SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort-A BIOMECA Consortium Study

The medical and functional burden of surviving childhood ependymoma: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND

Few studies have characterized the burden of late effects among childhood ependymoma survivors. To address this gap, we examined these sequelae using real-world health services data in a population-based ependymoma survivor cohort.

METHODS

All individuals younger than 18 years diagnosed with an ependymoma in Ontario, Canada between 1987 and 2015 who had survived at least 5 years from their latest pediatric cancer event (index date) were matched 1:5 with population controls. Following linkage with provincial health services data, the cumulative incidences of multiple medical and functional outcomes between survivors and controls were compared.

RESULTS

Among 96 survivors, 77.1% had been irradiated and 9.4% had received cisplatin. At 10 years post-index, survivors were at significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (7.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-13.3 vs. 0.3%, 95% CI: 0.0-1.0; p = .0002), non-obstetric hospitalization (45.1%, 95% CI: 32.6-56.7 vs. 10.6%, 95% CI: 7.6-14.1; p < .0001), stroke (6.5%, 95% CI: 2.3-13.7 vs. 0%; p < .0001), severe hearing loss requiring an amplification device (7.5%, 95% CI: 2.7-15.7 vs. 0%; p < .0001), receiving homecare service (27.6%, 95% CI: 18.5-37.5 vs. 7.7%, 95% CI: 5.3-10.7; p < .0001), and submitting a disability support prescription claim (24.0%, 95% CI: 14.8-34.3 vs. 5.4%, 95% CI: 3.5-7.8; p < .0001) compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric ependymoma survivors are highly vulnerable to severe late sequelae, including death, stroke, severe hearing loss, and disability. Urgent efforts are needed to improve risk-stratification approaches that mitigate exposure to toxic therapies for children with lower risk disease. Interventions to prevent or decrease the risk of developing late sequelae are critical to optimizing survivor long-term health.

Lateral-type posterior fossa ependymomas in pediatric patients: a national collaborative study

PURPOSE

To review a multicentric series of lateral-type posterior fossa ependymomas operated in the last ten years and to analyze the factors related to clinical evolution and tumor survival.

METHODS

Descriptive, retrospective study. Active members of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Neurosurgery were invited to participate in this multicentric study. Clinical and radiological data were incorporated to an open database. The role of histologic grade, grade of resection, postoperative morbidities, and clinical follow-up was evaluated through bivariate associations (chi-square), Kaplan-Meier's curves (log-rank test), and multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression).

RESULTS

Fourteen centers entered the study, and 25 cases with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. There were 13 boys and 12 girls with a mean age close to 3 years. Mean tumor volume at diagnosis was over 60 cc. A complete resection was achieved in 8 patients and a near-total resection in 5 cases. Fifteen tumors were diagnosed as ependymoma grade 2 and ten as ependymoma grade 3. Major morbidity occurred postoperatively in 14 patients but was resolved in twelve within 6 months. There were six cases of death and 11 cases of tumor progression along the observation period. Mean follow-up was 44.8 months. Major morbidity was significantly associated with histologic grade but not with the degree of resection. Overall and progression-free survival were significantly associated with complete surgical resection. At the last follow-up, 16 patients carried a normal life, and three displayed a mild restriction according to Lansky's scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral-type posterior fossa ependymomas constitute a specific pathologic and clinical tumor subtype with bad prognosis. Gross total resection is the goal of surgical treatment, for it significantly improves prognosis with no additional morbidity. Neurological deficits associated to lower cranial nerve dysfunction are common, but most are transient. Deeper genetic characterization of these tumors may identify risk factors that guide new treatments and stratification of adjuvant therapies.

Molecular characteristics and improved survival prediction in a cohort of 2023 ependymomas

