The Use of Alternative Routes for the Delivery of Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy for Retinoblastoma

Comparing internal versus external carotid artery branch delivery of intraarterial chemotherapy for the treatment of retinoblastoma

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of intraarterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma delivered via the ophthalmic artery (OA) division of the internal carotid artery (ICA) versus alternative branches of the external carotid artery (ECA).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients receiving IAC for retinoblastoma at a single institution. Subjects were divided into three groups: those that received IAC solely through the OA branch of the ICA, those that initially received IAC through the OA branch of the ICA but were later switched to the ECA, and those that only received IAC through the ECA. The main outcomes compared included globe salvage rate and reduction in tumor thickness and size.

RESULTS

A total of 30 eyes from 26 patients were included. A total of 91 (58%) sessions of IAC were performed through the OA division of the ICA and 65 (42%) were performed through branches of the ECA. Eleven eyes (37%) solely received IAC through the OA branch of the ICA, 16 eyes (53%) were converted to ECA treatment, and 3 eyes solely received IAC through branches of the ECA. Statistical analysis did not show any significant difference in globe salvage rate or reduction in tumor thickness and size.

CONCLUSION

The use of alternative approaches for IAC when the OA branch of the ICA catheterization is not feasible allows for safe continued delivery of highly effective IAC, leading to similar outcomes in terms of globe salvage and reduction in tumor size.

Comparison of Intra-Arterial Chemotherapy Efficacy Delivered Through the Ophthalmic Artery or External Carotid Artery in a Cohort of Retinoblastoma Patients

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of an external carotid artery (ECA) alternative route in intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for treatment of retinoblastoma.

Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre, case-control study, 98 retinoblastoma patients who received successful IAC were included. The drug delivery routes were the primary ophthalmic artery (OA) route and the ECA route when OA catheterization was not feasible.

Results: A total of 337 successful IAC procedures were performed in our study, of which 32 (9.5%) procedures were performed through the ECA route. Eighteen eyes (18.4%) accepted at least one IAC through branches of the ECA. Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference in ocular clinical results (enucleation, death, recurrence and event-free) between the ECA and OA routes. No significant association was found between the route of drug delivery and the ocular survival time (p = 0.69). The use of ECA catheterization in at least one IAC cycle was not a predictor of enucleation (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 0.56–4.46, p = 0.39). The increasing number of procedures through the ECA route did not increase the risk of enucleation (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 0.42–6.39, p = 0.48).

Conclusion: The ECA alternative route did not affect the efficacy of IAC in retinoblastoma. When the standard OA approach is not feasible, ECA system catheterization should be considered.

Intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma in 341 consecutive eyes (1,292 infusions): comparative analysis of outcomes based on patient age, race, and sex

PURPOSE

To evaluate tumor control and globe salvage following intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) for retinoblastoma based on International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) and patient demographics.

METHODS

The medical records of 313 patients (341 eyes) treated with IAC were reviewed retrospectively. Chemotherapy agents included melphalan, topotecan, and carboplatin. Comparative analysis was performed for tumor control and globe salvage based on ICRB and patient demographics including age (≤12 vs >12 months), race (white vs nonwhite), and sex.

RESULTS

Of the 341 eyes treated with 1,292 consecutive infusions of IAC as primary or secondary therapy for retinoblastoma, Kaplan-Meier 5-year estimates of globe salvage was 74%. Of those treated with IAC as primary therapy (n = 160 eyes; 655 infusions), 5-year globe salvage overall was 76%: and more specifically, 100% for groups B and C, 86% for group D, and 55% for group E. Of those treated with IAC as secondary therapy (n = 207 eyes; 859 infusions), 5-year globe salvage was 71%. Comparative analysis by race and sex demonstrated no differences in outcomes, but analysis by age revealed that younger patients had a higher rate of globe salvage (77% vs 72%; P < 0.001). Complications (per catheterization) included retina ischemia (1%), choroidal ischemia (1%), neovascularization of the disk, retina, iris (NVI), glaucoma (about 1% each), and central/peripheral systemic ischemia (<1%). Younger patients showed less NVI (P = 0.028), white patients showed less retinal ischemia (P = 0.037), and no difference by sex. There were no patients with metastatic disease or death.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that IAC provides substantial tumor control for advanced and/or recurrent retinoblastoma with a high rate of globe salvage and few complications. There was little difference in outcomes per age, race, and sex.

