Commentary: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Statement: What Neurosurgeons Should Know

Seizure Control Outcomes following Resection of Cortical Dysplasia in Patients with DEPDC5 Variants: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis

There is insufficient evidence regarding the efficacy of epilepsy surgery in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy and coexistent DEPDC5 (dishevelled EGL-10 and pleckstrin domain-containing protein 5) pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), or variance of unknown significance (VUS) variants. To conduct a systematic review on the literature regarding the use and efficacy of epilepsy surgery as an intervention for patients with DEPDC5 variants who have pharmacoresistant epilepsy. A systematic review of the current literature published regarding the outcomes of epilepsy surgery for patients with DEPDC5 variants was conducted. Demographics and individual patient data were recorded and analyzed. Subsequent statistical analysis was performed to assess significance of the findings. A total of eight articles comprising 44 DEPDC5 patients with genetic variants undergoing surgery were included in this study. The articles primarily originated in high-income countries (5/8, 62.5%). The average age of the subjects was 10.06 ± 9.41 years old at the time of study. The most common form of epilepsy surgery was focal resection (38/44, 86.4%). Thirty-seven of the 40 patients (37/40, 92.5%) with reported seizure frequency results had improvement. Twenty-nine out of 38 patients (29/38, 78.4%) undergoing focal resection achieved Engel Score I postoperatively, and two out of four patients achieved International League Against Epilepsy I (50%). Epilepsy surgery is effective in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy and coexistent DEPDC5 P, LP, or VUS variants.

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Centromedian Nucleus of the Thalamus for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe childhood-onset pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CMN) has been utilized.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) analysis to characterize outcomes of DBS of CMN in LGS.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Articles were screened by title/abstract then full text. Included articles were reviewed for bibliographic, demographic, and outcome data. IPD were extracted from studies providing IPD for all patients.

RESULTS

Of 72 resultant articles, 10 studies (114 patients) were included. Six of 7 studies reporting the outcome of ≥50% seizure reduction indicated that ≥50% of patients achieved this, with improved functional ability. Seizure freedom rate was generally <10%. Six studies with 47 patients provided IPD. The mean ages at epilepsy onset and CMN DBS were 3.9 ± 4.5 years and 17.4 ± 8.8 years, respectively. Nineteen of 41 (46.3%) patients had positive MRI findings. Seizure types included atypical absence in 39 (83.0%) patients, generalized tonic-clonic in 32 (68.1%), tonic in 22 (46.8%), and atonic in 20 (42.6%). Thirty-eight (80.9%) patients experienced ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, and only 3 (6.4%) experienced seizure freedom. The mean seizure reduction was 62.9% ± 31.2% overall. Quality of life improved in 30/34 (88.2%) and was unchanged in the remainder (11.8%). The complication rate was 2/41 (4.9%). The mean length of follow-up was 19.8 ± 26.1 months (IQR: 4-18 months).

CONCLUSION

Limited data indicate that DBS of the CMN may be effective and safe for people with LGS.

Clinical utility of intraoperative electrocorticography for epilepsy surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite the widespread use of intraoperative electrocorticography (iECoG) during resective epilepsy surgery, there are conflicting data on its overall efficacy and inability to predict benefit per pathology. Given the heterogeneity of iECoG use in resective epilepsy surgery, it is important to assess the utility of interictal-based iECoG. This individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis seeks to identify the benefit of iECoG during resective epilepsy surgery in achieving seizure freedom for various pathologies. Embase, Scopus, and PubMed were searched from inception to January 31, 2021 using the following terms: "ecog", "electrocorticography", and "epilepsy". Articles were included if they reported seizure freedom at ≥12-month follow-up in cohorts with and without iECoG for epilepsy surgery. Non-English articles, noncomparative iECoG cohorts, and studies with <10% iECoG use were excluded. This meta-analysis followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. The primary outcome was seizure freedom at last follow-up and time to seizure recurrence, if applicable. Forest plots with random effects modeling assessed the relationship between iECoG use and seizure freedom. Cox regression of IPD was performed to identify predictors of longer duration of seizure freedom. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank test were created to visualize differences in time to seizure recurrence. Of 7504 articles identified, 18 were included for study-level analysis. iECoG was not associated with higher seizure freedom at the study level (relative risk = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96-1.23, p = .19, I²  = 64%), but on IPD (n = 7 studies, 231 patients) iECoG use was independently associated with more favorable seizure outcomes (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% CI = .23-.95, p = .037). In Kaplan-Meier analysis of specific pathologies, iECoG use was significantly associated with longer seizure freedom only for focal cortical dysplasia (FCD; p < .001) etiology. Number needed to treat for iECoG was 8.8, and for iECoG in FCD it was 4.7. We show iECoG seizure freedom is not achieved uniformly across centers. iECoG is particularly beneficial for FCD etiology in improving seizure freedom.