The diagnosis of ependymoma has moved from a purely histopathological review with limited prognostic value to an integrated diagnosis, relying heavily on molecular information. However, as the integrated approach is still novel and some molecular ependymoma subtypes are quite rare, few studies have correlated integrated pathology and clinical outcome, often focusing on small series of single molecular types. We collected data from 2023 ependymomas as classified by DNA methylation profiling, consisting of 1736 previously published and 287 unpublished methylation profiles. Methylation data and clinical information were correlated, and an integrated model was developed to predict progression-free survival. Patients with EPN-PFA, EPN-ZFTA, and EPN-MYCN tumors showed the worst outcome with 10-year overall survival rates of 56%, 62%, and 32%, respectively. EPN-PFA harbored chromosome 1q gains and/or 6q losses as markers for worse survival. In supratentorial EPN-ZFTA, a combined loss of CDKN2A and B indicated worse survival, whereas a single loss did not. Twelve out of 200 EPN-ZFTA (6%) were located in the posterior fossa, and these tumors relapsed or progressed even earlier than supratentorial tumors with a combined loss of CDKN2A/B. Patients with MPE and PF-SE, generally regarded as non-aggressive tumors, only had a 10-year progression-free survival of 59% and 65%, respectively. For the prediction of the 5-year progression-free survival, Kaplan-Meier estimators based on the molecular subtype, a Support Vector Machine based on methylation, and an integrated model based on clinical factors, CNV data, and predicted methylation scores achieved balanced accuracies of 66%, 68%, and 73%, respectively. Excluding samples with low prediction scores resulted in balanced accuracies of over 80%. In sum, our large-scale analysis of ependymomas provides robust information about molecular features and their clinical meaning. Our data are particularly relevant for rare and hardly explored tumor subtypes and seemingly benign variants that display higher recurrence rates than previously believed.

Pediatric-Like Brain Tumors in Adults

Pediatric brain tumors are different to those found in adults in pathological type, anatomical site, molecular signature, and probable tumor drivers. Although these tumors usually occur in childhood, they also rarely present in adult patients, either as a de novo diagnosis or as a delayed recurrence of a pediatric tumor in the setting of a patient that has transitioned into adult services.Due to the rarity of pediatric-like tumors in adults, the literature on these tumor types in adults is often limited to small case series, and treatment decisions are often based on the management plans taken from pediatric studies. However, the biology of these tumors is often different from the same tumors found in children. Likewise, adult patients are often unable to tolerate the side effects of the aggressive treatments used in children-for which there is little or no evidence of efficacy in adults. In this chapter, we review the literature and summarize the clinical, pathological, molecular profile, and response to treatment for the following pediatric tumor types-medulloblastoma, ependymoma, craniopharyngioma, pilocytic astrocytoma, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, germ cell tumors, choroid plexus tumors, midline glioma, and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma-with emphasis on the differences to the adult population.

Ependymoma from Benign to Highly Aggressive Diseases: A Review

Ependymomas comprise biologically distinct tumor types with respect to age distribution, (epi)genetics, localization, and prognosis. Multimodal risk-stratification, including histopathological and molecular features, is essential in these biologically defined tumor types. Gross total resection (GTR), achieved with intraoperative monitoring and neuronavigation, and if necessary, second-look surgery, is the most effective treatment. Adjuvant radiation therapy is mandatory in high-risk tumors and in case of residual tumor. There is yet growing evidence that some ependymal tumors may be cured by surgery alone. To date, the role of chemotherapy is unclear and subject of current studies.Even though standard therapy can achieve reasonable survival rates for the majority of ependymoma patients, long-term follow-up still reveals a high probability of relapse in certain biological entities.With increasing knowledge of biologically distinct tumor types, risk-adapted adjuvant therapy gains importance. Beyond initial tumor control, and avoidance of therapy-induced morbidity for low-risk patients, intensified treatment for high-risk patients comprises another challenge. With identification of specific risk features regarding molecular alterations, targeted therapy may represent an option for individualized treatment modalities in the future.

Posterior fossa tumors in children: current insights

While in adults most intracranial tumors develop around the cerebral hemispheres, 45 to 60% of pediatric lesions are found in the posterior fossa, although this anatomical region represents only 10% of the intracranial volume. The latest edition of the WHO classification for CNS tumors presented some fundamental paradigm shifts that particularly affected the classification of pediatric tumors, also influencing those that affect posterior fossa. Molecular biomarkers play an important role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of childhood posterior fossa tumors and can be used to predict patient outcomes and response to treatment and monitor its effectiveness. Although genetic studies have identified several posterior fossa tumor types, differing in terms of their location, cell of origin, genetic mechanisms, and clinical behavior, recent management strategies still depend on uniform approaches, mainly based on the extent of resection. However, significant progress has been made in guiding therapy decisions with biological or molecular stratification criteria and utilizing molecularly targeted treatments that address specific tumor biological characteristics. The primary focus of this review is on the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of common subtypes of posterior fossa tumors in children, as well as potential therapeutic approaches in the future.   Conclusion: Molecular biomarkers play a central role, not only in the diagnosis and prognosis of posterior fossa tumors in children but also in customizing treatment plans. They anticipate patient outcomes, measure treatment responses, and assess therapeutic effectiveness. Advances in neuroimaging and treatment have significantly enhanced outcomes for children with these tumors. What is Known: • Central nervous system tumors are the most common solid neoplasms in children and adolescents, with approximately 45 to 60% of them located in the posterior fossa. • Multimodal approaches that include neurosurgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are typically used to manage childhood posterior fossa tumors What is New: • Notable progress has been achieved in the diagnosis, categorization and management of posterior fossa tumors in children, leading to improvement in survival and quality of life.

