Outcome of children with Shiga toxin-associated haemolytic uraemic syndrome treated with eculizumab: a matched cohort study

Eculizumab in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli hemolytic uremic syndrome: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Infection-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (IA-HUS), most often due to infection with Shiga toxin-producing bacteria, mainly affects young children. It can be acutely life-threatening, as well as cause long-term kidney and neurological morbidity. Specific treatment with proven efficacy is lacking. Since activation of the alternative complement pathway occurs in HUS, the monoclonal C5 antibody eculizumab is often used off-label once complications, e.g., seizures, occur. Eculizumab is prohibitively expensive and carries risk of infection. Its utility in IA-HUS has not been systematically studied. This systematic review aims to present, summarize, and evaluate all currently available data regarding the effect of eculizumab administration on medium- to long-term outcomes (i.e., outcomes after the acute phase, with a permanent character) in IA-HUS.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting the impact of eculizumab on medium- to long-term outcomes in IA-HUS. The final search occurred on March 2, 2022. Studies providing original data regarding medium- to long-term outcomes in at least 5 patients with IA-HUS, treated with at least one dose of eculizumab during the acute illness, were included. No other restrictions were imposed regarding patient population. Studies were excluded if data overlapped substantially with other studies, or if outcomes of IA-HUS patients were not reported separately. Study quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool for risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Data were analyzed descriptively.

RESULTS

A total of 2944 studies were identified. Of these, 14 studies including 386 eculizumab-treated patients met inclusion criteria. All studies were observational. Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) was identified as the infectious agent in 381 of 386 patients (98.7%), effectively limiting the interpretation of the data to STEC-HUS patients. Pooling of data across studies was not possible. No study reported a statistically significant positive effect of eculizumab on any medium- to long-term outcome. Most studies were, however, subject to critical risk of bias due to confounding, as more severely ill patients received eculizumab. Three studies attempted to control for confounding through patient matching, although residual bias persisted due to matching limitations.

DISCUSSION

Current observational evidence does not permit any conclusion regarding the impact of eculizumab in IA-HUS given critical risk of bias. Results of randomized clinical trials are eagerly awaited, as new therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to prevent long-term morbidity in these severely ill patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

OSF Registries, MSZY4, Registration DOI https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MSZY4 .

Eculizumab in STEC-HUS: a paradigm shift in the management of pediatric patients with neurological involvement

BACKGROUND

Eculizumab for the treatment of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a standard of care. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)-HUS is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. There is no consensus on the use of plasma exchange and/or eculizumab. We report a series (n = 4) of children with CNS involvement in STEC-HUS with excellent outcomes after treatment with eculizumab only and supportive therapies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with CNS involvement in STEC-HUS is managed with supportive therapies and eculizumab only.

RESULTS

Four patients (75% female) with a median age of 5 years and 11 months (IQR: 23.5-105.5 months) were admitted to a tertiary pediatric nephrology center with CNS involvement in STEC-HUS. Neurological symptoms presented between days 2 and 7 of illness and included ataxia, altered mental status, visual symptoms, and seizures. All had an abnormal MRI brain. All received two doses of eculizumab, 1 week apart (dosing according to weight). Resolution of neurological symptoms was evident at a mean of 60 h post-administration (range: 24-72 h). All patients have complete kidney and neurological recovery at 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

We present a case series of four children with STEC-HUS and CNS involvement, managed with eculizumab only, in lieu of plasma exchange (as per our previous policy). The marked improvement in symptoms in our cohort supports the use of eculizumab, rather than plasma exchange in the CNS involvement of STEC-HUS.

Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Treated via Immunomodulation with the Selective Cytopheretic Device

INTRODUCTION

Shiga-toxin associated-hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) is a severe cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in children. Although most children recover, about 5% die and 30% develop chronic renal morbidity. HUS pathophysiology includes activated neutrophils damaging vascular endothelial cells. Therapeutic immunomodulation of activated neutrophils may alter the progression of disease. We present 3 pediatric patients treated with the selective cytopheretic device (SCD).

METHODS

We describe a 12 y.o. (patient 1) and two 2 y.o. twins (patients 2 and 3) with STEC-HUS requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) who were enrolled in two separate studies of the SCD.

