Doppler ultrasound surveillance of recently formed haemodialysis arteriovenous fistula: the SONAR observational cohort study

Background

Arteriovenous fistulas are considered the best option for haemodialysis provision, but as many as 30% fail to mature or suffer early failure.

Objective

To assess the feasibility of performing a randomised controlled trial that examines whether, by informing early and effective salvage intervention of fistulas that would otherwise fail, Doppler ultrasound surveillance of developing arteriovenous fistulas improves longer-term arteriovenous fistula patency.

Design

A prospective multicentre observational cohort study (the 'SONAR' study).

Setting

Seventeen haemodialysis centres in the UK.

Participants

Consenting adults with end-stage renal disease who were scheduled to have an arteriovenous fistula created.

Intervention

Participants underwent Doppler ultrasound surveillance of their arteriovenous fistulas at 2, 4, 6 and 10 weeks after creation, with clinical teams blinded to the ultrasound surveillance findings.

Main outcome measures

Fistula maturation at week 10 defined according to ultrasound surveillance parameters of representative venous diameter and blood flow (wrist arteriovenous fistulas: ≥ 4 mm and > 400 ml/minute; elbow arteriovenous fistulas: ≥ 5 mm and > 500 ml/minute). Mixed multivariable logistic regression modelling of the early ultrasound scan data was used to predict arteriovenous fistula non-maturation by 10 weeks and fistula failure at 6 months.

Results

A total of 333 arteriovenous fistulas were created during the study window (47.7% wrist, 52.3% elbow). By 2 weeks, 37 (11.1%) arteriovenous fistulas had failed (thrombosed), but by 10 weeks, 219 of 333 (65.8%) of created arteriovenous fistulas had reached maturity (60.4% wrist, 67.2% elbow). Persistently lower flow rates and venous diameters were observed in those fistulas that did not mature. Models for arteriovenous fistulas' non-maturation could be optimally constructed using the week 4 scan data, with fistula venous diameter and flow rate the most significant variables in explaining wrist fistula maturity failure (positive predictive value 60.6%, 95% confidence interval 43.9% to 77.3%), whereas resistance index and flow rate were most significant for elbow arteriovenous fistulas (positive predictive value 66.7%, 95% confidence interval 48.9% to 84.4%). In contrast to non-maturation, both models predicted fistula maturation much more reliably [negative predictive values of 95.4% (95% confidence interval 91.0% to 99.8%) and 95.6% (95% confidence interval 91.8% to 99.4%) for wrist and elbow, respectively]. Additional follow-up and modelling on a subset (n = 192) of the original SONAR cohort (the SONAR-12M study) revealed the rates of primary, assisted primary and secondary patency arteriovenous fistulas at 6 months were 76.5, 80.7 and 83.3, respectively. Fistula vein size, flow rate and resistance index could identify primary patency failure at 6 months, with similar predictive power as for 10-week arteriovenous fistula maturity failure, but with wide confidence intervals for wrist (positive predictive value 72.7%, 95% confidence interval 46.4% to 99.0%) and elbow (positive predictive value 57.1%, 95% confidence interval 20.5% to 93.8%). These models, moreover, performed poorly at identifying assisted primary and secondary patency failure, likely because a subset of those arteriovenous fistulas identified on ultrasound surveillance as at risk underwent subsequent successful salvage intervention without recourse to early ultrasound data.

Conclusions

Although early ultrasound can predict fistula maturation and longer-term patency very effectively, it was only moderately good at identifying those fistulas likely to remain immature or to fail within 6 months. Allied to the better- than-expected fistula patency rates achieved (that are further improved by successful salvage), we estimate that a randomised controlled trial comparing early ultrasound-guided intervention against standard care would require at least 1300 fistulas and would achieve only minimal patient benefit.

Trial Registration

This trial is registered as ISRCTN36033877 and ISRCTN17399438.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR135572) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 24. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Hemodynamics in AVF over time: A protective role of vascular remodeling toward flow stabilization

