High Number of Plasma Exchanges Increases the Risk of Bacterial Infection in ABO-incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bacterial infections are major complications that cause significant mortality and morbidity in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The risk of bacterial infection has not been studied in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) recipients with a desensitization protocol in relation to the number of plasma exchanges (PEs). Therefore, we aimed to analyze the risk of bacterial infection in ABOi LDLT recipients with a high number of PEs compared with recipients with a low number of PEs.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed with 681 adult LDLT recipients, of whom 171 ABOi LDLT recipients were categorized into the high (n = 52) or low (n = 119) PE groups based on a cutoff value of 6 PE sessions. We compared bacterial infections and postoperative bacteremia within 6 mo after liver transplantation with the ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT group (n = 510) as a control group.

RESULTS

The high PE group showed a bacterial infection rate of 49.9% and a postoperative bacteremia rate of 28.8%, which were significantly higher than those of the low PE group (31.1%, 17.8%) and the ABOc group (26.7%, 18.0%). In multivariate analysis, the high PE group was found to have a 2.4-fold higher risk of bacterial infection ( P  = 0.008). This group presented a lower 5-y survival rate of 58.6% compared with the other 2 groups (81.5% and 78.5%; P  = 0.030 and 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high number of preoperative PEs increases bacterial infection rate and postoperative bacteremia in ABOi LDLT.

Effect of Induction Therapy Dose on Survival in Abo-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis Using Recent Data

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is an essential induction immunosuppressant for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (KT) (ABOi-KT). However, studies on the optimal dose of rituximab are insufficient, and there are dosage differences between transplant centers and countries. Therefore, we conducted a study to determine the survival outcomes of patients receiving the most effective and safe dose of rituximab during ABOi-KT.

METHODS

Studies on rituximab dose were divided into four groups: ABO compatible, 1) placebo, 2) rituximab 200 mg, 3) rituximab 200-500 mg, and 4) rituximab 500 mg. We searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded databases from 1970 to February 2022.9 . The inclusion criteria were adult patients (>18 years old). Reviews, observational studies, and clinical trials that did not clearly define outcomes or that did not have graft failure as an outcome were excluded. We performed direct and indirect network meta-analyses using Bayesian models and ranked different rituximab doses using a generation mixed treatment comparison (GeMTC) and Stata version 13. The NMA approach was evaluated using the GRADE framework, which specifies four levels of certainty for a given result: high, moderate, low, and very low. The outcomes included patient survival, graft failure, and bacterial and viral infections.

RESULTS

Twenty-five trials, including 5,378 subjects, were divided into the following four groups: 1) placebo, 2) rituximab 200 mg, 3) rituximab 200-500 mg, and 4) rituximab 500 mg. We focused on survival outcomes according to the dose of rituximab when patients received induction therapy for ABOi-KT. The mortality rate was significantly lower in the ABO-compatible and rituximab 200 mg groups (odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% CrI: 0.071-0.91 and OR 0.14, 95% CrI 0.036-0.47), compared with that in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that low-dose rituximab in ABO-i KT was effective compared to the high-dose and placebo in maintaining the survival rate. However, large-scale and long-term data are necessary for further validation of our findings. Additionally, the use of smaller doses of rituximab will require further discussion.

Success rate and safety of living donor kidney transplantation in ABO blood group incompatible relatives: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is considered an ideal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) because it provides a longer and better quality of life than dialysis. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplantation relies on two principles: (i) removal of antibodies from a blood group; and (ii) inhibition of reappearance of blood group antibodies by intensifying the induction and maintenance of immunosuppression. This systematic review aimed to analyze the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Databases, including Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Medline were searched. Search duration was from the database establishment to December 2022. A thorough search was performed for relevant studies investigating the success and safety of ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantation. Two investigators independently extracted literature information and assessed the quality of the included studies. Heterogeneity test was performed using Cochrane's Q and chi-squared tests. All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 4.2.1).

RESULTS

The search for relevant literature in the five electronic databases yielded 1238 articles. Of the 1238 articles, only 15 were included. Meta-analysis of outcomes from five studies showed a survival rate of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88 to 0.97, P < 0.001) after ≥3 years, while outcomes from 12 studies revealed a short-term patient survival rate of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92 to 0.96, P = 0.75). In contrast, long- and short-term graft survival rates were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.75 to 0.96, P < 0.001) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90 to 0.97, P < 0.001), respectively. Incidence rates of infectious, surgical, and medical complications were 0.31 (95% CI: 0.22 to 0.41, P < 0.001), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.25, P < 0.001), and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.66, P < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Good long- and short-term patient outcomes and graft survival rates were observed after ABO-I kidney transplantation. Similarly, the safety of performing kidney transplantations from living donors with ABO-I blood groups was established by the results of the current meta-analysis. Therefore, ABO-I live-donor kidney transplantations should be encouraged to reduce the time recipients spend on waiting lists and supplement the existing paired-exchange donor program.

Impact of ABO incompatibility and early antibody-mediated rejection on chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant patients

INTRODUCTION

Early antibody-mediated rejection has been reported to increase chronic antibody-mediated rejection and decrease graft survival in kidney transplantation. However, the impact of early antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation remains unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed living-donor kidney transplantation patients from two Korean centers. Patients were categorized based on ABO compatibility and early antibody-mediated rejection within 1 year. The primary outcome was chronic antibody-mediated rejection. The secondary outcomes were production of de novo donor-specific antibody and composite kidney outcome, defined as graft loss or a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate to below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2.

RESULTS

A total of 1639 patients were analyzed, including 1292 patients who underwent ABO-compatible kidney transplantation and 347 patients who underwent ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation had a lower risk of de novo donor-specific antibody production (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.95) and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.92) with a comparable risk of the composite kidney outcome (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.71-1.59) compared to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation. When outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation were analyzed according to early antibody-mediated rejection, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation without antibody-mediated rejection had a lower risk of de novo donor-specific antibody production (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.88) and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.91) than ABO-compatible kidney transplantation without antibody-mediated rejection. However, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation with antibody-mediated rejection showed a higher risk of de novo donor-specific antibody production and similar risk of chronic antibody-mediated rejection compared to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation without antibody-mediated rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation showed a lower risk of de novo donor-specific antibody production and chronic antibody-mediated rejection compared to ABO-compatible kidney transplantation; however, early antibody-mediated rejection abrogated these beneficial effects of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation.