Risk factors for ophthalmic artery stenosis and occlusion in patients with retinoblastoma treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy

Purpose

To explore the risk factors for ophthalmic artery (OA) stenosis and occlusion after intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) with selective ophthalmic artery catheterisation (OAC) in the treatment of retinoblastoma.

Design

Retrospective, single centre case-control study.

Methods

The study was conducted including consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral intraocular retinoblastoma undergoing IAC between June 2016 and June 2019 with a follow-up time of 4 years. Main outcomes are rate of IAC-induced OA occlusion and OA diameter.

Results

346 attempted OAC infusions were successful. The total incidence of OA occlusion was 15.89%. The occlusion and control groups were similar in patients’ age, sex and disease stage. Median OA diameter was 0.49 mm in those with OA occlusion, and 0.66 mm in those without occlusion. In the occlusion group, the OA diameter difference was significantly larger between the first IAC and the final IAC (0.22mm vs 0.12mm, p=0.001). In both groups, the median number of IAC treatments was 3. Multivariate Cox regression models included initial OA diameter (OR: 0.005, p=0.001), ratio of OA orifice diameter differences between first and last IAC to the initial OA orifice diameter (OR: 4.661, p=0.003), and number of IAC (OR: 1.538, p=0.042) as clinical features significantly associated with OA occlusion.

Conclusions

The OA diameter at first IAC treatment, the ratio of OA orifice diameter differences between first and last IAC to the initial OA orifice diameter and total number of IAC treatments may be three main clinical predictors for OA occlusion after IAC for retinoblastoma.

Eye Salvage with Intra-Arterial and Intra-Vitreal Chemotherapy in Patients with Retinoblastoma: 8-Year Single-Institution Experience in Colombia

Introduction

Intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) is useful for eye preservation in advanced retinoblastoma (Rb). Intra-vitreal chemotherapy (IvitC) is the latest treatment for vitreous seeds.

Methods

The present study is a retrospective assessment of 100 eyes, treated with primary or secondary IAC alone or with IvitC. We evaluated demographic and clinical variables, eye salvage, associated adverse events, and patient survival. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox hazard ratios were utilized to assess the effect of demographic and clinical variables over eye salvage.

Results

Bilateral Rb was observed in 61% of patients, and 57% of eyes received secondary treatment. Forty eyes needed intra-arterial plus IvitC and 62 presented advanced disease (group D and E). Three- and 5-year ocular survival probabilities were 75 and 68%. We found a higher risk in group D and E eyes and those requiring 2 or more routes for ophthalmic artery catheterization. Patients coming from other countries also showed increased risk. Using primary or secondary treatment, or IvitC, did not affect this risk. Overall rates of survival and eye salvages were 98.8 and 73%, and we had a 100% catheterization success and none ophthalmic arterial occlusions.

Conclusions

In an upper middle-income country such as Colombia, a specialized institution counting with therapeutic alternatives and a multidisciplinary team can reach rates of patient survival and eye salvage similar to those of high-income countries.

Incidence and predictors of ophthalmic artery occlusion in intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma

BACKGROUND

Retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in children.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of ophthalmic artery (OA) occlusion in patients treated with selective ophthalmic artery catheterization (OAC) for chemotherapy infusion for retinoblastoma. Also, to evaluate technical, anatomical, tumorous, and patient-related factors that are predictors of OA occlusion.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for patients diagnosed with intraocular retinoblastoma and managed with intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC).

RESULTS

The total study cohort included 208 retinoblastoma tumors of 208 eyes in 197 consecutive patients who underwent 688 attempted IAC infusions overall with a total of 624 successful OAC infusions. The total incidence of ophthalmic artery thrombosis was 11.1% (23/208). The numbers of successful OAC procedures before diagnosing OA occlusion were one OAC in six cases (27.3%), two in seven cases (31.8%), three in four cases (18.2%), four in one case (4.5%), five in two cases (9.1%), and six in one case (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Local factors relating to the chemotherapy and selective microcatheterization of the OA are essential factors in the development of OA thrombosis, as seen by the association of OA thrombosis with the frequency of IAC.