RESULTS

Patient 1 presented with STEC-HUS causing AKI and multisystem organ failure and received 7 days of SCD and CRRT treatment. After SCD initiation, the patient had gradual recovery of multi-organ dysfunction, with normal kidney and hematologic parameters at 60-day follow-up. Patients 2 and 3 presented with STEC-HUS with AKI requiring dialysis. Each received 24 h of SCD therapy. Thereafter, both gradually improved, with normalization (patient 2) and near-normalization (patient 3) of kidney function at 60-day follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Immunomodulatory treatment with the SCD was associated with improvements in multisystem stigmata of STEC-HUS-induced AKI and was well-tolerated without any device-related adverse events.

Diagnosis and Treatment for Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli Associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC)-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) is a clinical syndrome involving hemolytic anemia (with fragmented red blood cells), low levels of platelets in the blood (thrombocytopenia), and acute kidney injury (AKI). It is the major infectious cause of AKI in children. In severe cases, neurological complications and even death may occur. Treating STEC-HUS is challenging, as patients often already have organ injuries when they seek medical treatment. Early diagnosis is of great significance for improving prognosis and reducing mortality and sequelae. In this review, we first briefly summarize the diagnostics for STEC-HUS, including history taking, clinical manifestations, fecal and serological detection methods for STEC, and complement activation monitoring. We also summarize preventive and therapeutic strategies for STEC-HUS, such as vaccines, volume expansion, renal replacement therapy (RRT), antibiotics, plasma exchange, antibodies and inhibitors that interfere with receptor binding, and the intracellular trafficking of the Shiga toxin.

Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Thrombotic Microangiopathies: A Simple Test to Facilitate Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura and Hemolytic and Uremic Syndrome Diagnosis

Background: Early diagnosis of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) versus hemolytic and uremic syndrome (HUS) is critical for the prompt initiation of specific therapies. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the proteinuria/creatininuria ratio (PU/CU) for TTP versus HUS. Patients/Methods: In a retrospective study, in association with the “French Score” (FS) (platelets < 30 G/L and serum creatinine level < 200 µmol/L), we assessed PU/CU for the diagnosis of TTP in patients above the age of 15 with thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). Patients with a history of kidney disease or with on-going cancer, allograft or pregnancy were excluded from the analysis. Results: Between February 2011 and April 2019, we identified 124 TMA. Fifty-six TMA patients for whom PU/CU were available, including 35 TTP and 21 HUS cases, were considered. Using receiver–operating characteristic curves (ROC), those with a threshold of 1.5 g/g for the PU/CU had a 77% sensitivity (95% CI (63, 94)) and a 90% specificity (95% CI (71, 100)) for TTP diagnosis compared with those having an 80% sensitivity (95% CI (66, 92)) and a 90% specificity (95% CI (76, 100) with a FS of 2. In comparison, a composite score, defined as a FS of 2 or a PU/CU ≤ 1.5 g/g, improved sensitivity to 99.6% (95% CI (93, 100)) for TTP diagnosis and enabled us to reclassify seven false-negative TTP patients. Conclusions: The addition of urinary PU/CU upon admission of patients with TMA is a fast and readily available test that can aid in the differential diagnosis of TTP versus HUS alongside traditional scoring.

Thrombotic microangiopathy in children

The syndrome of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a clinical-pathological entity characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and end organ involvement. It comprises a spectrum of underlying etiologies that may differ in children and adults. In children, apart from ruling out shigatoxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) and other infection-associated TMA like Streptococcus pneumoniae-HUS, rare inherited causes including complement-associated HUS, cobalamin defects, and mutations in diacylglycerol kinase epsilon gene must be investigated. TMA should also be considered in the setting of solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In this review, acquired and inherited causes of TMA are described with a focus on particularities of the main causes of TMA in children. A pragmatic approach that may help the clinician tailor evaluation and management is provided. The described approach will allow for early initiation of treatment while waiting for the definitive diagnosis of the underlying TMA.

