Risk and complications of venous thromboembolism in dialysis patients

U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024

The 2024 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by persons who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and a meeting with national experts in Atlanta, Georgia, during January 25-27, 2023. The information in this report replaces the 2016 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR 2016:65[No. RR-3]:1-103). Notable updates include 1) the addition of recommendations for persons with chronic kidney disease; 2) revisions to the recommendations for persons with certain characteristics or medical conditions (i.e., breastfeeding, postpartum, postabortion, obesity, surgery, deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism with or without anticoagulant therapy, thrombophilia, superficial venous thrombosis, valvular heart disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, high risk for HIV infection, cirrhosis, liver tumor, sickle cell disease, solid organ transplantation, and drug interactions with antiretrovirals used for prevention or treatment of HIV infection); and 3) inclusion of new contraceptive methods, including new doses or formulations of combined oral contraceptives, contraceptive patches, vaginal rings, progestin-only pills, levonorgestrel intrauterine devices, and vaginal pH modulator. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of evidence-based clinical practice guidance for health care providers. The goals of these recommendations are to remove unnecessary medical barriers to accessing and using contraception and to support the provision of person-centered contraceptive counseling and services in a noncoercive manner. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking contraceptive services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients; when needed, patients should seek advice from their health care providers about contraceptive use.

Safety and Efficacy of Apixaban vs Warfarin in Patients With Stage 4 and 5 Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

Warfarin has been an anticoagulant of choice in patients with advanced Chronic Kidney Diseases (CKD) at stages 4 and 5 for decades, but with the advent of Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs), there has been a sharp rise in their prescriptions. Among all NOACS, apixaban is the least reliant on kidney function and is a very popular choice for this patient population. However, being utilized extensively, most of the landmark trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of apixaban excluded patients with Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) <25mL/min/1.73 m² or Serum Creatinine (SCr) ≥2.5mg/dL. Its approval for advanced CKD patients came from limited pharmacokinetic data only. We conducted a systematic review comparing the safety and efficacy of apixaban to warfarin in patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD and on dialysis. We queried major research literature databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Cochrane Central, and ScienceDirect to find relevant articles without any time or language restrictions. After screening and quality checks, we identified 11 studies relevant to our research question, of which nine were retrospective cohort studies, one was a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial (RCT), and one was an RCT. The included studies had a total of 27,007 patients, with 4,335 patients taking apixaban and 22,672 on warfarin. The results indicate that the overall efficacy of apixaban was equivalent to warfarin for the prevention of stroke, systemic embolization, and recurrent venous thromboembolism, but apixaban showed an equivalent and, in some studies, better safety profile than warfarin concerning the occurrence of bleeding. Apixaban may hence be considered a reasonable alternative to warfarin in patients with Stage 4 or 5 CKD and receiving dialysis. In light of the reviewed articles, we conclude that apixaban has similar efficacy and somewhat superior safety profile to warfarin, with more randomized controlled trials required to add to the evidence.

A Review of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Stage 5 or End-Stage Kidney Disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of oral anticoagulation in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD-5) or end-stage kidney disease (ESKD).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed (January 2000 to July 1, 2021), the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases (through April 1, 2021) was performed with keywords DOAC (direct-acting oral anticoagulant) OR NOAC or dabigatran OR rivaroxaban OR apixaban OR edoxaban AND end-stage kidney disease combined with atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) OR pulmonary embolism OR deep-vein thrombosis.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Case-control, cohort, and randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs to an active control for AF or VTE in patients with CKD-5 or ESKD and reporting outcomes of stroke, recurrent thromboembolism, or major bleeding were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nine studies were included. Efficacy data supporting routine use of warfarin or DOACs in CKD-5 or ESKD are limited. Rivaroxaban and apixaban may provide enhanced safety compared to warfarin in patients with AF. Data for VTE are limited to 1 retrospective study.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

Because of the paucity of rigorous, prospective studies in CKD-5 or ESKD, OACs should not be broadly used in this population. It is clear that data regarding efficacy of DOACs cannot be reliably and safely extrapolated from the non-ESKD population. Therefore, use of OACs in this population should be individualized.

CONCLUSIONS

If OACs for stroke prevention with AF are deemed necessary, apixaban or rivaroxaban can be considered. DOACs cannot currently be recommended over warfarin in patients with CKD-5 or ESKD and VTE.

Apixaban anti-Xa level monitoring in treatment of acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis for patient on chronic hemodialysis: a case report

Background

Patients on dialysis are at higher risk of major bleeding and recurrent thrombosis creating acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment challenges. DOACs represent an interesting option but there are concerns of bioaccumulation and increased bleeding risk. Anti-Xa trough levels may be used to monitor for bioaccumulation but there is little data.

Case presentation

We describe a case, a 51 yo female, 36 kg on hemodialysis with a provoked acute upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in whom body habitus and calciphylaxis contraindicated the use of standard therapy. She received apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. The apixaban anti-Xa trough levels were measured weekly 12 h after the morning dose and ranged from 58 to 84 ng/mL, similar to expected levels with normal renal function. There were no adverse events in the 3 months follow-up.

Conclusions

We saw no evidence of bioaccumulation indicating a potential role for low dose apixaban for acute VTE in dialysis patients.

Providing Care for Transgender Persons With Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review

Purpose of review

Nephrologists are increasingly providing care to transgender individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, they may lack familiarity with this patient population that faces unique challenges. The purpose of this review is to discuss the care of transgender persons and what nephrologists should be aware of when providing care to their transgender patients.

Sources of information

Original research articles were identified from MEDLINE and Google Scholar using the search terms "transgender," "gender," "sex," "chronic kidney disease," "end stage kidney disease," "dialysis," "transplant," and "nephrology."