Optimizing biomarkers for accurate ependymoma diagnosis, prognostication, and stratification within International Clinical Trials: A BIOMECA study

BACKGROUND

Accurate identification of brain tumor molecular subgroups is increasingly important. We aimed to establish the most accurate and reproducible ependymoma subgroup biomarker detection techniques, across 147 cases from International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Ependymoma II trial participants, enrolled in the pan-European "Biomarkers of Ependymoma in Children and Adolescents (BIOMECA)" study.

METHODS

Across 6 European BIOMECA laboratories, we evaluated epigenetic profiling (DNA methylation array); immunohistochemistry (IHC) for nuclear p65-RELA, H3K27me3, and Tenascin-C; copy number analysis via fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and MLPA (1q, CDKN2A), and MIP and DNA methylation array (genome-wide copy number evaluation); analysis of ZFTA- and YAP1-fusions by RT-PCR and sequencing, Nanostring and break-apart FISH.

RESULTS

DNA Methylation profiling classified 65.3% (n = 96/147) of cases as EPN-PFA and 15% (n = 22/147) as ST-ZFTA fusion-positive. Immunohistochemical loss of H3K27me3 was a reproducible and accurate surrogate marker for EPN-PFA (sensitivity 99%-100% across 3 centers). IHC for p65-RELA, FISH, and RNA-based analyses effectively identified ZFTA- and YAP-fused supratentorial ependymomas. Detection of 1q gain using FISH exhibited only 57% inter-center concordance and low sensitivity and specificity while MIP, MLPA, and DNA methylation-based approaches demonstrated greater accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

We confirm, in a prospective trial cohort, that H3K27me3 immunohistochemistry is a robust EPN-PFA biomarker. Tenascin-C should be abandoned as a PFA marker. DNA methylation and MIP arrays are effective tools for copy number analysis of 1q gain, 6q, and CDKN2A loss while FISH is inadequate. Fusion detection was successful, but rare novel fusions need more extensive technologies. Finally, we propose test sets to guide future diagnostic approaches.

Review and update on pediatric ependymoma

Since our last Special Annual Issue dedicated to the topic of ependymoma in 2009, critical advancements have been made in the understanding of this disease which is largely confined to childhood. In the era of molecular profiling, the prior classification of ependymoma based on histology has become largely irrelevant, with multiple new subtypes of this disease now being described in the newest 2021 WHO CNS Tumor Classification System. Despite our advancements in understanding the underlying biology of these tumors, the mainstays of treatment-gross total surgical resection followed by confocal radiation therapy-have continued to yield the best treatment results across multiple studies and centers. Here, we provide an update on our understanding of the advancements made in tumor biology, surgical, and oncologic management of this disease. As we move into an era of more personalized medicine, it is critical to reflect on our historical understanding of different disease entities, to better understand the future directions of our treatments.

Radiotherapy for Primary Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies: Current Treatment Paradigms and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system tumors are the most common solid tumors in childhood. Treatment paradigms for pediatric central nervous system malignancies depend on elements including tumor histology, age of patient, and stage of disease. Radiotherapy is an important modality of treatment for many pediatric central nervous system malignancies.

SUMMARY

While radiation contributes to excellent overall survival rates for many patients, radiation also carries significant risks of long-term side effects including neurocognitive decline, hearing loss, growth impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, strokes, and secondary malignancies. In recent decades, clinical trials have demonstrated that with better imaging and staging along with more sophisticated radiation planning and treatment set-up verification, smaller treatment volumes can be utilized without decrement in survival. Furthermore, the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton-beam radiotherapy has greatly improved conformality of radiation.

