Postoperative Oral Antibiotics and Sinonasal Outcomes Following Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumors Study: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study

The RAPID Consortium: A Platform for Clinical and Translational Pituitary Tumor Research

Objectives  Pituitary tumor treatment is hampered by the relative rarity of the disease, absence of a multicenter collaborative platform, and limited translational-clinical research partnerships. Prior studies offer limited insight into the formation of a multicenter consortium. Design  The authors describe the establishment of a multicenter research initiative, Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID), to encourage quality improvement and research, promote scholarship, and apply innovative solutions in outcomes research. Methods  The challenges encountered during the formation of other research registries were reviewed with those lessons applied to the development of RAPID. Setting/Participants  RAPID was formed by 11 academic U.S. pituitary centers. Results  A Steering Committee, bylaws, data coordination center, and leadership team have been established. Clinical modules with standardized data fields for nonfunctioning adenoma, prolactinoma, acromegaly, Cushing's disease, craniopharyngioma, and Rathke's cleft cyst were created using a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant cloud-based platform. Currently, RAPID has received institutional review board approval at all centers, compiled retrospective data and agreements from most centers, and begun prospective data collection at one site. Existing institutional databases are being mapped to one central repository. Conclusion  The RAPID consortium has laid the foundation for a multicenter collaboration to facilitate pituitary tumor and surgical research. We sought to share our experiences so that other groups also contemplating this approach may benefit. Future studies may include outcomes benchmarking, clinically annotated biobank tissue, multicenter outcomes studies, prospective intervention studies, translational research, and health economics studies focused on value-based care questions.

Postoperative protocols following endoscopic skull base surgery: An evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management strategies for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) vary widely because of limited evidence-based guidance.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from January 1990 through February 2022 to examine 18 postoperative considerations for ESBS. Nonhuman studies, articles written in a language other than English, and case reports were excluded. Studies were assessed for levels of evidence, and each topic's aggregate grade of evidence was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 74 studies reporting on 18 postoperative practices were reviewed. Postoperative pain management, prophylactic antibiotics, and lumbar drain use had the highest grades of evidence (B). The literature currently lacks high quality evidence for a majority of the reviewed ESBS precautions. There were no relevant studies to address postoperative urinary catheter use and medical intracranial pressure reduction.

CONCLUSION

The evidence for postoperative ESBS precautions is heterogeneous, scarce, and generally of low quality. Although this review identified the best evidence available in the literature, it suggests the urgent need for more robust evidence. Therefore, additional high-quality studies are needed in order to devise optimal postoperative ESBS protocols.

Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery Complication Avoidance: A Contemporary Review

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) provides a direct trajectory to ventral skull base lesions, avoidance of brain retraction, and clear visualization of cranial nerves as they exit skull base foramina. Despite these benefits, the EEA is not without complications. Here, we review published literature highlighting complications associated with the EEA including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, cranial nerve (CN) dysfunction, pituitary gland dysfunction, internal carotid artery (ICA) injury, infection, and others; we place special emphasis on discussing the prevention of these complications. As widespread adoption of the EEA continues, it becomes critical to educate surgeons regarding potential complications and their prevention while identifying gaps in the current literature to guide future research and advances in clinical care.

Skull Base Registries: A Roadmap

Hospitals, payors, and patients increasingly expect us to report our outcomes in more detail and to justify our treatment decisions and costs. Although there are many stakeholders in surgical outcomes, physicians must take the lead role in defining how outcomes are assessed. Skull base lesions interact with surrounding anatomy to produce a complex spectrum of presentations and surgical challenges, requiring a wide variety of surgical approaches. Moreover, many skull base lesions are relatively rare. These factors and others often preclude the use of prospective randomized clinical trials, thus necessitating alternate methods of scientific inquiry. In this paper, we propose a roadmap for implementing a skull base registry, along with expected benefits and challenges.

Retrospective Review of Surgical Site Infections after Endoscopic Endonasal Sellar and Parasellar Surgery: Multicenter Quality Data from the North American Skull Base Society

Introduction  Transnasal access to the anterior skull base provides a minimally invasive approach for sellar and parasellar masses compared with its open counterparts. The unique microbiome of the sinonasal mucosa provides distinct challenges not encountered with other cranial approaches. The use of antibiotics in these cases has not been standardized, and data remain scarce regarding infectious outcomes. Methods  We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of shared quality data points for the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for pituitary adenomas, along with other sellar and parasellar region masses that were included by participating institutions. Patient and operative characteristics, perioperative and postoperative antibiotic regimens and their durations, intraoperative and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, and onset of postoperative meningitis and sinusitis were compared. Results  Fifteen institutions participated and provided 6 consecutive months' worth of case data. Five hundred ninety-three cases were included in the study, of which 564 were pituitary adenomectomies. The incidences of postoperative meningitis and sinusitis were low (0.67 and 2.87% for all pathologies, respectively; 0.35% meningitis for pituitary adenomas) and did not correlate with any specific antibiotic regimen. Immunocompromised status posed an increased odds of meningitis in pituitary adenomectomies (28.6, 95% confidence interval [1.72-474.4]). Conclusions  The results show no clear benefit to postoperative antimicrobial use in EEA, with further larger studies needed.

Correlation of polyp grading scales with patient symptom scores and olfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various nasal polyp (NP) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature. However, no single system has been identified as superior. Correlations between NP scoring systems and patient symptoms, quality of life (QOL) or olfaction vary widely.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline. Any study examining endoscopy scores and symptom, QOL or olfaction measures in cross sectional manner or after therapeutic intervention were included.

RESULTS

This review identified 55 studies for a pooled meta-analysis of Lund-Kennedy (LK-NP) polyp scores (N = 6), Meltzer scores (N = 6), Nasal polyp scores (NPS; N = 19), Total polyp score (TPS; N=8) Lilholdt scores (N = 8), Olfactory cleft endoscopy score (OCES; N =4), Discharge, inflammation, polyp/edema score (DIP; N = 2), and Perioperative sinus endoscopy score (POSE; N = 2). Meta-regression assessed correlations between NP grading systems and SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), and Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT40). None of the NP grading systems correlated significantly with any symptom, QOL or olfactory metric. In intervention studies of surgery or monoclonal antibody treatment, changes in NPS scores did not correlate with any patient reported outcome measure (PROM) or olfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Current NP endoscopic scoring systems are not associated with PROMs such as SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, and TNSS as well as objective measures of olfaction. NP grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.

Surgery for acromegaly: Indications and goals

Acromegaly is a disease that occurs secondary to high levels of GH, most often from a hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma, with multisystem adverse effects. Diagnosis includes serum GH and IGF-1 levels, and obtaining an MRI pituitary protocol to assess for a functional pituitary adenoma. Attempted gross total resection of the GH-secreting adenoma is the gold standard in treatment for patients with acromegaly for a goal of biochemical remission. Medical and radiation therapies are available when patients do not achieve biochemical cure after surgical therapy.