Review of prognostic factors for kidney transplant survival

Transplantation is the most effective treatment for end-stage chronic kidney disease, as this procedure prolongs and improves the patient's quality of life. One of the key problems is the risk of graft rejection. The purpose of this research was to identify and analyse prognostic factors that will prevent rejection. In particular, the prognostic factors grouped by methods of synthesis, generalisation and statistical processing with calculation and graphical representation of hazard ratio and correlation coefficient were grouped, namely: age of donor and recipient, time of cold kidney ischaemia, duration of preoperative dialysis, body mass index, presence of concomitant diseases (diabetes mellitus, hypertension), primary causes causing transplantation. Several molecular genetic and biochemical prognostic markers (transcription factors, immunocompetent cell signalling and receptors, cytostatin C, creatinine, citrate, lactate, etc.) are annotated. It has been demonstrated that creatinine reduction rate determines the risk of rejection, displaying the dynamics of cystatin C and creatinine changes in the postoperative period. Young recipients who underwent prolonged preoperative dialysis were identified as having the highest risk of rejection. Diabetes and hypertension bear a non-critical but commensurately equal risk of rejection. The survival rate of the graft is better when transplanted from a living donor than from a deceased donor. A correlation between cold ischaemia time, body mass index and the probability of graft failure has been proven, namely, the greater the donor and recipient body mass index and the longer the cold ischaemia time, the lower the chance of successful long-term organ acclimation. The data obtained can be used as prognostic factors for graft accommodation at different intervals after surgery.

Advancement in preoperative desensitization therapy for ABO incompatible kidney transplantation recipients

ABO incompatibility has long been considered an absolute contraindication for kidney transplantation. However, with the increasing number of patients with ESRD in recent years, ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi-KT) has expanded the types of donors by crossing the blood group barrier through preoperative desensitization therapy. At present, the desensitization protocols consist of removal of preexisting ABO blood group antibody titers and prevention of ABO blood group antibody return. Studies have suggested similar patient and graft survival among ABOi-KT and ABOc-KT recipients. In this review, we will summarize the effective desensitization regimens of ABOi-KT, aiming to explore effective ways to improve the success rate and the long-term survival rate of ABOi-KT recipients.

ABO Incompatible Kidney Transplantation Without B-cell Depletion is Associated With Increased Early Acute Rejection: A Single-Center Australian Experience

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 66 consecutive ABO incompatible kidney transplants (ABOiKT) performed without B-cell depleting therapy. Outcomes were compared to an earlier era performed with rituximab (n = 18) and a contemporaneous cohort of ABO compatible live donor transplants (ABOcKT). Acute rejection within 3 months of transplant was significantly more common after rituximab-free ABOiKT compared to ABOiKT with rituximab (OR 8.8, p = 0.04) and ABOcKT (OR 2.9, p = 0.005) in adjusted analyses. Six recipients of rituximab-free ABOiKT experienced refractory antibody mediated rejection requiring splenectomy, and a further two incurred early graft loss with no such episodes amongst ABOiKT with rituximab or ABOcKT cohorts. Patient and graft survival were similar between groups over a median follow-up of 3.1 years. This observational evidence lends strong support to the continued inclusion of rituximab in desensitization protocols for ABOiKT.

Optimal dose of rituximab in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers: A single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation have improved with the introduction of desensitization therapy with rituximab. However, rituximab prevents not only antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) but also increases the risk of adverse events, such as infection. For ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, we previously used a rituximab-free desensitization protocol and then initiated a single dose of 100 mg rituximab in 2016. We retrospectively compared the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers before and after the introduction of rituximab.

METHODS

ABOi kidney transplantations (n = 142) in patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers between 2007 and 2021 were included. Patients were divided into two groups (with and without rituximab) for desensitization. The primary outcomes were the incidence of acute AMR and infection.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were desensitized without rituximab (rituximab-free group), and 76 were pretreated with 100 mg rituximab (rituximab group) before transplantation. The incidence of acute AMR was significantly lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group (.0% [0/76] vs. 7.6% [5/66], respectively; p = .047). Post-transplantation anti-A/B antibody titers were also lower in the rituximab group than in the rituximab-free group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events, including infections, between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In ABOi kidney transplantation patients with low anti-A/B antibody titers, the desensitization protocol with a single dose of 100 mg rituximab was effective in preventing acute AMR without increasing the risk of other adverse events.

A Multicenter Cohort Study From India of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in Post-COVID-19 Patients

BACKGROUND

There is a dearth of data regarding the consequences of ABO-incompatible kidney transplant (ABOiKTx) among post-COVID-19 candidates.

METHODS

The study was designed as a retrospective, multicentric cohort study across 11 sites in India, from August 2020 to December 2021. The data for ABOiKTx conducted for post-COVID-19 candidates were investigated. The primary outcome of biopsy-proven acute rejection was compared with the ABO protocol implemented through Kaplan-Meier analysis. The secondary outcomes were graft loss, patient survival, and infections.

RESULTS

A total of 38 ABOiKTx with candidates of median (interquartile range) age of 38.5 (31.25-47.5) years were performed. Nineteen cases had mild COVID-19 severity, while 9 cases (23.6%) had an oxygen requirement. Six (15.7%) donors also were post-COVID-19. The most common ABO incompatibility reported was A to O in 14 (36.8%) pairs followed by B to O in 10 (26.3%) pairs. The maximum isoagglutinin titer cutoff was 1:2048 and 1:64 for baseline and pretransplant levels, respectively. The median time from COVID-19 infection to surgery was 130 (63.2-183) days. Biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, and mortality were 13.1%, 2.6%, and 2.6%, respectively. The Breslow-Wilcoxon's P value in Kaplan-Meier plots were 0.57 and 0.93 for thymoglobulin-based induction and high dose rituximab-based regimen, respectively. The incidence of reinfection was 2.6%. Two (5.2%) urinary tract infections were reported. No cytomegalovirus or BK polyomavirus infection was reported. The median serum creatinine at 1 year of follow-up was 1.1 (0.8-1.3) mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report implies that ABOiKTx in post-COVID-19 candidates can be successfully performed with no major deviation from standard ABO protocol.

Transplant outcomes of 100 cases of living-donor ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation (KT) has been performed successfully, a standard preconditioning regimen has not been established. Based on the initial antidonor ABO antibody titers, an individualized preconditioning regimen is developed, and this study explored the efficacy and safety of the regimen.

METHODS

From September 1, 2014, to September 1, 2020, we performed 1668 consecutive living-donor KTs, including 100 ABOi and 1568 ABO-compatible (ABOc) KTs. ABOi KT recipients (KTRs) with a lower antibody titer (≤1:8) were administered oral immunosuppressive drugs (OIs) before KT, while patients with a medium titer (1:16) received OIs plus antibody-removal therapy (plasma exchange/double-filtration plasmapheresis), patients with a higher titer (≥1:32) were in addition received rituximab (Rit). Competing risk analyses were conducted to estimate the cumulative incidence of infection, acute rejection (AR), graft loss, and patient death.

