A Comparison of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Abnormalities Following Balloon Remodeling for Aneurysm Coil Embolization in the Ruptured vs Unruptured Setting

Safety and Efficacy of Management for Intraprocedural Rupture During Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is rare, it is a devastating complication of endovascular treatment (EVT) for intracranial aneurysms. Very few studies have been conducted on IPR, and the safety and efficacy of management techniques of IPR have not been investigated.

METHODS

Patients who experienced IPR during EVT between 2013 and 2022 were enrolled from a multicenter observational registry. We examined the safety and efficacy of the management of IPR using imaging markers, including increased hemorrhage and ischemic lesions, which were evaluated using postoperative computed tomography and diffusion-weighted imaging, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 3269 EVTs for intracranial aneurysms, 74 patients who experienced IPR (2.26%) were analyzed. Fifty-five patients (3.36%) experienced IPR among 1636 EVT cases for ruptured aneurysms. Multivariate analysis revealed that increased hemorrhage was significantly associated with poor outcomes (odds ratio [OR], 6.37 [95% CI, 1.00-40.51], P = .050), whereas ischemic lesions were not. Regarding management techniques of IPR, antihypertensive medication use was significantly associated with increased hemorrhage (OR, 14.16 [95% CI, 2.35-85.34], P = .004). Heparin reversal was an independent factor for ischemic lesions (OR, 8.92 [95% CI, 1.54-51.58], P = .014).

CONCLUSION

Although the setting of IPR may be miscellaneous, and optimal management varies depending on individual cases, heparin reversal might be associated with ischemic complications, and its role in the successful hemostasis in IPR during EVT for ruptured aneurysms remains unclear.

Thromboembolic Events With the Woven Endobridge Device: Incidence, Predictive Factors, and Management

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device has been increasingly used to treat wide-neck aneurysms showing a safe and effective profile, but a relatively high number of thromboembolic events (TEEs) have been reported with such treatment. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and management of TEEs and possible predictive factors related to WEB embolization of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A single-center database with consecutive aneurysms treated with a WEB device between July 2012 and May 2022 was reviewed for intraoperative and delayed TEEs. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors associated with TEEs.

RESULTS

A total of 266 independent aneurysms were treated with WEB devices in 245 patients (mean age 55.78 ± 11.64 years, 169 (63.5%) females, 80 (30%) ruptured). The overall rate of TEEs is 13% (35/266), including 8.7% intraoperative. Symptomatic TEEs with clinical sequelae at a 3-month follow-up are reported to be 2.6% (7/266) with no TEE-related mortality. Both the replacement of a WEB device during the procedure (adjusted odds ratio = 2.61, 95% CI 1.24-5.49; P = .01) and ruptured aneurysms (adjusted odds ratio = 2.74, 95% CI 1.31-5.7; P = .007) were independent predictors of TEEs. A case-by-case management of intraprocedural TEE is also presented; tirofiban was successfully used in most cases of this cohort.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrated that ruptured aneurysms and WEB device replacement during the procedure were independent predictive factors for TEEs. As a result, making the correct choice of WEB is crucial for improving treatment outcomes. Moreover, with proper medical management of TEEs, minimal morbidity and no mortality could be achieved, which reinforces the safety of the technique.

DWI-Detected Ischemic Lesions after Endovascular Treatment for Cerebral Aneurysms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

DWI-detected ischemic lesions are potential complications of endovascular procedures that are performed to treat intracranial aneurysms. We completed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the occurrence of DWI-detected ischemic lesions after endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, the Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus between January 2000 and June 2022 of post-endovascular procedures for intracranial aneurysm studies was conducted using the Nested Knowledge AutoLit software. The main outcome was DWI-detected ischemic lesions within 5 days of the procedures. Information regarding associated risk factors such as the type of procedure, patient demographics, and aneurysm characteristics was also collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies with 2686 patients were included. The overall incidence of DWI ischemic lesions was 47.0% (95% CI, 39.6%-55.8%). The highest rate of lesions was seen with flow diversion at 62.4% (95% CI, 48.4%-80.5%), followed by complex procedures at 49.3% (95% CI, 29.5%-82.1%), stent-assisted coiling at 47.5% (95% CI, 34.6%-65.3%), simple coiling at 47.1% (95% CI, 35.7%-62.3%), and balloon-assisted coiling at 37.0% (95% CI, 28.3%-48.4%). The differences among different techniques were not statistically significant; however, there was significant heterogeneity and a significant risk of publication bias among included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients who undergo endovascular procedures for intracranial aneurysms present with new postprocedural DWI-detected ischemic lesions, regardless of the endovascular procedure used. Future studies and meta-analyses are needed to investigate early and long-term outcomes of such small infarcts.

Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: A network meta-analysis

Background

Thromboembolism is one of the common complications in endovascular treatments including coiling alone, stent-assisted coiling (SAC), balloon-assisted coiling (BAC), and flow-diverting (FD) stents. Such treatments are widely used in intracranial aneurysms (IAs), which usually present as positive lesions in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Whether these adjunctive techniques increase postprocedural DWI-positive lesions after endovascular treatment remains unclear.

Methods

A thorough electronic search for the literature published in English between January 2000 and October 2022 was conducted on PubMed, Medline, and EMBASE. Eighteen studies (3 cohort studies and 15 case-control studies) involving 1,843 patients with unruptured IAs (UIAs) were included. We performed a frequentist framework network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the rank risks of cerebral thromboembolism of the above four endovascular treatments. The incoherence test was used to analyze the statistical disagreement between direct and indirect evidence. Funnel plots were used to analyze publication bias.

Results

The incidences of DWI lesions in patients who received FD stents, SAC, BAC, and coiling alone were 66.1% (109/165), 37.6% (299/795), 31.1% (236/759), and 25.6% (236/921). The incidence of DWI lesions in patients who received FD stents was higher than that in patients who received SAC [OR: 2.40; 95% CI (1.15, 5.00), P < 0.05], BAC [OR: 2.62; 95% CI (1.19, 5.77), P < 0.05], or coiling alone [OR: 2.77; 95% CI (1.26, 6.07), P < 0.05]. The incoherence test showed preferable consistency in this NMA. No obvious publication bias was found in the funnel plot.

Conclusion

FD stent placement brings more ischemic lesions identified by DWI than any other procedures for patients with UIA. The characteristics of FD stents may result in a high incidence of DWI lesions.

The Utility of Diffusion-Weighted MRI Lesions to Compare the Effects of Different Heparinization Schemes in Intracranial Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Intervention

Objective: Heparinization is applied to prevent ischemic complications in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, but there is no unified heparinization scheme. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can be used to evaluate ischemia after endovascular therapy for intracranial aneurysms. The goal of this study is to apply DWI to evaluate the effects of different heparinization schemes on intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular therapy.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 141 patients with 149 aneurysms treated with endovascular interventions from July 2019 to April 2020 at our center, including 96 aneurysms treated with local heparinization and 53 aneurysms treated with systemic heparinization. We collected the basic information of the patients, including age, sex, comorbidities, and aneurysm characteristics, and associated treatment data. New ischemic lesions detected by DWI were categorized belonging to four types. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the effects of different heparinization schemes on intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular therapy.

Results: There were no significant differences in age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and aneurysm size or location between the two groups. The incidence and distribution types of DWI abnormalities in the local heparinization groups and systemic heparinization groups were not significantly different (P > 0.05). There was a correlation between the laser engraving stent and postoperative DWI abnormalities (P < 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the laser engraving stent was significantly correlated with postoperative DWI abnormalities (odds ratio, 4.71; 95% CI: 1.51–14.58; P = 0.007).

Conclusion: Compared with systemic heparinization, local heparinization does not increase the incidence of DWI abnormalities after endovascular treatment, and its application in this group of patients is safe and effective.

Angiographic and clinical outcomes of balloon remodeling versus unassisted coil embolization in the ruptured aneurysm cohort of the GEL THE NEC study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

GEL THE NEC (GTN) was a multicenter prospective registry developed to assess the safety and efficacy of HydroSoft coils in treating intracranial aneurysms. We compared the angiographic and clinical outcomes of aneurysms treated with balloon assisted coil embolization (BACE) versus unassisted coil embolization (CE) in the ruptured aneurysm cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

GTN was performed at 27 centers in five countries. Patients aged 21-90 years with a ruptured aneurysm 3-15 mm in size were eligible for enrollment. We analyzed demographics/comorbidities, aneurysm location, and geometry, including maximum diameter, neck size, and dome to neck ratio, immediate and long term angiographic outcomes (graded by an independent core laboratory using the modified Raymond Scale), and procedure related adverse events. Angiographic and clinical outcomes were studied using χ²and t tests.

RESULTS

Of the 599 patients in the GTN, 194 met the inclusion criteria. 84 were treated with BACE and 110 with CE. There were more prior smokers in the BACE group (p=0.01). The BACE group also had more vertebrobasilar aneurysms (p=0.006) and a larger mean neck size (p=0.02). More aneurysms were immediately completely occluded in the BACE group (p=0.02) Procedure- related major morbidity and mortality were no different between the techniques (p=0.4 and p=1, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective ruptured aneurysm cohort from the GTN, BACE resulted in greater occlusion rates compared with unassisted CE with similar morbi-mortality.