Postsurgical Salvage Radiosurgery for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas Touching/Compressing the Optic Chiasm: Median 13-Year Postirradiation Imaging Follow-up Results

Comparing redo surgery and stereotactic radiosurgery for recurrent, residual, and/or tumors showing progression in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are well-differentiated benign tumors originating from the adenohypophyseal cells of the pituitary gland. They present with headaches, visual disorders, or cranial nerve deficits. NFPAs can recur, progress, or present as residual tumors. We, therefore, conducted this review to compare the effects of both revision surgery and stereotactic surgery on tumor size, visual status, endocrine status, and complications.

Methods

A systematic review of published literature on recurrent, residual, or progressing NFPAs that underwent redo surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery from the inception till June 2020 was conducted as per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Thirteen records (1209 patients) were included, and risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated from each study were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model.

Results

Redo surgery was the preferred intervention in patients presenting with larger tumor sizes and was more effective in reducing the tumor size as compared to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (risk ratio [RR] 56.14; 95% CI, 16.45-191.58). There was more visual loss with revision surgery as compared to SRS (risk ratio [RR] 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.20). However, SRS was associated with fewer complications, such as new diabetes insipidus, as compared to the redo surgery (risk ratio [RR] 0.01; 95% CI 0.01-0.03).

Conclusion

Redo surgery is the superior choice in the treatment of recurrent/residual or progressing NFPAs if the tumor size is large and an immediate reduction in tumor burden through debulking is warranted. However, redo surgery is associated with a higher risk of visual loss, new endocrinopathies, and other complications, in contrast to SRS.

Pituitary adenomas

Pituitary adenomas produce a complex collection of disorders. Some are incidental findings. Some distort local anatomical structures which can lead to disorders of vision or hormone production. Some produce excesses of hormones which can be either life threatening or clinically distressing. The management requires the expertise of a variety of experts who plan together. No single treatment is universally successful in controlling these conditions. Medical, biochemical, surgical and radiosurgical management can all have parts to play. Coordinate co-operation between specialists will provide patients with the best available treatment.

Guidelines in the management of CNS tumors

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines in the management of central nervous system tumors (CNS) continue to be developed and updated through the work of the Joint Section on Tumors of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS).

METHODS

The guidelines are created using the most current and clinically relevant evidence using systematic methodologies, which classify available data and provide recommendations for clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

This update summarizes the Tumor Section Guidelines developed over the last five years for non-functioning pituitary adenomas, low grade gliomas, vestibular schwannomas, and metastatic brain tumors.

Initial Gamma Knife radiosurgery for nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: results from a 26-year experience

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of initial Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs).

DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. Eighty-one patients with NFPAs undergoing initial GKRS were enrolled. The median age was 44.9 years (range, 7.2-75.5 years). The median tumor volume was 2.3 cm³ (range, 0.1-31.3 cm³), and the median tumor margin dose was 13.0 Gy (range, 8-22 Gy).

RESULTS

Tumor shrunk in 63 patients (77.8%), remained stable in 9 (11.1%), treatment failure in 9 (11.1%) during a median follow-up of 67.1 months (range, 11.5-263.9 months). The tumor control rates were 100%, 99%, 95%, and 84%, at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, tumor volume (≥4 cm³) and margin dose (<12 Gy) were associated with treatment failure (hazard ratio (HR) = 7.093, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.098-45.083, p = 0.040, and HR = 9.643, 95% CI = 1.108-83.927, p = 0.040, respectively). New apoplexy occurred in seven patients (8.6%) after GKRS with a median time of 39.9 months (range, 11.9-166.8 months). In multivariate analysis, tumor volume (≥10 cm³) was a significant risk factor (HR = 10.642, 95% CI = 2.121-53.398, p = 0.004). New hypopituitarism occurred in 14 patients (17.3%). No factors were associated with new hypopituitarism. Four patients (4.9%) developed new or worsening visual dysfunction. No new cranial neuropathy was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, initial GKRS can provide a high tumor control rate, as well as a low incidence rate of complications in NFPAs. GKRS may be an alternative initial treatment for selected NFPAs.