RESULTS

After propensity score analyses, 100 ABOi KTRs and 200 matched ABOc KTRs were selected. There were no significant differences in graft and patient survival between the ABOi and ABOc groups (P  = 0.787, P  = 0.386, respectively). After using the individualized preconditioning regimen, ABOi KTRs showed a similar cumulative incidence of AR (10.0% υs . 10.5%, P  = 0.346). Among the ABOi KTRs, the Rit-free group had a similar cumulative incidence of AR ( P  = 0.714) compared to that of the Rit-treated group. Multivariate competing risk analyses revealed that a Rit-free regimen reduced the risk of infection (HR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.12-0.78, P  = 0.013). Notably, antibody titer rebound was more common in ABOi KTRs receiving a Rit-free preconditioning regimen ( P  = 0.013) than those receiving Rit. ABOi KTRs with antibody titer rebound had a 2.72-fold risk of AR (HR: 2.72, 95% CI: 1.01-7.31, P  = 0.048). ABOi KTRs had similar serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate compared to those of ABOc KTRs after the first year.

CONCLUSIONS

An individualized preconditioning regimen can achieve comparable graft and patient survival rates in ABOi KT with ABOc KT. Rit-free preconditioning effectively prevented AR without increasing the risk of infectious events in those with lower initial titers; however, antibody titer rebound should be monitored.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and cancer-related mortality after kidney transplantation with rituximab treatment

Purpose

There are increased therapeutic usages of rituximab in kidney transplantation (KT). However, few studies have evaluated the effect of rituximab on cancer development following KT. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of rituximab on the cancer occurrence and mortality rate according to each type of cancer.

Methods

Five thousand consecutive recipients who underwent KT at our center were divided into era1 (1990–2007) and era2-rit– (2008–2018), and era2-rit+ (2008–2018) groups. The era2-rit+ group included patients who received single-dose rituximab (200–500 mg) as a desensitization treatment 1–2 weeks before KT.

Results

The 5-year incidence rates of malignant tumors after KT were 3.1%, 4.3%, and 3.5% in the era1, era2-rit–, and era2-rit+ group, respectively. The overall incidence rate of cancer after transplantation among the 3 study groups showed no significant difference (P = 0.340). The overall cancer-related mortality rate was 17.1% (53 of 310). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) had the highest mortality rate (61.5%) and relative risk of cancer-related death (hazard ratio, 8.29; 95% confidence interval, 2.40–28.69; P = 0.001). However, we found no significant association between rituximab and the incidence of any malignancy.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that single-dose rituximab for desensitization may not increase the risk of malignant disease or cancer-related mortality in KT recipients. HCC was associated with the highest risk of cancer-related mortality in an endemic area of HBV infection.

Effect of rituximab dose on induction therapy in ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is an induction immunosuppressant essential for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi KT). However, studies on its dosing, which differs among countries and transplant centers, are lacking. Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of the induction dose of rituximab against patient mortality, graft failure, and adverse events.

METHODS

We included the studies referring to at least 2 of eligible induction doses (200 mg, 200-500 mg, or 500 mg) of rituximab during ABOi KT and relevant outcomes such as patient survival, graft failure, and bacterial and viral infections. We performed direct and indirect network meta-analyses using Bayesian models and ranked different rituximab doses using generation mixed treatment comparison. Publications were retrieved using CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded databases from 1970 to February 2020 and analyzed. The GRADE of network meta-analysis approach specified 4 levels of certainty for a given result: high, moderate, low, and very low.

RESULTS

Among the 4256 patients from 21 trials, glomerular filtration rate, graft loss, antibody-mediated rejection, T-cell mediated rejection, fungal infection, bacterial infection, and CMV infection did not differ among ABOi groups treated with different rituximab doses. The effect on mortality was significantly higher in rituximab 200 to 500 mg, and rituximab 500 mg groups (odds ratios [OR] 3.5, 95% CrI: 1.3-9.8, and OR 3.0, 95% CrI 1.1-9.8), but not in rituximab 20 mg group (OR 0.45, 95% CrI 0.036-2.5). The incidence of BK virus was significantly lower in the rituximab 200-mg group than in the other groups.

DISCUSSION

In ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, low-dose rituximab is more efficacious than higher doses and reduces serious infection risks. Additional randomized controlled trials might be needed to confirm these findings due to small sample size.

The feasibility of organ transplantation during the COVID-19 outbreak: experiences from South Korea

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Outcome of desensitization in human leukocyte antigen and ABO incompatible living donor kidney transplantation: Single center experience of first 200 incompatible transplants

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although desensitization is well established, concerns about graft outcome, patient survival and rejection still exist. The present study aims at comparing outcomes of renal transplant recipients across simultaneous ABO and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibility barriers to those with ABO or HLA incompatibility alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted from October 2015 to December 2018. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic kidney disease, who were prospective HLA incompatible (HLAi) and/or ABO incompatible (ABOi) renal transplant recipients were included. A total of 400 cases including 36 ABOi transplants, 154 HLAi transplants, 10 simultaneously ABO and HLA incompatible transplants, and 200 ABO (ABOc) and HLA (HLAc) compatible kidney transplants from living donors were included.

RESULTS

There were significantly more number of blood transfusions, previous transplants and pregnancies in HLAi transplant recipients relative to the ABOi or the control group. Mean number of therapeutic plasma exchange procedures per patient and mean plasma volume processed per procedure were slightly higher in the ABOi + HLAi category. The incidence of graft dysfunction due to suspected antibody-mediated rejection during first year was highest in the ABOi + HLAi group, followed by ABOc + HLAi and ABOi + HLAc, lowest in the ABOc + HLAc category. Mean time to first episode of graft dysfunction was significantly shorter with incompatible transplants. There were no kidney transplant recipient deaths in the study.

CONCLUSION

Patient outcome and graft outcomes observed with incompatible transplants were not worse than those observed with compatible transplants.

Long-Term Outcome of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation in Patients Treated With Low-Dose Rituximab Regimen

BACKGROUND

Introduction of rituximab in the desensitization protocols for ABO-incompatible (ABOI) kidney transplantation (KTX) has afforded excellent results. However, the acceptability of minimal dosage of rituximab in these protocols remains to be defined.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who underwent ABOI KTX were included in this study. The desensitization protocol consisted of plasmapheresis, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin, basiliximab, and low-dose rituximab (100 mg/body). We evaluated the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcome of this protocol (group R, n = 39) and compared them with those of patients who underwent splenectomy (group S, n = 24).