KEY MESSAGES

Recent changes in radiation treatment paradigms have decreased risks of short- and long-term toxicity for common histologies and in different age groups. Future studies will continue to develop novel radiation regimens to improve outcomes in aggressive central nervous system tumors, integrate molecular subtypes to tailor radiation treatment, and decrease radiation-associated toxicity for long-term survivors.

Latest classification of ependymoma in the molecular era and advances in its treatment: a review

Ependymoma is a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumour occurring in all age groups and is one of the most common paediatric malignant brain tumours. Unlike other malignant brain tumours, ependymomas have few identified point mutations and genetic and epigenetic features. With advances in molecular understanding, the latest 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumours divided ependymomas into 10 diagnostic categories based on the histology, molecular information and location; this accurately reflected the prognosis and biology of this tumour. Although maximal surgical resection followed by radiotherapy is considered the standard treatment method, and chemotherapy is considered ineffective, the validation of the role of these treatment modalities continues. Although the rarity and long-term clinical course of ependymoma make designing and conducting prospective clinical trials challenging, knowledge is steadily accumulating and progress is being made. Much of the clinical knowledge obtained from clinical trials to date was based on the previous histology-based WHO classifications, and the addition of new molecular information may lead to more complex treatment strategies. Therefore, this review presents the latest findings on the molecular classification of ependymomas and advances in its treatment.

Recent Advancements in Ependymoma: Challenges and Therapeutic Opportunities

BACKGROUND

Ependymoma is one of the most common malignant pediatric brain tumors and can be difficult to treat. Over the last decade, much progress has been made in the understanding of the underlying molecular drivers within this group of tumors, but clinical outcomes remain unchanged.

SUMMARY

Here, we review the most recent molecular advances in pediatric ependymoma, evaluate results of recent clinical trials and discuss the ongoing challenges in the field and questions that remain.

KEY MESSAGES

The field of ependymoma has vastly changed over the last several decades with ten distinct molecular subgroups now described, but much progress needs to be made in developing new therapeutic strategies and targets.

Why haven't we solved intracranial pediatric ependymoma? Current questions and barriers to treatment advances

Pediatric intracranial ependymoma has seen a recent exponential expansion of biological findings, rapidly dividing the diagnosis into several subgroups, each with specific molecular and clinical characteristics. While such subdivision may complicate clinical conclusions from historical trials, this knowledge also provides an opportunity for interrogating the major clinical and biological questions preventing near-term translation into effective therapy for children with ependymoma. In this article, we briefly review some of the most critical clinical questions facing both patient management and the construct of future trials in childhood ependymoma, as well as explore some of the current barriers to efficient translation of preclinical discovery to the clinic.

Review of the Recent Changes in the WHO Classification for Pediatric Brain and Spinal Cord Tumors

BACKGROUND

Periodic updates to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for central nervous system (CNS) tumors reflect advances in the pathological diagnosis, categorization, and molecular underpinnings of primary brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerve tumors. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors was published in 2021. This review discusses the guiding principles of the revision, introduces the more common new diagnostic entities, and describes tumor classification and nomenclature changes that are relevant for pediatric neurological surgeons.

SUMMARY

Revisions to the WHO CNS tumor classification system introduced new diagnostic entities, restructured and renamed other entities with particular impact in the diffuse gliomas and CNS embryonal tumors, and expanded the requirements for incorporating both molecular and histological features of CNS tumors into a unified integrated diagnosis. Many of the new diagnostic entities occur at least occasionally in pediatric patients and will thus be encountered by pediatric neurosurgeons. New nomenclature impacts the terminology that is applied in communication between pathologists, surgeons, clinicians, and patients. Requirements for molecular information in tumor diagnosis are expected to refine diagnostic categories while also introducing practical considerations for intraoperative consultation, preliminary histological evaluation, and triaging of neurosurgical tissue samples for histology, molecular testing, and clinical trial requirements.

KEY MESSAGES

Pediatric brain tumor diagnosis and clinical management are a multidisciplinary effort that is rapidly advancing in the molecular era. Interdisciplinary collaboration is critical for providing the best care for pediatric CNS tumor patients. Pediatric neurosurgeons and their local neuropathologists and neuro-oncologists must work collaboratively to put the most current CNS tumor diagnostic guidelines into standard practice.

