Curve Characteristics and Response of Sciatic and Olisthesis Scoliosis Following L5/S1 Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to explore the mid-term efficacy of non-contact orthopedic robot navigation in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

The clinical data of young and middle-aged patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were retrospectively analyzed and divided into an observation group and a control group according to surgical methods. The observation group was treated with minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) combined with orthopedic robot-navigated percutaneous pedicle screw fixation; while the control group underwent traditional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). Perioperative indicators, waist and leg pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and complications were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this study, with the average age of 50.3 ± 2.7 years old. There were 17 patients in the observation group and 15 patients in the control group. Although the new surgical technique for the observation group may require longer operative time, it showed significant advantages in reducing intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, and shortening hospital stay. These benefits might result in faster recovery for patients, reduced risk of complications, and improved overall quality of life. The new technology was also significantly better compared to the traditional method in terms of VAS scores and ODI at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-surgery. These results provided patients with better treatment options and potentially a faster path to recovery. One case with infectious incision in the observation group and one case with intraspinal hematoma formation in the control group were observed. However, there was no statistical difference in the complication rates between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The non-contact orthopedic robot navigation for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis was demonstrated to be minimally invasive, precise, and stable surgical method. It is a treatment option worth considering for suitable patients.

Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Dual-channel Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Spinal Scoliosis

OBJECTIVES

Scoliosis associated with spondylolisthesis is a common phenomenon. Recent research has reported that scoliosis can spontaneously disappear after lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Researchers have advocated that, for scoliosis associated with vertebral slippage, surgery for the latter may be the only necessary intervention, while unnecessary surgery for scoliosis should be avoided. So we propose that minimally invasive techniques can achieve treatment effects similar to those of open surgery. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of unilateral dual-channel endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal scoliosis.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and spinal scoliosis who underwent ULIF between September 2021 and September 2023. Measurements of the Cobb angle, lumbar lordosis (LL) angle, sacral slope (SS), slip percentage (SP), slip angle (SA), L1 plumb line-S1 distance (LASD), and average intervertebral height (AIH) were taken preoperatively, immediately following surgery, 3 months after surgery, and at the final follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring systems were used to assess clinical results. The surgical efficacy was evaluated by comparing these parameters before and after surgery. Comparison of indicators within the same group was conducted using one-way repeated-measures analysis of variance or paired sample t-tests, whereas between-group differences were compared using an independent t-test.

RESULTS

This study included 31 individuals who underwent surgery and completed follow-up. The follow-up period did not show a significant loss of corrective angles. Furthermore, the Cobb angle, SP, SA, and LASD significantly decreased after surgery, whereas the LL angle, SS, and AIH significantly increased (all p < 0.05). SP did not differ between the immediate postoperative period and the 3-month and final follow-up periods (p > 0.05). However, other parameters significantly improved during the follow-up period at all time points, except from 3 months to the final follow-up period (p > 0.05). Throughout the follow-up period, the lower back and leg pain VAS, ODI, and JOA scores considerably improved compared with the preoperative levels (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ULIF effectively treated lumbar spondylolisthesis with scoliosis, thereby reducing the degree of slip and scoliosis. By performing surgical reduction, fusion, and fixation only on the slipped segment, ULIF also had a corrective effect on the spinal lateral curvature, thereby avoiding the need for unnecessary scoliosis surgery. Moreover, the short-term efficacy was satisfactory, but the long-term efficacy requires further study.

Scoliosis risk factors and outcomes in children with dysplastic spondylolisthesis undergoing surgical reduction and fixation

Purpose

To explore scoliosis risk factors and outcomes in children with dysplastic spondylolisthesis undergoing surgical reduction and internal fixation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 56 children with dysplastic spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical reduction and internal fixation. Patients were grouped according to presence of scoliosis before surgery. Radiographic parameters measured before surgery included pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, coronal Cobb angle, slip percentage, Dubousset's lumbosacral angle, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, and Spinal Deformity Study Group index. Groups were compared using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the optimal Spinal Deformity Study Group index cut-off value. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years.

Results

The scoliosis group comprises 36 patients (mean age: 9.6 ± 2.7 years), while the no scoliosis group comprises 20 (mean age: 9.1 ± 2.4 years). Slip percentage and Spinal Deformity Study Group index were significantly higher in the scoliosis group (p < 0.01). Sacral slope and pelvic incidence were lower in the scoliosis group (p < 0.05). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that slip percentage, Spinal Deformity Study Group index, pelvic incidence, and sacral slope were significantly associated with scoliosis. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only Spinal Deformity Study Group index was an independent risk factor for scoliosis. The optimal cut-off value for Spinal Deformity Study Group index was 0.288. Mean Cobb angle decreased from 20.3° ± 8.8° before surgery to 8.5° ± 8.9° at last follow-up; the mean scoliosis correction rate was 59.3%.

Conclusion

Severe S1 dysplasia and high slip percentage may be risk factors for developing scoliosis in patients with dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Scoliosis resolved spontaneously after spondylolisthesis reduction and fixation in most patients.

Level of evidence

3.

Scoliosis in dysplastic spondylolisthesis: a clinical survey of 50 young patients

Background

Dysplastic spondylolisthesis is a rare spinal deformity that occurs mainly in young patients. Although its sagittal parameters had been well stated, coronal abnormalities in these patients were poorly studied. The purposes of this study were: (1) to investigate the prevalence of scoliosis in dysplastic spondylolisthesis;(2) to assess scoliosis resolution or persistence after surgery; and (3) to propose a modified classification of scoliosis associated with dysplastic spondylolisthesis.

Methods

Fifty patients (average age 14.9 ± 5.6 years) diagnosed with dysplastic spondylolisthesis who underwent surgical treatment were followed up and their data were analyzed. Standing posteroanterior and lateral full spine radiographs were used to measure the coronal and sagittal parameters. Patients with scoliosis, which was defined as a coronal Cobb angle greater than 10°, were divided into three groups according to their curve characteristics: “independent” scoliosis (IS) group, spasm scoliosis (SS) group, and olisthetic scoliosis (OS) group. SS and OS were spondylolisthesis-induced scoliosis. The radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes were collected before and after surgery and compared between groups.

Results

The average slip percentage was 62.8% ± 23.1% and the average follow-up time was 51.5 ± 36.4 months (range 3–168 months). Twenty-eight of the 50 (56%) dysplastic spondylolisthesis patients showed scoliosis, of which 8 were IS (24.7° ± 15.2°), 11 were SS (13.9° ± 3.0°), and 9 were OS (12.9° ± 1.9°). By the last follow-up, no scoliosis resolution was observed in the IS group whereas all SS patients were relieved. Of the nine patients with OS, four (44.4%) had scoliosis resolution after surgery.

Conclusion

Distinguishing different types of scoliosis in dysplastic spondylolisthesis patients may help surgeons to plan treatment and understand prognosis. For patients with significant scoliosis, whether “independent” or spondylolisthesis-induced, treatment of spondylolisthesis should be performed first and scoliosis should be observed for a period of time and treated according to the corresponding principles.