1
|
Jones JJ, Jones KL, Wong SQ, Whittle J, Goode D, Nguyen H, Iaria J, Stylli S, Towner J, Pieters T, Gaillard F, Kaye AH, Drummond KJ, Morokoff AP. Plasma ctDNA enables early detection of temozolomide resistance mutations in glioma. Neurooncol Adv 2024; 6:vdae041. [PMID: 38596716 PMCID: PMC11003533 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Liquid biopsy based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a novel tool in clinical oncology, however, its use has been limited in glioma to date, due to low levels of ctDNA. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate that sequencing techniques optimized for liquid biopsy in glioma patients can detect ctDNA in plasma with high sensitivity and with potential clinical utility. Methods We investigated 10 glioma patients with tumor tissue available from at least 2 surgical operations, who had 49 longitudinally collected plasma samples available for analysis. Plasma samples were sequenced with CAPP-seq (AVENIO) and tissue samples with TSO500. Results Glioma-derived ctDNA mutations were detected in 93.8% of plasma samples. 25% of all mutations detected were observed in plasma only. Mutations of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MSH2 and MSH6 were the most frequent circulating gene alterations seen after temozolomide treatment and were frequently observed to appear in plasma prior to their appearance in tumor tissue at the time of surgery for recurrence. Conclusions This pilot study suggests that plasma ctDNA in glioma is feasible and may provide sensitive and complementary information to tissue biopsy. Furthermore, plasma ctDNA detection of new MMR gene mutations not present in the initial tissue biopsy may provide an early indication of the development of chemotherapy resistance. Additional clinical validation in larger cohorts is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan J Jones
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kate L Jones
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Q Wong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Whittle
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Goode
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hong Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Josie Iaria
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stan Stylli
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - James Towner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Thomas Pieters
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Frank Gaillard
- Department of Radiology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew H Kaye
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Kate J Drummond
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew P Morokoff
- Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karschnia P, Smits M, Reifenberger G, Le Rhun E, Ellingson BM, Galldiks N, Kim MM, Huse JT, Schnell O, Harter PN, Mohme M, von Baumgarten L, Albert NL, Huang RY, Mehta MP, van den Bent M, Weller M, Vogelbaum MA, Chang SM, Berger MS, Tonn JC. A framework for standardised tissue sampling and processing during resection of diffuse intracranial glioma: joint recommendations from four RANO groups. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e438-e450. [PMID: 37922934 PMCID: PMC10849105 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00453-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection represents the standard of care for people with newly diagnosed diffuse gliomas, and the neuropathological and molecular profile of the resected tissue guides clinical management and forms the basis for research. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) consortium is an international, multidisciplinary effort that aims to standardise research practice in neuro-oncology. These recommendations represent a multidisciplinary consensus from the four RANO groups: RANO resect, RANO recurrent glioblastoma, RANO radiotherapy, and RANO/PET for a standardised workflow to achieve a representative tumour evaluation in a disease characterised by intratumoural heterogeneity, including recommendations on which tumour regions should be surgically sampled, how to define those regions on the basis of preoperative imaging, and the optimal sample volume. Practical recommendations for tissue sampling are given for people with low-grade and high-grade gliomas, as well as for people with newly diagnosed and recurrent disease. Sampling of liquid biopsies is also addressed. A standardised workflow for subsequent handling of the resected tissue is proposed to avoid information loss due to decreasing tissue quality or insufficient clinical information. The recommendations offer a framework for prospective biobanking studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Karschnia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Guido Reifenberger
- Institute of Neuropathology, Heinrich Heine University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Research Center Juelich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Juelich, Germany
| | - Michelle M Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Oliver Schnell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Patrick N Harter
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany; Center for Neuropathology and Prion Research, Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Malte Mohme
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Louisa von Baumgarten
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Division of Neuroradiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Martin van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Susan M Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sokolov E, Dietrich J, Cole AJ. The complexities underlying epilepsy in people with glioblastoma. Lancet Neurol 2023; 22:505-516. [PMID: 37121239 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00031-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Seizures are among the most common clinical signs in people with glioblastoma. Advances over the past 5 years, including new clinical trial data, have increased the understanding of why some individuals with glioblastoma are susceptible to seizures, how seizures manifest clinically, and what implications seizures have for patient management. The pathophysiology of epilepsy in people with glioblastoma relates to a combination of intrinsic epileptogenicity of tumour tissue, alterations in the tumour and peritumoural microenvironment, and the physical and functional disturbance of adjacent brain structures. Successful management of epilepsy in people with glioblastoma remains challenging; factors such as drug-drug interactions between cancer therapies and antiseizure medications, and medication side-effects, can affect seizure outcomes and quality of life. Advances in novel therapies provide some promise for people with glioblastoma; however, the effects of these therapies on seizures are yet to be fully determined. Looking forward, insights into electrical activity as a driver of tumour cell growth and the intrinsic hyperexcitability of tumour tissue might represent useful targets for treatment and disease modification. There is a pressing need for large randomised clinical trials in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisaveta Sokolov
