Is there a prominent role for MR spectroscopy in the clinical management of brain tumors?

MR Spectroscopy for Detecting Fumarate Hydratase Deficiency in Hereditary Leiomyomatosis and Renal Cell Carcinoma Syndrome

Background Noninvasive in vivo detection of fumarate accumulation may help identify fumarate hydratase deficiency in renal cancer related to hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) syndrome. Purpose To investigate the feasibility of MR spectroscopy (MRS) in detecting elevated fumarate levels in HLRCC-associated renal cancers. Materials and Methods This study included an experimental xenograft mouse model and prospective clinical cohort. First, MRS was performed on patient-derived tumor xenograft models and control models to detect fumarate. Then, consecutive participants with clinical suspicion of HLRCC-associated renal tumors were enrolled. For the detection of fumarate, MRS results were classified as detected, borderline, undetected, or technical failure. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRS for diagnosing HLRCC-associated renal cancer were assessed. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the fumarate peak was calculated and evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results Fumarate peaks were detected at 6.54 parts per million in all three patient-derived xenograft models. A total of 38 participants (21 men; mean age, 47 years [range, 18-71 years]) with 46 lesions were analyzed. All primary HLRCC-associated renal cancers showed a fumarate peak; among the seven metastatic HLRCC-associated lesions, a fumarate peak was detected in three lesions and borderline in two. When only detected peaks were regarded as positive findings, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRS at the lesion level were 69% (nine of 13 lesions), 100% (33 of 33 lesions), and 91% (42 of 46 lesions), respectively. When borderline peaks were also included as a positive finding, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy reached 85% (11 of 13 lesions), 88% (29 of 33 lesions), and 87% (40 of 46 lesions), respectively. The SNR of fumarate showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 for classifying HLRCC-associated tumors. Conclusion MR spectroscopy of fumarate was sensitive and specific for hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma-associated tumors. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The influence of cystathionine on neurochemical quantification in brain tumor in vivo MR spectroscopy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ability of the PRESS sequence (T_E  = 97 ms, optimized for 2-hydroxyglutarate detection) to detect cystathionine in gliomas and the effect of the omission of cystathionine on the quantification of the full neurochemical profile.

METHODS

Twenty-three subjects with a glioma were retrospectively included based on the availability of both MEGA-PRESS and PRESS acquisitions at 3T, and the presence of the cystathionine signal in the edited MR spectrum. In eight subjects, the PRESS acquisition was performed also in normal tissue. Metabolite quantification was performed using LCModel and simulated basis sets. The LCModel analysis for the PRESS data was performed with and without cystathionine.

RESULTS

All subjects with glioma had detectable cystathionine levels >1 mM with Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) <15%. The mean cystathionine concentrations were 3.49 ± 1.17 mM for MEGA-PRESS and 2.20 ± 0.80 mM for PRESS data. Cystathionine concentrations showed a significant correlation between the two MRS methods (r = 0.58, p = .004), and it was not detectable in normal tissue. Using PRESS, 19 metabolites were quantified with CRLB <50% for more than half of the subjects. The metabolites that were significantly (p < .0028) and mostly affected by the omission of cystathionine were aspartate, betaine, citrate, γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and serine.

CONCLUSIONS

Cystathionine was detectable by PRESS in all the selected gliomas, while it was not detectable in normal tissue. The omission from the spectral analysis of cystathionine led to severe biases in the quantification of other neurochemicals that may play key roles in cancer metabolism.