1
|
Peker S, Samanci Y, Ozdemir IE, Kunst HPM, Eekers DBP, Temel Y. Long-term results of upfront, single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery for large cystic vestibular schwannomas. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 46:2. [PMID: 36471101 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01911-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Anecdotally, cystic vestibular schwannomas (cVSs) are regarded to have unpredictable biologic activity with poorer clinical results, and most studies showed a less favorable prognosis following surgery. While stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established therapeutic option for small- to medium-sized VSs, cVSs are often larger, thus making upfront SRS more complicated. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of upfront SRS for large cVSs. The authors reviewed the data of 54 patients who received upfront, single-session Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with a diagnosis of large cVS (> 4 cm3). Patients with neurofibromatosis type 2, multiple VSs, or recurrent VSs and < 24 months of clinical and neuroimaging follow-up were excluded. Hearing loss (48.1%) was the primary presenting symptom. The majority of cVSs were Koos grade IV (66.7%), and the most prevalent cyst pattern was "mixed pattern of small and big cysts" (46.3%). The median time between diagnosis and GKRS was 12 months (range, 1-147 months). At GKRS, the median cVS volume was 6.95 cm3 (range, 4.1-22 cm3). The median marginal dose was 12 Gy (range, 10-12 Gy). The mean radiological and clinical follow-up periods were 62.2 ± 34.04 months (range, 24-169 months) and 94.9 ± 45.41 months (range, 24-175 months), respectively. At 2, 6, and 12 years, the tumor control rates were 100%, 95.7%, and 85.0%, respectively. Tumor shrinkage occurred in 92.6% of patients (n = 50), tumor volume remained stable in 5.6% of patients (n = 3), and tumor growth occurred in 1.9% of patients (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 53.5 months, the pre-GKRS tumor volume significantly decreased to 2.35 cm3 (p < 0.001). While Koos grade 3 patients had a greater possibility of attaining higher volume reduction, "multiple small thick-walled cyst pattern" and smaller tumor volumes decreased the likelihood of achieving higher volume reduction. Serviceable hearing (Gardner-Robertson Scale I-II) was present in 16.7% of patients prior to GKRS and it was preserved in all of these patients following GKRS. After GKRS, 1.9% of patients (n = 1) had new-onset trigeminal neuralgia. There was no new-onset facial palsy, hemifacial spasm, or hydrocephalus. Contrary to what was believed, our findings suggest that upfront GKRS seems to be a safe and effective treatment option for large cVSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selcuk Peker
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Koç University, Davutpasa Caddesi No. 4, 34010, Zeytinburnu, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Yavuz Samanci
- Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Inan Erdem Ozdemir
- Gamma Knife Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Henricus P M Kunst
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yasin Temel
- School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Maastricht/Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Balossier A, Régis J, Reyns N, Roche PH, Daniel RT, George M, Faouzi M, Levivier M, Tuleasca C. Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for progressive vestibular schwannomas after previous radiosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44:3177-3188. [PMID: 33847846 PMCID: PMC8592961 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01528-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are slow-growing intracranial extraaxial benign tumors, developing from the vestibular part of the eight cranial nerves. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has now a long-term scientific track record as first intention treatment for small- to medium-sized VS. Though its success rate is very high, SRS for VS might fail to control tumor growth in some cases. However, the literature on repeat SRS after previously failed SRS remains scarce and reported in a low number of series with a limited number of cases. Here, we aimed at performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on repeat SRS for VS. Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed manuscripts published between January 1990 and October 2020 and referenced in PubMed. Tumor control and cranial nerve outcomes were evaluated with separate meta-analyses. Eight studies comprising 194 patients were included. The overall rate of patients treated in repeat SRS series as per overall series with first SRS was 2.2% (range 1.2–3.2%, p < 0.001). The mean time between first and second SRS was 50.7 months (median 51, range 44–64). The median marginal dose prescribed at first SRS was 12 Gy (range 8–24) and at second SRS was 12 Gy (range 9.8–19). After repeat SRS, tumor stability was reported in 61/194 patients, i.e., a rate of 29.6% (range 20.2–39%, I2 = 49.1%, p < 0.001). Tumor decrease was reported in 83/194 patients, i.e., a rate of 54.4% (range 33.7–75.1%, I2 = 89.1%, p < 0.001). Tumor progression was reported in 50/188 patients, i.e., a rate of 16.1% (range 2.5–29.7%, I2 = 87.1%, p = 0.02), rarely managed surgically. New trigeminal numbness was reported in 27/170 patients, i.e., a rate of 9.9% (range 1.4–18.3%, p < 0.02). New facial nerve palsy of worsened of previous was reported in 8/183 patients, i.e., a rate of 4.3% (range 1.4–7.2%, p = 0.004). Hearing loss was reported in 12/22 patients, i.e., a rate of 54.3% (range 24.8–83.8%, I2 = 70.7%, p < 0.001). Repeat SRS after previously failed SRS for VS is associated with high tumor control rates. Cranial nerve outcomes remain favorable, particularly for facial nerve. The rate of hearing loss appears similar to the one related to first SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Balossier
- Functional, and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| | - Jean Régis
- Functional, and Stereotactic Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Unit, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France.,Aix-Marseille University, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Reyns
- University of Lille, Inserm, CHU de Lille, U1189 - ONCO-THAI -Laser Assisted Therapies and Immunotherapies for Oncology, F-59000, Lille, France.,Neurosurgery and Neurooncology Department, CHU de Lille, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Pierre-Hugues Roche
- Neurosurgery Service, Neurochirurgie Hôpital Nord, Pôle NEUROSCIENCES, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
| | - Roy Thomas Daniel
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (Unil), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mercy George
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mohamed Faouzi
- Division of Biostatistics, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marc Levivier
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (Unil), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Constantin Tuleasca
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Neurosurgery Service and Gamma Knife Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Faculty of Biology and Medicine (FBM), University of Lausanne (Unil), Lausanne, Switzerland. .,Signal Processing Laboratory (LTS 5), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|