Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations: A Comparison of Modified and Supplemented Spetzler-Martin Grading Systems

Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mortality and Morbidity in Aruba-Eligible Studies

BACKGROUND

Treating unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) represent significant challenges, with numerous uncertainties still in debate. The ARUBA trial induced further investigation into optimal management strategies for these lesions. Here, we present a systematic-review and meta-analysis focusing on ARUBA-eligible studies, aiming to correlate patient data with outcomes and discuss key aspects of these studies.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic-review. Variables analyzed included bAVM Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade, treatment modalities, and outcomes such as mortality and neurological deficits. We compared studies with a minimum of 50% cases classified as SM 1-2 lesions and those with less than 50% in this category. Similarly, a comparison between studies with at least 50% microsurgery-cases and those with less than 50% was performed. We examined correlations between mortality incidence, SM distribution, and treatment modalities.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 16 studies with 2.417 patients. The frequency of bAVMs SM-grade 1-2 ranged from 44% to 76%, SM-grade 3 from 19% to 48%, and SM 4-5 from 5 to 23%. Notably, studies with more than 50% cases presenting lesions SM-grade 1-2 presented significantly lower mortality rates than those with less than 50% cases of SM 1-2 lesions (P < 0.001). No significant difference in mortality rates or neurological deficits was identified between studies with more than 50% of microsurgery-cases and those with less than 50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis revealed that studies with a higher proportion of bAVMs presenting SM 1-2 lesions were associated with lower mortality rates. Mortality did not show a significant association with treatment modalities.

Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in brain arteriovenous malformations treated with open surgery research: a systematic review and proposal of a reporting guideline for surgical and clinical outcomes

Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (bAVMs) are rare but high-risk developmental anomalies of the vascular system. Microsurgery through craniotomy is believed to be the mainstay standard treatment for many grades of bAVMs. However, a significant challenge emerges in the existing body of clinical studies on open surgery for bAVMs: the lack of reproducibility and comparability. This study aims to assess the quality of studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes for bAVMs treated by open surgery and develop a reporting guideline checklist focusing on essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for studies published between January 1, 2018, and December 1, 2023. Included studies were scrutinized focusing on seven domains: (1) Assessment of How Studies Reported on the Baseline Characteristics of the Patient Sample; (2) Assessment and reporting on bAVMs grading, anatomical characteristics, and radiological aspects; (3) Angioarchitecture Assessment and Reporting; (4) Reporting on Pivotal Concepts Definitions; (5) Reporting on Neurosurgeon(s) and Staff Characteristics; (6) Reporting on Surgical Details; (7) Assessing and Reporting Clinical and Surgical Outcomes and AEs. A total of 47 studies comprising 5,884 patients were included. The scrutiny of the studies identified that the current literature in bAVM open surgery is deficient in many aspects, ranging from fundamental pieces of information of methodology to baseline characteristics of included patients and data reporting. Included studies demonstrated a lack of reproducibility that hinders building cumulative evidence. A bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline with 65 items distributed across eight domains was developed and is proposed in this study aiming to address these shortcomings. This systematic review identified that the available literature regarding microsurgery for bAVM treatment, particularly in studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, lacks rigorous scientific methodology and quality in reporting. The proposed bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to address these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility in this scenario. This proposal aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the Open Surgery treatment for bAVMs.

Microsurgical Treatment of Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center Study Experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to assess the functional outcomes after microsurgical resection of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and to compare the results between patients eligible for A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in this surgical series to the results reported and the ARUBA study.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 169 patients who underwent microsurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformation (AVMs) in our institution between January 2016 and December 2021. These patients' functional status was assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at the last follow-up and before treatment. The mRS scores at the latest follow-up were classified into good outcomes (mRS < 3) and poor outcomes (mRS ≥ 3). Clinical presentation, patients' demographics, AVM characteristics, follow-up time, and obliteration rate were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were performed on the whole cohort, comparing Spetzler-Martin Grade I and Grade II, and ARUBA-eligible AVMs.

RESULTS

The initial hemorrhagic presentation occurred in 71 (42%) out of 169 patients. The majority of the patients presented with headaches (73%). The AVMs were completely obliterated in 166 (98.2%) patients. The series included 65 Spetzler-Martin Grade I (38.5%), 46 Grade II (27.2%), 32 Grade III (18.9%), 22 Grade IV (13%), and 4 Grade V (2.4%) AVMs. There were 98 unruptured and 79 ARUBA-eligible cases. Also, optimal functional outcome was achieved in 145 (85.8%) patients. The overall mortality rate was 5.3% (9/169). The multivariate analysis illustrated that a poor outcome was significantly associated with presurgical mRS ≥3 (p < 0.013; OR, 0.206; 95% CI 0.059-0.713), increasing age (p < 0.045; odds ratio [OR], 1.022; 95% CI 1.000-0.045), and female gender (p < 0.009; OR, 2.991; 95% CI 1.309-6.832).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that better outcomes can be obtained using microsurgical resection in the majority of patients with AVMs. Independent predictors of poor outcomes after surgical resection of AVMs include increasing age at the time of surgery, poor presurgical functional status, and female gender. Supposing that patients are more suitable for microsurgery after presurgical examination, outcomes are normally better in that case than those achieved by multimodal interventions (such as conservative treatment or ARUBA treatment arm). Therefore, we recommend early surgical removal on all surgically accessible AVMs to prevent successive hemorrhages and the consequences of poor neurological outcomes.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for intermediate- and high-grade arteriovenous malformations: outcomes stratified by the supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading system

OBJECTIVE

The supplemented Spetzler-Martin (Supp-SM) grading system was developed to improve the predictive accuracy of surgical risk for patients with brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The aim of this study was to apply the Supp-SM grading system to patients having stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for Spetzler-Martin (SM) intermediate- (grade III) or high-grade (grade IV-V) AVMs to enable comparison with published microsurgical series.

METHODS

In 219 patients who underwent SRS during the period from 1990 to 2016, the Supp-SM grade was calculated for SM grade III (n = 154) or SM grade IV-V (n = 65) AVMs. The Supp-SM grades in these patients were 4 (n = 14, 6%), 5 (n = 36, 16%), 6 (n = 67, 31%), 7 (n = 76, 35%), and 8-9 (n = 26, 12%). Sixty patients (27%) had deep AVMs (basal ganglia, thalamus, or brainstem). Thirty-nine patients (18%) had volume-staged SRS; 41 patients (19%) underwent repeat SRS. The median follow-up period was 69 months for SM grade III AVMs and 113 months for SM grade IV-V AVMs.

RESULTS

AVM obliteration was confirmed in 163 patients (74%) at a median of 38 months after initial SRS. The obliteration rates at 4 and 8 years were 59% and 76%, respectively. Thirty-one patients (14%) had post-SRS deficits from hemorrhage (n = 7, 3%) or radiation injury (n = 24, 11%). Six patients (3%) died after SRS (hemorrhage, n = 5; radiation injury, n = 1). The rates of neurological decline or death at 4 and 8 years were 11% and 18%, respectively. Factors predictive of nonobliteration were deep location (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.82, p = 0.003) and increasing AVM volume (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99, p = 0.002). Increasing AVM volume was the only factor associated with neurological decline (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, p = 0.002). The Supp-SM grading score did not correlate with either obliteration (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.82-1.09, p = 0.43) or neurological decline (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.84-1.56, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

The Supp-SM grading system was not predictive of outcomes after SRS of intermediate- or high-grade AVM. In a cohort that included a high percentage (47%) of "inoperable" AVMs according to Supp-SM grade (≥ 7), most patients had obliteration after SRS, although there was a high risk of neurological decline.