RESULTS

Graft and patient survival at 10 years after KTX were comparable between the groups (94.4% [group R] vs 95.4% [group S] and 94.6% [group R] vs 95.8% [group S], respectively). The incidence of acute antibody-mediated rejection (AAMR) was similar in the 2 groups (10.2% vs 12.5%). There were no significant differences in the incidence of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. Of the patients, 7 developed AAMR and 3 of these patients (1 in group R and 2 in group S) lost their grafts. There were no significant differences in the incidence of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. The incidence of postoperative cytomegalovirus infection in group R was significantly lower than that in group S. Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative late-onset neutropenia was low in group R.

CONCLUSIONS

A low-dose rituximab regimen for ABOI KTX is acceptable for preventing AAMR with a low incidence of delayed adverse events.

Effect of Different Rituximab Doses on B Cell Count, Anti-A/B Antibody Titer, Graft Function, and Infectious Complications in ABO-Incompatible Renal Transplantation: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOiKT) has been accepted as a viable and cost-effective modality with outcomes comparable to ABO-compatible transplants, but there is a concern regarding higher infectious complications in ABOiKT because of the heightened immunosuppression. The desensitization protocol normally includes antibody removal, B cell depletion by rituximab (RTX), and immunomodulation with intravenous immunoglobulin. Efforts have been made over the years to decrease the dose of RTX in an effort to decrease the infective complications. There is limited literature about the minimum effective dose of RTX, which can cause an effective B cell depletion. This prospective study was designed to correlate the RTX dose with peripheral absolute B cell count, graft function, graft and patient survival, and infective complications.

METHODS

This study included 52 adult ABOiKT recipients with anti-A/B antibody titer up to a maximum of 1:512. The participants were divided into 2 groups of 26 each according to the RTX dosage used: Group A received 100 mg/patient, and Group B received 200 mg/patient. RTX was given 14 days prior to transplant after B cell measurement by flow cytometry. The outcomes were compared after 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Both the dosages effectively depleted the absolute B cell count. Although patient survivals, graft survival, graft function, acute rejection episodes, and post-transplant hospital stay were similar in both groups, infective complications were significantly higher in group B.

CONCLUSION

A low dose (100 mg/patient) of RTX produces effective depletion of B cells while lowering the infective complications in ABOiKT.

Outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in older patients: a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of ABO-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ABOi LDKT) in older individuals have not been established.

METHODS

This multicentric observational study, using data from the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry database, included 634 older patients (≥60 years) undergoing kidney transplantation. We compared clinical outcomes of ABOi LDKT (n = 80) with those of ABO-compatible LDKT (ABOc LDKT, n = 222) and deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT, n = 332) in older patients.

RESULTS

Death-censored graft survival was similar between the three groups (P = 0.141). Patient survival after ABOi LDKT was similar to that after ABOc LDKT (P = 0.489) but higher than that after DDKT (P = 0.038). In multivariable analysis, ABOi LDKT was not risk factor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-10.38, P = 0.548), while DDKT was significant risk factor (HR 3.49, 95% CI 1.01-12.23, P = 0.049) for patient survival. Although ABOi LDKT showed higher biopsy-proven acute rejection than ABOc LDKT, the difference was not significant after adjustment with covariates. However, ABOi LDKT was significant risk factor for infection (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.12-2.45, P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

In older patients, ABOi LDKT was not inferior to ABOc LDKT and was superior to DDKT for patient survival. ABOi LDKT can be recommended for older patients, rather than waiting for DDKT.

Clinical outcome of living donor kidney transplantation across simultaneous ABO and HLA incompatibility: Single center experience of first ten cases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Preconditioning using different protocols has been tested to prevent antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) individually for ABO and HLA incompatibility. However, simultaneous presence of both barriers is still less explored. The aim of this study was to report outcomes of institutional desensitization protocol in renal transplant recipients with simultaneous ABO and HLA incompatibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted from October 2015 to December 2018. All patients with a clinical diagnosis of dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD), who were prospective coexistent HLA and ABO incompatible renal transplant recipients were included in the study. Patients were followed up and graft function and patient survival was assessed at 1 y from the date of transplant.

RESULTS

Median and mode baseline anti-A titers were 64, while median and mode baseline anti-B titers were 256. All recipients were discharged by tenth postoperative day. None of the patients had any bleeding complications. Post transplant infection rate was found to be 20 %. A total of 54 therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) procedures were performed before transplant and 8 were performed after transplant. Graft survival and patient survival was 100 % at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Range and mean follow-up period was 15-42 months and 23 months respectively. Mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 1 y using the CKD-EPI equation was 85.25 ± 13.76 mL/min. Biopsy proven ABMR was observed in one case only which was managed with TPE and immunosuppression.

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous ABO and HLA incompatibility in renal transplant recipients can be managed successfully with adequate preconditioning and careful monitoring.

ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation

ABO-incompatible living kidney transplantation is nowadays a routine procedure to expand living donor pool. The past decades have seen the evolution of desensitization protocol and immunosuppression regimen. Despite increased bleeding events, infectious complications, and rejection episodes reported in some studies, favorable graft and patient survival rate are now achieved, regardless of various protocols among transplant centers. Several issues such as the usage of rituximab and standardization of blood group antibody titration remain to be settled. The deposition of C4d is no longer the histopathologic hallmark of antibody-mediated rejection, which have inspired innovative strategies of peripheral molecular screening and the improvement of histological diagnosis of AMR (antibody-mediated rejection). The better understanding of the underlying mechanism might facilitate the distinction and therapeutic schemes of AMR.

Pneumocystis pneumonia occurrence and prophylaxis duration in kidney transplant recipients according to perioperative treatment with rituximab

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) is a life-threatening fungal infection that can occur in kidney transplantation (KT) recipients. A growing number of KT recipients are receiving perioperative treatment with rituximab, which is associated with prolonged B-cell depletion and possible risk of PCP occurrence; however, the optimal prophylaxis duration according to rituximab treatment is yet unknown. We compared the occurrence of PCP and the duration of prophylaxis in KT recipients according to rituximab treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 2110 patients who underwent KT between January 2009 and December 2016, who were divided into non-Rituximab group (n = 1588, 75.3%) and rituximab group (n = 522, 24.7%).

