Surgery for intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas in the neuromonitoring era: results from a consecutive series of 100 patients

OBJECTIVE

The established treatment of intramedullary spinal cord ependymomas (ISCEs) is resection. Surgical series reporting treatment results often lack homogeneity, as these are collected over long time spans and their analysis is plagued by surgical learning curves and inconsistent use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). The authors report the oncological and functional long-term outcomes in a modern series of 100 consecutive ISCEs that were resected between 2000 and 2015 by a surgically experienced team that consistently utilized IONM.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, the authors tailored surgical strategy and multimodal IONM, including somatosensory evoked potentials, muscle motor evoked potentials (mMEPs), and D-waves, with the aim of gross-total resection (GTR). Preservation of the D-wave was the primary objective, and preservation of mMEPs was the second functional objective. Functional status was evaluated using the modified McCormick Scale (MMS) preoperatively, postoperatively, and at follow-up.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 89 patients were functionally independent (MMS grade I or II). A GTR was achieved in 89 patients, 10 patients had a stable residual, and 1 patient underwent reoperation for tumor progression. At a mean follow-up of 65.4 months, 82 patients were functionally independent, and 11 lost their functional independence after surgery (MMS grades III-V). Muscle MEP loss predicted short-term postoperative worsening (p < 0.0001) only, while the strongest predictors of a good functional long-term outcome were lower preoperative MMS grades (p < 0.0001) and D-wave preservation. D-wave monitorability was 67%; it was higher with lower preoperative MMS grades and predicted a better recovery (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series of ISCEs, a high rate of GTR and long-term favorable functional outcome were achieved. Short- and long-term functional outcomes were best reflected by mMEPs and D-wave monitoring, respectively.

Intraoperative neurophysiology in intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery

Intramedullary spinal cord tumor (ISCT) surgery is challenged by a significant risk of neurological injury. Indeed, while most ISCT patients arrive to surgery in good neurological condition due to early diagnosis, many experience some degree of postoperative sensorimotor deficit. Thus, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is invaluable for providing functional information that helps neurosurgeons tailor the surgical strategy to maximize resection while minimizing morbidity. Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP), muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP), and D-wave monitoring are routinely used to continuously assess the functional integrity of the long pathways within the spinal cord. More recently, mapping techniques have been introduced to identify the dorsal columns and the corticospinal tracts. Intraoperative SEP decline is not a sufficient reason to abandon surgery, since SEPs are very sensitive to anesthesia and surgical maneuvers. Yet, a severe proprioceptive deficit may adversely impact daily life, and the value of SEPs should be reconsidered. While mMEPs are good predictors of short-term motor outcome, the D-wave is the strongest predictor of long-term motor outcome, and its preservation during surgery is essential. Mapping techniques are promising but still need validation in large cohorts of patients to determine their impact on clinical outcome. The therapeutic rather than merely diagnostic value of IONM in spine surgery is still debated, but there is emerging evidence that IONM provides an essential adjunct in ISCT surgery.

Automated Nerve Monitoring in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Evoked potential monitoring is believed to prevent neurologic injury in various surgical settings; however, its clinical effect has not been scrutinized. It was hypothesized that an automated nerve monitor can minimize intraoperative nerve injury and thereby improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

METHODS

A prospective, blinded, parallel group, superiority design, single-center, randomized controlled study was conducted. Study participants were equally randomized into either the automated nerve-monitored or the blinded monitored groups. The primary outcome was intraoperative nerve injury burden as assessed by the cumulative duration of nerve alerts. Secondary outcomes were neurologic deficits and functional scores of the operative arm, and the quality of life index (Euro Quality of life-5 domain-5 level score) at postoperative weeks 2, 6, and 12.

RESULTS

From September 2018 to July 2019, 213 patients were screened, of whom 200 were randomized. There was no statistically significant difference in the duration of nerve alerts between the automated nerve-monitored and control groups (median [25th, 75th interquartile range]: 1 [0, 18] and 5 [0, 26.5]; Hodges-Lehman difference [95% CI]: 0 [0 to 1] min; P = 0.526). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes between groups. However, in the ancillary analysis, there were reductions in neurologic deficits and improvements in quality of life index occurring in both groups over the course of the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Protection from nerve injury is a shared responsibility between surgeons and anesthesiologists. Although a progressive improvement of clinical outcomes were observed over the course of the study in both groups as a consequence of the real-time feedback provided by the automated nerve monitor, this trial did not demonstrate that automated nerve monitoring by itself changes important clinical outcomes compared with no monitoring.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE