Effects of icodextrin on the peritoneal membrane

Absence of Post-Transplantation Encapsulating Peritoneal Sclerosis after Relatively Short Exposure to Peritoneal Dialysis: Prospective Analysis Using Repeated Abdominal CT Scanning

BACKGROUND

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is the most severe complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). Several retrospective reports published between 2007 and 2009 have suggested an increasing incidence of EPS occurring after kidney transplantation. We conducted a prospective observational study to determine the incidence of post-transplantation EPS and identify possible risk factors.

METHODS

Consecutive PD patients undergoing kidney transplantation between 2009 and 2013 were included. Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis was defined as gastrointestinal obstruction combined with radiological evidence of EPS. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using a self-administered Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaire. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed prospectively at 6 and 18 months post-transplantation. The primary end point was EPS during follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-three PD patients were included (age 51 ± 14 years). Mean PD duration was 31.3 months. Peritoneal dialysis solutions low in glucose degradation products and icodextrin were used by 86.8% of patients. A fast or average-fast transport status was documented in 83.0%. After a median follow-up of 19 months, complete data of 47 patients were available for analysis. None of the patients developed clinical or radiological signs of EPS. The GSRS score improved from 1.87 to 1.55 (p = 0.024) and body weight increased from 75.9 to 78.3 kg (p = 0.003). Only 1 patient had new onset localized (< 20%) peritoneal thickening on CT 22 months post-transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Post-transplantation EPS did not develop in this cohort of patients with a relatively short time of PD exposure. This suggests that these patients can be transplanted safely without concern for the development of EPS, at least within the follow-up period of 19 months.

Icodextrin and peritoneal dialysis: advantages and new applications

The impact of icodextrin (ico) on peritoneal dialysis (PD) extension and patient survival is well established. Predominantly, ico-based solutions were prescribed in high-transporter PD patients. Advantages of the ico-based solutions include increased biocompatibility, avoidance of glucotoxicity, enhanced ultrafiltration failure (UF), sodium removal rates, better metabolic and blood pressure control. Bimodal solutions and twice daily exchanges of ico-based solutions are two newly introduced strategies to avoid glucose exposure and/or enhance UF in PD patients with UF failure. In addition, a simplified schedule of PD using a single nocturnal exchange of ico in patients with refractory congestive heart failure may represent an alternative option to manage fluid removal and azotaemia. The use of a simplified schedule of PD with only two ico exchanges or a single ico exchange is a challenging approach for end-stage renal disease patients with preserved residual function who desire to initiate PD.

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis in children

Encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis (EPS) is a rare but extremely serious complication of peritoneal dialysis (PD). While EPS has been well recognized in adults on long-term PD, and children can spend many years on PD before a transplant becomes available, only a small number of children with EPS have been described. Two European pediatric registries have recently reported on the prevalence, potential risk factors and outcomes of EPS in children. Although the prevalence of EPS is comparable to that published in adult registries, the outcome of pediatric EPS is significantly better and carries a lower mortality. All studies have shown a greater risk of EPS with a longer dialysis vintage, but it is not known why some individuals are susceptible to EPS development. In this review we discuss current views on the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management strategies for EPS. The hope of the authors is that this review will alert pediatric nephrologists to this rare but extremely serious complication of chronic PD. In the future, collaborative research and the establishment of a pediatric EPS registry may be of importance in helping pediatric nephrologists to recognize the early warning signs of EPS development and thereby to develop strategies for its prevention and optimal management.

Bimodal solutions or twice-daily icodextrin to enhance ultrafiltration in peritoneal dialysis patients

The efficacy and safety of icodextrin has been well established. In this paper, we will discuss the pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility of icodextrin and its clinical effect on fluid management in peritoneal dialysis patients. Novel strategies for its prescription for peritoneal dialysis patients with inadequate ultrafiltration are reviewed.

Inflammation and the peritoneal membrane: causes and impact on structure and function during peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis therapy has increased in popularity since the end of the 1970s. This method provides a patient survival rate equivalent to hemodialysis and better preservation of residual renal function. However, technique failure by peritonitis, and ultrafiltration failure, which is a multifactorial complication that can affect up to 40% of patients after 3 years of therapy. Encapsulant peritoneal sclerosis is an extreme and potentially fatal manifestation. Causes of inflammation in peritoneal dialysis range from traditional factors to those related to chronic kidney disease per se, as well as from the peritoneal dialysis treatment, including the peritoneal dialysis catheter, dialysis solution, and infectious peritonitis. Peritoneal inflammation generated causes significant structural alterations including: thickening and cubic transformation of mesothelial cells, fibrin deposition, fibrous capsule formation, perivascular bleeding, and interstitial fibrosis. Structural alterations of the peritoneal membrane described above result in clinical and functional changes. One of these clinical manifestations is ultrafiltration failure and can occur in up to 30% of patients on PD after five years of treatment. An understanding of the mechanisms involved in peritoneal inflammation is fundamental to improve patient survival and provide a better quality of life.

Icodextrin increases technique survival rate in peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy by improving body fluid management: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There are still controversies whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) with icodextrin preserves residual renal and peritoneal membrane functions in patients with diabetes. However, there are no randomized controlled and long-term clinical trials in newly started PD patients with diabetic nephropathy.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Forty-one patients with diabetic nephropathy with ESRD were enrolled and randomly assigned to the glucose group (GLU) treated with 8 L of 1.5% or 2.5% glucose or an icodextrin group (ICO) treated with 1.5 or 2.0 L of 7.5% icodextrin-containing solutions. Technique failure, body fluid management, glucose and lipid metabolism, and residual renal and peritoneal functions and were evaluated over 2 years.

RESULTS

The technique survival rate was 71.4% in ICO and 45.0% in GLU, with most of the technique failure due to volume overload. ICO showed significantly better cumulative technique survival. Net ultrafiltration volume was significantly higher in ICO throughout the study period. There were no beneficial effects of icodextrin on hemoglobin A1c, glycoalbumin, and lipid profile at 24 months. Urine volume and residual renal function declined faster in ICO, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. For peritoneal function, no differences were observed in dialysis-to-plasma creatinine ratios during the observation.

CONCLUSIONS

In PD therapy for diabetic nephropathy, the use of icodextrin-containing solutions has a beneficial effect on technique survival, but there are no apparent benefits or disadvantages in residual renal and peritoneal functions compared with conventional PD with glucose solution.