The mechanisms underlying vascular stenosis formation in the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) for hemodialysis (HD) remain mostly unknown. Several computational fluid dynamics (CFD) studies have suggested a potential role for unsteady flow in inducing intimal hyperplasia and AVF stenosis, but the majority of these observations have been limited to a single time point after surgical creation. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relation between hemodynamic conditions and AVF vascular remodeling through a CFD longitudinal study. Non contrast-enhanced MR images and Doppler Ultrasound (US) examinations were acquired at 3 days, 40 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 1.5 years after surgery in a 72-year male referred for native radio-cephalic AVF. Three-dimensional AVF models were generated and high fidelity CFD simulations were performed using pimpleFoam, setting patient-specific boundary conditions derived from US. Morphological and hemodynamic changes over time were then analyzed. Analysis of vessel morphology and hemodynamics during follow-up showed that the AVF had a successful maturation process, characterized by a massive arterial and venous dilatation within the 6 months after surgery, a corresponding increase in blood flow volume and important flow instabilities. Between 6 months and 1 year, a stenosis developed in the juxta-anastomotic vein and caused AVF failure at 1.5 years. The development of stenosis was paralleled by the regularization of blood flow velocity pattern and consequent decrease in the near-wall disturbed flow metrics. These results suggest that development of intimal hyperplasia and vessel stenosis, triggered by unsteady flow, could be the result of vascular inward remodeling toward regularization of turbulent-like flow.

Oscillometric pulse wave analysis for detecting low flow arteriovenous fistula

BACKGROUND

Pulse wave analysis may be useful to assess fistula function. We aimed to prospectively evaluate if convenient oscillometric devices are applicable to detect flow below 500 ml/min in a real life clinical setting.

METHODS

Pulse waves were recorded ambilaterally with the vicorder® device at the brachial artery in 53 patients on haemodialysis with native fistula. Primary variables consisted of the mean slope between the systolic maximum and the diacrotic notch (Slope2), the sum of the mean slopes in the four characteristic sections of pulse waves (Slope∑) and the amplitude of relative volumetric change in the measuring cuff at the upper arm (AMP). Fistula flow was measured with the use of duplex sonography using a standardized approach.

RESULTS

Parameter values above or below the median indicated measurement at the non-fistula side, with sensitivities/specificities of 0.79/0.79 (p < 0.001) for Slope 2, 0.64/0.64 (p = 0.003) for Slope∑ and 0.81/0.81 (p < 0.001) for AMP if measurements at the fistula and non-fistula arm were considered. ROC-analyses of parameter values measured at the fistula to detect low flow demonstrated AUCs (with CI) of 0.652 (0.437-0.866, p = 0.167) for Slope2, 0.732 (0.566-0.899, p = 0.006) for Slope∑ and 0.775 (0.56-0.991, p = 0.012) for AMP. The point with maximal youden's index was regarded as optimal cut-off, which corresponded to sensitivities and specificities of 0.8/0.56 for slope2, 0.86/ 0.56 for Slope∑ and 0.93/0.78 for AMP.

CONCLUSION

Functional surveillance with oscillometry is a promising clinical application to detect a low fistula flow. Among all investigated pulse wave parameters AMP revealed the highest diagnostic accuracy.

Reassessing the utility of access recirculation and Kt/V for the prediction of arteriovenous fistula failure using online clearance monitoring: the SHUNT STUDY

BACKGROUND

The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is prone to thrombosis which can be avoided by use of monitoring and surveillance programmes. Although surveillance imaging techniques have been shown to be more sensitive and specific than clinical monitoring during dialysis, monitoring may have significant advantages in terms of cost and time saving. In this study we evaluate the yield of two monitoring techniques [blood temperature monitoring (BTM) access recirculation (AR) and Kt/V via online-clearance-monitoring (OCM)].

METHODS

In this single-centre prospective observational study, 101 patients were followed-up for one year. The primary outcome measure was a composite of AVF failure. OCM-Kt/V and BTM-AR were recorded at every dialysis session.

RESULTS

Of all baseline characteristics only a prior history of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) to the AVF conferred a significant change in AVF survival (failure events/100 pt years with prior PTA vs. without = 64.0 vs. 17.3, log-rank p = 0.0014; unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) 3.74 (95% CI 1.56-8.94) p = 0.003). Participants with baseline AR < 10% vs. > 15% had poorer AVF survival (p = 0.0002) and HR for baseline AR 10-15% group vs. AR > 15% group = 4.5 (95% CI 1.55-13.05). There was no combination of change in (Δ) AR, ΔKt/V or its presence over any number of dialysis sessions that provided an acceptable combination of sensitivity and specificity or discrimination for AVF failure.

CONCLUSIONS

BTM-AR and OCM-Kt/V are specific but insufficiently sensitive tools for the prediction of AVF failure. BTM-AR and OCM-Kt/V use at every dialysis session appears to add little to the traditional, infrequent use of these evaluations.

