An Update of Neuroanesthesia for Intraoperative Brain Mapping Craniotomy

What helps patients to prepare for and cope during awake craniotomy? A prospective qualitative study

There is growing interest in awake craniotomies, but some clinicians are concerned that such procedures are poorly tolerated by patients. Therefore, we conducted a study to assess this phenomenon. In this prospective qualitative study, 68 patients who qualified for awake craniotomy were asked to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-two days before the surgery and visual analogue scales (VAS) for pain and stress, two days before the surgery and again about two days after. In addition, after their surgery, they took part in a structured interview about what helped them prepare for and cope with the surgery. Most patients tolerated the awake surgery well, scoring low on stress and pain scales. They reported a lower level of stress during the surgery (when questioned afterwards) than before it. Intensity of stress before the surgery correlated negatively with age, positively with HADS anxiety score and positively with stress subsequently experienced during surgery. The level of stress during surgery was associated with stress experienced before the surgery, pain and HADS anxiety and depression scores. Severity of pain during the surgery was positively correlated with stress during surgery and HADS depression and anxiety scores before the surgery. There was no correlation between stress, pain, anxiety and depression and the location of the lesion. Patients have a high tolerance for awake craniotomy. Various factors have an impact on how well patients cope with the operation. Extensive preoperative preparation should be considered a key part of the procedure.

Monitored Anesthesia Care Protocol for Awake Craniotomy and Patient's Perspective on the Procedure

OBJECTIVE

There is ongoing discussion on pros and cons in terms of different anesthesia protocols for awake craniotomy (AC) with direct brain stimulation. The aim of this study is to share our anesthesia protocol and present our patients' perspectives.

METHODS

We conducted an analysis of prospectively collected data from 53 (54 procedures) consecutive patients. Most of the patients (50) underwent surgery due to primary brain lesions. Eight procedures were performed in patients with lesions in the nondominant hemisphere for language. Four of all procedures were reoperations, and one patient was operated on in awake conditions twice. The psychological evaluation of patients was performed 2 times: 2 days before and after surgery. A visual analog scale for pain and stress levels as well as structured interviews was used.

RESULTS

Most patients tolerated ACwell. Patients reported that discomfort was mostly related to urinary catheter insertion, head holder placement, and temporal muscle detachment in cases of frontotemporal craniotomies. The intensity of stress measured with the visual analog scale before surgery was negatively associated with age and positively correlated with stress experienced in the operating room. In all patients, we were able to finish the procedure according to the monitored anesthesia care protocol without the need for conversion to general anesthesia. We observed 3 (5.6%) intraoperative seizures that required deepening of sedation.

CONCLUSION

AC using the monitored anesthesia care protocol was a safe and well-tolerated procedure with satisfactory patient experience. Extensive preoperative preparation should be considered a key part of the procedure.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) for Cranial Tumor Resection: A Review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols describe a standardized method of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative care to enhance outcomes and minimize complication risks surrounding elective surgical intervention. A growing body of evidence is being generated as we learn to apply principles of ERAS standardization to neurosurgical patients. First applied in spinal surgery, ERAS protocols have been extended to cranial neuro-oncological procedures. This review synthesizes recent findings to generate evidence-based guidelines to manage neurosurgical oncology patients with standardized systems and assess ability of these systems to coordinate multidisciplinary, patient-centric care efforts. Furthermore, we highlight the potential utility of multimedia, app-based communication platforms to facilitate patient education, autonomy, and team communication within each of the three settings.

Subcortical Stimulation in Brain Tumor Surgery: A closer look beneath the surface

INTRODUCTION

Maximizing a patient's onco-functional balance is the central tenet of brain tumor surgery. As a result, numerous surgical adjuncts have been developed to facilitate identification of the tumor-brain interface and preservation of functional anatomy. Among these, intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) with direct cortical and subcortical stimulation remains the gold standard for real time, functional mapping of motor and language activity. However, stimulation techniques are not standardized and vary significantly across institutions. This is particularly true with subcortical stimulation for mapping of motor function.

METHODS

We review the state of subcortical IONM and mapping techniques. Historical and predicate literature were reviewed as well as new and emerging techniques. We discuss their evolution, clinical utility, and limitations to direct future research and application.

RESULTS

We evaluate and discuss the background and current clinical use of direct cortical and subcortical stimulation techniques and protocols and identify current trends and limitations. We focus specifically on methods of subcortical stimulation given the heterogeneity in the published literature. We also suggest directions to optimize the clinical utility of these tools.

CONCLUSION

Despite significant heterogeneity in published techniques, trends support the use of the Taniguchi method for subcortical stimulation. Novel dynamic stimulation techniques may improve accuracy. Prospective studies to define standardized guidelines are needed.