Clinical practice guideline on peri- and postoperative care of arteriovenous fistulas and grafts for haemodialysis in adults

Antiphospholipid antibody positivity is associated with maturation failure and thrombosis of native arteriovenous fistula: a retrospective study in HD patients

Background and hypothesis

The prevalence of antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) is high among hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to the general population and is inconsistently associated with arteriovenous fistula (AVF) thrombosis or stenosis. The association with maturation failure has never been investigated. This study aims to evaluate native AVF complications (thrombosis, stenosis, and maturation failure) and primary patency in aPL positive HD patients.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 116 HD patients with native AVF. We collected the aPL profiles, the clinical and biological data potentially involved in AVF maturation failure, thrombosis, and stenosis, and investigated the association of these complications and aPL positivity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.

Results

In our cohort, the prevalence of aPL persistent positivity was 32.7% and this was strongly associated with AVF maturation failure defined by ultrasound. aPL persistent positivity was a strong predictor in multivariate analysis and this association was independent of AVF stenosis or thrombosis during maturation process. There was no association with primary and functional primary patency, and stenosis. However, aPL persistent positivity according to ACR/EULAR classification criteria was associated with thrombosis when compared to strictly negative aPL patients.

Conclusions

In our cohort, aPL persistent positivity was significantly associated with AVF maturation failure and thrombosis but not with AVF stenosis. To our knowledge, we report for the first time, a statistically significant association between aPL positivity and delay or absence of native AVF maturation.

Preconditions that facilitate cannulation in arteriovenous fistula: A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Nurses have a great responsibility in the daily care of arteriovenous fistulae, which entails the potential to affect patency. However, good cannulation technique involves more than placing a needle in the vessel and relies on different skills to facilitate needling.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the preconditions for cannulation in arteriovenous fistulas.

DESIGN

Descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis were used in a mixed-methods design.

PARTICIPANTS

Haemodialysis units in Sweden.

MEASUREMENTS

Local guidelines regarding arteriovenous fistula cannulation were analysed in parallel with responses to a questionnaire that contained open-ended and closed-ended questions on cannulation technique.

RESULTS

Preconditions that facilitate cannulation fall into five stages, each with relevant factors in relation to the cannulation, as follows: planning cannulation-maturation and planning the cannulation, patient record, education and experience, and patient information; precannulation-physical examination, hygiene routines, arm position, tourniquet, choosing the cannulation site, and preventing pain; during cannulation-how to needle, type of needle, angle during cannulation, fixation, and adjusting; evaluating cannulation-blood flow rate and arterial and venous pressure; and postcannulation-needle withdrawal and haemostasis. The majority of dialysis units identified implementation of most of these preconditions, but the units handle several practical aspects differently.

CONCLUSIONS

Tracing the chain of cannulation led to identification of necessary preconditions for facilitating good cannulation technique. The findings also show the need for a better understanding of how different preconditions affect arteriovenous fistula and patency.

Cannulation technique and complications in arteriovenous fistulas: a Swedish Renal Registry-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The four cannulation techniques, rope ladder (RL), area puncture (AP), buttonhole with blunt needles (BHb), and buttonhole with sharp needles (BHs), affects the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in different ways. The aim of this study was to describe the relationship between the different cannulation techniques and the occurrence of AVF complications.

METHODS

The study was performed as a national registry-based cohort study using data from the Swedish Renal Registry (SRR). Data were collected from January 2014 to October 2019. Seventy of Sweden's dialysis units participate in the registry. We analyzed a total of 1328 AVFs in this study. The risk of complications was compared between the four different cannulation techniques. The risk of AVF complications was measured by the incidence and incidence rate ratio (IRR). We compared the IRRs of complications between different cannulation techniques.

RESULTS

BHs is the most common cannulation technique in Sweden. It has been used in 55% of the AVFs at some point during their functional patency. BHb (29%), RL (13%), and AP (3%) has been used less. BHb had the lowest risk of complications compared to the other techniques, and a significantly lower risk of stenosis, infiltration, cannulation difficulties, compared to RL and BHs. Cannulation difficulties were significantly more common using AP compared to BHs, and BHb. Infections were not significantly increased using the buttonhole technique.

CONCLUSIONS

BHb had the lowest risk of complications. Infections were not significantly increased using the buttonhole technique. Dialysis units with a low infection rate may continue to use the buttonhole technique, as the risk of complications is lower.