Characterization of hemodialysis fistulas experienced abrupt thrombosis and determination of a proper follow-up protocol: A retrospective cohort study and an interventionist's perspective

Abrupt thrombosis is a form of thrombosis that occurs unexpectedly and without being preceded by hemodialysis fistula (AVF) dysfunction during dialysis. We found that AVFs with a history of abrupt thrombosis (abtAVF) appeared to have more episodes of thrombosis and required more frequent interventions than those without such history. Therefore, we sought to characterize the abtAVFs and examined our follow-up protocols to determine which one is optimal. We performed a retrospective cohort study using routinely collected data. The thrombosis rate, AVF loss rate, thrombosis-free primary patency, and secondary patency were calculated. Additionally, the restenosis rates of the AVFs under the follow-up protocol/sub-protocols and the abtAVFs were determined. The thrombosis rate, procedure rate, AVF loss rate, thrombosis-free primary patency, and secondary patency of the abtAVFs were 0.237/pt-yr, 2.702/pt-yr, 0.027/pt-yr, 78.3%, and 96.0%, respectively. The restenosis rate for AVFs in the abtAVF group and the angiographic follow-up sub-protocol were similar. However, the abtAVF group had a significantly higher thrombosis rate and AVF loss rate than AVFs without a history of abrupt thrombosis (n-abtAVF). The lowest thrombosis rate was observed for n-abtAVFs, followed up periodically under the outpatient or angiographic sub-protocols. AVFs with a history of abrupt thrombosis had a high restenosis rate, and periodic angiographic follow-up with a mean interval of 3 months was presumed appropriate. For selected populations, such as salvage-challenging AVFs, periodic outpatient or angiographic follow-up was mandatory to extend their usable lives for hemodialysis.

Results of the implementation of a triage system of vascular access performance in haemodialysis patients: experience of a single dialysis centre

BACKGROUND

Routine systems for monitoring vascular access (VA) performance are lacking. We developed a vascular access triage system to evaluate the monthly performance of the access, developed a specific score and assessed the association between score improvement and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Vascular access was triaged (Green, Yellow or Red) according to a score generated by dialytic and clinical parameters in all patients who, from 1/1/2014 to 31/03/2014, had been receiving haemodialysis treatment for at least 3 consecutive months in our Unit and who were then followed up for 4 years.

RESULTS

We enrolled 130 patients, 78 with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and 52 with tunnelled central venous catheter (CVC). During a median of 29 ± 11 months of follow up (range 3-46 months), 28 deaths and 303 hospitalizations (lasting 16 ± 30 days) were recorded. Vascular access triage scores improved over time (2014 vs 2015 vs 2016 vs 2017) in the population with an AVF (Green from 25% to 58% to 77% to 79%, Yellow from 65% to 39% to 18% to 20% and Red from 10% to 3% to 5% to 1%, respectively; χ² p < 0.01) but not in the CVC group (Green 58% to 57% to 80% to 92%; Yellow 37% to 36% to 20% to 8%; Red 5% to 7% to 0%; χ² = n.s). Blood pressure and dialysis efficiency improved in the population as a whole and in the two subgroups (AVF and CVC) separately. AVF and CVC populations, stratified separately according to median VA score, had different event-free follow-up, which was higher (p = 0.0085) in patients with lower scores in the AVF population only.

CONCLUSION

The vascular access monitoring system improved the vascular access score as well as some clinical and dialytic parameters. Green triage in AVF patients identify those with better outcomes, in agreement with the commonly recognized clinical value of a well-functioning vascular access.

Arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis: Brief review and current problems

The number of people worldwide living with end-stage renal disease is increasing. Arteriovenous fistulas are the preferred method of vascular access in patients who will require hemodialysis. As the number of patients with arteriovenous fistulas grows, the role of physicians who intervene who maintain and salvage these fistulas will grow in importance. This review aims to familiarize practitioners with the rationale for arteriovenous fistula creation, the detection of fistula dysfunction, and the state of the art on fistula maintenance and preservation. Current controversies are briefly reviewed.

A Korean perspective on the 2019 Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines for vascular access: what has changed and what should be changed in practice?

The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines are developed by the National Kidney Foundation in the United States; however, the guidelines have an impact on most international societies, including those in Korea. The KDOQI recently released the updated 2019 guidelines for vascular access based on numerous papers and controversies concerning vascular access since 2006, when the first guidelines were published. The new KDOQI guidelines have undergone significant changes compared to previous guidelines, including a change in the philosophy regarding a patient-centered approach using an end-stage kidney disease “Life-Plan.” In addition, there are newly developed or revised definitions and some key differences from previous guidelines. The process of adapting guidelines needs to be individualized to hemodialysis practice in each country, while agreeing with general principles and philosophy; therefore, we summarize changes in the updated guidelines and discuss the application and implementation of the new principles and concepts of the guidelines for vascular access care in Korea.