- Department of Neurosciences, Cleveland Clinic, London, UK; Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Cancer and Neurotoxicity Clinic and Brain Repair Research Program, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew J Cole
- MGH Epilepsy Service, Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yao J, Hagiwara A, Oughourlian TC, Wang C, Raymond C, Pope WB, Salamon N, Lai A, Ji M, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Cloughesy TF, Ellingson BM. Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of pH- and Oxygen-Sensitive Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Glioma: A Retrospective Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2520. [PMID: 35626127 PMCID: PMC9139712 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Characterization of hypoxia and tissue acidosis could advance the understanding of glioma biology and improve patient management. In this study, we evaluated the ability of a pH- and oxygen-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique to differentiate glioma genotypes, including isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, 1p/19q co-deletion, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, and investigated its prognostic value. A total of 159 adult glioma patients were scanned with pH- and oxygen-sensitive MRI at 3T. We quantified the pH-sensitive measure of magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym) and oxygen-sensitive measure of R2’ within the tumor region-of-interest. IDH mutant gliomas showed significantly lower MTRasym × R2’ (p < 0.001), which differentiated IDH mutation status with sensitivity and specificity of 90.0% and 71.9%. Within IDH mutants, 1p/19q codeletion was associated with lower tumor acidity (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 76.9%, specificity 91.3%), while IDH wild-type, EGFR-amplified gliomas were more hypoxic (R2’ p = 0.024, sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 76.9%). Both R2’ and MTRasym × R2’ were significantly associated with patient overall survival (R2’: p = 0.045; MTRasym × R2’: p = 0.002) and progression-free survival (R2’: p = 0.010; MTRasym × R2’: p < 0.0001), independent of patient age, treatment status, and IDH status. The pH- and oxygen-sensitive MRI is a clinically feasible and potentially valuable imaging technique for distinguishing glioma subtypes and providing additional prognostic value to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwen Yao
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Akifumi Hagiwara
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Talia C. Oughourlian
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
- Neuroscience Interdepartmental Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Chencai Wang
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Catalina Raymond
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Whitney B. Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Noriko Salamon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
| | - Albert Lai
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Matthew Ji
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Phioanh L. Nghiemphu
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Linda M. Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA;
| | - Timothy F. Cloughesy
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - Benjamin M. Ellingson
- UCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory (BTIL), Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (J.Y.); (A.H.); (T.C.O.); (C.W.); (C.R.)
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (W.B.P.); (N.S.)
- UCLA Neuro-Oncology Program, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA; (A.L.); (M.J.); (P.L.N.); (T.F.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The histological representativeness of glioblastoma tissue samples. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:1911-1920. [PMID: 33085022 PMCID: PMC8195928 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-020-04608-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Glioblastomas (GBMs) are known for having a vastly heterogenous histopathology. Several studies have shown that GBMs can be histologically undergraded due to sampling errors of small tissue samples. We sought to explore to what extent histological features in GBMs are dependent on the amount of viable tissue on routine slides from both biopsied and resected tumors. Methods In 106 newly diagnosed GBM patients, we investigated associations between the presence or degree of 24 histopathological and two immunohistochemical features and the tissue amount on hematoxylin-eosin (HE) slides. The amount of viable tissue was semiquantitatively categorized as “sparse,” “medium,” or “substantial” for each case. Tissue amount was also assessed for associations with MRI volumetrics and the type of surgical procedure. Results About half (46%) of the assessed histological and immunohistochemical features were significantly associated with tissue amount. The significant features were less present or of a lesser degree when the tissue amount was smaller. Among the significant features were most of the features relevant for diffuse astrocytic tumor grading, i.e., small necroses, palisades, microvascular proliferation, atypia, mitotic count, and Ki-67/MIB-1 proliferative index (PI). Conclusion A substantial proportion of the assessed histological features were at risk of being underrepresented when the amount of viable tissue on HE slides was limited. Most of the grading features were dependent on tissue amount, which underlines the importance of considering sampling errors in diffuse astrocytic tumor grading. Our findings also highlight the importance of adequate tissue collection to increase the quality of diagnostics and histological research.