Radiotherapy with Helium Ions Has the Potential to Improve Both Endocrine and Neurocognitive Outcome in Pediatric Patients with Ependymoma

Ependymomas are the third most-frequent pediatric brain tumors. To prevent local recurrence, the resection site should be irradiated. Compared to photon radiation treatment, proton therapy often achieves even better results regarding target coverage and organ-sparing. Due to their physical properties, helium ions could further reduce side effects, providing better protection of healthy tissue despite similar target coverage. In our in silico study, 15 pediatric ependymoma patients were considered. All patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapeutic treatment with active-scanned protons at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT). Both helium ion and highly conformal IMRT plans were calculated to evaluate the potential dosimetric advantage of ion beam therapy compared to the current state-of-the-art photon-based treatments. To estimate the potential clinical benefit of helium ions, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were calculated. Target coverage was comparable in all three modalities. As expected, the integral dose absorbed by healthy brain tissue could be significantly reduced with protons by up to -48% vs. IMRT. Even compared to actively scanned protons, relative dose reductions for critical neuronal structures of up to another -39% were achieved when using helium ions. The dose distribution of helium ions is significantly superior when compared to proton therapy and IMRT due to the improved sparing of OAR. In fact, previous studies could clearly demonstrate that the dosimetric advantage of protons translates into a measurable clinical benefit for pediatric patients with brain tumors. Given the dose-response relationship of critical organs at risk combined with NTCP calculation, the results of our study provide a strong rationale that the use of helium ions has the potential to even further reduce the risk for treatment related sequelae.

Toward Improved Diagnosis Accuracy and Treatment of Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Ependymoma: The International SIOP Ependymoma II Protocol

Background

The clinical management of ependymoma in childhood and adolescence is complex and the clinicobiopathological correlates of outcome remain poorly understood. This international SIOP Ependymoma II (SIOP EPII) trial aims to improve the outcome of patients with ependymoma.

Methods

SIOP EPII includes any patient <22 years at diagnosis with ependymoma, stratified by age, tumor location, and outcome of the initial surgery. Centralized pathology and imaging is required for diagnosis confirmation. SIOP EPII included three randomized studies according to age, postoperative residue, and suitability to receive radiotherapy. Patients ineligible for interventional strata are followed-up in an observational study. The staging phase aims to determine if central neurosurgical and radiological postoperative MRI reviews increase the resection rate. Patients ≥12 months with (i) no residual disease are randomly assigned in a phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of post-radiation 16-week chemotherapy (VEC + CDDP) on PFS (stratum I); (ii) centrally confirmed measurable inoperable residual disease are allocated to randomized frontline chemotherapy phase II study (VEC vs. VEC + high-dose methotrexate) and considered for a second-look surgery (stratum II). If second-look surgery is not feasible or tumor residuum remains, patients receive 8 Gy-boost radiotherapy after conformal radiotherapy (phase I). (iii) Patients < 12 months (18 months in the UK) or not eligible to receive radiotherapy are randomized in a phase II study to receive chemotherapy (alternated myelosuppressive and nonmyelosuppressive chemotherapy), with or without valproate (stratum III). To overcome the limitations encountered in the preliminary conclusions of the ACNS-0831 study, a SIOP EPII dedicated on-study amendment has been planned to definitively conclude the relevance of maintenance chemotherapy in stratum I. Secondary outcomes include overall survival, quality of life, neuropsychological and neuroendocrine outcomes, safety, and identification of key prognostic biomarkers (BIOMECA).

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02265770.

Posterior Fossa Tumours in the First Year of Life: A Two-Centre Retrospective Study

Posterior fossa tumours (PFTs) in infants are very rare, and information on these tumours is scarce in the literature. This retrospective study reports their pathological characteristics and describes surgical aspects and treatment outcomes. A two-centre cohort of infants with PFTs treated from 2007 to 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics, clinical, and treatment data were reviewed. Survival curves for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were generated. Thirty-three infants were retrieved. There were 11 low grade and 22 high-grade tumours. The most common presenting symptom was intracranial hypertension. Fifteen children out of thirty-three progressed. Five-year PFS was significantly lower in children with high-grade tumours (38.3%) than those with low-grade tumours (69.3%), p = 0.030. High-grade pathology was the only predictor of progression (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.1–13.31), p = 0.045. Fourteen children with high-grade tumours died, with a 5-year OS of 55.25%. PFTs in children below one year of age still represent a unique challenge. Infants with high-grade tumours display the worst outcomes and the lowest survival, indicating that more effective strategies are needed.