Surgical management outcomes of intracranial arteriovenous malformations after preoperative embolization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) has been shown to mitigate morbidity for high-risk AVMs, chiefly by reducing lesional blood flow before resection. However, associated risks include postembolization AVM rupture, and the effect of preoperative embolization on outcome remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis of the literature on preoperative embolization for microsurgically treated AVMs.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all English-language publications reporting clinical outcomes after combined embolization and surgical resection for AVMs. Single- and 2-arm analyses were performed using random-effects modeling.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies with 2108 patients were included in this analysis. Most patients (90.6%) who underwent embolization had at least a 50% obliteration of AVMs on posttreatment preoperative angiography, with a mean rate of obliteration of approximately 80% (range 28.8-100%). Among patients who had combined treatment, 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1-4.6%) experienced embolization-related hemorrhagic complications before surgery. Both treatment groups achieved excellent postsurgical complete resection rates (odds ratio [OR] 1.05; 95% CI 0.60-1.85). Neither the clinical outcome (OR 1.42; 95% CI 0.84-2.40) nor the total number of hemorrhagic complications (OR 1.84; 95% CI 0.88-3.85) was significantly different between the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, preoperative embolization appears to have substantially reduced the lesional volume with active AV shunting before AVM resection. Anecdotally, preoperative embolization facilitates safe and efficient resection; however, differences in outcomes were not significant. The decision to pursue preoperative embolization remains a nuanced decision based on individual lesion anatomy and treatment team experience.

IV and V grade arteriovenous Malformations: A multicenter surgical experience. Use of multiple grading system to predict surgical risk

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to report a multicenter experience in the treatment of IV and V grade arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and to apply commonly used grading scales for surgical risk assessment for these vascular high-grade lesions.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2019, a retrospective study was conducted to identify patients undergoing microsurgical intervention for cAVMs at two Italian centers specialized in the treatment of vascular pathologies. Data on patients with Spetzler-Martin IV and V and with a score equal or more than 7 according to Lawton-Young classification were collected. Ruptured AVMs at admission were subsequently classified according to the new proposed AVICH classification.

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients with high grade (IV and V) cAVMs were enrolled in the study and the average follow-up was 36.45 months. The outcome based on mRS was favorable in 65 % of cases. The pre-operative mRS was a factor influencing clinical outcome, as well as the number of bleedings preceding the treatment, age, and nidus characteristics. S-M IV, L-Y 3 and S-M supp 7 scores were associated with good outcome. Based on the AVICH classification, for ruptured cAVMs, having a score of 9 ore less was correlated to a postoperative mRS fewer or equal than 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical management for high-grade AVMs should be considered in highly selected patients with repeated bleeding or disabling symptoms. Classification systems provide an aid in selecting patients for surgery, also in grade IV and V. It is essential to establish common registers for the management of these complex vascular malformations.

Patient frailty association with cerebral arteriovenous malformation microsurgical outcomes and development of custom risk stratification score: an analysis of 16,721 nationwide admissions

OBJECTIVE

Patient frailty is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes for several neurosurgical procedures. However, comparative accuracy between different frailty metrics for cerebral arteriovenous malformation (AVM) outcomes is poorly understood and existing frailty metrics studied in the literature are constrained by poor specificity to neurosurgery. This aim of this paper was to compare the predictive ability of 3 frailty scores for AVM microsurgical admissions and generate a custom risk stratification score.

METHODS

All adult AVM microsurgical admissions in the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (2002–2017) were identified. Three frailty measures were analyzed: 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5; range 0–5), 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11; range 0–11), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (range 0–29). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare accuracy between metrics. The analyzed endpoints included in-hospital mortality, routine discharge, complications, length of stay (LOS), and hospitalization costs. Survey-weighted multivariate regression assessed frailty-outcome associations, adjusting for 13 confounders, including patient demographics, hospital characteristics, rupture status, hydrocephalus, epilepsy, and treatment modality. Subsequently, k-fold cross-validation and Akaike information criterion–based model selection were used to generate a custom 5-variable risk stratification score called the AVM-5. This score was validated in the main study population and a pseudoprospective cohort (2018–2019).

RESULTS

The authors analyzed 16,271 total AVM microsurgical admissions nationwide, with 21.0% being ruptured. The mFI-5, mFI-11, and CCI were all predictive of lower rates of routine discharge disposition, increased perioperative complications, and longer LOS (all p < 0.001). Their AVM-5 risk stratification score was calculated from 5 variables: age, hydrocephalus, paralysis, diabetes, and hypertension. The AVM-5 was predictive of decreased rates of routine hospital discharge (OR 0.26, p < 0.001) and increased perioperative complications (OR 2.42, p < 0.001), postoperative LOS (+49%, p < 0.001), total LOS (+47%, p < 0.001), and hospitalization costs (+22%, p < 0.001). This score outperformed age, mFI-5, mFI-11, and CCI for both ruptured and unruptured AVMs (area under the curve [AUC] 0.78, all p < 0.001). In a pseudoprospective cohort of 2005 admissions from 2018 to 2019, the AVM-5 remained significantly associated with all outcomes except for mortality and exhibited higher accuracy than all 3 earlier scores (AUC 0.79, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient frailty is predictive of poorer disposition and elevated complications, LOS, and costs for AVM microsurgical admissions. The authors’ custom AVM-5 risk score outperformed age, mFI-5, mFI-11, and CCI while using threefold less variables than the CCI. This score may complement existing AVM grading scales for optimization of surgical candidates and identification of patients at risk of postoperative medical and surgical morbidity.