Neurological involvement in children with hemolytic uremic syndrome

Our objective was to establish the rate of neurological involvement in Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli-hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) and describe the clinical presentation, management and outcome. A retrospective chart review of children aged ≤ 16 years with STEC-HUS in Children's Health Ireland from 2005 to 2018 was conducted. Laboratory confirmation of STEC infection was required for inclusion. Neurological involvement was defined as encephalopathy, focal neurological deficit, and/or seizure activity. Data on clinical presentation, management, and outcome were collected. We identified 240 children with HUS; 202 had confirmed STEC infection. Neurological involvement occurred in 22 (11%). The most common presentation was seizures (73%). In the neurological group, 19 (86%) were treated with plasma exchange and/or eculizumab. Of the 21 surviving children with neurological involvement, 19 (91%) achieved a complete neurological recovery. A higher proportion of children in the neurological group had renal sequelae (27% vs. 12%, P = .031). One patient died from multi-organ failure.Conclusion: We have identified the rate of neurological involvement in a large cohort of children with STEC-HUS as 11%. Neurological involvement in STEC-HUS is associated with good long-term outcome (complete neurological recovery in 91%) and a low case-fatality rate (4.5%) in our cohort. What is Known: • HUS is associated with neurological involvement in up to 30% of cases. • Neurological involvement has been reported as predictor of poor outcome, with associated increased morbidity and mortality. What is New: • The incidence of neurological involvement in STEC-HUS is 11%. • Neurological involvement is associated with predominantly good long-term outcome (90%) and a reduced case-fatality rate (4.5%) compared to older reports.

Renal diseases and the role of complement: Linking complement to immune effector pathways and therapeutics

The complement system is an ancient and phylogenetically conserved key danger sensing system that is critical for host defense against pathogens. Activation of the complement system is a vital component of innate immunity required for the detection and removal of pathogens. It is also a central orchestrator of adaptive immune responses and a constituent of normal tissue homeostasis. Once complement activation occurs, this system deposits indiscriminately on any cell surface in the vicinity and has the potential to cause unwanted and excessive tissue injury. Deposition of complement components is recognized as a hallmark of a variety of kidney diseases, where it is indeed associated with damage to the self. The provenance and the pathophysiological role(s) played by complement in each kidney disease is not fully understood. However, in recent years there has been a renaissance in the study of complement, with greater appreciation of its intracellular roles as a cell-intrinsic system and its interplay with immune effector pathways. This has been paired with a profusion of novel therapeutic agents antagonizing complement components, including approved inhibitors against complement components (C)1, C3, C5 and C5aR1. A number of clinical trials have investigated the use of these more targeted approaches for the management of kidney diseases. In this review we present and summarize the evidence for the roles of complement in kidney diseases and discuss the available clinical evidence for complement inhibition.

Interventions for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disorder characterised by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, and acute kidney injury. The condition is primarily caused by inherited or acquired dysregulation of complement regulatory proteins with ~40% of those affected aged < 18 years. Historically, kidney failure and death were common outcomes, however, improved understanding of the condition has led to discovery of novel therapies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions for aHUS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies for randomised controlled studies (RCTs) up to 3 September 2020 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. MEDLINE(OVID) 1946 to 27 July 2020 and EMBASE (OVID) 1974 to 27 July 2020 were searched for non-RCTs.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised and non-randomised clinical trials comparing an intervention with placebo, an intervention with supportive therapy, or two or more interventions for aHUS were included. Given the rare nature of the condition in question, prospective single-arm studies of any intervention for aHUS were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted pre-specified data from eligible studies and evaluated risk of bias using a newly developed tool based on existing Cochrane criteria. As statistical meta-analysis was not appropriate, qualitative analysis of data was then performed.

MAIN RESULTS

We included five single-arm studies, all of which evaluated terminal complement inhibition for the treatment of aHUS. Four studies evaluated the short-acting C5 inhibitor eculizumab and one study evaluated the longer-acting C5 inhibitor ravulizumab. All included studies within the review were of non-randomised, single-arm design. Thus, risk of bias is high, and it is challenging to draw firm conclusions from this low-quality evidence. One hundred patients were included within three primary studies evaluating eculizumab, with further data reported from 37 patients in a secondary study. Fifty-eight patients were included in the ravulizumab study. After 26 weeks of eculizumab therapy there were no deaths and a 70% reduction in the number of patients requiring dialysis. Complete thrombotic microangiopathic (TMA) response was observed in 60% of patients at 26 weeks and 65% at two years. After 26 weeks of ravulizumab therapy four patients had died (7%) and complete TMA response was observed in 54% of patients. Substantial improvements were seen in estimated glomerular filtration rate and health-related quality of life in both eculizumab and ravulizumab studies. Serious adverse events occurred in 42% of patients, and meningococcal infection occurred in two patients, both treated with eculizumab.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

When compared with historical data, terminal complement inhibition appears to offer favourable outcomes in patients with aHUS, based upon very low-quality evidence drawn from five single-arm studies. It is unlikely that an RCT will be conducted in aHUS and therefore careful consideration of future single-arm data as well as longer term follow-up data will be required to better understand treatment duration, adverse outcomes and risk of disease recurrence associated with terminal complement inhibition.