Sensorimotor outcomes after resection for perirolandic drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of long-term postoperative sensorimotor deficits in children undergoing perirolandic resective epilepsy surgery is unclear. The risk of developing these deficits must be weighed against the potential reduction in seizure frequency after surgery. In this study, the authors investigated the prevalence of sensorimotor deficits after resective surgery at ≥ 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Subgroups of patients were identified and categorized according to their outcomes as follows: group A patients were denoted as seizure free with no postoperative sensorimotor deficits; group B patients experienced seizure recurrence with no deficit; group C patients were seizure free with deficits; and group D patients were not seizure free and with deficits. Rates of sensory deficits were examined in patients undergoing postcentral gyrus resection, and rates of motor deficits were aggregated in patients undergoing precentral gyrus resection.

RESULTS

Of 797 articles resulting from the database searches, 6 articles including 164 pediatric patients at a mean age of 7.7 ± 5.2 years with resection for drug-resistant perirolandic epilepsy were included in the study. Seizure freedom was observed in 118 (72.9%) patients at a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 1.8 years. In total, 109 (66.5%) patients did not develop sensorimotor deficits at last follow-up, while 55 (33.5%) had permanent deficits. Ten (14.3%) of 70 patients with postcentral gyrus resection had permanent sensory deficits. Of the postcentral gyrus resection patients, 41 (58.6%) patients were included in group A, 19 (27.1%) in group B, 7 (10.0%) in group C, and 3 (4.3%) in group D. Forty (37.7%) of 106 patients with precentral resections had permanent motor deficits. Of the precentral gyrus resection patients, 50 (47.2%) patients were in group A, 16 (15.1%) in group B, 24 (22.6%) in group C, and 16 (15.1%) in group D. Patients without focal cortical dysplasia were more likely to have permanent motor deficits relative to those with focal cortical dysplasia in the precentral surgery cohort (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In total, 58.6% of patients were seizure free without deficit, 27.1% were not seizure free and without deficit, 10.0% were seizure free but with deficit, and 4.3% were not seizure free and with deficit. Future studies with functional and quality-of-life data, particularly for patients who experience seizure recurrence with no deficits (as in group B in the present study) and those who are seizure free with deficits (as in group C) after treatment, are necessary to guide surgical decision-making.

Language and Geographic Representation of Neurosurgical Journals: A Meta-Science Study

OBJECTIVE

Medical journals have a role in promoting representation of neurosurgeons who speak primary languages other than English. We sought to characterize the language of publication and geographic origin of neurosurgical journals, delineate associations between impact factor (IF) and language and geographic variables, and describe steps to overcome language barriers to publishing.

METHODS

Web of Science, Scopus, and Ulrich's Serial Analysis system were searched for neurosurgery journals. The journals were screened for relevance. Language of publication, country and World Health Organization region, World Bank income status and gross domestic product, and citation metrics were extracted.

RESULTS

Of 867 journals, 74 neurosurgical journals were included. Common publication languages were English (52, 70.3%), Mandarin (5, 6.8%), and Spanish (4, 5.4%). Countries of publication for the greatest number of journals were the United States (23, 31.1%), United Kingdom (8, 10.8%), and China (6, 8.1%). Most journals originated from the Americas region (29, 39.2%), the European region (28, 37.8%), and from high-income countries (n = 54, 73.0%). Median IF was 1.55 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.89-2.40). Journals written in English (1.77 [IQR 1.00-2.87], P = 0.032) and from high-income countries (1.81 [IQR 1.0-2.70], P = 0.046) had highest median IF. When excluding outliers, there was a small but positive correlation between per capita gross domestic product and IF (β = 0.021, P = 0.03, R² = 0.097).