RESULTS

In the rituximab group, the estimated number needed to treat (NNT) for prophylaxis prolongation from 6 to 12 months was 29.0 with a relative risk reduction of 90.0%. In the non-rituximab group, the estimated NNT value was 133.3 and the relative risk reduction was 66.4%. Rituximab treatment (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.09; P <  0.01) and acute rejection (HR = 2.19; P = 0.03) were significant risk factors for PCP in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that maintaining PCP prophylaxis for 12 months may be beneficial in KT recipients treated with rituximab for desensitization or acute rejection treatment.

Treatment of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients - a single center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Chronic active antibody-mediated rejection is a major etiology of graft loss in renal transplant recipients. However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategies.

METHODS

Computerized records from Taichung Veterans General Hospital were collected to identify renal transplant biopsies performed in the past 7 years with a diagnosis of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. The patients were divided into two groups according to treatment strategy: Group 1 received aggressive treatment (double filtration plasmapheresis and one of the followings: rituximab, intravenous immunoglobulin, antithymogycte globulin, bortezomib, or methylprednisolone pulse therapy); and group 2 received supportive treatment.

RESULTS

From February 2009 to December 2017, a total of 82 patients with biopsy-proven chronic antibody mediated rejection were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis of death-censored graft survival showed a worse survival in group 2 (P = 0.015 by log-rank test). Adverse event-free survival was lower in group 1, whereas patient survival was not significantly different. Proteinuria and supportive treatment were independent risk factors for graft loss in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive treatment was associated with better graft outcome. However, higher incidence of adverse events merit personalized treatment, especially for those with higher risk of infection. Appropriate prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for patients undergoing aggressive treatment.

Peripheral blood transcriptome analysis and development of classification model for diagnosing antibody-mediated rejection vs accommodation in ABO-incompatible kidney transplant

The major obstacle to successful ABO blood group-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABOi KT) is antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). This study aimed to investigate transcriptional profiles through RNA sequencing and develop a minimally invasive diagnostic tool for discrimination between accommodation and early acute AMR in ABOi KT. Twenty-eight ABOi KT patients were selected: 18 with accommodation and 10 with acute AMR at the 10th day posttransplant protocol biopsy. Complete transcriptomes of their peripheral blood were analyzed by RNA sequencing. Candidate genes were selected by bioinformatics analysis, validated with quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and used to develop a classification model to diagnose accommodation. A total of 1385 genes were differentially expressed in accommodation compared with in AMR with P-adjusted < .05. Functional annotation and gene set enrichment analysis identified several immune-related and immunometabolic pathways. A 5-gene classification model including COX7A2L, CD69, CD14, CFD, and FOXJ3 was developed by logistic regression analysis. The model was further validated with an independent cohort and discriminated between accommodation and AMR with 92.7% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity, and 91.7% accuracy. Our study suggests that a classification model based on peripheral blood transcriptomics may allow minimally invasive diagnosis of acute AMR vs accommodation and subsequent patient-tailored immunosuppression in ABOi KT.

Rituximab protects against development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease after kidney transplantation: a propensity-matched study

Recent studies have implicated B cells in atherosclerosis and have verified the atheroprotective effect of rituximab. Rituximab is widely used for desensitization in ABO-incompatible or crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation (KT). Using a single-center KT database, we performed propensity-matched analysis to investigate the association between rituximab and posttransplant atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Among 1299 eligible patients, 239 given rituximab induction were matched with 401 controls in a 1:2 propensity score matching process. The cumulative rate of ASCVD during 8 years of follow-up was significantly lower in rituximab-treated patients, compared with matched controls (3.7% vs. 11.2%; P = 0.012). However, all-cause mortality did not differ by group (2.9% vs. 4%; P = 0.943). In multivariable Cox analysis, rituximab proved independently protective of ASCVD (hazard ratio = 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.14–0.83). The lower risk of ASCVD seen with rituximab induction reached significance only in patient subsets of diabetes mellitus, pretransplant dialysis, or older age (>50 years). Rituximab induction confers a lower risk of ASCVD during the posttransplant period. This atheroprotective effect appears particularly beneficial in patients whose risk of ASCVD is heightened.

Clinical outcomes after ABO-incompatible renal transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

ABO-incompatible renal transplantation (ABOi-rTx) is increasingly used to overcome organ shortage. Evidence about its non-inferiority in comparison with ABO-compatible renal transplantation (ABOc-rTx) needs to be analysed at early and late timepoints. We aimed to investigate differences in outcome after ABOi-rTX and ABOc-rTX.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies published up until Dec 31, 2017, that reported outcome data (≥1 year of follow-up) after ABOi-rTx and included an ABO-compatible control group, by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase Ovid, MEDLINE Ovid, and PubMed. Trials on recipients of ABOi-rTx were assessed, if an ABO-compatible control group was included and if outcome data on at least graft or recipient survival with 1 year or more of follow-up were available. Exclusion criteria included case reports, editorials, reviews and letters, animal studies, meeting papers, studies unable to extract data, non-renal solid organ and bone-marrow transplant studies, and deceased donor ABOc-rTx. Data were extracted from published reports. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and graft survival at 1, 3, 5, and more than 8 years after transplantation. In the meta-analysis, we used a fixed-effects model if the I² value was 0, and both a fixed-effects and random-effects model if I² was more than 0. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018094550.

FINDINGS

1264 studies were screened and 40 studies including 49 patient groups were identified. 65 063 patients were eligible for analysis, 7098 of whom had undergone ABOi-rTx. Compared with ABOc-rTx, ABOi-rTx was associated with significantly higher 1-year mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2·17 [95% CI 1·63-2·90], p<0·0001; I²=37%), 3 years (OR 1·89 [1·46-2·45], p<0·0001; I²=29%), and 5 years (OR 1·47 [1·08-2·00], p=0·010; I²=68%) following transplantation. Death-censored graft survival was lower with ABOi-rTx than with ABOc-rTx at 1 year (OR 2·52 [1·80-3·54], p<0·0001; I²=61%) and 3 years (OR 1·59 [1·15-2·18], p=0·0040; I²=58%) only. Graft losses were equivalent to that of ABOc-rTx after 5 years and patient survival after 8 years. No publication bias was detected and the results were robust to trial sequential analysis until 5 years after transplantation; thereafter, data became futile or inconclusive.

INTERPRETATION

Despite progress in desensitisation protocols and optimisation of ABOi-rTx procedures, excess mortality and loss of kidney grafts was found compared with ABOc-rTx within the first 3 years after transplantation. Only long-term outcomes after 5 years yielded equivalent survival rates and organ function. Awareness of the increased risks of infection, organ rejection, and bleeding could improve care of patients and promote efforts towards paired kidney exchange programmes.

FUNDING

None.

