Near haploidization is a genomic hallmark which defines a molecular subgroup of giant cell glioblastoma

"De novo replication repair deficient glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype" is a distinct glioblastoma subtype in adults that may benefit from immune checkpoint blockade

Glioblastoma is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease, and new predictive biomarkers are needed to identify those patients most likely to respond to specific treatments. Through prospective genomic profiling of 459 consecutive primary treatment-naïve IDH-wildtype glioblastomas in adults, we identified a unique subgroup (2%, 9/459) defined by somatic hypermutation and DNA replication repair deficiency due to biallelic inactivation of a canonical mismatch repair gene. The deleterious mutations in mismatch repair genes were often present in the germline in the heterozygous state with somatic inactivation of the remaining allele, consistent with glioblastomas arising due to underlying Lynch syndrome. A subset of tumors had accompanying proofreading domain mutations in the DNA polymerase POLE and resultant "ultrahypermutation". The median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range 27-78), compared with 63 years for the other 450 patients with conventional glioblastoma (p < 0.01). All tumors had histologic features of the giant cell variant of glioblastoma. They lacked EGFR amplification, lacked combined trisomy of chromosome 7 plus monosomy of chromosome 10, and only rarely had TERT promoter mutation or CDKN2A homozygous deletion, which are hallmarks of conventional IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Instead, they harbored frequent inactivating mutations in TP53, NF1, PTEN, ATRX, and SETD2 and recurrent activating mutations in PDGFRA. DNA methylation profiling revealed they did not align with known reference adult glioblastoma methylation classes, but instead had unique globally hypomethylated epigenomes and mostly classified as "Diffuse pediatric-type high grade glioma, RTK1 subtype, subclass A". Five patients were treated with immune checkpoint blockade, four of whom survived greater than 3 years. The median overall survival was 36.8 months, compared to 15.5 months for the other 450 patients (p < 0.001). We conclude that "De novo replication repair deficient glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype" represents a biologically distinct subtype in the adult population that may benefit from prospective identification and treatment with immune checkpoint blockade.

2021 World Health Organization Classification of Brain Tumors

OBJECTIVE

The classification of brain tumors is a rapidly evolving field that requires extensive integration of molecular diagnostic findings from an expanding set of platforms and assays. This article summarizes the schema presented in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors while highlighting diagnostic molecular findings and discussing the strengths and weaknesses of commonly available testing modalities.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Several major changes in practice were introduced with the 5th edition of the CNS WHO classification, including molecular grading of adult diffuse gliomas, the introduction of many new entities within the spectrum of pediatric gliomas and glioneuronal tumors, and the widespread adoption of methylation classes as useful or even necessary diagnostic criteria. Additionally, several revisions to nomenclature (eg, IDH-mutant gliomas) were introduced for simplicity and to disambiguate from other tumor types.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

The classification of brain tumors continues to grow in complexity alongside our improved understanding of their nuanced molecular underpinnings.

IDH-wild type glioblastomas featuring at least 30% giant cells are characterized by frequent RB1 and NF1 alterations and hypermutation

Giant cell glioblastoma (GC-GBM) is a rare variant of IDH-wt GBM histologically characterized by the presence of numerous multinucleated giant cells and molecularly considered a hybrid between IDH-wt and IDH-mutant GBM. The lack of an objective definition, specifying the percentage of giant cells required for this diagnosis, may account for the absence of a definite molecular profile of this variant. This study aimed to clarify the molecular landscape of GC-GBM, exploring the mutations and copy number variations of 458 cancer-related genes, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and microsatellite instability (MSI) in 39 GBMs dichotomized into having 30-49% (15 cases) or ≥ 50% (24 cases) GCs. The type and prevalence of the genetic alterations in this series was not associated with the GCs content (< 50% or ≥ 50%). Most cases (82% and 51.2%) had impairment in TP53/MDM2 and PTEN/PI3K pathways, but a high proportion also featured TERT promoter mutations (61.5%) and RB1 (25.6%) or NF1 (25.6%) alterations. EGFR amplification was detected in 18% cases in association with a shorter overall survival (P = 0.004). Sixteen (41%) cases had a TMB > 10 mut/Mb, including two (5%) that harbored MSI and one with a POLE mutation. The frequency of RB1 and NF1 alterations and TMB counts were significantly higher compared to 567 IDH wild type (P < 0.0001; P = 0.0003; P < 0.0001) and 26 IDH-mutant (P < 0.0001; P = 0.0227; P < 0.0001) GBMs in the TCGA PanCancer Atlas cohort. These findings demonstrate that the molecular landscape of GBMs with at least 30% giant cells is dominated by the impairment of TP53/MDM2 and PTEN/PI3K pathways, and additionally characterized by frequent RB1 alterations and hypermutation and by EGFR amplification in more aggressive cases. The high frequency of hypermutated cases suggests that GC-GBMs might be candidates for immune check-point inhibitors clinical trials.

Genetics, Diagnosis, and Management of Hürthle Cell Thyroid Neoplasms

Hürthle cell lesions have been a diagnostic conundrum in pathology since they were first recognized over a century ago. Controversy as to the name of the cell, the origin of the cell, and even which cells in particular may be designated as such still challenge pathologists and confound those treating patients with a diagnosis of "Hürthle cell" anything within the diagnosis, especially if that anything is a sizable mass lesion. The diagnosis of Hürthle cell adenoma (HCA) or Hürthle cell carcinoma (HCC) has typically relied on a judgement call by pathologists as to the presence or absence of capsular and/or vascular invasion of the adjacent thyroid parenchyma, easy to note in widely invasive disease and a somewhat subjective diagnosis for minimally invasive or borderline invasive disease. Diagnostic specificity, which has incorporated a sharp increase in molecular genetic studies of thyroid tumor subtypes and the integration of molecular testing into preoperative management protocols, continues to be challenged by Hürthle cell neoplasia. Here, we provide the improving yet still murky state of what is known about Hürthle cell tumor genetics, clinical management, and based upon what we are learning about the genetics of other thyroid tumors, how to manage expectations, by pathologists, clinicians, and patients, for more actionable, precise classifications of Hürthle cell tumors of the thyroid.