Machine-Learning Approach to Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: A Multicenter Study

Preoperative Classification of Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors on MRI Using Radiomics

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are aggressive soft-tissue tumors prevalent in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients, posing a significant risk of metastasis and recurrence. Current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging lacks decisiveness in distinguishing benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (BPNSTs) and MPNSTs, necessitating invasive biopsies. This study aims to develop a radiomics model using quantitative imaging features and machine learning to distinguish MPNSTs from BPNSTs. Clinical data and MRIs from MPNST and BPNST patients (2000-2019) were collected at a tertiary sarcoma referral center. Lesions were manually and semi-automatically segmented on MRI scans, and radiomics features were extracted using the Workflow for Optimal Radiomics Classification (WORC) algorithm, employing automated machine learning. The evaluation was conducted using a 100× random-split cross-validation. A total of 35 MPNSTs and 74 BPNSTs were included. The T1-weighted (T1w) MRI radiomics model outperformed others with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71. The incorporation of additional MRI scans did not enhance performance. Combining T1w MRI with clinical features achieved an AUC of 0.74. Experienced radiologists achieved AUCs of 0.75 and 0.66, respectively. Radiomics based on T1w MRI scans and clinical features show some ability to distinguish MPNSTs from BPNSTs, potentially aiding in the management of these tumors.

CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas: an updated systematic review of reproducibility and validation strategies

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review radiomic feature reproducibility and model validation strategies in recent studies dealing with CT and MRI radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, thus updating a previous version of this review which included studies published up to 2020.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on EMBASE and PubMed databases for papers published between January 2021 and March 2023. Data regarding radiomic feature reproducibility and model validation strategies were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

Out of 201 identified papers, 55 were included. They dealt with radiomics of bone (n = 23) or soft-tissue (n = 32) tumors. Thirty-two (out of 54 employing manual or semiautomatic segmentation, 59%) studies included a feature reproducibility analysis. Reproducibility was assessed based on intra/interobserver segmentation variability in 30 (55%) and geometrical transformations of the region of interest in 2 (4%) studies. At least one machine learning validation technique was used for model development in 34 (62%) papers, and K-fold cross-validation was employed most frequently. A clinical validation of the model was reported in 38 (69%) papers. It was performed using a separate dataset from the primary institution (internal test) in 22 (40%), an independent dataset from another institution (external test) in 14 (25%) and both in 2 (4%) studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to papers published up to 2020, a clear improvement was noted with almost double publications reporting methodological aspects related to reproducibility and validation. Larger multicenter investigations including external clinical validation and the publication of databases in open-access repositories could further improve methodology and bring radiomics from a research area to the clinical stage.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

An improvement in feature reproducibility and model validation strategies has been shown in this updated systematic review on radiomics of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas, highlighting efforts to enhance methodology and bring radiomics from a research area to the clinical stage.

KEY POINTS

• 2021-2023 radiomic studies on CT and MRI of musculoskeletal sarcomas were reviewed. • Feature reproducibility was assessed in more than half (59%) of the studies. • Model clinical validation was performed in 69% of the studies. • Internal (44%) and/or external (29%) test datasets were employed for clinical validation.

Malignant and Benign Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in a Single Center: Value of Clinical and Ultrasound Features for the Diagnosis of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the combined use of ultrasonography and clinical features for the differentiation of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST) from benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors (BPNST) and to compare the efficacy of ultrasonography with that of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 28 MPNSTs and a control group of 57 BPNSTs. All patients underwent an ultrasound scan using the Logiq E9 (GE Health Care, Milwaukee, WI) or EPIQ7 equipment (Philips Medical System, Bothell, WA). A 3.0-T MRI machine (Ingenia; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) was used for scanning, and conventional MRI was performed on different regions based on the patient's clinical situation. The following variables were evaluated: palpable mass, pain, nerve symptoms, maximum diameter, location, shape, boundary, encapsulation, echogenicity, echo homogeneity, presence of a cystic component, calcification, target sign, posterior echo, and intertumoral vascularity of the tumors. The diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography and clinical factors was compared with that of MRI. Independent factors for predicting MPNST versus BPNST were also assessed.