Treatment Strategies for Infections With Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli

Infections with Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) cause outbreaks of severe diarrheal disease in children and the elderly around the world. The severe complications associated with toxin production and release range from bloody diarrhea and hemorrhagic colitis to hemolytic-uremic syndrome, kidney failure, and neurological issues. As the use of antibiotics for treatment of the infection has long been controversial due to reports that antibiotics may increase the production of Shiga toxin, the recommended therapy today is mainly supportive. In recent years, a variety of alternative treatment approaches such as monoclonal antibodies or antisera directed against Shiga toxin, toxin receptor analogs, and several vaccination strategies have been developed and evaluated in vitro and in animal models. A few strategies have progressed to the clinical trial phase. Here, we review the current understanding of and the progress made in the development of treatment options against STEC infections and discuss their potential.

Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies

Verotoxin, VT (aka Shiga toxin,Stx) is produced by enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and is the key pathogenic factor in EHEC-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (eHUS-hemolytic anemia/thrombocytopenia/glomerular infarct) which can follow gastrointestinal EHEC infection, particularly in children. This AB5 subunit toxin family bind target cell globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb₃), a glycosphingolipid (GSL) (aka CD77, pk blood group antigen) of the globoseries of neutral GSLs, initiating lipid raft-dependent plasma membrane Gb₃ clustering, membrane curvature, invagination, scission, endosomal trafficking, and retrograde traffic via the TGN to the Golgi, and ER. In the ER, A/B subunits separate and the A subunit hijacks the ER reverse translocon (dislocon-used to eliminate misfolded proteins-ER associated degradation-ERAD) for cytosolic access. This property has been used to devise toxoid-based therapy to temporarily block ERAD and rescue the mutant phenotype of several genetic protein misfolding diseases. The A subunit avoids cytosolic proteosomal degradation, to block protein synthesis via its RNA glycanase activity. In humans, Gb₃ is primarily expressed in the kidney, particularly in the glomerular endothelial cells. Here, Gb₃ is in lipid rafts (more ordered membrane domains which accumulate GSLs/cholesterol) whereas renal tubular Gb₃ is in the non-raft membrane fraction, explaining the basic pathology of eHUS (glomerular endothelial infarct). Females are more susceptible and this correlates with higher renal Gb₃ expression. HUS can be associated with encephalopathy, more commonly following verotoxin 2 exposure. Gb₃ is expressed in the microvasculature of the brain. All members of the VT family bind Gb₃, but with varying affinity. VT2e (pig edema toxin) binds Gb₄ preferentially. Verotoxin-specific therapeutics based on chemical analogs of Gb₃, though effective in vitro, have failed in vivo. While some analogs are effective in animal models, there are no good rodent models of eHUS since Gb₃ is not expressed in rodent glomeruli. However, the mouse mimics the neurological symptoms more closely and provides an excellent tool to assess therapeutics. In addition to direct cytotoxicity, other factors including VT–induced cytokine release and aberrant complement cascade, are now appreciated as important in eHUS. Based on atypical HUS therapy, treatment of eHUS patients with anticomplement antibodies has proven effective in some cases. A recent switch using stem cells to try to reverse, rather than prevent VT induced pathology may prove a more effective methodology.

Shiga-Toxin E. coli Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: Review of Management and Long-term Outcome

Purpose of Review

We review the pathophysiology of Shiga-Toxin Enteropathogenic–Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (STEC-HUS), strategies to ameliorate or prevent evolution of STEC-HUS, management and the improved recognition of long-term adverse outcomes.

Recent Findings

Following on from the preclinical evidence of a role for the complement system in STEC-HUS, the use of complement blocking agents has been the major focus of most recent clinical research. Novel therapies to prevent or lessen HUS have yet to enter the clinical arena. The long-term outcomes of STEC-HUS, similarly to other causes of AKI, are not as benign as previously thought.

Summary

Optimizing supportive care in STEC-HUS is the only current recommended treatment. The administration of early isotonic fluids may reduce the severity and duration of STEC-HUS. The role of complement blockade in the management of STEC-HUS remains unclear. The long-term sequelae from STEC-HUS are significant and patients with apparent full renal recovery remain at risk.