Endovascular treatment in the multimodality management of brain arteriovenous malformations: report of the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery Standards and Guidelines Committee

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this review is to summarize the data available for the role of angiography and embolization in the comprehensive multidisciplinary management of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs METHODS: We performed a structured literature review for studies examining the indications, efficacy, and outcomes for patients undergoing endovascular therapy in the context of brain AVM management. We graded the quality of the evidence. Recommendations were arrived at through a consensus conference of the authors, then with additional input from the full Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS) Standards and Guidelines Committee and the SNIS Board of Directors.

RESULTS

The multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment of brain AVMs continues to evolve. Recommendations include: (1) Digital subtraction catheter cerebral angiography (DSA)-including 2D, 3D, and reformatted cross-sectional views when appropriate-is recommended in the pre-treatment assessment of cerebral AVMs. (I, B-NR) . (2) It is recommended that endovascular embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations be performed in the context of a complete multidisciplinary treatment plan aiming for obliteration of the AVM and cure. (I, B-NR) . (3) Embolization of brain AVMs before surgical resection can be useful to reduce intraoperative blood loss, morbidity, and surgical complexity. (IIa, B-NR) . (4) The role of primary curative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations is uncertain, particularly as compared with microsurgery and radiosurgery with or without adjunctive embolization. Further research is needed, particularly with regard to risk for AVM recurrence. (III equivocal, C-LD) . (5) Targeted embolization of high-risk features of ruptured brain AVMs may be considered to reduce the risk for recurrent hemorrhage. (IIb, C-LD) . (6) Palliative embolization may be useful to treat symptomatic AVMs in which curative therapy is otherwise not possible. (IIb, B-NR) . (7) The role of AVM embolization as an adjunct to radiosurgery is not well-established. Further research is needed. (III equivocal, C-LD) . (8) Imaging follow-up after apparent cure of brain AVMs is recommended to assess for recurrence. Although non-invasive imaging may be used for longitudinal follow-up, DSA remains the gold standard for residual or recurrent AVM detection in patients with concerning imaging and/or clinical findings. (I, C-LD) . (9) Improved national and international reporting of patients of all ages with brain AVMs, their treatments, side effects from treatment, and their long-term outcomes would enhance the ability to perform clinical trials and improve the rigor of research into this rare condition. (I, C-EO) .

CONCLUSIONS

Although the quality of evidence is lower than for more common conditions subjected to multiple randomized controlled trials, endovascular therapy has an important role in the management of brain AVMs. Prospective studies are needed to strengthen the data supporting these recommendations.

Current concepts and perspectives on brain arteriovenous malformations: A review of pathogenesis and multidisciplinary treatment

Brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs) are unusual vascular pathologies characterized by the abnormal aggregation of dilated arteries and veins in the brain parenchyma and for which the absence of a normal vascular structure and capillary bed leads to direct connections between arteries and veins. Although bAVMs have long been believed to be congenital anomalies that develop during the prenatal period, current studies show that inflammation is associated with AVM genesis, growth, and rupture. Interventional treatment options include microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and endovascular embolization, and management often comprises a multidisciplinary combination of these modalities. The appropriate selection of patients with brain arteriovenous malformations for interventional treatment requires balancing the risk of treatment complications against the risk of hemorrhaging during the natural course of the pathology; however, no definitive guidelines have been established for the management of brain arteriovenous malformations. In this paper, we comprehensively review the current basic and clinical studies on bAVMs and discuss the contemporary status of multidisciplinary management of bAVMs.