CONCLUSIONS

Language concordance represents a substantial barrier to research equity in neurosurgery, limiting dissemination of ideas of merit that currently have inadequate outlets for readership. Initiatives aimed at increasing the accessibility of neurosurgical publishing to underrepresented authors are essential.

Global Epidemiology of Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Craniosynostosis leads to craniofacial deformity and may result in raised intracranial pressure, neurocognitive deficits, and psychosocial issues if left untreated. The global epidemiology of craniosynostosis is unknown. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate global birth prevalence.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched. Articles were screened by title and abstract and then full text. Meta-analysis of birth prevalence was conducted. Birth prevalence figures were combined with metrics detailing the number of births in 2019 to estimate the number of children worldwide born with craniosynostosis annually.

RESULTS

Of 1378 resultant articles, 24 studies were included, including 20 providing data for craniosynostosis overall and 9 for nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. World Health Organization regions of included studies were 9 (37.5%) European Region, 8 (33.3%) Region of the Americas, 4 (16.7%) Western Pacific region, 2 (8.3%) African Region, and 1 (4.2%) Eastern Mediterranean Region. Lower middle-income countries represented only 4% of study manuscripts. The overall birth prevalence of craniosynostosis was 5.9 per 10,000 live births (20 studies; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9, 8.4; I² = 100%). The birth prevalence of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis was 5.2 per 10,000 live births (9 studies; 95% CI: 3.4, 7.3; I² = 98%). The number of children born globally with craniosynostosis in 2019 was estimated to be 84,665 (95% CI: 55,965, 120,540), including 72,857 (95% CI: 47,637, 120,280) with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Craniosynostosis is a common condition that affects the neurocognitive and craniofacial skeletal development of children worldwide. Initiatives to scale up capacity for craniosynostosis epidemiologic research and clinical care are warranted, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

Reporting Policies in Neurosurgical Journals: A Meta-Science Study of the Current State and Case for Standardization

BACKGROUND

Reporting quality within the neurosurgical literature is low, limiting the ability of journals to act as gatekeepers for evidence-based neurosurgical care. Journal policies during article submission aim to improve reporting quality. We conducted a meta-science study characterizing the reporting policies of neurosurgical journals and other related peer-reviewed publications.

METHODS

Journals were retrieved in 7 searches using Journal Citation Reports and Google Scholar. Characteristics, impact metrics, and submission policies were extracted.

RESULTS

Of 486 results, 54 journals were included, including 27 neurosurgical and 27 related topical journals. Thirty-eight (70.4%) adopted authorship guidelines and 20 (37.0%) disclosure standards of the International Council of Medical Journal Editors. Twenty-six (48.1%) required data availability statement and 33 (61.1%) clinical trials registration. Twenty-one (38.9%) required and 11 (20.4%) recommended adherence to reporting guidelines. Twenty (37.0%) endorsed EQUATOR network guidelines. PRISMA was mentioned by 30 (55.6%) journals, CONSORT by 28 (51.9%), and STROBE by 18 (33.3%). Among neurosurgical journals, factors associated with a requirement or recommendation to follow reporting guidelines among neurosurgical journals included impact factor (P = 0.0013), Article Influence Score (P = 0.0236), SCImago h-index (P = 0.0152), SCImago journal rank (P = 0.002), and CiteScore (P = 0.0023), as well as recommendations pertaining to International Council of Medical Journal Editors authorship guidelines (P = 0.0085), ORCID (P = 0.014), clinical trials registration (P = 0.0369), or data availability statement (P = 0.0047). CONSORT, PRISMA, or STROBE delineations were significantly associated with the mention of another guideline (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Neurosurgical journal submission policies are inconsistent. Frameworks to improve reporting quality are uncommonly used. Increasing rigor and standardization of reporting policies across journals publishers may improve quality.