Methods

A focused review and critical appraisal of existing literature regarding the provision of care to transgender men and women with CKD including dialysis and transplant to identify specific issues related to gender-affirming therapy and chronic disease management in transgender persons.

Key findings

Transgender persons are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with the cisgender population including mental health, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, sexually transmitted infections, and mortality. Individuals with CKD have a degree of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and decreased levels of endogenous sex hormones; therefore, transgender persons with CKD may require reduced exogenous sex hormone dosing. Exogenous estradiol therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease which may be further increased in CKD. Exogenous testosterone therapy increases the risk of polycythemia which should be closely monitored. The impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) trajectory in CKD is unclear. Gender-affirming hormone therapy with testosterone, estradiol, and anti-androgen therapies changes body composition and lean body mass which influences creatinine generation and the performance for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations in transgender persons. Confirmation of eGFR with measured GFR is reasonable if an accurate knowledge of GFR is needed for clinical decision-making.

Limitations

There are limited studies regarding the intersection of transgender persons and kidney disease and those that exist are mostly case reports. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies in nephrology do not routinely differentiate between cisgender and transgender participants.

Implications

This review highlights important considerations for providing care to transgender persons with kidney disease. Additional research is needed to evaluate the performance of eGFR equations in transgender persons, the effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy, and the impact of being transgender on outcomes in persons with kidney disease.

Oral Factor Xa Inhibitors versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease

Introduction

Warfarin remains the preferred oral anticoagulant for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become preferred for treatment of VTE in the general population, patients with advanced CKD were excluded from the landmark trials. Postmarketing, safety data have demonstrated oral factor Xa inhibitors (OFXais) such as apixaban and rivaroxaban to be alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, it remains unknown if these safety data can be extrapolated to the treatment of VTE and CKD.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study from January 2013 to October 2019 was performed at NYU Langone Health. All adult patients with CKD stage 4 or greater, treated with anticoagulation for VTE, were screened. The primary outcome was tolerability of anticoagulant therapy at 3 months, defined as a composite of bleeding, thromboembolic events, and/or discontinuation rates. The secondary outcomes included bleeding, discontinuations, and recurrent thromboembolism.

Results

There were 56 patients evaluated, of which 39 (70%) received warfarin and 17 (30%) received an OFXai (apixaban or rivaroxaban). Tolerability at 3 months was assessed in 48/56 patients (86%). A total of 34/48 (71%) patients tolerated anticoagulation at 3 months, 12 (80%) in the OFXai arm, and 22 (67%) in the warfarin arm (p=0.498). There were 10/48 (21%) patients that experienced any bleeding events within 3 months, 7 on warfarin, and 3 on apixaban. Recurrence of thromboembolism within 3 months occurred in 3 patients on warfarin, with no recurrence in the OFXai arm. Discussion. OFXais were better tolerated compared to warfarin for the treatment of VTE in CKD, with lower rates of bleeding, discontinuations, and recurrent thromboembolism in a small cohort. Future prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Providing Care for Transgender Persons With Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review

Purpose of review:

Nephrologists are increasingly providing care to transgender individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, they may lack familiarity with this patient population that faces unique challenges. The purpose of this review is to discuss the care of transgender persons and what nephrologists should be aware of when providing care to their transgender patients.

Sources of information:

Original research articles were identified from MEDLINE and Google Scholar using the search terms “transgender,” “gender,” “sex,” “chronic kidney disease,” “end stage kidney disease,” “dialysis,” “transplant,” and “nephrology.”

Methods:

A focused review and critical appraisal of existing literature regarding the provision of care to transgender men and women with CKD including dialysis and transplant to identify specific issues related to gender-affirming therapy and chronic disease management in transgender persons.

Key findings:

Transgender persons are at an increased risk of adverse outcomes compared with the cisgender population including mental health, cardiovascular disease, malignancy, sexually transmitted infections, and mortality. Individuals with CKD have a degree of hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and decreased levels of endogenous sex hormones; therefore, transgender persons with CKD may require reduced exogenous sex hormone dosing. Exogenous estradiol therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism and cardiovascular disease which may be further increased in CKD. Exogenous testosterone therapy increases the risk of polycythemia which should be closely monitored. The impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) trajectory in CKD is unclear. Gender-affirming hormone therapy with testosterone, estradiol, and anti-androgen therapies changes body composition and lean body mass which influences creatinine generation and the performance for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations in transgender persons. Confirmation of eGFR with measured GFR is reasonable if an accurate knowledge of GFR is needed for clinical decision-making.

Limitations:

There are limited studies regarding the intersection of transgender persons and kidney disease and those that exist are mostly case reports. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies in nephrology do not routinely differentiate between cisgender and transgender participants.

Implications:

This review highlights important considerations for providing care to transgender persons with kidney disease. Additional research is needed to evaluate the performance of eGFR equations in transgender persons, the effects of gender-affirming hormone therapy, and the impact of being transgender on outcomes in persons with kidney disease.

Anticoagulant strategies for the patient with chronic kidney disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global health problem affecting up to 14% of the adult population in developed countries. On the basis of current guidelines, patients with CKD will often fulfil criteria for both short-term and long-term anticoagulation. Paradoxically, patients with CKD are not only at a higher risk of thrombosis, they are also at increased risk of bleeding. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of many anticoagulant therapies are significantly affected by renal dysfunction. In addition, patients with advanced CKD are often systematically excluded from major clinical trials. As such, the decision on whether to anticoagulate or not, and if so with what agent, poses significant challenges. A solid understanding of the condition in question and the available treatments is required to make an informed judgement call. An in-depth appreciation of the advantages and disadvantages of the currently available anticoagulants is a key element in the decision-making process.