RESULTS

The parameters of location, shape, boundary, encapsulation, and vascularity were significantly different between MPNSTs and BPNSTs. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that shape, boundary, and vascularity were independent predictors of MPNSTs. The sensitivity, specificity, and Youden index of the three clinical and ultrasound factors (shape, boundary, and vascularity) were 0.89, 0.81, and 0.69, respectively, whereas those of MRI were 0.71, 0.89, and 0.61, respectively. No significant differences in the area under the curve (AUC) of the three combined clinical and ultrasound factors and those of MRI were found (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI was useful in the differential diagnosis between MPNSTs and BPNSTs. However, the combination of clinical and ultrasound diagnoses can achieve the same effect as MRI, including shape, boundary, and vasculature.

Pediatric Sarcomas: The Next Generation of Molecular Studies

Simple Summary

There has been an incredible amount of discovery in pediatric sarcomas, but much remains to be accomplished. Clinical challenges include diagnostic heterogeneity and the poor outcome of patients with high risk, metastatic, and relapsed disease. The emergence of single cell sequencing has allowed the ability to document tumor cell heterogeneity in amazing detail, but it does not allow the ability to visualize spatial orientation. This problem has been solved by spatial multi-omics, which can be used to map tumors and visualize the distribution of critical transcripts, mutations, and proteins. However, these tools only offer observational data. High-throughput functional genomics provides a powerful way to highlight oncogenic drivers and potential therapy opportunities. Research has been hamstrung by a need for annotated specimens, particularly in post-therapy, relapsed, and metastatic disease, and initial biopsies offer only limited data opportunities. Data complexity, variability, and inconsistency present problems best approached with AI/machine learning. We stand on the threshold of a revolution in cancer cell biology that has the potential for translation into more effective and more directed therapies, particularly for previously recalcitrant diseases.

Abstract

Pediatric sarcomas constitute one of the largest groups of childhood cancers, following hematopoietic, neural, and renal lesions. Partly because of their diversity, they continue to offer challenges in diagnosis and treatment. In spite of the diagnostic, nosologic, and therapeutic gains made with genetic technology, newer means for investigation are needed. This article reviews emerging technology being used to study human neoplasia and how these methods might be applicable to pediatric sarcomas. Methods reviewed include single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), spatial multi-omics, high-throughput functional genomics, and clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic sequence-Cas9 (CRISPR-Cas9) technology. In spite of these advances, the field continues to be challenged by a dearth of properly annotated materials, particularly from recurrences and metastases and pre- and post-treatment samples.

Machine Learning Approach to Differentiation of Peripheral Schwannomas and Neurofibromas: A Multi-Center Study

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive differentiation between schwannomas and neurofibromas is important for appropriate management, preoperative counseling, and surgical planning, but has proven difficult using conventional imaging. The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate machine learning approaches for differentiating peripheral schwannomas from neurofibromas.

METHODS

We assembled a cohort of schwannomas and neurofibromas from 3 independent institutions and extracted high-dimensional radiomic features from gadolinium-enhanced, T1-weighted MRI using the PyRadiomics package on Quantitative Imaging Feature Pipeline. Age, sex, neurogenetic syndrome, spontaneous pain, and motor deficit were recorded. We evaluated the performance of 6 radiomics-based classifier models with and without clinical features and compared model performance against human expert evaluators.

RESULTS

107 schwannomas and 59 neurofibroma were included. The primary models included both clinical and imaging data. The accuracy of the human evaluators (0.765) did not significantly exceed the no-information rate (NIR), whereas the Support Vector Machine (0.929), Logistic Regression (0.929), and Random Forest (0.905) classifiers exceeded the NIR. Using the method of DeLong, the AUC for the Logistic Regression (AUC=0.923) and K Nearest Neighbor (AUC=0.923) classifiers was significantly greater than the human evaluators (AUC=0.766; p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics-based classifiers developed here proved to be more accurate and had a higher AUC on the ROC curve than expert human evaluators. This demonstrates that radiomics using routine MRI sequences and clinical features can aid in differentiation of peripheral schwannomas and neurofibromas.