Early hospital readmissions after ABO- or HLA- incompatible living donor kidney transplantation

Early hospital readmission (EHR) after kidney transplantation (KT) is associated with adverse outcomes and significant healthcare costs. Despite survival benefits, ABO- and HLA-incompatible (ABOi and HLAi) KTs require desensitization and potent immunosuppression that increase risk of EHR. However, little data exist regarding EHR after incompatible KT. We defined EHR as admission for any reason within 30 days of discharge from the index hospitalization. Patients who underwent living donor KT from 2010–2017 were classified into one of three groups (control, ABOi KT, or HLAi KT). Our study included 732 patients, 96 (13.1%) of who experienced EHR. HLAi KT patients had a significantly higher incidence of EHR than other groups (26.6%; P < 0.001). In addition, HLAi KT (HR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.35–3.77; P = 0.002) and advanced age (≥60 years) (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.20–3.12; P = 0.007) were independent risk factors for EHR. Patients with EHR showed 1.5 times and 3 times greater risk of late hospital readmission and death-censored graft loss, respectively, and consistently exhibited inferior renal function compared to those without EHR, regardless of immunologic incompatibilities. We recommend that KT recipients experiencing EHR or its risk factors be managed with extreme care due to their increased susceptibility to adverse outcomes.

Efficacy of 2 Doses of Rituximab on B-Cell and Antidonor Antibody and Outcomes of ABO-Incompatible Living-Donor Pediatric Kidney Transplant

OBJECTIVES

Rituximab treatment strategies vary in ABOincompatible pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Here, we present the efficacy of 2 doses of rituximab and subsequent outcomes in ABO-incompatible pediatric kidney transplant patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study of ABO-incompatible pediatric kidney transplant recipients included 21 who were pretreated with desensitization that included 2 doses of 100 mg rituximab (rituximab group) at 10 and 1 day pretransplant and 14 who received splenectomy without rituximab (splenectomy group). Both groups received immunosuppression. Basiliximab was administered during transplant and 4 days posttransplant. Double-filtration plasmapheresis and/or plasma exchange procedures were performed pretransplant in those with higher antidonor antibody titers. CD19-positive and CD20-positive B cells were measured sequentially in the rituximab group. Maximum titers of antidonor antibody pre- and posttransplant, patient and graft survival, biopsy-proven rejection, and complications/infections were compared between groups.

RESULTS

In the rituximab group, CD19- and CD20-positive B cells were depleted on transplant, persistently depleted at 3 months, and under 5% until 1 year posttransplant. Maximum titers of antidonor antibodies decreased significantly posttranplant in the rituximab (P < .001) but not in the splenectomy group (P = .174), with maximum titers posttransplant significantly lower than shown in the splenectomy group (P < .001). No rituximab patients had clinical rejection, but 5 splenectomy group patients had clinical T-cell-mediated rejection, with 2 also having antibody-mediated rejection. Six in the rituximab group had cytomegalovirus viremia but no cytomegalovirus disease; however, 5 splenectomy group recipients had cytomegalovirus disease and viremia. In the rituximab group, 3 had late-onset neutropenia. One child died of hypertrophic cardio myopathy with a functioning graft; all others survived with no failed grafts. All splenectomy group children survived, although 2 had deteriorated graft function.

CONCLUSIONS

Two doses of rituximab were effective in long-term B-cell depletion to suppress antidonor antibodies. The possibility of late-onset neutropenia must be considered.

Effects of rituximab dose on hepatitis B reactivation in patients with resolved infection undergoing immunologic incompatible kidney transplantation

Sensitized patients received desensitization therapy with rituximab for kidney transplantation. However, the impact of rituximab dose on hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is unknown. Patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation between 2008 and 2016 were grouped according to rituximab dose (control vs. standard-dose rituximab [375 mg/m²] vs. reduced-dose rituximab [200 mg/body]) for comparison of HBV reactivation. A total of 336 hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative/antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc)-positive patients underwent kidney transplantation, of whom 91 (27.1%) received rituximab for desensitization (57 standard-dose and 34 reduced-dose rituximab). During the study period, eight patients experienced HBV reactivation (three in the control group, five in the standard-dose group). In the standard-dose group, four patients experienced hepatitis flare, and one patient died due to hepatic failure. No HBV reactivation occurred in the reduced-dose group. Standard-dose rituximab significantly decreased hepatitis B surface antigen antibody titer (anti-HBs; −99.8 IU/L) at 12 months, compared with reduced-dose rituximab (−20.1 IU/L) and control (−39.1 IU/L, P = 0.017). Standard-dose rituximab (HR, 10.60; 95% CI, 2.52–44.60; P = 0.001) and anti-HBs < 100 IU/L at transplantation (HR, 9.06; 95% CI, 1.11–74.30; P = 0.04) were independent risk factors for HBV reactivation. Standard-dose rituximab significantly increased HBV reactivation risk for HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive kidney transplant patients.

Incidence of Hepatitis B Viral Reactivation After Kidney Transplantation With Low-Dose Rituximab Administration

BACKGROUND

In hematological malignancy patients intended to receive rituximab, hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology screening, viral reactivation monitoring, are recommended. However, the effect of single-dose rituximab (RIT) on HBV reactivation in kidney transplant patients with previous HBV infection is still unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study consisting of 1294 kidney transplant patients, we identified 76 patients showing preoperative hepatitis B surface antigen-negative, hepatitis B core antibody-positive, and HBV-DNA-negative results. A rituximab dose of 200 mg/body was administered to 48 patients, 46 of whom did not receive prophylaxis (RIT+ group). Twenty-eight patients received neither rituximab nor prophylaxis (RIT- group). We monitored HBV-DNA by polymerase chain reaction every 1 to 3 months, and HBV reactivation was defined as detectable HBV-DNA.

RESULTS

HBV reactivation was found in 1 patient in the RIT+ group (2.2%) and 1 patient in the RIT- group (3.6%) at 6 weeks and 5.5 years posttransplant, respectively, but spontaneously cleared. Both patients showed positive hepatitis B surface antibody preoperatively. HBV reactivation was not found in 6 patients lacking anti-hepatitis B surface preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose RIT administration in kidney transplant patients without prophylaxis is associated with low incidence of HBV reactivation. However, the comparisons among standard-dose RIT, low-dose RIT, and controls with high-quality study design is necessary.

Pharmacotherapy-Induced Hepatitis B Reactivation Among Patients With Prior Functional Cure: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To describe and quantify the incidence and morbidity of hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) secondary to pharmaceutical agents (eg, rituximab, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, direct-acting antivirals [DAAs] for hepatitis C) among patients with previously resolved hepatitis B infection.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE database was searched from inception through July 2018 using the terms hepatitis B + ( reactivation OR [drug or drug class linked to HBVr]).

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant English-language cohort studies or randomized trials quantifying the incidence of HBVr secondary to pharmacotherapy among patients negative for hepatitis B surface antigen and DNA and positive for hepatitis B core antibody were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among 2045 articles, 102 met inclusion criteria. Receipt of rituximab was associated with the highest risk of HBVr (for oncological indication: 6.2% rate [225/3601 patients]) and subsequent hepatitis (up to 52.4% of all HBVr cases). Biologic agents for autoimmune disease were uncommonly associated with HBVr (2.4%, 56/2338), with only 4 cases of hepatitis, all attributable to rituximab. Reactivation caused by DAAs was rare (0.3%, 28/8398), with no cases of hepatitis. Relevance to Patient Care/Clinical Practice: This review compares and contrasts the incidence and clinical relevance of HBVr for various pharmacotherapies among patients with functionally cured hepatitis B, with discussion of appropriate risk mitigation strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with prior functional cure of hepatitis B, prophylactic antiviral therapy is recommended with rituximab administration irrespective of indication because of a high risk for HBVr-associated morbidity. Enhanced monitoring alone is reasonable for patients receiving nonrituximab biologics or DAAs.

ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplant Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ABO blood group-incompatible kidney transplantation is considered a safe procedure, with noninferior outcomes in large cohort studies. Its contribution to living kidney transplantation programs is substantial and growing. Outcomes compared with center-matched ABO blood group-compatible control patients have not been ascertained.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Comprehensive searches were conducted in Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web-of-Science, and Google Scholar. Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology study guidelines for observational studies and Newcastle Ottawa bias scale were implemented to assess studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. A subgroup analysis on antibody removal technique was performed.

RESULTS

After identifying 2728 studies addressing ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation, 26 studies were included, describing 1346 unique patients who were ABO-incompatible and 4943 ABO-compatible controls. Risk of bias was low (all studies ≥7 of 9 stars). Baseline patient characteristics revealed no significant differences in immunologic risk parameters. Statistical heterogeneity of studies was low (I2 0% for graft and patient survival). One-year uncensored graft survival of patients who were ABO-incompatible was 96% versus 98% in ABO-compatible controls (relative risk, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 0.98; P<0.001). Forty-nine percent of reported causes of death in patients who were ABO-incompatible were of infectious origin, versus only 13% in patients who were ABO-compatible (P=0.02). Antibody-mediated rejection (3.86; 95% confidence interval, 2.05 to 7.29; P<0.001), severe nonviral infection (1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.82; P=0.003), and bleeding (1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.36 to 2.72; P<0.001) were also more common after ABO-incompatible transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients have good outcomes, albeit inferior to center-matched ABO-compatible control patients.

Incidence of Infectious Disease and Malignancies After Rituximab Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results From a Cohort in Germany

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is frequently used in solid organ transplantation off-label, especially in patients with renal allografts. Few data are available on the safety aspects of solid organ transplant recipients receiving rituximab. There is a knowledge gap on long-term follow-up data, in particular on infectious complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective observational registry study (German Registry on Autoimmune Diseases) comprising a total of 681 patients was conducted. The data of 63 adult kidney transplant recipients who received rituximab between 2006 and 2013 were used in this analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 42 (1-109) months. At least 1 severe infection occurred in 57% of patients. The median time between the first rituximab infusion and the first infection was 4 (1-48) months. Of the overall 88 infections, 74 were severe bacterial infections, 5 were severe viral infections, 3 were severe fungal infections, 2 were combined severe bacterial and fungal infections, and 4 were combined severe viral, fungal and bacterial infections. Seven patients died during the observational period, 2 of them due to infectious complications. In the observational period, 1 case of squamous cell carcinoma but no other malignancies were observed.

CONCLUSION

Consistent with previous data, a high incidence of infections was observed after rituximab treatment in kidney transplant recipients. Most infections occurred within 6 months after rituximab initiation. With more than 3 years of follow-up, we were able to document a low incidence of secondary malignancies after rituximab with only 1 case in our cohort.

Pediatric ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation: Evolving with the advancing apheresis technology: A single-center experience

Recent literature has endorsed favorable outcomes following ABOi kidney transplantation in pediatric population. Nevertheless, reluctance to pursue an ABOi still remains pervasive. This could be ascribed to various legitimate reasons, namely less extensive pediatric ABOi data, technical difficulties encountered during PP, cost restraints, and concerns regarding higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection, infectious complications, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder as compared to adults. However, given the similar excellent outcomes of both ABOi and ABOc kidney transplantation, clinicians should consider this option sooner if a compatible donor or swap is not available. Here, we describe the outcomes of three pediatric ABOi performed at our institute in India (from 2014 till now), wherein distinct apheresis modalities had been employed in each desensitization protocol, and our techniques evolved with advancing science in apheresis. This case series includes India's first published pediatric ABO-incompatible transplant (Case 2) and the youngest child to undergo ABO-incompatible renal transplant in SAARC nations (Case 3).

Rituximab Induction to Prevent the Recurrence of PSC After Liver Transplantation-The Lessons Learned From ABO-Incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

Multiple studies have failed to reveal an effective method for preventing the recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) after liver transplantation (LTx). A national study conducted in Japan revealed several risk factors for the recurrence after living donor LTx (LDLTx); however, recipients of ABO-blood type incompatible (ABO-I) LTx were excluded from the previous analysis. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of an immunosuppressive protocol in ABO-I LTx on the recurrence of PSC after LDLTx.

Methods

We conducted a national survey and analyzed the outcome of recipients who underwent ABO-I LDLTx for PSC (n = 12) between 1994 and 2010 in 9 centers and compared the outcome with that of ABO-compatible LDLTx for PSC (n = 96). The key elements of the immunosuppressive regimen in ABO-I LTx are plasma exchange sessions to remove existing antibodies, and the use of immunosuppression to control humoral immunity. Rituximab was added to the immunosuppression regimen from 2006 onward; 5 patients received rituximab perioperatively.

Results

All 7 recipients who underwent ABO-I LDLTx before 2006 (who did not receive rituximab) died of infection (n = 3), antibody-mediated rejection (n = 1), ABO-incompatibility associated cholangiopathy (n = 1) or recurrence of PSC (n = 2). In contrast, we found that all 5 recipients from 2006 (who were treated with rituximab) retained an excellent graft function for more than 7 years without any recurrence of PSC.