Analysis of access flow using duplex ultrasonography and the ultrasound dilutional method

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between duplex ultrasonography (DUS) and ultrasound dilution (UD) measurement's results and determine the factors affecting the correlation of the measured values among other clinical factors in patients.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2020 to May 2020 and included 60 patients who visited our dialysis centre. The flow of the fistula was measured in the proximal brachial artery using DUS. While dialysis was performed on the same day, the access flow was measured using the UD method. The correlation and agreement between the access flows acquired by each measurement method were analysed. Similarly, the correlation was analysed by classifying the groups based on the predisposing factor, and statistically significant factors were observed through comparison.

RESULTS

Both measurements showed a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.60, p < 0.01). The bias (mean of UD-DUS) between the two measurements was about 230 mL/min. When the measurement site of DUS was near the inflow artery and in the same anatomical section, a strong correlation with the measurement value of UD was observed (brachial based fistula: r = 0.85, radial based fistula: r = 0.87). Similarly, for patients without diabetes and those who regularly underwent access surveillance for the dialysis route, strong correlations were observed between the two measurements (r = 0.79 and r = 0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors can influence the correlation between UD and DUS. The findings showed a high correlation for DUS measurement sites within the same anatomical section as the inflow artery, patients without diabetes, and patients undergoing periodic surveillance.

Getting the basics right: the monitoring of arteriovenous fistulae, a review of the evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite being the preferred vascular access for haemodialysis, the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains prone to a number of complications, the most common of these being thrombosis secondary to stenosis. This has resulted in the widespread use of monitoring and surveillance programmes. Surveillance uses more resources than monitoring and has not been convincingly shown to improve outcomes. The evidence supporting the use of the various monitoring tools has been relatively neglected and has not been the focus of literature review. This narrative review is the first to appraise the evidence for the use of physical examination, access recirculation, Kt/V and dynamic venous pressures (DVP) as monitoring tools in mature AVF.

RECENT FINDINGS

The vastly increased number of data points for access recirculation, Kt/V and DVP produced as standard by online clearance monitoring (OCM) on modern dialysis machines is likely to have significantly changed the utility of these metrics in the prediction of AVF failure. Algorithms have been developed to highlight those of highest risk of failure.

SUMMARY

The evidence supporting the use of monitoring in the prediction of AVF failure is predominantly observational, underpowered and more than 20 years old. Access recirculation and Kt/V appears to have higher utility in AVF than in arteriovenous grafts. We suggest that the development of OCM necessitates the reevaluation of these tools.

A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodialysis Access Blood Flow Surveillance Compared to Standard of Care: The Hemodialysis Access Surveillance Evaluation (HASE) Study

Introduction

Arteriovenous (AV) access thrombosis remains 1 of the most troubling AV access–related complications affecting hemodialysis patients. It necessitates an urgent and occasionally complicated thrombectomy procedure and increases the risk of AV access loss. AV access stenosis is found in the majority of thrombosed AV accesses. The routine use of AV access surveillance for the early detection and management of stenosis to reduce the thrombosis rate remains controversial.

Methods

We have conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the standard of care coupled with ultrasound dilution technique (UDT) flow measurement monthly surveillance with the standard of care alone.

Results

We prospectively randomized 436 patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or arteriovenous graft (AVG) using cluster (shift) randomization to surveillance and control groups. There were no significant differences in the baseline demographic data between the 2 groups, except for ethnicity (P = 0.017). Patients were followed on average for 15.2 months. There were significantly less per-patient thrombotic events (Poisson rate) in the surveillance group (0.12/patient) compared with the control group (0.23/patient) (P = 0.012). There was no statistically significant difference in the total number of procedures between the 2 groups, irrespective of whether thrombectomy procedures were included or excluded, and no statistically significant differences in the rate of or time to the first thrombotic event or the number of catheters placed due to thrombosis.

Conclusion

The use of UDT flow measurement monthly AV access surveillance in this multicenter randomized controlled trial reduced the per-patient thrombotic events without significantly increasing the total number of angiographic procedures. Even though there is a trend, surveillance did not reduce the first thrombotic event rate.