25 DCa, despite a negative dialysate/blood iCa gradient, diffusive CMB was slightly positive in blood and negative in dialysate. The global balances based on both the convective and diffusive components showed a positive net transfer of Ca from dialysate to blood with 1.5 DCa and an approximately neutral Ca flux with 1.25 DCa.

CONCLUSIONS

While CMB is nearly neutral when using 1.25 DCa, the use of 1.5 DCa results in a gain of Ca during HD. The risks associated with Ca load should be considered in the choice of DCa prescription for HD but need also be weighed against the risk of worse haemodynamic dialysis tolerance.

Effect of dialysate calcium concentrations on parathyroid hormone and calcium balance during a single dialysis session using bicarbonate hemodialysis: a crossover clinical trial

BACKGROUND

In bicarbonate-based hemodialysis, dialysate total calcium (tCa) concentration may have effects on mineral metabolism.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized crossover trial of 3 dialysate tCa concentrations (2.5, 2.75, and 3.0 mEq/L).

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

22 stable anuric uremic patients underwent three 4-hour bicarbonate hemodialysis sessions with the 3 different dialysate tCa concentrations using a single-pass batch dialysis system.

OUTCOMES

Hourly measurements of plasma water ionized calcium (iCa) and plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. tCa mass balances were measured from the dialysate side.

RESULTS

Hourly plasma water iCa concentrations were higher with a dialysate tCa concentration of 3.0 compared with 2.75 and 2.5 mEq/L (P < 0.05), as were iCa concentrations at the end of dialysis sessions (2.66 ± 0.1, 2.56 ± 0.12, and 2.4 ± 0.08 mEq/L, respectively; P < 0.001). Mean tCa mass balance values (diffusion gradient from the dialysate to the patient) were positive with all dialysate tCa concentrations and increased progressively with dialysate tCa concentration (75 ± 122, 182 ± 125, and 293 ± 228 mg, respectively; P < 0.001). Plasma PTH levels increased during dialysis using dialysate tCa concentration of 2.5 mEq/L (mean increase, 225 ± 312 pg/mL) and decreased with dialysate tCa concentrations of 2.75 and 3.0 mEq/L (mean decreases, 68 ± 325 and 99 ± 432 pg/mL, respectively).

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and lack of measurement of total-body calcium mass balances.

CONCLUSIONS

A dialysate tCa concentration of 2.75 mEq/L might be preferable to 2.5 or 3.0 mEq/L because it is associated with mildly positive tCa mass balance values, plasma water iCa levels in the reference range, and stable PTH levels during dialysis.