Conclusions

The findings of this study shed light on the efficacy of a novel strategy to prevent the recurrence of PSC and the possible mechanisms provided by rituximab treatment are discussed.

Favorable results in ABO-incompatible renal transplantation without B cell-targeted therapy: Advantages and disadvantages of rituximab pretreatment

The effectiveness of desensitization with rituximab in ABO-incompatible renal transplantation (ABO-I) has been widely reported. However, ABO-I outcomes are still worse than those of ABO-identical or ABO-compatible renal transplantation (ABO-Id/C). We retrospectively examined the outcomes in consecutive living donor ABO-Id/C (n = 412) and ABO-I (n = 205) cases to elucidate the causes of inferiority in ABO-I. ABO-I cases included recipients treated with rituximab (RIT, n = 131), splenectomy (SPX, n = 21), or neither because of low anti-A/B antibody titers (NoR/S, n = 53). Graft survival, infection, and de novo HLA antibody production were compared for ABO-I and ABO-Id/C, followed by stratification into RIT and NoR/S groups. Propensity score-based methods were employed to limit selection bias and potential confounders. Overall graft survival for ABO-I was significantly lower than that for ABO-Id/C (92.8% vs 97.2% after 5 years, P = .0037). Graft loss due to infection with ABO-I was significantly more frequent than that with ABO-Id/C, whereas acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) caused no graft failure in ABO-I recipients. Stratified analysis demonstrated significantly higher infection risk with RIT than with NoR/S. Safe reduction or avoidance of rituximab in desensitization protocols might contribute to further improvement of ABO-I outcome.

Clinical outcomes of ABO- and HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation: a nationwide cohort study

This was a nationwide cohort study to investigate the impact of anti-A/B and donor-specific anti-HLA (HLA-DSA) antibodies on the clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). We classified a total of 1964 KTRs into four groups: transplants from ABO-incompatible donors (ABOi, n = 248); transplants in recipients with HLA-DSA (HLAi, n = 144); transplants from combined ABOi and HLAi donors (ABOi + HLAi, n = 31); and a control group for whom neither ABOi nor HLAi was applicable (CONT, n = 1541). We compared the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), allograft and patient survival rates. The incidence of BPAR was higher in the HLAi and ABOi + HLAi groups relative to the CONT group; in contrast, it was not higher in the ABOi group. Death-censored graft survival rates did not differ across the four groups. However, relative to the CONT group, patient survival rate was reduced in the ABOi and ABOi + HLAi groups, and with infection being the most common cause of death. Further, multivariable analysis revealed that desensitization therapy because of ABOi or HLAi was independent risk factors for patient mortality. HLAi was a more important risk factor for BPAR compared with ABOi. However, pretransplant desensitization therapy for either ABOi or HLAi significantly increased the risk of infection-related mortality.

Rituximab and hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg-negative/ anti-HBc-positive kidney transplant recipients

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation is a well-known complication of immunosuppressive therapy. Although rituximab is increasingly used for desensitization of ABO-incompatible or positive crossmatch kidney transplantation, the risk of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative/hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive kidney transplant patients receiving rituximab desensitization remains undetermined.

Methods

We analysed 172 resolved HBV patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation between 2008 and 2014. Patients were divided into rituximab ( n  =  49) or control ( n  =  123) groups. All patients were observed for HBV reactivation, which was defined as the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen or HBV DNA.

Results

During the follow-up period (median, 58 months; range, 4-95 months), five patients (10.2%) in the rituximab group and two patients (1.6%) in the control group experienced HBV reactivation (P   =   0.003). In the rituximab group, two patients experienced HBV-related severe hepatitis, and one patient died due to hepatic failure. The median time from rituximab desensitization to HBV reactivation was 11 months (range, 5-22 months). By contrast, no patients in the control group experienced severe hepatitis. The status of hepatitis B surface antibody was similar between groups. Rituximab desensitization [hazard ratio (HR), 9.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74-48.86; P   =   0.009] and hepatitis B surface antibody status (HR, 4.74; 95% CI, 1.05-21.23, P =   0.04) were significant risk factors for HBV reactivation.

Conclusions

Rituximab desensitization for incompatible kidney transplantation significantly increased the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients. Therefore, close monitoring of HBV DNA is required in these patients.

Rituximab for immunologic renal disease: What the nephrologist needs to know

Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric, monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, is increasingly used in immune-mediated renal diseases. While licensed in the induction treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis, it represents one of the most commonly prescribed off-label drugs. Much of the information regarding its safety has been drawn from experience in hematology and rheumatology. Ample evidence illustrates the safety of RTX, however, rare but serious adverse events have emerged that include progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and hepatitis B reactivation. Moderate to severe hypogammaglobulinemia and late-onset neutropenia following RTX therapy confer an increased infectious risk and factors predicting these side effects (i.e. a genetic basis) need to be identified. Nephrologists initiating RTX need to bear in mind that long-term risks and optimal dosing for many renal indications remain unclear. Special considerations must be given when RTX is used in women of childbearing age. We summarize practical aspects concerning the use of RTX. This review will provide nephrologists with information to guide their use of RTX alerting them to safety risks and the need for patient counselling.

Early Versus Late Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection Among Renal Transplant Recipients in Terms of Response to Rituximab Therapy: A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

There are no comparable trials concerning the use of rituximab among renal transplant recipients with acute antibody-mediated rejection. Here, we compared early and late acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients in terms of response to rituximab therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 1230 kidney transplants performed at Hamed Al-Essa Organ Transplant Center (Kuwait) over the past 10 years, 103 recipients developed acute antibody-mediated rejections and were subcategorized into 4 groups according to the onset of rejection and rituximab treatment. All patients received the standard treatment for acute antibody-mediated rejection according to our protocol (plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin). We added rituximab to the treatment regimen in 2 groups of patients: 27 patients with early rejection (group 1) and 38 patients with late rejection (group 2). Groups 3 and 4 represented nonrituximab groups, with 20 patients with early (group 3) and 18 patients with late rejection (group 4). We compared the 4 groups regarding graft and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

All patients were comparable regarding patient age, sex, pretransplant type of dialysis, viral profile, type of induction, donor criteria, and pretransplant comorbidities. We observed that delayed and slow graft function were significantly higher in groups 1 and 3 (P = .016); however, we found no significant differences in the 4 groups regarding new-onset diabetes after transplant, BK viral infection, and malignancy. Graft outcomes were significantly better in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4 (P = .028). However, patient outcomes were comparable in the 4 groups (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early acute antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients had significantly better outcomes when rituximab was added to the standard treatment regimen.