Collapse
|
6
|
Unterrainer M, Fleischmann DF, Vettermann F, Ruf V, Kaiser L, Nelwan D, Lindner S, Brendel M, Wenter V, Stöcklein S, Herms J, Milenkovic VM, Rupprecht R, Tonn JC, Belka C, Bartenstein P, Niyazi M, Albert NL. TSPO PET, tumour grading and molecular genetics in histologically verified glioma: a correlative 18F-GE-180 PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 47:1368-1380. [PMID: 31486876 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04491-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) is overexpressed in brain tumours and represents an interesting target for glioma imaging. 18F-GE-180, a novel TSPO ligand, has shown improved binding affinity and a high target-to-background contrast in patients with glioblastoma. However, the association of uptake characteristics on TSPO PET using 18F-GE-180 with the histological WHO grade and molecular genetic features so far remains unknown and was evaluated in the current study. METHODS Fifty-eight patients with histologically validated glioma at initial diagnosis or recurrence were included. All patients underwent 18F-GE-180 PET, and the maximal and mean tumour-to-background ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) as well as the PET volume were assessed. On MRI, presence/absence of contrast enhancement was evaluated. Imaging characteristics were correlated with neuropathological parameters (i.e. WHO grade, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation). RESULTS Six of 58 patients presented with WHO grade II, 16/58 grade III and 36/58 grade IV gliomas. An (IDH) mutation was found in 19/58 cases, and 39/58 were classified as IDH-wild type. High 18F-GE-180-uptake was observed in all but 4 cases (being WHO grade II glioma, IDH-mutant). A high association of 18F-GE-180-uptake and WHO grades was seen: WHO grade IV gliomas showed the highest uptake intensity compared with grades III and II gliomas (median TBRmax 5.15 (2.59-8.95) vs. 3.63 (1.85-7.64) vs. 1.63 (1.50-3.43), p < 0.001); this association with WHO grades persisted within the IDH-wild-type and IDH-mutant subgroup analyses (p < 0.05). Uptake intensity was also associated with the IDH mutational status with a trend towards higher 18F-GE-180-uptake in IDH-wild-type gliomas in the overall group (median TBRmax 4.67 (1.56-8.95) vs. 3.60 (1.50-7.64), p = 0.083); however, within each WHO grade, no differences were found (e.g. median TBRmax in WHO grade III glioma 4.05 (1.85-5.39) vs. 3.36 (2.32-7.64), p = 1.000). No association was found between uptake intensity and MGMT or TERT (p > 0.05 each). CONCLUSION Uptake characteristics on 18F-GE-180 PET are highly associated with the histological WHO grades, with the highest 18F-GE-180 uptake in WHO grade IV glioblastomas and a PET-positive rate of 100% among the investigated high-grade gliomas. Conversely, all TSPO-negative cases were WHO grade II gliomas. The observed association of 18F-GE-180 uptake and the IDH mutational status seems to be related to the high inter-correlation of the IDH mutational status and the WHO grades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - D F Fleischmann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Vettermann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V Ruf
- Department of Neuropathology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - L Kaiser
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - D Nelwan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Lindner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - S Stöcklein
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Herms
- Department of Neuropathology, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - V M Milenkovic
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - R Rupprecht
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - J C Tonn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Petrescu GED, Sabo AA, Torsin LI, Calin GA, Dragomir MP. MicroRNA based theranostics for brain cancer: basic principles. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2019; 38:231. [PMID: 31142339 PMCID: PMC6542029 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1180-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because of the complexity of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), brain tumors, especially the most common and aggressive primary malignant tumor type arising from the central nervous system (CNS), glioblastoma, remain an essential challenge regarding diagnostic and treatment. There are no approved circulating diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers, nor novel therapies like immune checkpoint inhibitors for glioblastoma, and chemotherapy brings only minimal survival benefits. The development of molecular biology led to the discovery of new potential diagnostic tools and therapeutic targets, offering the premise to detect patients at earlier stages and overcome the current poor prognosis. MAIN BODY One potential diagnostic and therapeutic breakthrough might come from microRNAs (miRNAs). It is well-known that miRNAs play a role in the initiation and development of various types of cancer, including glioblastoma. The review aims to answer the following questions concerning the role of RNA theranostics for brain tumors: (1) which miRNAs are the best candidates to become early diagnostic and prognostic circulating biomarkers?; (2) how to deliver the therapeutic agents in the CNS to overcome the BBB?; (3) which are the best methods to restore/inhibit miRNAs? CONCLUSIONS Because of the proven roles played by miRNAs in gliomagenesis and of their capacity to pass from the CNS tissue into the blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), we propose miRNAs as ideal diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Moreover, recent advances in direct miRNA restoration (miRNA mimics) and miRNA inhibition therapy (antisense oligonucleotides, antagomirs, locked nucleic acid anti-miRNA, small molecule miRNA inhibitors) make miRNAs perfect candidates for entering clinical trials for glioblastoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George E. D. Petrescu
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
- Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emergency Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Alexandru A. Sabo
- Marie Curie Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ligia I. Torsin
- Elias Clinical Emergency Hospital, Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Department, Bucharest, Romania
| | - George A. Calin
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
- Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNAs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Mihnea P. Dragomir
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| |
Collapse
|